Archive for the ‘asott2’ Category

374(1): Precessing Orbits in Fluid Spacetimes

March 26, 2017

This note begins this new subject area by developing UFT363 to evaluate the precessing orbit in an incompressible fluid spacetime. The numerical problem is the simultaneous solution of Eqs. (3), (4), (11) and (12) to give the differential orbital function (6). Finally this is integrated numerically to give the orbit. It is already known that this is a precessing orbit from numerical work by co author Horst Eckardt. The development in this note allows the spin connection to be determined uniquely. Other types of fluid spacetime can be used, for example a compressible spacetime. So the theory of precessing orbits can be merged with the well known equations of fluid dynamics.

a374thpapernotes1.pdf

UFT88 Read at Sheffield Hallam University

March 26, 2017

Sheffield Hallam is ranked 781 by webometrics and 801+ by Times. It has 31,485 students and was founded as a School of Design in 1843, becoming a university in 1992. So it is one of the new universities. UFT88 is a famous paper that corrects the second Bianchi identity of 1902 for torsion. It has been read in about two hundred and fifty of the best unversities in the world in the past two or three years, and leads in to the post Einsteinian paradigm shift in which the old gravitational physics is replaced by ECE2 theory. As can be seen from my university analysis of the last two or three days, combined sites www.aias.us and www.upitec.org are read continuously at all the best universities in every region of the world.

Wind 0 – 18 mph, Wales 4 – 14 mph, 0809 local time

March 26, 2017

The effective wind speed in the Betws area now is only 5 mph, an average of 14 mph minus 9 mph needed to start the turbines. Their optimal wind speed is about 20 to 45 mph, and so these turbines will never produce any significant power and should be demolished before they start to disintegrate. Once subsidies are dropped the remote cabal will have no interest or money to maintain them. Solar is a spectacular 0.63% so solar panels contribute essentially nothing to the grid (University of Sheffield estimate on www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk because solar is not metred). The average year round contribution of wind to the grid in Wales is a ridiculous 2%. So they are a total failure forced through by insane greed, and let through by weak and incompetent governments in both London and Cardiff. I would advocate raising the money for turbine lagoons by private means and start work. This is what Brunel would have done, or my ancestor Morgan Morgan of Craig y Nos.

Daily Report 24/3/17

March 26, 2017

The equivalent of 174,089 printed pages was downloaded (634.730 megabytes) from 397 distinct visits each averaging 4.3 memory pages and 7 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 70.06, top referrals total 2,222,312, main spiders Google, MSN and Yahoo. Top ten 1425, Collected ECE2 1317, Collected Evans / Morris 792, F3(Sp) 575, Collected scientometrics 455, Principles of ECE 373, Barddoniaeth 214, Evans Equations 180, Collected Eckardt / Lindstrom 121, Autobiography volumes one and two 110, Collected Proofs 78, Self charging inverter 74, UFT88 71, Engineering Model 66, ECE2 51, CEFE 47, Llais 38, UFT311 29, Idaho 27, UFT321 18, UFT313 23, UFT314 13, UFT315 14, UFT316 13, UFT317 14, UFT318 10, UFT319 14, UFT320 13, UFT322 27, UFT323 16, UFT324 19, UFT325 26, UFT326 12, UFT327 18, UFT328 18, UFT329 15, UFT330 13, UFT331 15, UFT332 14, UFT333 11, UFT334 11, UFT335 22, UFT336 12, UFT337 12, UFT338 12, UFT339 11, UFT340 12, UFT341 26, UFT342 21, UFT343 23, UFT344 23, UFT345 18,UFT346 17, UFT347 39, UFT348 20, UFT349 18, UFT351 32, UFT352 45, UFT353 26, UFT354 49, UFT355 30, UFT356 34, UFT357 31, UFT358 34, UFT359 30, UFT360 27, UFT361 7, UFT362 20, UFT363 30, UFT364 28, UFT365 16, UFT366 51, UFT367 28, UFT368 27, UFT369 36, UFT370 43, UFT371 53, UFT372 25 to date in March 2017. City of Winnipeg UFT Section; University of Victoria Canada levitron; Caja de Compensacion Familiar Bogota Colombia F3(Sp); Chemistry Complutense University Madrid LCR Resonant; Kapteyn Astronomical Institute University of Groningen UFT33; Los Alamos Public Library UFT Section; Electronics Engineering National Chiao Tung University Taiwan Essay 24. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for March 2017.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us – March 2017 – URL

March 26, 2017

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us – March 2017 – URL

European Top Hundred Universities

March 25, 2017

These can be found by googling “webometrics Europe”, and there has been intense interest in www.aias.us from essentially all of them over thirteen years. The main areas of interest therefore are North and Mid America (Canada, Mexico, USA) and Europe, also a lot of interest from the Far East (notably Japan, Taiwan, Australia). Therefore www.aias.us has been studied continuously for thirteen years by all the best universities in the world, without a single valid objection. They have all ignored wikipedia, now considered to be a scandal. Trolls are of course criminals and no university will deal with them in any way at all. Similarly trolls are ignored by AIAS and UPITEC, the world’s best small institutes judging by impact and advanced scientometrics.

