Book of Scientometrics Updated to April 15th 2014

April 17, 2014

The Book of Scientometrics was started on April 30th 2004, and shows intense and sustained worldwide interest in ECE theory. It focuses on Universities, Institutes and Similar and shows that ECE has ben read in all the best places for a decade. This book records only a tiny 2% of the vast total impact of ECE theory, obviously the theory making most impact in contemporary physics, chemistry, mathematics and engineering. It is the first successful unified field theory,developed entirely from well known Cartan geometry in 260 UFT papers, several monographs, and articles and papers by the AIAS colleagues. There are also almost a hundred essays and essay broadcasts by Robert Cheshire, translated into Spanish and broadcast by Alex Hill. ECE has refuted the standard physics almost entirely and in a decade I have received nominations for a Nobel and Wolf Prize, a Civil List Pension and a Coat of Arms in recognition for this work. The AIAS colleagues fully deserve equal recognition. This book shows that the dogma of the old physics is still being pumped out incessantly but is being essentially ignored by avant garde intellectuals. During this decade energy from spacetime and low energy nuclear reactors have become routine in industry. The old physics asserts that they do not exist, but ECE has offered a plausible explanation.

overview1.docx

Daily Report 15/4/14

April 17, 2014

There were 1771 hits from 487 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN and seznam. UFT85 140, Auto1 99, Auto2 33, UFT88 55, CEFE 51, EEC Engineering Model 33, Book of Scientometrics 57, Animation 21, Englynion 19 to date in April 2014. University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT59, Arizona State University UFT214; Library Michigan State University UFT7; San Jose State University Essay 32; University of Limoges Open Letter to Prof. S. J. Hawking; University of Poitiers general; Silesian Data Center general; Joint Institutes of Nuclear Research Dubna Russia UFT33; University of Kent UFT99; Newcastle University AIAS Staff, Eduroam Oxford University UFT206. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2014.

Variations on a Cracked Record

April 16, 2014

Fully agreed, these fraudulent attacks were instigated by someone unknown to prevent me from being awarded a Nobel Prize. Now that the fraud is out in the open the Nobel Prize Committee is expected by the colleagues to judge fairly, bearing in mind that I have already been awarded two higher honours than a Nobel prize, in 2005 and 2008. A Nobel Prize for B(3) and ECE would mean the end of the standard model, and it would be a prize for all of AIAS, and not just yours truly. The standard modellers would be eating a lot of omelette and would have to admit that electric power can be obtained from spacetime. As Alex mentions, Fortune Fifty companies have already been using such power for years.

In a message dated 16/04/2014 18:49:32 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Perhaps it might be worth mentioning that rebuttals to ECE theory, claiming it contains fundamental mathematical mistakes, had sort of died away, especially from characters such as Bruhn, when AIAS mathematical developments started to be checked by computer by Horst using generally accepted mathematical software, such as Maxima and Mathematika, and operated by a scientist who has been doing this as his everyday job for several decardes at a Furtune 50 corporation.

This seems to be a renewed attack by means of a variation of the same old theme, as is called by musicians, forgetting the fact that if the basic equations which are behind ECE theory would be mathematically wrong as they claim then there would be red lights turning on all over the computer.

These basic attacks also claim that there is nothing mathematically wrong with all mathematical developments originating from Einstein´s field equation. If this would be so then I am sure they would not only be able to explain why the computer rejects such developments but also show wherein lie the mistakes in computer programming made unwittingly by Horst. If this could be accomplished by eliminating torsion from the equations fed to the computer then their mistake would become clearly obvious, since there is no doubt that torsion is part of Cartan geometry. Quite frankly, I doubt such changes could be done in practice.

