In order to evaluate the flux density from a wire with 60 Hz mains current, radiation theory will be needed, as in UFT309. That will be the subject of the next note.
Nearly all of us in South Wales have some connections with coal mining. Gareth Evans, Kerry Pendergast and myself all come from coal mining families. At one time you could walk from one end of South Wales to the other underground. This coal mining background is often described in my poetry, collected together in “Autobiography Volume One” in the blue box above my coat of arms on the home page of www.aias.us. We were all lucky not to land up underground ourselves, and I described that in the sonnet “On Peering down the Entrance to a Drift Mine: Nixon Drift Late Fifties”. That is just about as close as I ever got to the satanic galleries. The prospect of unlimited energy from the ECE spacetime as in UFT311 is all the more exciting for anyone from this background. So this background was the tail end of the first industrial revolution. The methods used in the fifties were not much different from those in the nineteenth century, very dangerous. The iron works like Cyfarthfa and Dowlais were if possible worse. So the first industrial revolution was a phenomenon accompanied by great hardship. This still goes on today wherever there are coal mines.
Sent: 01/04/2015 09:19:06 GMT Daylight Time
Good luck Steve. This is a subject close to our hearts here in Wales. I am sure you have done a good job.
Sincerely, Gareth Evans
Sent from Samsung Mobile
This is an experiment that any electrical engineer or scientist can try. The mains frequency is about 60 Hz and the power in watts is volts multiplied by amps. The flux density is watts divided by an area in square metres. This could be the area of the wire carrying an electric current from the mains. If there is no photon mass the flux density phi in watts per square metre and the angular frequency omega in radians per second of the mains should be related by Eq. (16) from the Planck distribution. If there is photon rest mass the relevant equation is (7). This is an example of ELF technology (extremely low electromagnetic frequencies). This experiment is many orders of magnitude better than using a laser, because the mains frequency of 60 Hz is close to what is thought to be the rest frequency of the photon. The latter is not yet known, but this experiment has a real chance of finding it. The search for the photon rest mass has been pursued since 1905 – one hundred and ten years. It is relatively easy to find the moving mass of the photon, in fact this can be found to order of magnitude simply by measuring a refractive index, or any absorption spectrum, but the rest mass is an entirely different and far more difficult proposition. Any electrical engineer or physicist or chemist could refine this experiment greatly. As usual I just give the basic idea and outline. This idea gives another severe test of the Planck theory and the basic concept of photon.
UFT311 has been read 49 times in about a week, so is being read at a rate of over 2,500 times a year from www.aias.us alone. Multiply this by 1.6 to get the complete number of readings of about 4,000 times a year from www.aias.us, www.upitec.org, and www.atomicprecision.com. It is a breakthrough paper giving complete agreement between ECE theory and a circuit by Osamu Ide whose design is known in all detail and given in the paper. It shows that energy is available in unlimited quantities from spacetime – the ECE vacuum (see UFT292 to UFT299). It is now possible to design circuits to obtain electric power from spacetime, using the principles of ECE theory (UFT281 to UFT288). The standard model of physics is unable to do this. Low energy nuclear reactors are known to be reproducible and repeatable and also work from the ECE spacetime. Patents based on devices can now be filed and the major corporations will probably be looking in to this. There have been visits to www.aias.us over the last decade from order of magnitude one hundred thousand corporations. The first corporation to file patents will capture a vast new market – the second industrial revolution driven by unlimited new energy. I like to think of each new paper as starting a downhill run in the winter Olympics.
This reorganization looks excellent, particularly the blog and papers section. It is also available under the name www.atomicprecision.com. The total readership of ECE theory and my Omnia Opera back to 1973 is estimated from the total of www.aias.us, www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com. The latter two sites contribute 60% of the readership of www.aias.us. This percentage was accurately estimated recently from feedback stats forwarded by Sean MacLachlan, who works for Hewlett Packard in Boise, Idaho. UPITEC is registered in Boise, Idaho, U. S. A. as a not for profit organization legally entitled to take donations. The Omnia Opera is also excellently organized and there is a useful and easy to use index. Click on any Omnia Opera or UFT paper to bring up the original. The blog also appears on these sites and is very well designed. The www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com sites are owned by Sean MacLachlan, and I suggest that they be archived by the United States national digital collection in Washington D. C. Sean may like to look in to this. The www.aias.us site is already archived by the national digital collection of the countries of Britain on www.webarchive.org.uk . All AIAS fellows are also fellows of UPITEC. These are all very well known sites now and amount to a new physics organization as well as a great deal of new science making an unprecedented impact worldwide.
Sent: 31/03/2015 22:37:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Upitec Site Update
I’ve done some redesign to the upitec.org site.
All papers are now consolidated under Scientific Papers.
There is a useful search bar and filters there now.
All papers have been tagged by author, language, series and topic.
Using the filters and the search it is now much easier to find specific papers.
It’s live now. Any suggestions for refinement are welcome.
City University Hong Kong is ranked 182 in the world by Times Higher Education and has over 20,000 students. It was founded in 1984 and accredited as a university in the nineties. So it is a high quality, world ranking university. UFT88 is currently being read at the rate of 1,800 times a year and refutes the gravitational sector of the standard model by correcting the second Bianchi identity for torsion. The final version of the second Bianchi identity with torsion is Eq. (105) of UFT255 reviewed in the first chapter of “Principles of ECE Theory” (UFT281 and Spanish section). “The Principles of ECE Theory” (UFT281 to UFT288) is currently being read at the rate of 2,482 times a year. There can be no doubt that the second Bianchi identity used by Einstein in 1915 is incorrect. Definitive proofs one to five on www.aias.us, and papers such as UFT99 and 139 prove beyond doubt that torsion cannot be neglected, zero torsion leads to zero curvature and no gravitation. The new field equations of gravitation are in the Engineering Model of UFT303, currently being read at the rate of 1,594 times a year.
There were 3,768 hits or files downloaded from 542 distinct visits or study sessions. Main spiders, baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans / Morris papers 485, Auto1 353, Auto2 156, F3(Sp) 341, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 222, Principles of ECE 204, Book of Scientometrics 204, Evans Equations 169 (numerous Spanish), UFT88 148, Engineering Model 131, CEFE 90, Englynion 72 (second book of poetry), Llais 59, Autobiography Sonnets 27 (first book of poetry) to date in March 2015. National Medical Dispatching Center Bulgaria UFT38; Physics Federal University of Brazil at Paraiba UFT2, UFT25; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Technical University Dresden levitron; Computer Centre Karlsruhe University Home page and “Evans Equations” by Lar Felker; University of Maryland general; Polytechnic School Autonomous University of Madrid general; Institute of Particle Physics University of Valencia F13(Sp); University of Turku Finland AIAS staff, UFT papers; University of Poitiers general; City University of Hong Kong UFT88; Mexican National Polytechnic Institute F3(Sp); United States National Archives general; National Cryogenics Institute (ICSI) Romania my page. Intense interst all sectors, updated usage file attached for March 2015.
Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us
Summary Period: March 2015 – URL
Generated 31-Mar-2015 11:37 EDT
Fully agreed, CERN’s motivation is always to ask for more billions. I was always told by a place like UC Swansea that it had never had money, and that I had to cover computing costs myself (Auto Two). I fought them to a standstill on that one until they finally admitted that computing was covered by the College after all. I was reprimanded for using too much postage in attempting to send out preprint requests. They suddenly spent £104,000 on an early notebook by Dylan Thomas. Admittedly Thomas wrote some good stuff, later in his life, but could not afford the price of a stamp. This notebook covers “Altarwise by Owl Light”, which I have unravelled on this blog. It is deliberately dense and ultra ultra obscure, and the young Thomas was playing around with his readers. Only in his later years does he become a good poet, for example “Over Sir John’s Hill”. I have asked people in Swansea whether they have read anything by Dylan Thomas, and the answer is almost always “no”. In the same way CERN is producing incredible obscurity at vast expense to al of us, while they pay no taxes themselves. So not very good stuff. The difference is that CERN is very well paid, Thomas was almost always as poor as it is possible to be. With this kind of society, who needs chaos?
Sent: 31/03/2015 13:42:23 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: The Rest Mass of the Photon
Same here, I do not understand why they are not asking some of these simple and basic questions themselves. They seem to have created an unreal world where obstacles encountered are “fixed” by introducing more adjustable parameters and more abstraction.
Then again, we have only just started realising some of these things ourselves. There is more clarity with each new advance thanks to you and Horst. Out of the mist a little more of our world emerges.
Sent from Samsung Mobile
This simple calculation uses the Beer Lambert law in combination with the Planck distribution for massive photons of monochromatic frequency omega. In the free photon gas the moving mass is 1.02 ten power minus 38 kilograms, compared with the rest mass m0 of 7.39 ten power minus 53 kilograms from the lowest known electromagnetci frequency of 0.01 Hz. This means that the photon is moving very close to c, but not at c. The Poincare / de Broglie / Vigier School referred to this as “FAPP c” (for all practical purposes c). Upon absorption by a low absorber such as glass of assumed refractive index 1.5 the moving mass is 8.53 ten power minus 53 kilograms, with a velocity of 1.5 ten power eight metres per second, half that of light because n = c / v. This is a simple calculation, and for that reason greatly preferred to a calculation with any number of adjustables costing billions and studying noise. There are no adjustables in this calculation, it uses fundamental theory. In future notes for UFT312 the Evans / Morris shift will be considered and worked in to this calculation.
I should think that they are just encountering noise again, and there is nothing there. In Poincare’s theory the photon is just like any other relativistic particle of energy E = gamma m0 c squared and momentum p = gamma m0 v. Here gamma is the Lorentz factor gamma = (1 – (v / c) squared) power minus half. So when v = 0, E = m0 c squared and p = m0 v. Louis de Broglie equated E = h bar omega and p = h bar kappa to the above. Using the lowest known frequency of 0.01 Hz the photon rest mass is easily calculated to be about ten power minus fifty one kilograms. This is a fixed constant. The photon moves very close to c in almost all known experiments, so the moving mass m is increased by many orders of magnitude. The UFT papers summarized in UFT310 record the moving mass gamma m0. In all those papers the photon moves very close to c, but not quite at c. The claims by CERN simply make no sense to me. They do not look like science at all.
Sent: 31/03/2015 11:29:42 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Major Problems for CERN
Your statement below is important:
“I calculate that the photon rest mass is far too small to be measured by the Stefan Boltzmann law, with the instrumental precision we have now”
This may explain why results from CERN suggest a photon mass 26 orders of magnitude too large. Out of the noise, using their sophisticated equipment and multiple adjustable parameters, perhaps they are seeing something. It cannot be a Higgs boson as claimed though – that can then decay into two photons. Photon mass cannot be this large. There would be no electromagnetic spectrum from the ultra violet down with a photon rest mass of this magnitude.
Sent from Samsung Mobile