I have an interest in joining a few chapels and churches of various denominations because they are very important, and should be conserved. I remain a logical agnostic, a scientist.
Rev. Alun Brookfield,
Vicar St, John the Baptist Callwen,
Dear Rev. Brookfield,
I am interested in joining St Callwen and putting up a stone for my grandparents, William John and Gwenllian Evans. Is it possible to purchase a plot for burial for myself in St. Callwen, or to put up a private chapel in the grounds? It looks like a nice place to be buried. I hope to be around for a few years, but you never know. I am an Armiger and Member of the Gentry, descended from the Morgan Aubrey Family. You kindly looked up an entry for Stuart Davies and myself when compiling the attached genealogy, widely regarded as definitive. I am a Welsh speaking Baptist by upbringing but an ecumenical outlook is a good thing. We discussed genealogy some time ago and all the results are on www.aias.us. Many of the Family are interred at Ty’n y Coed and St. Cynog. I am an agnostic, but hedging my bets in the manner of my distant ancestors, the Vikings. The attached book of poetry contains an englyn to my grandparents, who are buried un an unmarked grave. I would like to put up a stone and engrave this englyn on it, and “Gwyn eu byd y rhau addfwyn, canys hwy a etifeddant y ddaear” (Dr William Morgan 1588, 1620). “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth”.
(Dr. M. W. Evans, 50 Rhyddwen Road, Craig Cefn Parc, Swansea SA 5RA).
In this note the reference frames used in Note 371(2) are defined. The mass m orbits a mass M situated at the origin. The spherical polar coordinates are defined, and frame (X, Y, Z) is rotated into frame (1, 2, 3) with the matrix of Euler angles as in Eq. (11). The inverse of this matrix can be used to define r1, r2, and r3 in terms of X, Y, Z. In plane polar coordinates the orbit is a conic section with M at one focus as is well known.The planar elliptical orbit does not precess, but using spherical polar coordinates and Eulerian angles the orbit is no longer planar and precesses.
To Auditor’s Office, Welsh Assembly:
These accounts do not contain any information which show how taxpayers’ money was actually used. I assume that the accounts of Mawr Development Trust can be inspected at Companies House before it went bankrupt, owing creditors a lot of money. We still do not know how much money. Can you send me a copy of the two Audit Documents which severely reprimanded the Community Council in 2011 and again 2015. Your office described the Community Council as having completely failed the electorate, or similar wording. This was widely reported in the media. Subsequently, Cllr. Ioan Richard and others were forced to resign from the Community Council after a meeting in which the electorate voiced its displeasure at extreme overdevelopment. Cllr. Richard has also resigned from the Planning Committee of Swansea County Council and has little or no support in Mawr. I have filed several complaints against Cllr Richard with the Ombudsman’s Office concerning his abusive conduct. I feel that the Community Council should be wound up and Mawr run directly by the Assembly. In view of these auditing irregularities Cllr Richard should resign, they occurred during his tenure as County Councillor. I feel that there should be a fraud investigation.
Myron Evans, Armiger (2008) and Member of the Gentry (Burke’s Peerage and Gentry 2012), Civil List Pensioner (2005).
cc M. P. for Gower,
Sent: 23/02/2017 15:07:22 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Request for Information: Mawr Community Council and Development Trust accounts (IR590)
Dear Dr Evans,
Further to my email of 7 February 2017, I am responding to your request for information of 3 February 2017, which was for:
i) A complete record of accounts for the Mawr Community Council; and
ii) A complete record of accounts for the Mawr Development Trust.
With regard to item (i) of your request, please find attached the accounts we hold for the Mawr Community Council. I have redacted a small amount of information from the documents provided as I consider the exemption under section 40(2) (personal information) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies. This section provides an absolute exemption and applies because disclosure would breach the data protection principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.
We do not hold the accounts of the Mawr Development Trust as this is not an entity which we audit.
If you wish to complain about my handling of your request, please email or write to me.
