There were 2,313 hits from 338 distinct visits, main spiders baidu, google, MSN and yahoo. The following records how many times the following selected items of particular interest to me were read in August 2015. Collected Scientometrics 681, F3(Sp) 655 (chapter three in Spanish translation by Alex Hill of “The Evans Equations” on Quantum Theory), The 26 Evans / Morris papers 620 (estimated at 20 a day), Collected ECE2 papers 518 (UFT313-320, UFT322 – 325), Autobiography volumes one and two 336, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 311, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers (UFT292 to UFT299) 220, Proofs that no torsion means no curvature and no gravitation and complete refutation of Einsteinian general relativity 197, The Principles of ECE (UFT281 – UFT288) 194, UFT88 136, “The Evans Equations of Unified Field Theory” by Laurence Felker 131 (UFT302); Translation of Welsh language newspaper article by Dewi Lewis in “Llais” 102, “The ECE Engineering Model” collected equations collated by Horst Eckardt) 101, UFT311 (first circuit paper) 85, “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation” (UFT301) 74, UFT321 (second circuit paper) 63, UFT322 57, UFT320 54, UFT318 52, UFT319 50, UFT314 45, UFT317 44, UFT324 43, UFT323 40, UFT313 39, UFT316 38, UFT315 34, UFT325 22 for August 2015. University of Rostock Edyn3, Istella Media Italy general, extensive private spidering, Izhevsk region general. Intense interest all sectors, usage file attached for August 2015.

## Daily Report 30/8/15

September 1, 2015## Plans for UFT326

August 31, 2015I intend to continue by using the approach used in previous UFT papers developing the fermion equation, but to explore approximations other than those used by Dirac and contemporaries. In those approximation they used E = gamma mc squared about equal to m c squared in the denominator, UFT247 to UFT253. I like this kind of work because it is so elegant and produces so much information and has so many possible variations on the theme. It is based on the Einstein energy equation, which is a retsatemtn of the realtivistic momentum p = gamma m v (see Marion and Thornton or good websites). It can be looked upon as quantization of the ECE2 Lorentz force equation. In the Einstein energy equation

E squared = c squared p squared + m squared c fourth

where p is the relativistic momentum p = gamma m v. In the Dirac type approximations p is approximated in the development by the non relativistic momentum in the numerator of

E – m c squared = p squared c squared / ( E + m c squared)

After this development I intend to go back to the earlier ECE2 equations and develop them for the spin connection. Dirac used the minimal prescription which is equivalent to adding U as shown in immediately preceding UFT papers. The approximations used by Dirac et al. are crude and rough ones which can only be justified by the agreement with experimental data, the famous half integral spin , ESR, NMR and so on. I suggest strongly that readers follow this discussion with readings of Marion and Thornton, chapter on special relativity. It is especially important to understand the Lorentz transform and the definition of the Lorentz gamma factor from the Minkowski metric. Horst’s demonstration of precession from special relativity in UFT325 is also very important. At first, special relativity can be very confusing but it is not difficult if a few rules are kept clearly in mind.

## The Velocity of the Lorentz Factor

August 31, 2015This is defined directly from the Minkowski metric as is well known, so it is the velocity in the observer frame, v. Perhaps I should describe it in this way instead of as “the Newtonian velocity”. However the two velocities are the same. The velocity of the particle in the ticked frame which moves with the particle is zero. The time in the ticked frame is the proper time tau, so we get

c squared dtau squared = (c squared – v squared) dt squared.

and gamma = dt / dtau = (1 – v squared / c squared) power minus half = gamma. The time in the observer frame is t, and the ticked frame moves with respect to the observer frame at v. The observer frame is the frame in which v is non zero. In a Newtonian context the Galilean transform applies and

dr’ squared = dr squared

In special relativity the Lorentz transform applies and

c squared dt’ squared – dr’ squared = c squared dt squared – dr squared

where

dt’ squared = dtau squared

the infinitesimal of proper time.

## Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to 29/8/15

August 31, 2015As usual the stats are taken on the last day of the month before a key file is overwritten. The complete returns for August 2015 will be available in a few days. August 2015 was another outstanding performance for www.aias.us, now sustained for 159 consecutive months since May 2002. To 29/8/15 in August there were 10,575 distinct visits, 80,793 hits, 14.71 gigabytes downloaded, 58,757 page views and 2,266 documents read from 97 countries, led by USA, Germany, Mexico, Czechia, Russian Federation, Ukraine, ….. with Britain in eighteenth place. this unusually low placement is probably due to universities being closed in August and mindless Westminster government cuts beginning to destroy the educational and research system. There were visits from the following of the Webometrics and Times Higher Education top twenty universities in the world: MIT, Caltech, Penn State, Purdue*, Stanford, Minnesota Twin Cities, Yale, Imperial and Tokyo*, the * denotes repeat visits. These scientometrics are currently being read 8,408 times a year across the world, and are the leading single item on www.aias.us . So everyone knows that ECE is the new physics.

