There was very intense international interest in ECE2 theory, we are going to shatter the record interest of July 2017 by a wide margin. The ECE2 papers and books are being read today at the rate of 89,547 times a year from combined sites www.aias.us and www.upitec.org.. Note carefully that half of all standard model papers in physics are not read at all. This fact can be looked up by Google. From the world’s top twenty universities there were consultations from MIT, Texas A and M, Univ Pennsylvania and Tokyo. August is a quiet month, most universities are geared down for the long vacation.

## Book of Sceintometrics Vol. Two Updated to 15/8/17

August 17, 2017## Checking UFT385

August 17, 2017Agreed that this is true, but for the static dipole electric field for example, a spin connection vector omega and a vector potential A were calculated numerically from the antisymmetry laws. The magnetic field on the ECE2 level is:

B = curl A – omega x A

It is known that curl A is zero, but is omega x A zero and is del omega x A zero? For electrostatics the requirements are:

curl E = 0

partial B / partial t = 0

del B = 0

partial E / partial t = 0

del E = rho / eps0

curl B = mu0 J

So the check I had in mind is to compute omega x A. If this is zero then all is well, but if it is not zero, there is a magnetic flux density present. It must obey the Gauss Law del B = 0, i .e. we must have

del omega x A = 0

If this is not true, the antisymmetry equations must be solved with B = 0 as in my original method. This was based on B = 0. this ensures that del B = 0 , curl B = 0. Electrostatics is defined by curl E = 0, so the Faraday law of induction implies that partial B / partial t = 0. Electrostatics does not mean the absence of a magnetic field in general, and in general J is not zero if there is a magnetiic flux density present .

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 16/08/2017 18:21:45 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Final Checks of UFT385, please hold off postingI checked for the E dipole field (3) that

div E = 0

curl E = 0is fulfilled in spherical as well as cartesian coordinates.

Since B (eq.17) only differs from E by constant factors, it also holdsdiv B = 0

curl B = 0.Hope this solves the question.

Horst

Am 16.08.2017 um 17:42 schrieb EMyrone:

I would like to ask Dave to hold off posting UFT385 until a couple more checks have been made as follows

1) It must be checked that del B = 0 when solving the set of antisymmetry equations, and it must be checked numerically whether or not curl B = 0. If not then the onl y possible solution must be Eqs. (8) to (10) combined with B = curl A – omega A = 0, i.e. B = 0 for a static electric dipole field.

To: EMyrone

Sent: 13/08/2017 14:28:03 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: final calculation of vector spin connectionsIn the last version I sent over it looked strange that the X and Y

components look different in symmetry, although the E and A field have a

symmetry in these components. Therefore I used the full set of

antisymmetry eqs. (8-10) of note 385(1). Then the right symmetry comes

out for both cases of the scalar spin connection, see eqs. o48 and o54.

The reason could be that eq. (7) in note 385(1) holds for a different

vector potential “A_B” while for an electric dipole the electric “A_E”

enters eq.(1). So we cannot use the simplifications inferred by (7) and

have to use the original antisymmetry set for “A_E”.Horst

## Wolf Prize Letter of Support from UPITEC President Dr. Horst Eckardt

August 17, 2017Many thanks indeed for this letter of support. The letter of support from Dr. Doug Lindstrom has arrived, and when the letter from Dr. Steve Bannister arrives, the material can be collected and ordered, and submitted by the Nominator, Dr. Gareth Evans, by e mail to the Wolf Foundation. It consists of the material for the nomination form, three support letters and the support letter from Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe rolled over from a previous Wolf Prize nomination. All these nominations are recorded in Marquis Who’s Who, and have established ECE theory as the mainstream physics of the ECE School of Thought. At the 1927 Solvay Conference, physics split into two the Copenhagen and Einstein de Broglie Schools of Thought. The latter has developed into the ECE School of Thought. The Standard Model has remained essentially stagnant since 1927, surprising as this may seem. All the major advances of the past fifteen years have been made by the ECE School of Thought – van der Merwe’s post Einsteinian paradigm shift.