I must also refer you to section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act under which you may apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision on whether or not your request has been dealt with in accordance with the Act. The Information Commissioner’s contact details are:
Information Commissioner’s Office
Cheshire SK9 5AF
email : casework
Tel: 0303 123 1113
Fax: 01625 524510
You should note, however, that the Information Commissioner would normally expect you to have exhausted our internal complaints procedures before dealing with such an application. Further guidance may be found on the Information Commissioner’s website https://ico.org.uk/
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Cynorthwyydd y Gyfraith a Moeseg / Law and Ethics Assistant
Ffôn / Tel: 029 2032 0552
Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru: www.archwilio.cymru
Wales Audit Office: www.audit.wales
Dilynwch / Follow @WalesAudit Hoffwch ein tudalen / Like us on Facebook Darllenwch ein blog / Read our blog
This email and any attached files is private. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
For further information on the Wales Audit Office and details of other ways to contact us please visit our website at http://www.audit.wales.
The Wales Audit Office welcomes correspondence in Welsh or English and we will respond to you in in the language you have used. Please let us know if you would like to receive future correspondence from us in Welsh. Corresponding in Welsh will not lead to a delay.
If you are attending a meeting at the Wales Audit Office, please let the organiser know if you would like to contribute to the meeting in Welsh and/or if you’d like to receive a Welsh language reception service during your visit.
Mae’r e-bost hwn ac unrhyw ffeiliau atodedig yn breifat. Os nad atoch chi y bwriadwyd anfon yr e-bost hwn dylech ddinistrio pob copi a hysbysu’r anfonwr drwy anfon e-bost yn ôl atynt.
Am fwy o wybodaeth am Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru a manylion am ffyrdd eraill o gysylltu â ni, ewch i’n gwefan http://www.archwilio.cymru.
Mae Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn Gymraeg neu’n Saesneg a byddwn yn ymateb yn yr iaith rydych chi wedi ei defnyddio. Rhowch wybod os yr hoffech dderbyn gohebiaeth gennym yn Gymraeg yn y dyfodol. Ni fydd gohebu’n Gymraeg yn arwain at oedi.
Os byddwch yn mynychu cyfarfod yn Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru, rhowch wybod i’r trefnydd os yr hoffech gyfrannu i’r cyfarfod yn Gymraeg ac/neu os yr hoffech dderbyn gwasanaeth Cymraeg ar y dderbynfa yn ystod eich ymweliad.
This is the usual orbital problem of m attracted by M according to the usual Hooke / Newton inverse square law of force, the concept of force having been proposed by Kepler (Koestler, “The Sleepwalkers” online). The frame (1, 2, 3) is a generalization of the usual frame (plane polar or spherical polar). So in a planar orbit (r, 1, 2, 3) reduces to (r, phi) of the plane polar coordinates, in a three dimensional orbit (r, 1, 2, 3) reduces to (r, theta, phi) of the spherical polar coordinates). So the Eulerian angles are used to define the spin connection matrix in Eq. (10), with omega sub i, i = 1, 2, 3 defined by Eqs. (6) to (8). Therefore the angular velocity expressed in terms of spherical polar coordinates has been re expressed in terms of Eulerian angles as in Note 370(9) and similarly for the spin connection. The Eulerian angles define the rotation from the inertial frame (X, Y, Z) to frame (1, 2, 3). The inertial frame contains only the Newtonian force as you know (no centrifugal or Coriolis forces). In the spherical polar coordinate system r bold = r e sub r, where e sub r is the radial unit vector. In the (1, 2, 3) frame the same r bold is defined as
r bold = r sub 1 e sub 1 + r sub 2 e sub 2 + r sub 3 e sub 3
= r e sub r
= X i + Y j + Z k
Here r bold is the vector joining m and M. So to sum up, everything is expressed in frame (1, 2, 3), giving a huge amount of new information which was of course intractable in the eighteenth century.
Sent: 23/02/2017 10:44:59 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 371(2): Orbital Theory in Terms of Euler Angles
I am not sure if I understand correctly the physical problem to be solved. You have always to discern between the lab and rotating frames. The Lagrangians (1) and (16) are for the rotating frame. So what is r_1, r_2, r_2 in the rotating frame? So far we have considered situations with centre in the rigid body and with a point outside with fixed distance to the centre of the rigid body (gyro with one point fixed). As soon as we relate this to anohter centre of gravity, we obtain additional vectors from the centre of gravity to the centre of rotating frame (1,2,3). I am not sure if eq.(10) is right in this context. We need the complete coordinate transformation to the lab frame and then can define the kinetic energy plus the roational part which is additionally required because of the rigid body.