## Daily Report Saturday 29/8/15

August 31, 2015There were 1,914 files downloaded or hits from 341 distinct visits or reading sessions, main spiders, baidu, google, MSN and yahoo. Collected Scientometrics 668, F3(Sp) 634, Evans / Morris papers 580 (est), Collected ECE2 papers 488, Autobiography volumes one and two 329, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 310, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 210. Principles of ECE 187, proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 181, UFT88 136, Evans Equations 123 (numerous Spanish), Llais 98, Engineering Model 96, UFT311 83, CEFE 70, UFT321 61, UFT322 56, UFT320 52, UFT318 52, UFT319 49, UFT324 42, UFT317 42, UFT313 40, UFT316 37, UFT323 37, UFT315 31, UFT314 29, UFT325 21 to date in August 2015. University of the Andes UFT139 (Sp), spidering from a private site in Germany, Istella Media Italy general; Gospel Ministry Alliance general; Izhevsk region extensive. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for August 2015

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

## Mathew 5.4 and 5.5

August 30, 2015I cannot find any better words than these. These apply irrespective of any origin or religious persuasion, including agnosticism (not knowing).

5.4 Gwyn ei byd y rhai sydd yn galaru: canys hwy a ddiddenir. (Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.)

5.5 Gwyn ei byd y rhai addfwyn: canys hwy a etifeddant y ddaear. (Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.)

5.11 and 5.12 : Gwyn ei byd pan y’ch gwaradwyddant, ac y’ch erlidiant, a y dywedant bob drygair yn eich erbyn er mwyn i, a hwy yn gelwyddog. Byddwch lawen a hyfryd .. (Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kind of evil against you because of me. Be joyful and serene …

(Dr. William Morgan at alii 1588, the 1620 version online).

“because of me ” read “because of nature”.

## 326(5): Final Version of Note 326(4)

August 30, 2015I went through my calculations again and found that the correct free particle quantization equation is Eq. (29) with gamma defined by Eq. (32) and the de Broglie wave particle dualism by Eq. (33). So these equations can be solved by computer algebra to give E in terms of p sub 0, the classical momentum, and kappa. The cross check on page (5) confirms that everything is self consistent. Having gone through this baseline calculation the particle on a ring and H atom can be defined in a relativistic context. The answer to the computer algebra must be:

E squared = (h bar kappa c) squared + m squared c fourth

so this gives a check on the results of the computer algebra. The fermion equation for the free particle is therefore Eq. (29) where gamma is given by Eq. (32). and where the de Broglie wave particle dualism is given by Eq. (33). Although these equations look like familiar special relativity they are the quantization of the ECE2 Lorentz force equation.

## Discussion of Note 326(4): A New Free Particle Relativisic Schroedinger Equation

August 30, 2015Many thanks indeed, an exciting discovery! I will proceed immediately to developing these new solutions with Schroedinger quantization in preparation for numerical solution, then add a potential. The quantized versions may be soluble to give completely new relativistic free particle wavefunctions both for translational and rotational free particle motion. The golden age of quantum mechanics always comes up with something new, almost a hundred years after its first development. This is essentially quantization of ECE2 theory. This is of course the method we have used in many previous UFT papers, many variations on a theme by Paul Dirac and contemporaries, but always based on geometry so the Dirac equation has become the fermion equation of generally covariant unified field theory (now ECE2 theory).

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 29/08/2015 11:30:00 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Exact solution of the relativistic momentum equationIn note 326(4) eq.(33) can be solved with some effort in computeralgebra without approximation v<<c, see attached. There are 4 solutions for p^2, the results differ in signs and a summand m*H1.

Horst

Am 24.08.2015 um 15:57 schrieb EMyrone:

This note uses a Dirac type quantization to produce the equation (21), a relativistic Schroedinger equation which must be solved for the wavefunctions psi. In general this is a highly non trivial procedure which must be carried out numerically in three dimensions. However, it is straightforward to show that this type of quantization produces small shifts in the H atom energy levels given by the expectation value (28). The Thomas factor is given correctly by the Sommerfeld atom, but there is no spin orbit interaction, because the Sommerfeld atom does not contain a spin quantum number, later suggested by the Sommerfeld group itself and developed by Pauli and others. As in previous UFT papers spin orbit coupling and many new effects of development of ECE appears with the use of the SU(2) basis and Pauli matrices. It is known from UFT325 that these orbitals in two dimensions must be the result of a quantization of a two dimensional precessing ellipse, and that will be the subject of the next note. This method is much clearer than that used by Sommerfeld himself in 1913, who did not have the benefit of Schroedinger Debye quantization (circ 1923 / 1924). Sommerfeld produced orbitals in 1913 which he communicated by letter to Einstein.