## Daily Report 15/8/17

August 17, 2017The equivalent of 119,218 printed pages was downloaded (434.646 megabytes) from 2,269 downloaded memory files (hits) and 509 distinct visits each averaging 3.4 memory pages and 7 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 52.54, top referrals total 2,281,622, main spiders Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 1840, Top ten 573, Collected Evans Morris 495(est), Collected scientometrics 332, Barddoniaeth (Collected poetry) 174, F3(Sp) 147, Collected Eckardt Lindstrom 113, Principles of ECE 109, Evans Equations 85, Autobiography volumes one and two 83, UFT88 49, Engineering Model 48, MJE 44, PECE2 37, CV 36, PECE 30, UFT311 29, PLENR 30, 83Ref 20, CEFE 29, SCI 27, UFT321 26, Llais 25, ADD 22, UFT313 18, UFT314 28, UFT315 37, UFT316 15, UFT317 34, UFT318 14, UFT319 31, UFT320 24, UFT322 25, UFT323 19, UFT324 34, UFT325 28, UFT326 15, UFT327 11, UFT328 28, UFT329 22, UFT330 14, UFT331 29, UFT332 25, UFT333 19, UFT334 21, UFT335 30, UFT336 16, UFT337 10, UFT338 18, UFT339 14, UFT340 24, UFT341 29, UFT342 17, UFT343 28, UFT344 27, UFT345 22, UFT346 29, UFT347 41, UFT348 39, UFT349 18, UFT351 24, UFT352 35, UT353 30, UFT354 48, UFT355 35, UFT356 26, UFT357 29, UFT358 34, UFT359 26, UFT360 23, UFT361 24, UFT362 29, UFT363 46, UFT364 36, UFT365 27, UFT366 37, UFT367 29, UFT368 36, UFT369 33, UFT370 29, UFT371 31, UFT372 25, UFT373 31, UFT374 38, UFT375 16, UFT376 14, UFT377 22, UFT378 26, UFT379 18, UFT380 22, UFT381 14, UFT382 39, UFT383 28, UFT384 28 to date in August 2017. Mathematics and Physics Charles University Prague general; Physics Free University Berlin UFT249; University of California Irvine UFT142; Univeristy of California Santa Barbara UFT2; Creanova Finland Overview, edu System Pakistan general; Parliament of the Solomon Islands UFT107. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for August 2017.

## Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us – August 2017 – URL

August 17, 2017## Final Checks of UFT385, please hold off posting

August 16, 2017I would like to ask Dave to hold off posting UFT385 until a couple more checks have been made as follows. It must be checked that del B = 0 when solving the set of antisymmetry equations, and it must be checked numerically whether or not curl B = 0. If not then the only possible solution must be Eqs. (8) to (10) combined with B = curl A – omega A = 0, i.e. B = 0 for a static electric dipole field. The different symmetry of X and Y components is the result of correct algebra.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 13/08/2017 14:28:03 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: final calculation of vector spin connectionsIn the last version I sent over it looked strange that the X and Y

components look different in symmetry, although the E and A field have a

symmetry in these components. Therefore I used the full set of

antisymmetry eqs. (8-10) of note 385(1). Then the right symmetry comes

out for both cases of the scalar spin connection, see eqs. o48 and o54.

The reason could be that eq. (7) in note 385(1) holds for a different

vector potential “A_B” while for an electric dipole the electric “A_E”

enters eq.(1). So we cannot use the simplifications inferred by (7) and

have to use the original antisymmetry set for “A_E”.Horst

## FOR POSTING: Refusal of Authors to Give Permission to Stephen Crothers

August 16, 2017This petulant and grossly unethical refusal by authors to give Stephen Crothers permission to reproduce figures in volume two of Principles of ECE is a pathetic and intellectually dishonest effort at censorship. In nearly fifty years as a professional I have never seen such an ugly incident before. It is petulant because they cannot answer numerous devastating criticisms by co author Stephen Crothers and by Professor Robitaille, who has shown that big bang and black hole theory violate the zero’th, first and second laws of thermodynamics. Today’s scientometrics show that the ECE theory is sweeping the world of science. I strongly recommend that Stephen’s work be read in ECE2. Its preliminary version is UFT366, excellently collated by Horst Eckardt. I also recommend Steve’s chapter in UFT350 and in the publications section, volume one of “Principles of ECE”. The attached document on eighty three refutations of Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) is being read regularly around the world. So EGR is completely riddled with errors and is as obsolete as yesterday’s melted snow. I have also witnessed Steve being subjected to a vicious verbal common assault by a senior level academic, and to the usual disinformation and defamation by wikipedia. The latter has committed a criminal offence under the malicious communications act by using the language of the gutter. It is a criminal offence to send grossly offensive communications. It seems that a great majority of scientists are starting to reject the standard physics. Those who respond with abuse and censorship are finished. I recommend that Steve describe the figures in words, or redraw them so they do not violate copyright. Strenuous efforts were of course made to censor “Principles of ECE”, which has been read many tens of thousands of times in a couple of years, entirely without criticism . One cannot stop the march of ideas (Victor Hugo). There is a new generation of scientists which demands recognition and intellectual honesty