Am 23.02.2017 um 11:02 schrieb EMyrone:
It is shown straightforwardly in this note that the orbits of a mass m around a mass M in the frame (1, 2, 3) of the Euler angles can be found by solving simultaneously six Euler Lagrange equaions in six Lagrange variables. The problem is far too complicated to be solved by hand but can be solved numerically using Maxima to give twenty one new types of orbit described on page 4. There are nutations and precessions in the Euler angles phi, theta and chi. The usual assumption made in orbital theory is that the orbit is planar. Note carefully that the inverse square law is still being used for the force of attraction between m and M, but the Eulerian orbits contain far more information than the theory of planar orbits. The inverse square law does not give precession of a planar orbit as is well known. However the same inverse square law gives rise to many types of nutation and precession in the twenty one types of orbit described by the Euler angles. This isa completely new discovery, and it should be noted carefully that it is based on classical rotational dynamics found in any good textbook. It could have been defined in the eighteenth century, but orbital theory became ossified in planar orbits. This theory is part of ECE2 generally covariant unified field theory because all of rotational dynamics are described by a spin connection of Cartan geometry. Eq. (10) of this note is a special case of the definition of the Cartan covariant derivative. This is another major discovery. An art gallery full of graphics can be prepared based on these results, of greatest interest are plots of the twenty one types of orbit, looking for precessions of a point in the orbit such as the perihelion.
This plan looks full of interest, giving orbits r(theta), r (phi) and r (beta). There is a lot of interest already in the latest papers as can be seen from the early morning reports.
Sent: 23/02/2017 10:13:07 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Checking Note 371(1), corrigendum Eq. (6).
Ok, the motion in coordinates of r, theta, phi could be computed numerically from eqs.(3-5), and beta could be determined from the additional diff. equation (6). This then gives the constant of motion L which is not known a priori, if we start the solution from the initial conditions. The corresponding argument holds for L_Z.
Am 23.02.2017 um 09:21 schrieb EMyrone:
Many thanks again. This is just a typo, the equation should be the same as Eq. (25) of UFT270. The rest of the note is the same. The great advantage of UFT371 over UFT270 is that Maxima is able to solve all the relevant equations numerically in UFT371, so the laborious hand calculations in UFT270 no longer have to be done. A close control over the use of the computer is still needed of course, but an array of new possibilities opens up. I will proceed now to develop the same problem in terms of the Eulerian angles. ECE2 relativity is still needed of course in other situations, but it would be interesting to see whether classical rotational dynamics gives planetary precessions. That would mean that one of the most famous experiments of Einsteinian general relativity EGR, the precession of the perihelion would be refuted. We have refuted EGR in many ways, and there have been no valid objections to these refutations. The lagrangian (1) of Note 371(1) gives precessions in the angles of the spherical polar coordinates. When Eulerian angles are used, more precessions appear on the classical level. Furthermore, we now know clearly that classical rotational dynamcis are governed by a well defined spin connection of Cartan geometry. Finally, all these calculations can be quantized. Again, Maxima removes all the laborious calculations.
Sent: 22/02/2017 13:48:28 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Note 371(1): Precession of the Perihelion on the Classical Level
Anything seems to go wrong with beta. Inserting beta dot squared from (6) does not give (1), there are additional terms then.
Am 21.02.2017 um 12:31 schrieb EMyrone:
This note looks afresh at the precession of the perihelion by setting up the classical lagrangian (1) and solving Eqs. (3), (4), (5), (9) and (13) simultaneously for the orbit r = alpha / (1 + epsilon cos beta) where beta is defined in Eq. (6). This method is a development of one used originally in UFT270. The power of the Maxima program now allows the relevant equations to be solved for beta in terms of the angles theta and phi if the spherical polar coordinates system. There are precessions in theta and phi. The precession of the perihelion is usually thought of as a precession of phi in a planar orbit, using the incorrect Einsteinian general relativity. In the UFT papers ECE2 relativity has been used to describe the precession. However it may be that it can be described on the classical level with the use of spherical polar coordinates. If this supposition is true, and if Eq. (8) is a precessing ellipse, then other precessions can also be developed in this way. The theory can also be developed with the Eulerian angles. In general there are precessions in theta and phi. There is no reason why an orbit should be planar. In general it must be described by a three dimensional theory.