So this simply seems to be a new attempt of rebuttal by means of old, deja-vu, worn out tools. If the claimed basic mistakes could be shown by computer analysis, as AIAS has done, and showing the details of the program used, then the discussion might attract some interest. But unfortunately this will never happen…

Regards,

Fraud in Physics and Mathematics

April 16, 2014

I don’t like saying this, but there is an awful lot of fraud in physics and mathematics. In some cases the fraud is easy to pick up. For example if violently abusive language is used by a person who attacks Cartan’s geometry by attacking me personally. So I advise that such e mails be forwarded to the police in your locality. I don’t think I wish to see such junk any longer. In about eleven years about 300 papers have been produced by AIAS giving many detailed proofs of Cartan geometry. Some proofs are self checking, for example the proofs of identities, one side is proven to be identically equal to the other. These are detailed expansions of proofs given by S. M. Carroll for example in graduate lectures at Harvard, UCSB, Chicago and Caltech. In a message to the late John B. Hart, Carroll accepted ECE theory. So it is quite clear that Waldyr Rodrigues, Gerhard Bruhn and Akhlesh Lakhtakia were and are frauds. Gerard ‘t Hooft’s editorship is unethical and very poor. Hehl just rolled out his own theory and deliberately tried to misrepresent. This is the verdict of the overwhelming majority. So if any more e mails arrive from these people I would just complain to the police in your locality. They go behind my back because I blocked them as much as eight years ago. I am proceeding now with a new book written with three co authors, and which is written with an overwhelming vote of confidence from genuine colleagues. If any genuine scientist wishes to ask a genuine question about Cartan’s geometry they are always welcome. There are other geometries of course, but I am not using other geometries, I am using Cartan’s geometry.

Formal Complaints against W. A. Rodrigues

April 16, 2014

There have been many of these down the years by many parties, for example on 4th Dec. 2011 I made a formal complaint to the President of UNICAMP and recorded it on this blog. The latter has been brought into severe disrepute by Rodrigues. Long ago this ceased to be a matter of natural philosophy and became a criminal matter. I do not correspond with or recognize criminals. In my opinion Rodrigues uses hyper abstract mathematics which have little or no meaning. He publishes this worthless material in his own journals, and for many years has used these journals in a defamatory manner. The journal publishers Springer are to be criticised internationally. I base my mathematics on entirely standard Cartan geometry, as is very well known throughout the world. A distinguished barrister employed by my insurance company Norwich Union / Aviva described the activities of Rodrigues and all his company associates as wildly pejorative in a case I brought against them to an Employment Tribunal. I was awarded compensation and having won my case did not go forward to the Tribunal. That was in 2010 and the case is closed. Since then Rodrigues has lied and harassed incessantly, disrupted conferences proposed in my honour, tried to adversely influence the Nobel Prize committee, Sci Topics, wikipedia and so on. This is known in the medical profession as pathological lying or pseudologia fantastica, a psychosis. In my opinion Rodrigues is disturbed, that is pretty clear to all. His activities should be stopped by UNICAMP or the Brazilian police. The antisymmetry of the connection is explained in Proofs One to Five, and in many UFT papers. These proofs and papers have been studied in all the best places for nearly a decade without a single objection from bona fide mathematicians. My mathematics are identical to those of S. M. Carroll. It is important to note that Rodrigues never attacks Carroll, and the latter if attacked would probably not respond. Senior academics do not respond to trolls. So I have no need to give further proof. The antisymmetry of the connection immediately refutes the Einsteinian general relativity as in UFT88, which has been studied for years. So all of this is going to be published in a new book, whose table of contents have been posted on this blog. Rodrigues should just be ignored completely. This is the obvious way to deal with internet trolls.If anything from Rodrigues arrives behind my back , feel free to sent it to me, and I will raise further objections until Rodrigues is finally dismissed or prosecuted. If an economics student like Steve Bannister can understand the proofs, so can all mathematicians, physicists, chemists and engineers of any ability. Rodrigues is a disgusting individual, in that he seized on a normal depression caused by the deaths of my family members to try to brand me as insane. He is the lowest form of life and a product of the gutter. If he came here I would tell him that to his face then phone the police.