## Discussion of 326(4)

August 30, 2015Thanks again for going through 326(4). Agreed with the first two points, I thing that the factor 2 is alright because 1 + gamma is approximately 1 + 1 – v squared / (2 c squared).

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 29/08/2015 11:20:02 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 326(2): Quantization of the Sommerfeld HamiltonianIn eq.(39) it should read at the RHS:

hbar^2 / 2 m^2 c^2

(with m squared). In eq.(46) the factor E seems to be missing. Should there be a “3” instead of “2” because of 1+gamma in eq. (30)?

Horst

Am 24.08.2015 um 15:57 schrieb EMyrone:

This note uses a Dirac type quantization to produce the equation (21), a relativistic Schroedinger equation which must be solved for the wavefunctions psi. In general this is a highly non trivial procedure which must be carried out numerically in three dimensions. However, it is straightforward to show that this type of quantization produces small shifts in the H atom energy levels given by the expectation value (28). The Thomas factor is given correctly by the Sommerfeld atom, but there is no spin orbit interaction, because the Sommerfeld atom does not contain a spin quantum number, later suggested by the Sommerfeld group itself and developed by Pauli and others. As in previous UFT papers spin orbit coupling and many new effects of development of ECE appears with the use of the SU(2) basis and Pauli matrices. It is known from UFT325 that these orbitals in two dimensions must be the result of a quantization of a two dimensional precessing ellipse, and that will be the subject of the next note. This method is much clearer than that used by Sommerfeld himself in 1913, who did not have the benefit of Schroedinger Debye quantization (circ 1923 / 1924). Sommerfeld produced orbitals in 1913 which he communicated by letter to Einstein.

## Ten Year Readership of “The Evans Equations of Unified Field Theory”

August 30, 2015This vastly influential book was published by Abramis in 2007 as a softback, but by far its major impact has been open source on www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com and www.upitec.org. The impact of the book is miniscule in comparison with the websites, but still good. This is typical of the open source revolution in education. It was written by Laurence Felker, an engineer residing in Nevada and a lecturer in the Nevada / California region of the western United States. It was translated into Spanish by Alex Hill, (www.et3m.net), a leading industrialist. The Spanish version is in the Spanish section of www.aias.us divided into fifteen chapters, and the English version is UFT302. In August 2015 to date the Spanish version has been read 960 times, and the English version 118 times. This is 14,053 readings a year. The book first began to be posted in 2005, so over a decade it has accumulated at least 140,000 readings from www.aias.us alone, probably much more. Adjusting for all three ECE sites by a factor of 60% gives 224,000 readings. This is a “best reader” by any standards. There are eight times more readings in Spanish than English, suggesting that the book is well known throughout the Spanish speaking world, as well as the English speaking world. It is also read throughout the Portuguese and Italian speaking world, and this readership has been sustained for a decade and is already of historic importance. The distribution of the Spanish readership, chapter by chapter, for August 2015 is as follows.

1) Introduction 61

2) General Relativity 25

3) Quantum Theory 621

4) Geometry 28

5) Well Known Equations 37

6) Evans Field equation 21

7) Evans Wave equation 17

8) Implications 14

9) Dirac, Klein Gordon and Evans Wave Equations 25

10) Replacement of the Heisenberg Principle 20

11) The B(3) Spin Field 11

12) Electroweak Theory 17

13) Aharonov Bohm Effect 33

14) Geometrical Concepts 22

15)Unified Viewpoint 8

in the first 28 days of August 2015 in the middle of the summer vacation, a quiet time in academia. It is seen that the Spanish version is dominated completely by chapter three on quantum theory, so this is an important area of ECE, the first theory to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity and to definitively disprove the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in UFT175. The Croca group in Lisbon has refuted it many times in many ways experimentally. The book covers the initial, explosive, impact of ECE theory, since then there has been tremendous progress in many directions and the massive initial impact of ECE has been sustained, so it is already historic – a permanent and internationally famous new school of thought. This means that the standard model of physics has lost all credibility, and Governments are drastically curtailing its funding, not before time. The meteoric impact of ECE in 2003 to 2005 is clear from UFT307 (available in softback from New Generation, London), the scientometrics, currently being read 8,173 times a year off www.aias.us. It is also known that the loonie fringe of standard physics tried to misrepresent, defame and severely distort both my work and career on wikipedia using trolling methods. Obviously there should be a Government investigation of Wikipedia. This disgusting calumny hastened the demise of standard physics funding. Trolls are of course criminals and have been reduced to historical, hysterical rubble.

cc Prime Minister’s Office.

M. P. Gower