## FOR POSTING: UFT385 Sections 1 and 2 and Background Notes

August 16, 2017This is a paper that demonstrates that the electric dipole field of electrostatics conserves antisymmetry. In general the same method can be used to show that any static electric field strength conserves antisymmetry. The conservation of antisymmetry is a new fundamental law of physics, as fundamental as conservation of energy / momentum or charge / current density. The same method can be used to show that any static magnetic flux density in regions where the current density is vanishingly small conserves antisymmetry. The antisymmetry laws are solved numerically by Dr. Horst Eckardt and give the spin connections or “vacuum structure”.

## Record Interest in ECE2 in August 2017

August 16, 2017The record set last month (July 2017) is going to be completely shattered. The current rate of readings of ECE2 papers and books is 90,416 a year from combined sites www.aias.us and www.upitec.org. This is timely for the Wolf Prize nominations. The nominator is Gareth Evans, who has known my work in detail for forty three years. The referees or supporters are Horst Eckardt, Doug Lindstrom and Steve Bannister, and there is an additional support letter from Alwyn van der Merwe, the eminent physics editor and Emeritus in the University of Denver. It should be emphasizedthat a million book equivalents are downloaded every year from combined sites, www.aias.us and www.upitec.org, and that our impact in terms of page views per month per author is by far the highest in the world for any institute or any university. The second in line is M. I. T., a long way behind. There are many excellent people worthy of a Wolf Prize (second to the Nobel Prize), but with all due respect to them, none has this record. Currently I am the most prolific theoretical and chemical physicist in the world. So the work has world leading impact and productivity, as measured by accurate and comprehensive scientometrics over fifteen years. It is a challenge to the standard model for which these prizes are usually given, and a radical challenge to the conservative system of physics.

## For Nominator: Wolf Prize Letter of Support from Alwyn van der Merwe

August 16, 2017Unless Professor Emeritus Alwyn van dere Merwe indicates anything to the contrary, this letter can be forwarded this year to the Wolf Prize Committee. His magnificent letter of support was primarily responsible for my life appointment as Civil List Pensioner in February 2005.

150728. LETTER OF SUPPORT: WOLF PRIZE.

Dear Professors Myron Evans and Gareth Evans,

Would it be OK if I simply amend my earlier letter of support as follows:

Candidate: Prof. Dr. Myron Wyn Evans

Supporter: Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe, Dept. of Physics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

I should like to support the nomination of Professor Myron Evans for the

Wolf Prizein the strongest possible terms for Chemistry. Physics, and Mathematics. I am familiar with Myron’s work, ever since I, as founding Editor-in-Chief of both Plenum Press’sFoundations of Physics Lettersand Kluwer Academic’s monograph seriesFundamental Theories of Physics(nowadays continued by Springer),published his early papers and books on his discovery of B(3) (nominated by Jean-Pierre Vigier and others for the Nobel prize) and his ECE (Einstein-Cartan-Evans) theory, always on the recommendation of three referees. Since that time enormous strides has been made, by Professor Evans and his colleagues at the Alpha Institute of Advanced Studies, with the development of his ECE theory in physics and chemical physics. Their findings have been chronicled in more than 305 papers at the website www.aias.us, which has been downloaded and studied tens of million times—a breathtaking statistic—by scientists at the top universities all over the world.Professor Evans has been the recipient of the D.Sc. degree (1978), when he was 27 (a world record), the Harrison Memorial Prize (1978) and the Meldola Medal (1979) of the Royal Society of Chemistry, and was awarded a Civil List Pension in 2005 by the British government. It would be eminently fitting to award him the Wolf Prize in support of his ongoing trail-blazing work on the ECE theory and related areas in chemical physics for the benefit of mankind.