Galaxy Rotation Curve

April 16, 2014

Many thanks, this is explained straightforwardly using cylindrical polar coordinates and relativistic synamics in several UFT papers, (for example UFT238 and 238b), without the use of dark matter. Recent experiments have refuted the theory of dark matter, so this is just another adjustable parameter that has failed, UFT238b was recently the subject of an internet conference involving several Austrian and other Universities and has been heavily studied without objection.

In a message dated 16/04/2014 03:12:18 GMT Daylight Time writes:

All stars in practically every galaxy have a constant orbital velocity around the superfluid center a.k.a. black hole of a galaxy, no matter their distances from the center. In other words, all stars orbit at the same unexplainable mysterious speed. This requires different amounts of dark matter for each galaxy, already in enormous amounts, to maintain it’s shape and structure by relativity or gravity theory. Quantized superfluid spin rates are at fixed increments, depending on the atom type and it’s energy level. Astronomers have identified galaxy types having distinctly faster or slower spin rates, which is evidence they are quantized. The faster spinning galaxies have faster star formation rates, with their center warming faster.

Daily Report 14/4/14

April 16, 2014

There were 1810 hits from 474 distinct visits. Spiders from baidu, google, MSN, Softlayer and yandex. Auto1 94, Auto2 31, UFT85 128, UFT88 55, CEFE 51, “Llais” 39, Engineering Model 32, Book of Scientometrics 53, Evans Equations 20, Englynion 19, Animations 21 to date in April 2014. University of Hamburg UFT239, University of Marburg UFT142, The Ohio State University Educational Note Two; University of Utah UFT88; University of Poitiers general; United States Oak Ridge National Laboratory Potential Waves; Mesh Company Japan; Autonomous National University of Mexico Center for Nanotechnology and Nanoscience F3(Sp); Silesian Data Center Poland general; Joint Institutes for Nuclear Research Dubna LCR Resonant; High Energy Physics University of Manchester UFT2. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2014.

Paper Rebutted

April 15, 2014

This is a preprint dated 2011 and is again nonsense or false mathematics. Apparently this preprint has not been published or is just another item that Rodrigues published in his own journal. In this case the rebuttal is contained in proofs one to five and in S. M. Caroll. The commutator of covariant derivative acts on any tensor in any space of any dimension to produce the torsion and curvature simultaneously, as described by Carroll. The torsion is made up of the difference of two connections, the symmetry of the connection is the same as that of the commutator, antisymmetric, quod erat demonstrandum. Nothing can change this conclusion, least of all childish insults delivered behind my back at a safe distance. The pejorative comments all come from Rodrigues, I am exercising my right to self defence against deliberate disinformation. So as in my reply to the Brazilian Embassy he should not be recognized as a scientist. The kind of comments he delivers would have him expelled from any conference or scientific society. The fact that he repeatedly makes false and deeply insulting comments in the medical field means that he is a psychotic, a habitual liar is a kind of psychotic. So how can he be trusted as a scientist? He can fly here and make these comments to my face. I will apprehend him and take him to the nearest police station for an examination in the common law. In addition, Bruhn has been rebutted many times, and Hehl rebutted in UFT89. No one has ever objected to these rebuttals in almost a decade. I have asked several people if they can make sense of the pseudomathematics used by Rodrigues but they cannot. For example L. B. Crowell. S. M. Carroll never mentions Rodrigues, and I use the same mathematics as S. M. Carroll and everyone else. All this is very well known by now, and in the years 2011 to present the remarks by Rodrigues have been rejected by the international community.

