Summary by Prof Oscar Wilde

“If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they’ll kill you.” As for all standard model: “Always forgive your enemies, nothing annoys them so much.” There’s a connection between the two, and it’s always antisymmetric.

Thanks to Gareth Evans

Thanks again, our mutual Ph. D. supervisor used to quote Peter Debye: “complexity is lack of understanding”. From this point onwards education becomes very important, which is why the new book from CISP is exctly right timing. It is

M. W. Evans, Ed. “Definitive Refutations of the Einsteinian General Relativity”, softback and e book at about twenty pounds stirling. The ISBN numbers are on the blog, please use the index to find them.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 14:51:52 GMT Standard Time

Bare bone physics at its very best as Horst says.Well done Myron. Now that it is so simple it is right – to turn a phrase around a little!!

Original Paper of Elie Cartan

This is probably:

E. Cartan, “Sur les varietes a connection affine, et la theorie relativiste generalisee” in Annales Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normal Superieure, 40, 325 – 412 (1923). “On the varieties of spin connection and the theory of general relativity”.

Elie Joseph Cartan lived from April 9th 1869 to 6th May 1951, and was born in the village of Dolomieu, Isere, the son of a blacksmith. He attended Lysee Janson de Sailly, and Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris in 1888. Doctorate 1894, lecturer at Montpellier and Lyon, professor in Nancy in 1903, lecturer at the Sorbonne in 1903, prefessor 1912. A total of 186 publications with many brilliant contributions to mathematics, including spinors (1913), the differential form, the Maurer Cartan structure equations of the early twenties, the exterior derivative, theory of Lie groups and so on. Corresponded with Albert Einstein in the nineteen twenties. Dirac used the Cartan spinor to infer the Dirac equation, now superceded by the ECE fermion equation.

Thanks and Acknowledgments to Douglas Lindstrom

Thanks also to Dr. Douglas Lindstrom, a leading ECE scholar from Canada who has also gone through all the notes for the papers, some of them very difficult, both conceptually and technically. I am going through my Heinz 57 varieties of EGR refutation, this is the tomato soup, easy to digest.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 13:35:43 GMT Standard Time

This is the simplest solution yet. Even I can follow this one easily.
Doug

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:15 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

Thanks and acknowledgments to Dr. Horst Eckardt, who has carefully checked every note for some years now, both analytically and with computer algebra. Let us hope that the simplicity of this proof finally leads to progress away from Einstenian general relativity, a great theory of natural philosophy in its day. I also hope that the media will take time to study ECE theory and this proof. I am sure they are capable of doing this.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 13:05:32 GMT Standard Time

This is an excellent note. Only the antisymmetry of the original Riemann tensor is assumed which nobody will deny. Even with the original definiton it is clear that vanishing torsion implies vanishing curvature. This is physics at its best.
Horst

Betreff: 210(2): Conclusive Proof of the Antisymmetry of the Christoffel Connection

This is another conclusive proof of the incorrectness and obsolescence of the Einsteinian general relativity (EGR), and if possible it should go into the frontispiece of the special issue six “Definitive Refutations of the Einsteinian General Relativity” of Journal of Foundations of Physics and Chemistry (CISP, www.cisp-publishing.com). The proof is simple for mathematicians and theoretical physicists and not much more difficult for a chemical physicist. It starts with the Cartan identity, and shows that the curvature tensor is eq. (5). If the connection is symmetric as used throughout the twentieth century, the curvature vanishes, reductio ad absurdum. So all inferences based on the Einstein theory are incorrect. There are no black holes, no big bang. Perihelion precession and light deflection cannot be due to EGR. There is no Hawking Penrose theorem, no gravitational radiation due to EGR and so on. The precision tests of EGR are meaningless, and an impartial UNESCO enquiry is need as to why they still claim to verify a theory that is incorrect. The Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory is geometrically correct because it uses the correct antisymmetry of the connection, and therefore correctly considers torsion. I have great respect for Albert Einstein’s work and he would have accepted this and developed something like ECE theory. No point in hanging on to incorrect mathematics. Funding is urgently needed for new energy and should not be wasted on an incorrect theory.

Prof. M .W. Evans,
H. M. Civil List
www.aias.us

Thanks and Acknowledgments to Horst Eckart

Thanks and acknowledgments to Dr. Horst Eckardt, who has carefully checked every note for some years now, both analytically and with computer algebra. Let us hope that the simplicity of this proof finally leads to progress away from Einstenian general relativity, a great theory of natural philosophy in its day. I also hope that the media will take time to study ECE theory and this proof. I am sure they are capable of doing this.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 13:05:32 GMT Standard Time

This is an excellent note. Only the antisymmetry of the original Riemann tensor is assumed which nobody will deny. Even with the original definiton it is clear that vanishing torsion implies vanishing curvature. This is physics at its best.
Horst

Betreff: 210(2): Conclusive Proof of the Antisymmetry of the Christoffel Connection

This is another conclusive proof of the incorrectness and obsolescence of the Einsteinian general relativity (EGR), and if possible it should go into the frontispiece of the special issue six “Definitive Refutations of the Einsteinian General Relativity” of Journal of Foundations of Physics and Chemistry (CISP, www.cisp-publishing.com). The proof is simple for mathematicians and theoretical physicists and not much more difficult for a chemical physicist. It starts with the Cartan identity, and shows that the curvature tensor is eq. (5). If the connection is symmetric as used throughout the twentieth century, the curvature vanishes, reductio ad absurdum. So all inferences based on the Einstein theory are incorrect. There are no black holes, no big bang. Perihelion precession and light deflection cannot be due to EGR. There is no Hawking Penrose theorem, no gravitational radiation due to EGR and so on. The precision tests of EGR are meaningless, and an impartial UNESCO enquiry is need as to why they still claim to verify a theory that is incorrect. The Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory is geometrically correct because it uses the correct antisymmetry of the connection, and therefore correctly considers torsion. I have great respect for Albert Einstein’s work and he would have accepted this and developed something like ECE theory. No point in hanging on to incorrect mathematics. Funding is urgently needed for new energy and should not be wasted on an incorrect theory.

Prof. M .W. Evans,
H. M. Civil List
www.aias.us

Preparation of the Omnia Opera for Publication

Thanks again! I wish that some famous names would take the time to study ECE theory as Ray Delaforce is doing here.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 11:23:06 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Ok, then I’ll start on the next paper.

I’m getting a double education while typesetting your papers – strengthening both my skill in doing the typesetting in TeX itself and my understanding of ECE theory, as I must read each paper a couple times in the process checking for typos – the math and arguments get ‘burned in’, so to speak.

Ray Delaforce

Subject: FOR POSTING: OO616(a)

This looks free of any error, and can be posted as OO616(a). It is one of the reasons out of very many why the CERN U(1) sector symmetry is incorrect. It is clear that CERN ignores science and mathematics. So governments should cease funding CERN and also cease funding the EGR theory. In order to do this a new, critical and impartial science funding method is needed because science funding at present is controlled by advisors with vested interest. All this will come crashing down when the world starts to run out of fuel.

In a message dated 28/02/2012 10:51:14 GMT Standard Time,

Prof. Evans,

Here’s the 1st draft of OO616 in TeX format.

Ray Delaforce

New Structure Equation

I would reply to any criticism like this that eq. (14) is a new structure equation of differential geometry. The original two structure equations of Cartan, as you know, are:

T = D ^ q ; R = D ^ omega

and these remain the same. However, the Cartan identity

D ^ T := R ^ q

has a solution which is eq. (14), another definition of curvature, one that needs non zero T for non zero R. The original R is of course a solution of the Cartan identity also. The Evans identity is simply an example of the Cartan identity. In my opinion the commutator proof is very simple. It consists of

