M. I. T. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is currently ranked 1st in the world by QS, 3rd by Webometrics and 5th by Times and Shanghai. There have been many consultations of www.aias.us from staff and students from M. I. T. since scientometrics were initiated on 30th April 2004. It was founded in 1861 and is associated with 85 Nobel Laureates and 6 Fields Medallists. It has about ten thousand students and an acceptance rate of 9.7%. It places a high value on meritocracy (as do AIAS / UPITEC and myself) and technical proficiency. Richard Feynman, the theoretical physicist and Nobel Laureate, graduated from there in 1939. UFT88 is the by now famous paper that refutes the geometrical basis of Einsteinian general relativity (EGR). It has been read tens of thousands of times since it was published in 2007, in several hundred of the world’s best universities, often in the top twenty such as M. I. T. The latter is often the world’s number one. AIAS / UPITEC is the world’s number one institute in theoretical physics for its size. UFT88 should be read with UFT99, UFT109, UFT255, UFT313, UFT354 and UFT375, together with many UFT papers that refute EGR in many ways. In the latest research on S2 type star systems, EGR has been quietly abandoned in leading astronomy laboratories worldwide. ECE2 offers a plausible explanation of such star systems as we have just seen in UFT375.
Sent: 23/04/2017 22:19:02 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Final due:May 11,invite submissions for 2017 AMMSA in Beijing,China
2017 International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Statistics Application
With the rapid development of applied mathematics, modelling and statistics, researchers in different fields start to discuss new ideas of those fields. Scholars can exchange their own thought about their own research face to face in AMMSA2017. Conference has attracted scholars in different fields including mathematics, computational, modelling, statistics and so on to attend in Beijing, China on May 21-22, 2017. Submission Submit your papers to ammsa2017 with the email subject “Sub/Author’s Name/Tel“.
Please note that the submission deadline is May 11, 2017.
Peer Review Publication AMMSA2017 have invited many experts in different fields such as mathematics, computational, statistics to be the reviewers. They are from different countries with different culture. All you submissions will be reviewed first by those reviewers with professional opinions. Papers accepted by the reviewers will be published on AISR serieswith ISSN: 1951-6851. All published papers will be submitted for indexing in EI Compendex, CPCI-S, CNKI and Scholar Google. AMMSA2017 also have invited several experts to be the Keynote Speakers to attend the conference and make Keynote Speeches for all attendees. They are from different countries and have received different education. If you attend the conference, it is certain that you will gain a different way of thought to do your related research. Welcome to attend AMMSA2017. Welcome your papers!
与您共同探讨学术领域新发展——2017年应用数学、建模与统计学应用大会 AMMSA2017【www.ammsa2017.org】将于2017年5月21日至22日在中国北京召开。作为用数学、建模与统计学应用领域的主要学术盛会AMMSA2017的使命就是为这一领域的专家、学者和企业界人士提供一个理论研究和成果展示的交流平台以推动应用数学、建模与统计学的发展及应用。 投稿方式 邮箱投稿ammsa2017 文稿评审所有投稿会根据文章主题分配给至少两位专家审稿 截稿时间2017年5月11日
出版检索 大会报告 审稿后被录用的文章将由Atlantis Press出版在Advances in Intelligent Systems Research (ISSN 1951-6851)之上并由出版社提交至EI、CPCI-S、中国知网和谷歌学术检索。 AMMSA2017已经邀请了数位来自世界各地的专家学者作为大会的主题演讲人届时专家会参会并作主题报告期待您的参与 如您有任何疑问欢迎来电咨询+86-13871519230 unsubscribe
This is an impressive piece of work, and I agree that it is worthy of immediate publication. I will do another extensive literature search on this kind of star.
Sent: 23/04/2017 22:34:30 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: UFT 375, section 3, part 1
This is the first part of section 3 investigating the S2 star system. It
is a system of “weak relativity” as pointed out by other researchers
too. The fluid spacetime model for retrograde precession is new and
origninal. I think its physicals basis has already been founded by note
376(1). There is a rotation period of about 20 000 years of the “central
spacetime disk” which perhaps is related to the oscillation of the solar
system with 26 000 years. I did not mention this in the article but at
least the numbers give a consistent picture, if retrograde precession is
The section about the Hulse-Taylor pulsar is still missing, but this
preliminary version is certainly worth an immediate publication.