Sent: 15/04/2014 20:44:26 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: The Wildly Pejorative Waldyr Rodrigues

Perhaps the blog readers might be more interested in a rebuttal to the attached paper than in the reading of the present exchange of pejorative comments, and it would look as a much more elegant way of silencing this vociferous individual, but of course this is completely up to you…

Regards,

1109.5403v1RebuttalofECEConnectionDecomposition.pdf

My Reply to the Brazilian Embassy

April 15, 2014

This is further evidence of aggravated harassment, my reply to the Brazilian Embassy is final. Rodrigues knows nothing about Cartan geometry or the truth.

r]
Sent: 15 April 2014 10:50
To: Waldyr Alves Rodrigues Jr.
Subject: false statement

Dear truth’s search:

Reluctantly, I feel unfortunately obliged to inform you that in his blog (04/14/2013) Mr. M. W. Evans stated:

….‘’Rodrigues was admonished by a senior barrister as “wildly pejorative”, in awarding me considerable financial compensation out of court, and by legal implication is a product of the lowest kind of gutter, having no scientific credibility. He had falsely accused me of being dangerous and insane, and this disgusted the barrister to the pit of his stomach. I had been sad over the deaths of my parents and some cousins, and loss of my first wife, and this was seized upon by Rodrigues in order to create disinformation. He should also be dismissed from Campinas, and I have complained to Campinas about him’’ ….

I declare here that I never in my life have been admonished by any barrister and I never paid any compensation to Mr. Evans (or to any other person), his statements are false. So he is a liar and/or as stated somewhere suffers from time to time from a delirious state.

Even more, if Mr. Evans can show any valid document proving that I paid to him a given sum of money I immediately will send to him and to any AIAS fellow double that sum.

If someone gave any amount of money to him because of what I wrote, eventually it will be a good idea for all of you who needs money that I will write statements against you. Then you go the Mr. Evans ‘’senior’’ barrister and ask him to obtain a compensation… Of course, I do not want to receive any compensation in doing that.

Moreover, several medical doctors that I know in Brazil and abroad (ten in my own family, including a recently dead brother) never get infuriated by my opinion on Mr. Evans character, particularly to my proved statement that he is a liar and now, with the definitive proof given by his blog article that he suffers from a delirious state of mind.

Please, read with attention the attached document and get your conclusion. If you need additional information, please write to me.

I also declare here that that indeed Mr. Evans made a complaint against me to UNICAMP’S dean of research. He and all other members of the UNICAMP council only laugh a lot, because all know that unfortunately he is no more than a lunatic crackpot.

I also declare that I never act behind the scenes, all I think I write and publish using my name. Moreover, since a long time ago I even did not pay any attention to what Mr. Evans do, but after reading his blog today (after a fellow called my attention) I read many of his last papers and I can again state what I proved on several published papers long ago: Mr. Evans ECE theory is no more than a potpourri of bad use of mathematics and nonsense physics.

To end, here is a proposal which can prove once and for all to anyone if I, Hehl, ´t Hooft and others are right or if he is right. The proposal is:

(i) If Mr. Evans and collaborators want to come to Campinas and make a final examination on differential geometry and are all approved I will pay each one US$ 5000 plus living expenses and the air-tickets.

(ii) If they fail they must pay me only US$ 1 and of course, will pay for their air-tickets and living expenses. Exam’s questions will be formulated in English with translations in Welsh, German, French, Italian, etc…, if required.

(iii) I reserve the right to publish their answers to the exam questions.

Sincerely,

Waldyr Alves Rodrigues, Jr.

Professor of Mathematical Physics

Institute of Mathematics, Statistics and Scientific Computation

IMECC-UNICAMP

Editor-in-Chief “ Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras”

http://www.springer.com/birkhauser/physics/journal/6

walrod or walrod

Home page: http://ime.unicamp.br/~walrod

wxmed11.pdf

Note of Objection to the Brazilian Embassy in London

April 15, 2014

Brazilian Embassy, London

In view of this wildly pejorative conduct by a man called Waldyr Rodrigues of the State University of Campinas I am obliged to make a diplomatic objection to the Brazilian Government, through its London Embassy, with a request that Rodrigues be dismissed for academc misconduct and charged with harassment in the first degree and verbal common assault. I withdraw recognition of him as professor and call for international condemnation of his conduct. He is also suspected of fraud and should not be allowed to work in Britain.

