Archive for September, 2008

High Honour

September 30, 2008


Subject: High Honour
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:35:06 EDT

This is a High Honour so is featured as can be seen above some Knights and a University such as Plymouth. So all my friends and colleagues over about forty years can share in this honour.

Glyn Eithrym

Armorial Bearings

September 30, 2008


Subject: Armorial Bearings
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:26:22 EDT

To Windsor Herald

Many thanks indeed. The finished arms look magnificent, and I am most grateful to the College of Arms for featuring them in the Newsletter. They can be placed on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and _www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com) now, and also on _www.steriwave.com_ (http://www.steriwave.com) . We are scheduled to arrive around 11.30 am on Monday 6th October and will be very pleased to meet you then for the formal presentation of the Letters Patent.

Glyn Eithrym

Dear Dr Evans,

I am forwarding the latest College newsletter which has just been issued.

Yours sincerely, William Hunt, Windsor

—– Original Message —–

Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: FW: College of Arms Newsletter No 18 (September 2008)

Dear William,

Attached is the September newsletter for your client Mr Evans.

Peter

——————————————————————————–

Sent: 30 September 2008 08:26

Subject: College of Arms Newsletter No 18 (September 2008)

Dear friend of the College of Arms,

We are delighted to send you the 18th issue of the College of Arms electronic newsletter. It is intended to supplement our website (which will, of course, continue to be updated) in providing a detailed and informative view of the workings and activities of the College, together with relevant

current questions of heraldry, genealogy, public record keeping and historical research.

The Officers of Arms

——————————————————————————–

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG – http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1698 – Release
Date: 29/09/2008 19:25


Attachment: CoA Newsletter – No 018.pdf

The Fallacy of the CERN Experiment

September 30, 2008


Subject: Fwd: The Fallacy of the CERN Experiment
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:15:52 EDT

This is a good idea, my sonnet sequence “False Philosophers Fall” in “Autobiography – Sonnets” (Arima) (_www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) ) is what I anticipated back in the early eighties.

The plan for paper 120 has developed very nicely and the paper will highlight the fallacy of the CERN experiment (and big bang, black holes etc). The standard model is in melt down – just like the global economy. Perhaps this is what happens when greed and ignorance is allowed to form the basis of “success” rather than accuracy and objective fairness – eventually it implodes and disintegrates of its own accord. Using your introduction to paper 120 Myron, perhaps you could develop a statement, in lay person terms, explaining the fallacy of the CERN experiment etc to bring pressure to bear on the powers that be to stop the spread of scientific misinformation and the associated waste of public money. You have an exceptional literary gift and are best placed to write a popular statement of this type on the fallacy of the CERN experiment and the myths of Big Bang and Black Holes etc. The statement could be copied onto the sleeve of the DVD of your new film and distributed with it. It could also be circulated to all the journals and popular press etc. The statement will probably not be published by them but at least it can be recorded for posterity on the various websites etc and will circulate with the film.

Just a thought,Best, Gareth

Many thanks again to Dr Horst Eckardt! These results show beyond doubt that the use of the symmetric connection in the obsolete physics is incorrect, because it leads to a violation of the dual identity of geometry. In general the connection must be asymmetric. Therefore the line elements used in black hole and big bang theory are geometrically incorrect, leading to meaningless results. The expenditure at CERN is based on incorrect mathematics. In addition, it has come to my attention that CERN funding is being used for corrupt purposes, such as bringing a complete choir to Geneva at public expense – this must cost about ten thousand pounds. A Parliamentary Enquiry is needed into this organized fraud and misuse of public funds. In addition there has been an organized attempt to suppress ECE theory – which by our site feedback analysis is the leading unified field theory at present, and to suppress valid criticism such as those by Dunning-Davies and Crothers. I cannot get any reply from people like Hawking or Rees on these important issues. Sir Fred Hoyle was indeed right, big bang is complete rubbish and black holes do not exist. Society now has a major problem of being pounded by garbage. People do not have the technical ability to understand any of this stuff, and are being made to believe anything.