The second line was whited out, so was not used. It is possible in Eq. (32) to use
partial X double dot / partial X = (partial X double dot / partial t) (partial t / partial X double dot)
and similarly for Y. That introduces a time dependence. The solutions of Eqs. (30) and (31) must also obey Eq. (32). To obtain the simplistic approach is another very good result.
Sent: 23/04/2017 12:36:43 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 376(1): General Theory of Orbital Precession in Fluid Gravitation
I cannot read the second line of eq. (12), there is a manuscript problem.
Eqs.(30-31) are self-contained (2 eqs. for 2 variables), one cannot add a third equation to these. However one can solve the space dependence of (32), obtaining two space fields X dotdot (X,Y) and Y dotdot (X,Y). If these are inserted into (30,31), we get two algebraic equations for X and Y but no time dependence. Perhaps one has to go back to the field equations directly.
PS: my simplistic approach of my last email seems to come out when setting R_X = -X, R_Y = -Y.
Am 23.04.2017 um 12:48 schrieb EMyrone:
This note introduces the richly structured field equations of ECE2. In general, precession is governed by simultaneous solution of Eqs. (18), (19), (21), (22) and (29) to give the orbit. In the limit defined by Eqs. (33) and (34), simultaneous solution of Eqs. (30), (31) and (33) may be enough to give precession by adjusting the parameters a sub X and a sub Y, defined by Eqs. (27) and (28) in terms of Cartesian components of the tetrad and spin connection vectors. These are of course missing from special relativity (flat Minkowski spacetime with no curvature or torsion) and its Newtonian limit, but exist in ECE2 relativity (spacetime with finite curvature and torsion). In my opinion the discovery of retrograde precession in S2 is very important because it signals the end of EGR. Leading astronomers dealing with S2 have abandoned EGR (see paper posted on this blog from the Bogoliubov laboratory and co workers). This type of general ECE2 theory can be applied to any problem considered by Einstein. This task has been has been initiatyed in UFT313 to UFT375 to date. The computer may be able to solve all four field equations (8) to (11) simultaneously for gravitation and also electrodynamics, using Cartesian coordinates, or any coordinates.
This looks like a very good approach. I will study Section 3.
Sent: 23/04/2017 12:01:09 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT376
Concerning fluid dynamics models, my simple approach for the orbital velocity was
r dot –> r dot – v_f bold.
In preceding papers I had used v bold with a plus sign, but then we have the strange situation that retrograde precession goes into direction of negative v_f. With the above change it becomes clear that v_f impacts the precession in direction of v_f. In particular, if the body is at rest in the surrounding medium:
r dot – v_f bold = 0,
we have the usual Newtonian case of a body at rest. Therefore the above approach seems to be the right one.
My use of a rotating vector field v_f is a model for a rotating rigid “spacetime disk” around the central mass. This is a non-relativistic approach, but I checked the disk tangential velocity at the apastron of the S2 star, it is some thousands of kilometers/s, far below light velocity. A correct description would require something like the Lense-Thirring effect, perhaps worth a thought in later papers. I will describe now the detailed numbers in section 3 of UFT 375.
Am 22.04.2017 um 14:30 schrieb EMyrone:
In UFT375, Horst has already succeeded in describing retrograde precession using ECE2 fluid gravitation, which refutes EGR. I think that UFT376 should build on this breakthrough by introducing the field equations and spin connection. I should also continue with a literature search to see if I can find some more retrograde precessions. There is also a need to investigate exactly what is meant by strong field and weak file gravitation. However for S2 like stars, weak gravitation is perfectly adequate.
The wind speed in the Betws area now is 6 mph, not enough to start the giant turbines, and throughout Wales almost no power is being produced by the wind turbines because they need 9 mph to start. Solar is negligible at 1.64% and hydro is also negligible. So the energy demand is still being met almost completely by nuclear and gas. Renewable energy will continue to be a total failure unless hydro is built up and ES and LENR introduced. Nuclear energy is being imported from France at huge cost.
The equivalent of 56,038 printed pages was downloaded (204.313 megabytes) from 1,990 memory files downloaded and 509 distinct visits each averaging 2.8 memory pages and 5 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 28.16, top referrals total 2,228,868, main spiders Google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 1540, Top ten 852, Collected Evans / Morris 726(est), Collected scientometrics 435, F3(Sp) 181, Barddoniaeth 132, Principles of ECE 126, UFT88 115, Collected Eckardt / Lindstrom 114, Autobiography volumes one and two 105, Evans Equations 83, UFT311 62, CV 59, PECE 38, ECE2 36, Self charging inverter 28, Llais 25, CEFE 24, UFT321 20, MJE 19, Idaho 7, UFT313 18, UFT314 31, UFT315 24, UFT316 11, UFT317 16, UFT318 10, UFT319 36, UFT320 16, UFT322 32, UFT323 18, UFT324 23, UFT325 39, UFT326 17, UFT327 22, UFT328 21, UFT329 20, UFT330 15, UFT331 21, UFT332 18, UFT333 13, UFT334 26, UFT335 32, UFT336, 14, UFT337 14, UFT338 14, UFT339 17, UFT340 13, UFT341 25, UFT342 19, UFT343 24, UFT344 32, UFT345 19, UFT346 21, UFT347 51, UFT348 28, UFT349 29, UFT351 40, UFT352 35, UFT353 30, UFT354 41, UFT355 33, UFT356 33, UFT357 30, UFT358 27, UFT359 29, UFT360 15, UFT361 11, UFT362 42, UFT363 28, UFT364 33, UFT365 19, UFT366 36, UFT367 32, UFT368 35, UFT369 34, UFT370 34, UFT371 23, UFT372 23, UFT373 25, UFT374 26, UFT375 2 to date in April 2017. Deusu search engine poetry; Studentergarden College Denmark general, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) UFT88; Pakistan Education and Research Network general; edu Pakistan general. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2017.
This note introduces the richly structured field equations of ECE2. In general, precession is governed by simultaneous solution of Eqs. (18), (19), (21), (22) and (29) to give the orbit. In the limit defined by Eqs. (33) and (34), simultaneous solution of Eqs. (30), (31) and (33) may be enough to give precession by adjusting the parameters a sub X and a sub Y, defined by Eqs. (27) and (28) in terms of Cartesian components of the tetrad and spin connection vectors. These are of course missing from special relativity (flat Minkowski spacetime with no curvature or torsion) and its Newtonian limit, but exist in ECE2 relativity (spacetime with finite curvature and torsion). In my opinion the discovery of retrograde precession in S2 is very important because it signals the end of EGR. Leading astronomers dealing with S2 have abandoned EGR (see paper posted on this blog from the Bogoliubov laboratory and co workers). This type of general ECE2 theory can be applied to any problem considered by Einstein. This task has been initiated in UFT313 to UFT375 to date. The computer may be able to solve all four field equations (8) to (11) simultaneously for gravitation and also electrodynamics, using Cartesian coordinates, or any coordinates.
UCC in the Republic of Ireland is ranked 283 in the world by QS, 344 by webometrics and 351 – 400 by Times. It was founded in 1845 on a site of Finbarr (Fionnbharra, fair headed) 550 – 623 A. D., born Lochan Mac Amergin, Bishop of Cork. It now has 18,000 students and Alumni include Jack Lynch, sometime Taoiseach. UFT88 was written by Horst Eckardt and myself in 2007 and since then is known to have been consulted on www.aias.us tens of thousands of times at several hundred of the world’s best universities. It has probably been read many thousands of times by staff and students worldwide from private computers, and also from www.upitec.org. It refutes the geometrical basis of EGR (Einsteinian general relativity), the second Bianchi identity of 1902. As we have just seen in notes and discussion for UFT375, EGR has been refuted experimentally by retrograde precession in S2. Co author Horst Eckardt has succeeded in producing retrograde precession with ECE2 fluid gravitation. UFT88 should be read with UFT99 and its definitive proofs, UFT109, UFT255, UFT313, UFT354 and many other papers which refute EGR in many definitive ways. EGR has been quietly abandoned by astronomers. Dogmatic claims that EGR is always right are myths.