Glyn Eithrym

Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List Pensioner, Scientiae Doctor,
AAIS President
www.aias.us

Nobel and Wolf Prize Nominee

cc Prime Ministers Office.

Sent: 15/04/2014 13:34:13 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: The Wildly Pejorative Waldyr Rodrigues

CC South Wales Police

This is further aggravated harassment in the first degree of Victor Riecansky by Waldyr Rodrigues, containing further defamatory and wildly pejorative comments, easily proven to be false. I have already won a case against his companies and himself out of court. There is a complete record of this case. As I have stated on this blog I obtained compenastion from my insurance company. I have never stated that I obtained compensation from Rodrigues. This is further disinformation by him. Currently there is another court case against his companies. Here Rodrigues describes Cartan geometry as a pot pourri of nonsense. No such person should be a professor of physics because Cartan geometry is entirely standard and has been for ninety years. I will make another strong complaint against him to Campinas, asking again for his dismissal for academic misconduct. He has already brought Campinas into severe disrepute. Colleagues from all over Brazil frequently study my work as everyone knows from the Book of Scientometrics. So Rodrigues is isolated even in his own country. There are other witnesses to the fact that Rodrigues has maligned them and defamed them in a similar manner. This is intolerable and he should be removed from academia. They have both complained to me about his conduct, they are Profs. van der Merwe, Jadczyk and Amoroso. Rodrigues has been responsible for reams of chronic aggravated harassment for many years. He has come under extensive investigation for suspected fraud (attached “Sign of the Times” article ) and is habitually deeply offensive. He specializes in acting behind one’s back, this time to the CISP publisher. This again is aggravated harassment in the first degree. Here he describes me as suffering from a delirious state. This is evidence again for aggravated harassment and a verbal common assault. The attached letter shows that I have never suffered from any psychological illness. Rodrigues has been spreading this disgusting disinformation for many years, so should be dismissed for academic misconduct and also prosecuted for harassment and verbal common assault. The attached doctor’s opinion shows that he is indulging, yet again, in deliberate misinformation. He has never seen me, and has never talked to me, even by telephone. He is a victim of his own bile. The medical profession would describe him as grossly unethical, and although I have no medical qualifications, he appears to be just a little bit peculiar. The SOTT article seems to indicate that he is just a little bit shady too. The compensation was paid to me out of court by my insurance company after a senior barrister found Rodigues and his company to be wildly pejorative. He is even more wildly pejorative now. In my opinion Rodrigues should be removed from his academic position and editorial position. He is known to have indulged in extensive harassment of a Vigier Conference by e mail, with the same old rubbish. I have never taken any notice of Rodrigues’ public ranting, and very little notice of his hyper abstract mathematics. The Cartan geometry I use is the same as that used by everyone else. Only Rodrigues thinks that Cartan geometry is a pot pourri of nonsense and all my work is based directly on Cartan geometry. He is partly responsible for the attacks using Wikipedia article and attacks on Sci Topics. He comes from a country with a long history of fascist dictatorship and it is uncertain whether it is a democracy. The fascist method is to repeat a lie often enough. A complete and comprehensive reply to Hehl is given in UFT89. Who is Hehl anyway? In about seven years there have been no objections to this reply. ‘t Hooft has been dismissed out of hand by the profession, which has read my work abot thirty to fifty million times in the past eleven years. We all know this accurately from scientometrics. I don’t call people names like “crackpot”, but this is a cracked record – Roddy howling to himself by moonlight.
Irrespective of any argument of philosopohy this conduct and wildly pejorative language amonts to a criminal offence : aggravated harassmnet in the first degree and verbal common assault.