British Civil List Scientist–Forwarded Message Attachment–

Meanwhile we can produce metrical analyses by assembly line… For comparison (see my other mail) I added the results for the spherically symmetric line element. The document a-r.pdf contains the so-called Schwarzschild metric enhanced by a term a/r. For a=0 you obtain a vacuum metric as expected. Interestingly, the Finkelstein metric is a true vacuum metric (Ric=0 etc.).. The Kruskal coordinates are tricky. The coordinates are (v,u,theta,phi), but additionally there is a “r” coordinate which is not independent but defined implicitly by v and u. Therefore one cannot handle it analytically. I introduced r as a function r(v,u). Then all terms can be calculated with derivatives of r with respect to v and u. Although this metric is derived from a vacuum metric, it is not a vacuum metric at all. It would be one if all derivatives of r would vanish, but this is not possible by definition of r.

Horst

—–Ursprüngliche Nachricht—–Von: EMyrone] at [aol.com [mailto:EMyrone] at [aol.com] Gesendet: Montag, 29. September 2008 13:39An: ted] at [annis.org; fdamador] at [comcast.net; sean] at [somewhere.ws; dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; annwvyn76] at [hotmail.com; garethjohnevans] at [hotmail.co.uk; fucilla] at [electrosilicagroup.com; f.fucilla] at [steriwave.com; J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; aje] at [warfplc.comBetreff: Testing Black Hole Line Elements with Maxima

To begin paper 120, it would be possible to test these exotic coordinate transformations of black hole theory with Maxima: notably the Eddington Finkelstein coordinates (7.68) and the Kruskal coordinates (7.79). From a glance at this publicly available chapter by Carroll, black hole theory is total nonsense from the outset.

_________________________________________________________________ Make a mini you and download it into Windows Live Messenger http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/=

Source of the Incorrectness of Standard Gravitational Physics

September 30, 2008


Subject: Source of the Incorrectness of Standard Gravitational Physics
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:36:31 EDT

This can be traced to the use of the symmetric connection. The idea of connection was intorduced by Christoffel in the nineteenth century, but the symmetric connection seems to have been developed by T. Levi-Civita, the co-founder with G. Ricci-Curbastro of tensor calculus in 1900 in:

“Methods de Calcul Differential Absolu et Leurs Applications”

This was the source used by Einstein, whose many errors in tensor calculus were corrected by Levi-Civita during 1915 to 1917. Therefore it is necessary to find the above document from a library or lending library and to se whether the connection used is symmetric. I am fluent in written French so can read it. If so, this would pinpoint the source of the present fiasco, in which the whole of cosmology and gravitational physics is being shown to be incorrect because of its use of this symmetric connection. There is a classic book by Levi-Civita:

“The Absolute Differential Calculus”

and there is a need to go through this to find whether Levi-Civita ever used anything different from a symmetric connection (i.e. zero torsion). If he did not then it shows why torsion has been incorrectly eliminated from gravitational theory, rendering it meaningless, and violating the dual identity.

Levi-Civita died in isolation in 1941 after having been ostracized by the scientific community because of his ethnic background. This may also have contributed to the fact that torsion was not properly taken account of. It is clear that Einstein never properly grasped the meaning of torsion in correspondence with Cartan. Now we know that torsion is central to all physics.

Generalized FLRW Metric

September 30, 2008


Subject: Generalized FLRW Metric
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:05:07 EDT

I have found one of these in a paper by Portugal in about 1995. It is:

ds squared = c squared dt squared – a dx squared – b dy squared – c dz squared

where:

a = t squared / (m – n ) squared

b = 1 / (t power 2(m +n) exp (2x))

c = exp (2x) / (t power (2 (m + n)))

Our code will again show this to be completely incorrect geometrically, again violating the dual identity of geometry. It may be worth trying out this one, but as Horst mentions, we are now able to shred any standard lien element like a production line.