mu = nu

in which case the commutator becomes the null operator and both torsion and curvature vanish, reductio ad absurdum. The key point in that method is that there is a one to one correspondence between commutator and connection. In the old theory they simply omitted the torsion and this correspondence was incorrectly abandoned. So in order for T and R to exist the connection must be antisymmetric. If one takes the general case where the connection is hypothetically asymmetric then only its antisymmetric part contributes to T and R. Its symmetric part is zero. The symmetric part of a hypothetically asymmetric commutator is zero in precise analogy. The structure equations of Cartan are in the last analysis, definitions. The Cartan identity is an exact identity, and has two possible solutions. These are R = D ^ omega, and eq. (14). The original definition of curvature seems to have been given by Levi Civita and Ricci and co workers in about 1900 – 1905. At that time torsion was of course unknown. As eq. (12) shows, that definition consisted of grouping a particular combination of terms on the right hand side of the equation. Then as in UFT137 the three combinations are each made equal to a curvature tensor. So in the usual method a solution of the identity was CHOSEN in order to give R = D ^ omega. That is not the only solution, eq. (14) is the other possible one. The precisely correct groupings of terms are shown in eq. (12)’s right hand side. The correct grouping shows that if the connection is symmetric, the right hand side and left hand side vanish. Not only does the sum vanish, the curvatures vanish individually.

In a message dated 29/02/2012 08:21:38 GMT Standard Time,

The arguments about eq.(14) are convincing, but critcs will say that you have changed the definition of curvature. Then all equations containing curvature would have to be proven again. Is there an argument that this is not necessary? What are the consequences of changing this definition?

Horst

Betreff: 210(1): Proof that the Connection is Antisymmetric

This is the final version of note 210(1), proving conclusively in yet another way that the connection is antisymmetric. The note proves for the first time that curvature can be defined in terms of torsion as in eq. (14). Curvature is therefore constructed from torsion, which is the more fundamental quantity. The Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) is obviously incorrect because it violates the Cartan identity, and violates eq. (14). In EGR, torsion is incorrectly zero and curvature non-zero. This fact has now been proven in many ways, and funding of EGR should cease completely. In order to prevent this waste of public funds, the political will must be found to overrule advisors with vested interest. So the many government departments that follow this blog are advised accordingly. For mathematicians this note is not difficult to follow. For others however it is technically very difficult, which is why grant applications based on incorrect mathematics have been funded for such a long time. My aim is to give the geometrical truth, but I also advise governments all the time through this blog. The eight year feedback data bank shows this conclusively, and I advise as a British Civil List scientist, impartially and with no vested interest. I have discovered several new fundamentals of differential geometry, and eq. (14) is yet another new discovery. It is a solution of the Cartan identity. I often go over notes to improve them, and produce final versions. Thanks to Horst Eckardt and Douglas Lindstrom for critical comments on each note. They have the technical ability to understand all aspects of ECE and are also impartial with no vested interest in incorrect mathematics. No honest intellectual should ever have a vested interest in a theory that has been proven wrong so many times, in so many ways, by so many scientists – the EGR theory.

Elsevier Abandons Anti-Open Access Bill

This is the way things are going. The open access experiment of AIAS has been a tremendous success.

In a message dated 28/02/2012 20:54:19 GMT Standard Time,  writes:

http://the-scientist.com/2012/02/28/elsevier-abandons-anti-open-access-bill/

February 2012 Feedback for www.aias.us

This is summarized at the end of the attached file as usual. Up to 28th Feb. there were 82,831 hits from 13,568 distinct visits, 39,864 page views, 5.502 gigabytes downloaded from 96 countries, led by USA, Mexico, Germany, Austria, France, Britain, Australia, India, …… Final returns will be in tomorrow.

overview.pdf

Daily Report 28/2/12

There were 2,796 hits from 558 distinct visits, 26.8% spiders from ggogle, yandex, MSN, yahoo, etc. Jacobs University UFT81; Siemens Corporation UFT12, 57, 60, ECE article; TU Darmstadt Omnia Opera; University of Regensburg, “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”, Georgia Institute of Technology numerical solutions; Ohio State University UFT116; Yale University metric manifolds; Universiy of Murcia Spain SU(2) quantum electrodynamics; Universiy of Poitiers general; Institute Ruder Boskovic Croatia UFT158; Chamaign Schools galaxies; Royal Society of Chemistry Civil List pension; Quad i Azam University Pakistan UFT169; Technical University of Lisbon UFT124; Troitsk Region Phys. Scripta rebuttal; St. Edmund Hall Oxford UFT25, intense interest all sectors.