Australian Universities

March 25, 2017

There has been intense interest in www.aias.us from Australian universities for thirteen years, the top ten at present according to webometrics are Melbourne, Queensland, New South Wales, Australian National, Sydney, Western Australia, Adelaide, Monash, Curtin Institute of Technology, Macquarrie.

Japanese Universities

March 25, 2017

There has been intense interest in www.aias.us from Japanese Universities for thirteen years. The top ten are currently: Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Tohoku, Nagoya, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Keio, Tokyo Tech and Tsukuba. There have been many consultations from all of these, and several others.

Top Ten Universities Russian Federation

March 25, 2017

There have been numerous consultations of www.aias.us from the Russian Federation over thirteen years, from universities institutes of various Academies of Science and so on. The top ten according to webometrics are: Moscow State, St Petersburg State, Novosibirsk State, NRU Higher School of Economics, National Nuclear Research University, ITMO University, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Tomsk State University, St. Petersburgh Tech, Ural Federal University. There have been many visits from Moscow State, the others are more difficult to identify. However there have been numerous visits from the Siberian Academy of Sciences, and Joint Institutes for Nuclear Research in Dubna and the National Nuclear Research University. The total of visits from the Russian Federation is often high up in the list of countries. These are from private addresses and similar that I cannot identify. A lot of the Federation’s best scientists have emigrated, but the conditions inside the Federation may be improving now. The standard of living is certainly improving, and the ordinary people want peaceful conditions.

Marriage Certificates of Elizabeth Portrey

March 25, 2017

Many thanks again. Yes it was Richard Aubrey (originally Gough) as in the attached who brought the prosecution on 9th April 1753. The fact that Elizabeth John changed her name to Elizabeth Portrey is conclusive. Christopher Portrey arranged the name change. She was, beyond reasonable doubt, the daughter of Christopher Portrey, descended from the Princes and Richard Duke of Normandy through the marriage of Sir Reginald Aubrey with Isabella de Clare. Her mother was Gwenllian John, as you discovered. There must have been a legal document or documents recording the name change. It is clear that illegitimacy would have been a stigma, so it was all covered up for almost three hundred years. If Christopher Portrey is interred in St. Cynog, an X chromosome comparison is possible, scientifically. The X chromosome is passed from father to daughter. We know that Elizabeth Thomas formerly Portrey nee John is interred there with her husband, Morgan ap Thomas y Garth, also descended from the Princes and Richard Duke of Normandy. I had not realized that she was referred to as Elizabeth John in Christopher Portrey’s Will. This is all important and I will write it up in the attached. There would have to be permission for exhumation for scientific research, followed by DNA analysis.

In a message dated 25/03/2017 10:13:08 GMT Standard Time, writes:

I read the section as being “of the same parish and county afores. [I
presume that is an abbreviation for aforesaid] widow”

The first witness appears to be ???? Thomas with ‘the mark of’ seemingly above the name. It could easily be Morgan Thomas’s brother, cousin or whatever. William Harry signed the first certificate, but not the second for some reason. Perhaps his hands had developed a shake as his mark is rather crude.

The year of the wedding is difficult to be sure of other that it is definitely the 1760s. Christopher Portrey died at the end of 1752.

The court case was brought in association with Richard Awbrey nee Gough. He sadly had died by 1759, so would not have been available as a witness to either wedding.
Nothing of Gwenllian John appears in the registers, other than the baptism of Elizabeth John.

Elizabeth was left the money in Christopher Portrey’s will as Elizabeth John. She would not have changed her name to above all Portrey, within three months of his death, without the action of somebody and Christopher Portrey is the only person of that surname available, albeit on his deathbed.

Stuart Davies

From: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:49 AM
To: bo.lehnert@alfvenlab.kth.se ; avanderm@du.edu ; dblake@no10.x.gsi.gov.uk ; pennbonvivant@yahoo.com ; raydela@sbcglobal.net ; corbis@bigpond.net.au ; normanpage@comcast.net ; fritzius@bellsouth.net ; garethjohnevans@hotmail.co.uk ; rpmc_6@hotmail.com ; burleigh.personal@gmail.com ; alexhillgtz@yahoo.com ; ccefalas@eie.gr ; simon.cliffy@googlemail.com ; fdamador@comcast.net ; steve.bannister@econ.utah.edu ; alwyn.vandermerwe@du.edu ; henryk.ratajczak@gmail.com ; croca@fc.ul.pt ; dwlindstrom@gmail.com ; cr1460solarinc@gmail.com ; sean@somewhere.ws ; norpag@att.net ; kp.phys@btinternet.com ; mail@horst-eckardt.de ; rob@rfmicrosystems.co.uk ; thenarmis@yahoo.com ; Alwyn.VanDerMerwe@du.edu ; dendavis@aol.com ; k.pendergast@btinternet.com ; mcp358@gmail.com ; russdavis1234@yahoo.com ; dewi.lewis1@btinternet.com ; wsd@axenus.plus.com ; arthur.turnerthomas@live.com ; sianifan@sky.com ; meirion66@yahoo.com ; save.the.eagles2@gmail.com ; vivswaby@gmail.com
Subject: Marriage Certificates of Elizabeth Portrey

Many thanks! These are of key importance. I notice that in the second certificate she is described as Elizabeth Portrey of the same (written) Parish (printed) followed by the written words “and

DISCOVERY_OF_DOCUMENT_EXTANT_UPDATE.pdf