So it is quite clear that the standard scientists amount to a small and obsolete group with cynical intentions on power and money. In our system it is up to the politicians to clean up this mess. The easiest way is to turn off the public funding.

The Dirac Metric

September 30, 2008


Subject: The Dirac Metric
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:46:50 EDT

This appears in Jeremy’s book, and Horst tested it against the dual identity. It was found to be a complete fiasco, not even obeying the Ricci cyclic (so called “first Bianchi identity”). I think we could also show this in paper 120. I don’t know what Dirac was trying to do here, I think it was also to do with the singularities. So this subject area is a mess, and I recommend students to go into other subject areas of physics, chemistry, engineering or similar, i.e. to do something useful for society. Do not swallow pronouncements as if they come from marble. I have never been impressed by reputation or the fact that someone works somewhere which is proclaimed to be terribly important.

PS typo

September 30, 2008


Subject: PS typo
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:38:47 EDT

Sections three and four

So called Schwarzschild contradicted by galactic dynamics

September 30, 2008


Subject: Paper 120 : So called Schwarzschild contradicted by galactic dynamics
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:16:14 EDT

As a result of paper 119 it can be seen that the misnamed Schwarzschild metric is severely contradicted by galactic dynamics, in which the orbit of the sun around the centre of the Milky Way is not described by the so called SM. Therefore the latter is in general incorrect. To describe galactic orbits one needs ECE theory as in paper 119. The field equation approach, rather than the geodesic approach, is needed. The geodesic approach is sufficient only for solar system dynamics, and even then there are Pioneer / Cassini anomalies. In binary pulsars, the geodesic approach begins to fail, and as shown in papers 108 and 111 the use of a symmetric metric becomes self contradictory. So in fact, there is no line element known that can self consistently describe all aspects of cosmology. There is no point in waffling around with “dark matter”. The only known self consistent description of cosmology is the ECE field equation description. Standard physics is obsolete, self-inconsistent, and a total failure.

Refusal of Hawking to reply

September 30, 2008


Subject: Refusal of Hawking to reply
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:55:12 EDT

Thank you for your email to Professor Hawking.

As you can imagine, Prof. Hawking receives many such every day. He very much regrets that due to the severe limitations he works under, and the enormous number of requests he receives, he is unable to compose a reply to every message, and we do not have the resources to deal with many of the specific scientific enquiries and theories we receive.

Please see the website http://www.hawking.org.uk for more information about Professor Hawking, his life and his work.

Yours faithfully

Sam Blackburn

Technical Assistant to Professor S W Hawking CH CBE FRS

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0WA. United Kingdom.

http://www.hawking.org.uk

This is all that anyone ever gets from hyped up Hawking. Also, Carroll fails or refuses to correspond. As pointed out by Crothers, Carroll’s chapter seven implies:

exp (2a) = 1 – 2GM / r ——————- (1)

Therefore this expression becomes infinite at

r = 0 —————– (2)

and the solution becomes unphysical. Also, the right hand side of Eq. (1) cannot become negative. All black hole and big bang line elements are pure nonsense. This can be seen by high school pupils. Yet billions of public funding are being spent on this nonsense, and children are being frightened into thinking that black holes will destroy the world. An elaborate charade is entered into in Carroll’s chapter seven, called “coordinate transformation”. The result of this was found to be another fiasco this morning, after coordinate transformation, the dual identity of geometry is still violated.

Combined Returns Jun to Sept 2008

September 30, 2008


Subject: NEW RECORD : Combined Returns Jun to Sept 2008
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:30:49 EDT

These have set a new record in Sept 2008 of number of documents read: 23,905 to date in the month. The combined returns became available in about June, and are as follows:

Month Hits Visits Documents Read

June 08 269,430 11,658 20,608 July 252,360 11,507 12,763 August 274,164 11,631 21,687 Sept to 29 256,617 10,026 23,905

These are for _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and _www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com)