Sent: 23/02/2017 15:57:17 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: FOR POSTING: New Paper by Douglas Mann
On 2/16/2017 1:25 AM, EMyrone wrote:
the Howard Johnson magnetic motor
The average wind speed in the Betws turbine area is 9 mph now, an effective wind speed of zero, because it takes 9 mph to start the turbines. Wind has collapsed completely again after a brief storm. This shows that the industry is useless and its wild claims are pure, cynical deception (“….for now I see / Peace to corrupt ….” in the words of Milton). So Mynydd y Gwair and Betws should be permanently opposed until they are demolished and all the land stolen from the People of Wales over the centuries returned in a Land Act. Nuclear is flat out, and gas is almost flat out. Coal is approaching maximum capacity because it is a cold morning with heavy demand (now 40.68 gigawatts). A few large tidal turbine lagoons would easily meet this demand until ES (energy from spacetime) comes on line using tens or hundreds of millions of patented Osamu Ide circuits. I hope that LENR will also come online soon.
The equivalent of 91,258 printed pages was downloaded (332.726 megabytes) from 2.752 downloaded memory files (hits) and 506 distinct visits each averaging 4.1 memory pages and 8 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 33.17, top ten referrals total 2,211,875, main spiders google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 1076, Top ten 947, Evans / Morris 726(est), Collected scientometrics 467, F3(Sp) 312, Barddoniaeth 208, Principles of ECE 143, Eckardt / Lindstrom 113(est), Autobiography volumes one and two 95, Collected proofs 84, Engineering Model 80, UFT88 63, Evans Equations 53, PECE 43, UFT311 41, CEFE 41, ECE2 36, Self charging inverter 28, UFT321 22, Llais 19, PLENR 11, UFT313 20, UFT314 18, UFT315 14, UFT316 15, UFT317 28, UFT318 15, UFT319 19, UFT320 15, UFT322 19, UFT323 15, UFT324 16, UFT325 23, UFT326 16, UFT327 16, UFT328 25, UFT329 21, UFT330 13, UFT331 19, UFT332 14, UFT333 19, UFT334 14, UFT335 18, UFT336 12, UFT337 15, UFT338 11, UFT339 11, UFT340 12, UFT341 21, UFT342 11, UFT343 17, UFT344 20, UFT345 14, UFT346 13, UFT347 17, UFT348 14, UFT349 18, UFT351 19, UFT352 25, UFT353 25, UFT354 28, UFT355 15, UFT356 24, UFT357 23, UFT358 17, UFT359 18, UFT360 16, UFT361 13, UFT362 20, UFT363 20, UFT364 23, UFT365 14, UFT366 37, UFT367 39, UFT368 43, UFT369 39, UFT370 21 to date in February 2017. Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics Johannes Kepler University Linz UFT149; Deusu search engine filtered statistics; Cornell University UFT142; University of California Los Angeles UFT146; Laboratory for the Structure, Properties and Modelling of Solids Ecole Centrale Paris (Grande Ecole) UFT331; Dr Pip Nicholas Davies, University College of Wales Aberystwyth Definitive Proof 1. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for February 2017.
It is shown straightforwardly in this note that the orbits of a mass m around a mass M in the frame (1, 2, 3) of the Euler angles can be found by solving simultaneously six Euler Lagrange equations in six Lagrange variables. The problem is far too complicated to be solved by hand but can be solved numerically using Maxima to give twenty one new types of orbit described on page 4. There are nutations and precessions in the Euler angles phi, theta and chi. The usual assumption made in orbital theory is that the orbit is planar. Note carefully that the inverse square law is still being used for the force of attraction between m and M, but the Eulerian orbits contain far more information than the theory of planar orbits. The inverse square law does not give precession of a planar orbit as is well known. However the same inverse square law gives rise to many types of nutation and precession in the twenty one types of orbit described by the Euler angles. This is a completely new discovery, and it should be noted carefully that it is based on classical rotational dynamics found in any good textbook. It could have been defined in the eighteenth century, but orbital theory became ossified in planar orbits. This theory is part of ECE2 generally covariant unified field theory because all of rotational dynamics are described by a spin connection of Cartan geometry. Eq. (10) of this note is a special case of the definition of the Cartan covariant derivative. This is another major discovery. An art gallery full of graphics can be prepared based on these results, of greatest interest are plots of the twenty one types of orbit, looking for precessions of a point in the orbit such as the perihelion.