Glyn Eithrym

Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List pensioner, Scientia Doctor (Wales)
President AIAS
www.aias.us

Nobel and Wolf Prize Nominee

In a message dated 15/04/2014 12:02:35 GMT Daylight Time

I received this email this morning do not understand why it was sent to me
Regards
Victor
Sent from my iPad Victor Riecansky
Publisher
Cambridge International Science Publishing
www.cisp-publishing.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: “Waldyr Alves Rodrigues Jr.” <walrod>
Date: 15 April 2014 10:50:28 GMT+01:00
To: “Waldyr Alves Rodrigues Jr.” <walrod>
Subject: false statement

Dear truth’s search:

Reluctantly, I feel unfortunately obliged to inform you that in his blog (04/14/2013) Mr. M. W. Evans stated:

….‘’Rodrigues was admonished by a senior barrister as “wildly pejorative”, in awarding me considerable financial compensation out of court, and by legal implication is a product of the lowest kind of gutter, having no scientific credibility. He had falsely accused me of being dangerous and insane, and this disgusted the barrister to the pit of his stomach. I had been sad over the deaths of my parents and some cousins, and loss of my first wife, and this was seized upon by Rodrigues in order to create disinformation. He should also be dismissed from Campinas, and I have complained to Campinas about him’’ ….

I declare here that I never in my life have been admonished by any barrister and I never paid any compensation to Mr. Evans (or to any other person), his statements are false. So he is a liar and/or as stated somewhere suffers from time to time from a delirious state.

Even more, if Mr. Evans can show any valid document proving that I paid to him a given sum of money I immediately will send to him and to any AIAS fellow double that sum.

If someone gave any amount of money to him because of what I wrote, eventually it will be a good idea for all of you who needs money that I will write statements against you. Then you go the Mr. Evans ‘’senior’’ barrister and ask him to obtain a compensation… Of course, I do not want to receive any compensation in doing that.

Moreover, several medical doctors that I know in Brazil and abroad (ten in my own family, including a recently dead brother) never get infuriated by my opinion on Mr. Evans character, particularly to my proved statement that he is a liar and now, with the definitive proof given by his blog article that he suffers from a delirious state of mind.

Please, read with attention the attached document and get your conclusion. If you need additional information, please write to me.

I also declare here that that indeed Mr. Evans made a complaint against me to UNICAMP’S dean of research. He and all other members of the UNICAMP council only laugh a lot, because all know that unfortunately he is no more than a lunatic crackpot.

I also declare that I never act behind the scenes, all I think I write and publish using my name. Moreover, since a long time ago I even did not pay any attention to what Mr. Evans do, but after reading his blog today (after a fellow called my attention) I read many of his last papers and I can again state what I proved on several published papers long ago: Mr. Evans ECE theory is no more than a potpourri of bad use of mathematics and nonsense physics.

To end, here is a proposal which can prove once and for all to anyone if I, Hehl, ´t Hooft and others are right or if he is right. The proposal is:

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>(i) <!–[endif]–> If Mr. Evans and collaborators want to come to Campinas and make a final examination on differential geometry and are all approved I will pay each one US$ 5000 plus living expenses and the air-tickets.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>(ii) <!–[endif]–> If they fail they must pay me only US$ 1 and of course, will pay for their air-tickets and living expenses. Exam’s questions will be formulated in English with translations in Welsh, German, French, Italian, etc…, if required.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>(iii) <!–[endif]–>I reserve the right to publish their answers to the exam questions.

Sincerely,

Waldyr Alves Rodrigues, Jr.

Professor of Mathematical Physics

Institute of Mathematics, Statistics and Scientific Computation

IMECC-UNICAMP

Editor-in-Chief “ Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras”

http://www.springer.com/birkhauser/physics/journal/6

walrod or walrod

Home page: http://ime.unicamp.br/~walrod

adoctorsletter.pdf
alyingbyrodrigues.pdf
aSOTT.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers