This theory uses the same set of equations as for the dark star dynamics of the previous note, under the conditions (5) and (6). The conventional theory of light deflection is given in the Newtonian limit, and the by now well known limit of transforming the Newtonian result to the experimental result, without using the Einstein field equation. Light deflection in m theory was developed in UFT419, but the aim of this note is to use the full set of equations available, because the results of 438(3) are so interesting and startlingly original. Clearly, when a photon approaches a dark star it will be captured, and not just deflected. After being captured it is permanently trapped. In the usual theory of light grazing an object of mass M the hyperbolic trajectory is slightly deflected. There is a need to compute all the conic section orbits from m theory: ellipse, circle, hyperbola and parabola. To date only the ellipse has been considered.

## UFT88 Consulted Again at Imperial College London

April 29, 2019Imperial is ranked 8 in the world by QS, 9 by Times, 24 by Shanghai and 59 by Webometrics. It was chartered in 1907 and has a 7.51% acceptance rate. There is a well established ECE School of Thought at Imperial, there have been many consultations over the past fifteen years. UFT88 has been read many times from Imperial. It has probably been read many more times by staff and students using private computers which cannot be identified. Hinshelwood, Salam, Fleming, Blackett, Higgs, and Thomas Huxley are a few of those associated with Imperial. UFT88 is read frequently at the best universities in the world, and Imperial is one of those. UFT88 is so popular because it corrects the geometry on which the Einstein field equation is based, the 1902 second Bianchi identity (Caroll online notes). UFT88 gradually developed into the JCE identity of UFT313. This is completely different from the second Bianchi identity, so the Einstein field equation cannot be correct. In consequence the predictions of the Einstein field equation begin to go wildly wrong when tested rigorously enough, and it has been replaced by the powerful m theory. For example the Einstein field equation fails completely to give the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy and is wrong by an order of magnitude when considering the precession of the S2 star system. Horst Eckardt, Douglas Lindstrom myself have shown in many ways that torsion modifies geometry extensively. For example in chapter one of “Principles of ECE”. The establishment of standard physics is implicitly heavily criticized for failing to admit that the Einstein theory is obsolete. One academic was obliged to apologize after his gutter abuse of the leading scholar Stephen Crothers was reported in a newspaper. The obsolete establishment is quilty of rigging wikipedia against ECE theory, and its fringe elements are guilty of outright abuse. In consequence physics has become democratic in nature and there is no longer an anthropomorphic establishment, there is Nature.

## Plans for the Rest of UFT438

April 29, 2019These are to define the equations of motion of m theory for a photon of very tiny but identically non-zero mass in the vicinity of an object M. As M becomes very large an entirely new and original theory can be worked out of how a photon is captured by a dark star. It would be very interesting to see what happens at the event horizon.

## Daily Webalizer Report 27/4/19

April 29, 2019The equivalent of 347,230 printed papers was downloaded (1.266 gigabytes) from 2,749 memory files downloaded (hits) and 414 distinct visits each averaging 6.0 memory pages and 13 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 126,31, top referrals total 2,699,683, 55.3% spiders mainly from Amazon, Baidu, Google, and MSN. Apple Inc. spidering; Sony Network Communications Japan general; Internet Census general; Imperial College London UFT88. Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.

## UFT88 Read Again at the University of Copenhagen

April 28, 2019Copenhagen is ranked 29 in the world by Shanghai, 73 by QS, 79 by webometrics and 116 by Times. It was founded in 1479 and has over forty thousand students. There is an ECE School of Thought there, the filtered statistics section of www.aias.us record many visits over fifteen years daily. Notable Alumni include Tycho Brahe, Niels Bohr and Aage Bohr. UFT88 is the classic refutation of the Einstein field equation through use of torsion. UFT88 gradually reached its final form in UFT313, the JCE identity or second Bianchi identity corrected for torsion. The Einstein field equation is based directly on the torsionless second Bianchi identity, so is completely incorrect. This is a fact of geometry which has gradually gained complete acceptance without any reference to the standard model establishment. UFT88 and its acceptance as recorded in the attached survey is the best antidote to the media noise about black holes, because black holes are inferred from the completely incorrect Einstein field equation. I can record only public domain URL’s but other scientometric data such as the monthly reports show that the attached amounts to only about 5% of the total interest. It is seen that the interest exists in the best universities in the world.

## Beware of Media Propaganda

April 27, 2019I will remind the readership regularly to ignore half witted media propaganda, which is easy to post these days without any control. It saturates the media with crass rubbish, making a pig’s breakfast out of physics. John Michell could not have inferred black holes because he used Newtonian theory. It sometimes gets right historical facts, for example that Michell’s visitors included Benjamin Franklin and Joseph Priestley, but persists in attributing to him black hole theory. A casual glance at Carroll’s online notes will show that black hole theory is based on the Einstein field equation, now thoroughly obsolete. The m theory is a new and powerful theory. UFT88 is alone sufficient to shred the Einsteinian dogma.

## Detailed Trajectory of a Photon in m Theory

April 27, 2019Many thanks. To give a rough first answer to the question on why a central mass evolves, these data show that a mass m is captured by a dark star, so over time the mass of the dark star becomes larger and larger as it captures more and more objects. It is possible to use the same set of equations to study the trajectory of a photon of mass m captured by a dark star, or in orbit around a smaller mass M than that of a dark star. In the next note I will develop the theory of the trajectory of a photon of mass m in the vicinity of a dark star of mass M. In that problem m << M, for any M. Horst’s code is so powerful that it can be applied to any problem with the production of many new results. The standard dogmatists have not advanced in fifty years. In fact, according to Hawking’s rejection of black holes in 2013 / 2014, they have gone backwards. The photon mass m is very tiny but as I showed in 1991 with the discovery of the B(3) field, is identically non zero. Vigier pointed out the connection between B(3) and photon mass.

Fascinating results – congratulations both!!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

## Graphics for Dark Star Theory

April 27, 2019These results are full of new information that is not available in any other theory, and are excellently presented by co author Horst Eckardt in such a way as to show what happens when the central mass becomes very large, but not infinite. I think that Rev. John Michell would have been astounded by these results if they were available in 1783, so would his colleagues Henry Cavendish and Benjamin Franklin, and in an earlier era Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. The m theory is based on the most general spherically symmetric space and produces wholly unexpected and original results, without restricting the m function to 1 – r0 / r (Einstein result). The rosetta orbits are indicative of a large precession, and finally m fuses with M. Of particular interest is the analysis of the event horizon in m theory. The Newtonian theory gives no indication at all of the wealth of information contained in m theory. All astronomical data gathered in a futile attempt to find black holes can now be used to apply m theory to dark stars. We are now in a position where we are way out in front of the field and can produce new information of great profundity on almost any topic in astronomy and cosmology.

## UFT88 Consulted at the Institute of Mathematics in Goettingen

April 27, 2019Goettingen is ranked 216 by webometrics, 123 by Times, 197 by QS and 99 by Shanghai. It was founded in 1734 by George II, King of England, and Elector of Hanover. It has 31,500 students, and is associated with Heine, Goethe, Planck, Heisenberg, Gauss, Riemann, Dirichlet, Oppenheimer, von Neumann, Noether, Teller, Sommerfeld, Wiechert and J. P. Morgan. UFT88 is the classic refutation of the Einstein field equation by incorporating torsion into the 1902 second Bianchi identity, inferred in an era when torsion was unknown. UFT88 gradually evolved into UFT313, the JCE identity. This is completely different in structure from the second Bianchi identity so any equation of physics based on the latter is wildly incorrect. In consequence the UFT series of papers has refuted the Einstein field equation in almost a hundred ways. Crothers, Robitaille and others have also revealed major flaws in the standard model. The attached survey represents about 5% of the interest in UFT88. It has been read about fifty thousand times since it was published about a decade ago. Goettingen is a famous enlightened university.

## Effect of increasing central mass in m theory

April 26, 2019The results of m theory seem to make good sense, and I look forward to seeing the graphics. The superluminal aspect is also very interesting. The m theory goes far beyond Newton, which for M approaching infinity gives alpha goes to 0, r goes to zero, phi dot (angular velocity of the orbit) goes to infinity for all epsilon. and orbital time goes to zero. So according to Newton and Michell these are the properties of an object captured by M goes to infinity. One can forget “black holes”, they are diametrically opposite in philosophy to m theory and to ECE and ECE2 because they contain no torsion. All of ECE is based on torsion and curvature.

Very interesting. So, it stops moving and adds its mass to the dark star with no means of escape. This is matter aggregating at the astronomical level. It does not just “disappear”, however, down an bottomless “black hole”.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

## The Original Physics of the Dark Star

April 26, 2019I think that m theory has already given a much clearer picture of the dynamics, described in the orbit equations of m theory and Horst’s latest computations. The white ring also comes out of ECE theory as described here. Rosetta orbits appeared in our work on fractal conic sections, they then evolved into very intricate structures. Following Horst’s note of this morning it is now known how a dark star captures an object, initially at superluminal velocities which fall to zero when the object merges with the dark star. All of this comes out of the orbit equations of m theory. By definition, the hamiltonian and angular momentum are conserved. The m theory keeps on giving completely original and wholly unexpected results, and it already has a large and first class readership.

Sean,

what we see is certainly a white ring. There is no direct evidence that the star should have a rotating ring structure but this could possibly be modeled. Such models exist n elementary particle physics (alternative proton models). The observed radiation of the ring (in RF range) can probably be explained by hydrodynamic effects, with a rotating spacetime which is also responsible for the formation of spiral galaxies. The additional effects of radiational deflection have already been explained in an early ECE paper. You whould be aware that the picture shown to the public is a “translation” from Gigahertz ratiation to an optical image.

Horst

Am 26.04.2019 um 06:44 schrieb Sean:

Myron,

I wonder if the anomaly in the photo is a dark star or possibly a ring like the rings of Saturn without a central planet perhaps due to a whirlpool type of formation in spacetime or in a spinning electromagnetic field with charged dust particles?. Are we looking at a dark star or a white ring?

Sean

On April 25, 2019 at 5:05:35 AM, Myron Evans (myronevans123) wrote:

Calculations of Escape Velocity from a Dark Star

The m theory, special relativity and Newtonian theories all show that once an object of mass m is captured by a dark star it cannot escape. It is also shown that the Einstein field equation’s Schwarzschild metric gives zero escape velocity which is total nonsense. This shows how dangerous it is to swallow media propaganda uncritically, especially Wikipedia, and why I never read the newspapers. Since light can never escape a dark star, a dark star cannot be photographed.

## Effect of increasing central mass in m theory

April 26, 2019Model Calculations, Rosetta Structures and Superluminal Fall into the Very Large Mass

This looks wholly new and unexpected, the rosetta structures could be looked for in spiral galaxies. This is excellent work, and full of interest. I guess that once it arrives at the centre of the dark star with zero velocity, it does not have any means of escaping. These are very interesting results.

I did some model calculations. I enlarged the central mass while initial conditions of the orbiting mass remained the same. The orbit changes from a precessing ellipse to rosetta structures. Then the orbiting mass falls into the centre with superluminal velocity but decelerates and arrives with zero velocity.

I will send over some graphics next.

Horst

Von meinem Samsung GerÃ¤t gesendet.e

## The Evolution of a Dark Star

April 25, 2019This can also be worked out and gravitational collapse is familiar in the solar system, in the rings of Saturn. In fact all the planets are due to a kind of gravitational collapse of matter originally thrown out by the sun. Wikipedia is already distorting the work of John Michell severely and cynically by describing it as black hole theory. It is obviously nothing of the kind. This bounces off the professionals and intellectuals, or those with common sense, but it may deceive the gullible or those who want to be deceived. There is a hysterical need to observe the unobservable, probably because of big money. Michell died long before the Einstein field equation appeared in 1915, and obviously did not infer black holes. This idea was rejected by Einstein in 1939, and by Hawking in 2014. The name “dark star” is due to Michell. The attached survey of the overwhelmingly positive reception to UFT88 has finished off black hole theory. Indirect indications of dark stars could probably be observed. The most advanced theory of gravitation at present is m theory, so it can be tested with astronomical data in the vicinity of a dark star.

## Calculations of Escape Velocity from a Dark Star

April 25, 2019The m theory, special relativity and Newtonian theories all show that once an object of mass m is captured by a dark star it cannot escape. It is also shown that the Einstein field equation’s Schwarzschild metric gives zero escape velocity which is total nonsense. This shows how dangerous it is to swallow media propaganda uncritically, especially Wikipedia, and why I never read the newspapers. Since light can never escape a dark star, a dark star cannot be photographed.

## Escape Velocity in m Theory

April 25, 2019The next stage of UFT438 is to calculate the escape velocity in m theory to see if light can ever escape from a dark star. Progress in m theory has been so rapid that it would be useful to have a chapter on it in Horst’s new textbook. It is important to note that torsion is correctly considered in all the 750 or so UFT papers and books. Eventually it would be very useful to have all the papers translated into classical Spanish, then there would be about 880 papers and books produced since 2003. These are very good quality translations produced by hand. Machine translations are still not very good, but may have progressed to the point where the websites www.aias.us and www.upitec.org could be machine translated into any language.

## Resonant Vacuum Force

April 24, 2019The m theory explanation is based on UFT417 ff. and the vacuum force from the lagrangian. Under well defined conditions the vacuum force goes to infinity, and this is described in detail in UFT417 ff. This is a generally covariant explanation (general relativity), because m theory is a theory of general relativity. All these papers are already well studied. This can be seen from the filtered statistics section of www.aias.us, so the standard modellers are talking to themselves, they do not have any impact on the professionals, but can make the general public unlock their wallets for another dose of dogma. They can make captive students regurgitate dogma.

## Apparatus of the Cavendish Experiment actually built by John Michell

April 24, 2019Agreed, there is also the vacuum particle of UFT338 and UFT339. In those papers the mass of the universe was worked out in terms of the vacuum particle. There are very few standard physicists left, and they talk to themselves, carefully ignoring www.aias.us. If there is a dark star at the centre of every galaxy, such as a whirlpool galaxy, it is the result of evolution and gravitational dynamics described by m theory (e.g. UFT419, which applies m theory to a whirlpool galaxy). I would say that at some stage the gravitational pull at the centre becomes so large that light cannot escape. I think that Poincare, de Broglie and Vigier did a great deal of work on photon mass as the origin of the mass of the universe. The only thing missing about standard modellers is common sense.

## Constant m Orbits

April 24, 2019Coming too near a dark star is like stepping in to a coal pit. Any self consistent numerical method can be used and your method looks very promising.

Constant m Orbits

I like the name “dark star”. There was a Russian SciFi film in the sixties where a spaceship came near to a dark star. The star was only visible by hiding the view to other stars and nebulae behind the object. Unfortunately the star had a devastating effect on the crew…

Coming back to notes 438(1,2): I found that with the parameters of the S2 star it is quite difficult to keep closed orbits when changing the central mass. One has to search new initial conditions for each parameter set, and numerical stability limits are quickly reached when increasing the central mass. Since we are planning to study different effects as

– relativistic vs. Newtonian theory

– constant and non-constant m functions

it seems to make more sense to use a model system with unified parameters. This will also give more numerical stability.

Am 23.04.2019 um 12:35 schrieb Myron Evans:

Constant m Orbits

These are defined by Eqs. (1) and (2) and when solved give a precessing orbit. In the particular case m = 1 they give the precessing orbits of special relativity. It would be very interesting to investigate the properties of the precession as M becomes infinite and the dark star is formed. I use Michel’s appellation “dark star” (1783). For different values of constant m the orbit departs more and more from special relativity because it is an orbit of generally covariant m theory. The complete orbit equations are Eqs. (7) and (8) of Note 438(1). It would be very interesting to investigate what happens to the orbit as M approaches infinity and the dark star is formed. It is already known that the complete orbit equations spark off new physics of many different kinds. In order not to waste the astronomical data on the fictitious “black holes” they can be reinterpreted in terms of the dark star and m theory. The unhealthy obsession or fixation on black holes is due to the fact that funding depends on finding them, even though they do not exist. The same type of idee fixe is present in the obsessions about the Higgs boson and gravitational radiation. This is the age hold habit of forcing nature into anthropomorphic preconceptions – the opposite of Baconian science.

## Apparatus of the Cavendish Experiment actually built by John Michell

April 23, 2019The apparatus of the Cavendish experiment in gravitation was actually built by Michell, but he died before he could use it. Cavendish was a son of the Duke of Devonshire so could have used his influence to get hold of the apparatus. Cavendish was a good experimenter but he did not give credit to Michell. The “official” history of physics is riddled with such lies and distortions. The media are now trying to claim that Michell inferred black holes and that he was a forgotten genius. The truth is that Michell used Newtonian dynamics, and could not have inferred black holes. The latter are produced by the well refuted Einstein field equation, and amount to mathematical nonsense. Crothers has often pointed out many errors in the propaganda of standard physics. The bottom line is that governments should not fund black holes, they should try to stop millions from dying from hunger every year. Every aspect of standard model teaching is now rejected as soon as it is taught.

## Constant m Orbits

April 23, 2019These are defined by Eqs. (1) and (2) and when solved give a precessing orbit. In the particular case m = 1 they give the precessing orbits of special relativity. It would be very interesting to investigate the properties of the precession as M becomes infinite and the dark star is formed. I use Michel’s appellation “dark star” (1783). For different values of constant m the orbit departs more and more from special relativity because it is an orbit of generally covariant m theory. The complete orbit equations are Eqs. (7) and (8) of Note 438(1). It would be very interesting to investigate what happens to the orbit as M approaches infinity and the dark star is formed. It is already known that the complete orbit equations spark off new physics of many different kinds. In order not to waste the astronomical data on the fictitious “black holes” they can be reinterpreted in terms of the dark star and m theory. The unhealthy obsession or fixation on black holes is due to the fact that funding depends on finding them, even though they do not exist. The same type of idee fixe is present in the obsessions about the Higgs boson and gravitational radiation. This is the age hold habit of forcing nature into anthropomorphic preconceptions – the opposite of Baconian science.

## Rev. John Michell 1724 to 1793

April 23, 2019He inferred the dark star in a paper to Trans. Royal Society, 27th Nov., 1783. The cynically deceptive and evil media propaganda of wikipedia equates a dark star with a black hole. This is total nonsense, a dark star is Newtonian, a black hole is a particular solution of the incorrect Einstein field equation. Wikipedia does a lot of harm to physics, and is known to try to destroy careers and theories. So it is immediately rejected by real scientists, and completely rejected by the ECE School of Thought. I am carefully censored from Wikipedia at my own request, but I am well known throughout the world of science. My colleagues at AIAS / UPITEC are also censored by Wikipedia but are also very well known. The famous UFT88 (attached) is alone a complete refutation of black holes. All 750 papers and books of ECE get the same type of attention worldwide. Rev. John Michell was the son of Gilbert Michell, an Anglican Priest, and Obedience Gerrard. He was refused permanent posts at Cambridge and as Astronomer Royal. However Whittaker wrote that Michell was the only scientist of significance who worked at Cambridge in the century following Newton’s death. His colleagues stood by with the Devil himself and let Michell’s work be claimed by others. He was appointed Rector at St. Michael’s in Thornhill and he did all his best work there. In Note 438(1) I derived the existence of a dark star independently, without knowing of the work of Michell, but hereby give him due scholarly credit. The fact that scholarly credit is withheld systematically from ECE is also well known, the result is a collapse of confidence in the physics establishment and standard physics. There is no longer a physics establishment, and very soon standard physics will be pure mythology and pseudoscience.

## 438(1): Orbit Around a Pseudoinfinite Mass in m Theory

April 23, 2019Many thanks, this is exactly what is required, graphing the effect of an increasing central mass. The complete m theory orbit equations were used in UFT419 with the S2 star. They were also used in UFT416 and UFT417 to produce very interesting results. So we just have to increase the central mass M in that code to as large a value as the computer can take. The Newtonian limit is fully analytical and will show the characteristics of the dark star, named by Michell in 1783. The complete equations (7) and (8) can be developed in several ways, for example by using a static m(r) to begin with, then repeating the method you suggest in the Newtonian limit. Finally the complete equations can be used with a finite dm(r) /dr and m(r) with various models. These are all well read papers so it is well known that all claims about dark holes completely ignore modern scholarship. It is well known that they ignore scholarship, so their claims are immediately rejected. The astronomical data probably indicate the existence of a Newtonian dark star modified by m theory. The complete equations (7) and (8) can be analyzed in many ways, some of this work has already been done in UFT416 ff.

438(1): Orbit Around a Pseudoinfinite Mass in m Theory

In which paper exactly did we use eqs.(7-8)? I will reactivate the calculation.

I think besides the mass m the intital conditions should be kept the same so that we see the impact of changing M. We will have to rescale the orbits because they shrink to zero.

Horst

Am 22.04.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Myron Evans:

438(1): Orbit Around a Pseudoinfinite Mass in m Theory

This is a development of UFT419, the orbit equations of m theory being the richly structured Eqs. (7) and (8) which can produce any observable orbit. Note carefully that they are not based on the Einstein field equation. In the Newtonian limit they reduce to the well known equations (9) and (10), which give conic section orbits (11). It is shown that if the central mass becomes infinite in the Newtonian limit, the orbit shrinks to a point of infinite mass density, the half right latitude approaches zero, the eccentricity approach 1, and the orbital velocity approaches infinity. A photon of mass m is captured by the pseudoinfinite M, and can never escape, because its escape velocity (26) must be infinite. All the characteristics of this type of orbit can be graphed in various ways. The area around the infinite mass will look completely dark, because all the photons have been captured. These graphics will probably reproduce the object claimed by standard model propaganda to be a “dark hole”. The use of the complete m theory will produce a large amount of other information. However Newtonian dynamics can explain the so called “dark hole” photograph. The use of Newtonian graphics will show that “black hole” theory can be explained almost completely without using event horizons. In fact this was Hawking’s last thoughts on the subject. So the computer graphics could illustrate what happens to a Newtonian orbit as the central mass approaches infinity. Animations would be even better. There are no “black holes” because they are inferred from an incorrect geometry, the 1902 second Bianchi identity. The correct second Bianchi identity is the JCE identity of UFT88 to UFT313. Crothers, Robitaille and many others including Einstein and Hawking have argued against black holes.

## Photon Mass and Dark Stars

April 23, 2019My idea of the dark star (Note 438(1)) is based on photon mass, which I proved in 1991 from the inverse Faraday effect and the B(3) field. This became the basis of the ECE unified field theory and has apparently been nominated several times for a Nobel Prize, for what that is worth. Vigier pointed out in 1993 that the B(3) field implies photon mass. In 1783 Michell was not sure what attracted light to a mass. So if we just use common sense and dark stars, the photon mass m would be attracted to the super heavy mass M according to Newton’s universal gravitation. The m theory is general relativity, but has nothing to do with Einstein’s field equation. It gives a huge amount of new information (UFT415 ff).

## Dark Stars of John Michell (1783 letter to Cavendish)

April 23, 2019These dark stars were independently inferred in the last note and explain most characteristics of the geometrically incorrect fallacy of “black holes”. The complete orbit equations of m theory would add a lot more information, so I will proceed to that in the next note. I was unaware of the work of Rev. John Michell when I wrote Note 438(1). I found it with a Google search today. The Newtonian theory of the dark star, inferred independently by Michell and myself, can be graphed and animated in such a way as to reproduce the notorious photograph immediately rejected by the AIAS / UPITEC group, and by all the followers of ECE theory. I have no idea what this photograph is supposed to be, because light cannot escape a Newtonian dark star. Therefore no photograph can be taken without any light. Various imaginative graphics and animations can be produced of Newtonian conic section orbits as the central mass M approaches infinity. Michell used much the same arguments as I did in his 1783 letter to Henry Cavendish, that light would be trapped by a dark star, which is why it is dark. That 1783 letter is on the net but uses eighteenth century language. The thing that I dislike most about loud propagandists is that they ignore scholarship known to be studied in all the best universities (survey of UFT88 for example). It must be firmly held in mind that UFT88 and all the UFT papers and books, completely refute all the predictions of the Einstein field equation. These refutations, mainly by Horst, Doug and myself, have been long accepted. The media propagandists have gone a long way towards completely destroying the subject of physics, and that is why I dislike them so intensely. They never do any of the hard work of scholarship, and are interested only in cash.

## 438(1): Orbit Around a Pseudoinfinite Mass in m Theory

April 22, 2019This is a development of UFT419, the orbit equations of m theory being the richly structured Eqs. (7) and (8) which can produce any observable orbit. Note carefully that they are not based on the Einstein field equation. In the Newtonian limit they reduce to the well known equations (9) and (10), which give conic section orbits (11). It is shown that if the central mass becomes infinite in the Newtonian limit, the orbit shrinks to a point of infinite mass density, the half right latitude approaches zero, the eccentricity approach 1, and the orbital velocity approaches infinity. A photon of mass m is captured by the pseudoinfinite M, and can never escape, because its escape velocity (26) must be infinite. All the characteristics of this type of orbit can be graphed in various ways. The area around the infinite mass will look completely dark, because all the photons have been captured. These graphics will probably reproduce the object claimed by standard model propaganda to be a “dark hole”. The use of the complete m theory will produce a large amount of other information. However Newtonian dynamics can explain the so called “dark hole” photograph. The use of Newtonian graphics will show that “black hole” theory can be explained almost completely without using event horizons. In fact this was Hawking’s last thoughts on the subject. So the computer graphics could illustrate what happens to a Newtonian orbit as the central mass approaches infinity. Animations would be even better. There are no “black holes” because they are inferred from an incorrect geometry, the 1902 second Bianchi identity. The correct second Bianchi identity is the JCE identity of UFT88 to UFT313. Crothers, Robitaille and many others including Einstein and Hawking have argued against black holes.

## ECE text book by Horst Eckardt

April 22, 2019This is excellent news! I agree that the proof in UFT137 can be used. This textbook is very important because it demonstrates the basics in a way that most mathematicians and physicists should be able to understand, and shows that the ECE and ECE2 theories are based directly on Cartan geometry. The entire series of seven hundred and fifty papers and books is based on the Maurer Cartan structure equations and the Cartan identity, together with the tetrad postulate. Added to these are UFT88 and the JCE identity of UFT313 (second Bianchi identity corrected for torsion). The theory has long been recognized by capable mathematical physicists. The fact that there are thousands of checks by hand and computer carried out by Horst and others gives overwhelming confidence in the theory. This output of work is equivalent to the entire lifetime output of someone like Linus Pauling, but produced in only fifteen years. The entire staff of AIAS / UPITEC has contributed to the refereeing process, and millions of colleagues worldwide. To any objective judge this is the physics of the twenty first century, the standard model is overturned and is saturated with non Baconian assertions. Therefore I strongly recommend this textbook as essential reading.

## note 437(4)

April 22, 2019This is a useful check as usual and can be used in Section 3.

## Note 437(3)

April 22, 2019This looks good, it looks as if Wikipedia made another error, so students are advised not to cite wikipedia.

## Plans for UFT438

April 21, 2019These are to develop the m theory to describe orbits around a central mass that is made to approach infinity. This is a development of UFT419, with the additional topic suggested by co author Dr. Horst Eckardt, escape of light from an almost infinite central mass. UFT419 included light deflection by gravitation in m theory. What happens when the deflecting mass becomes pseudoinfinite? The answer is that the light is captured and never escapes, or more accurately escapes only in very special circumstances. Similarly what happens when an object of very small mass orbits a pseudoinfinite mass? It is clear to millions of readers that the Einstein field equation is refuted by ECE and m theory in almost a hundred ways. For this reason alone there are no “black holes”. So I intend to limit my response to discussion of crass media pseudoscience. There are plenty of interesting topics in real science. Intellectuals such as Crothers and Robitaille have shredded black holes repeatedly.

## FOR POSTING: UFT437 Sections 1 and 2 and Background Notes

April 21, 2019These are Sections 1 and 2 of UFT 437, introducing the fluctuating m space.

## Note 437(3)

April 21, 2019Thanks for going through this note. The meticulous checking by Horst and others has resulted in complete acceptance of ECE theory, and rejection of the standard model. In this case the integral is log sub e (mc / h bar) – log sub e (pi / a0) = loge sub e (mc a0 / h bar pi). The Bohr radius is a sub 0 = 4 pi eps0 h bar squared / (m e squared), so the integral is log sub e (4 eps0 h bar c / e squared) = loge sub e (1 / (alpha pi), where alpha is the fine structure constant. I checked this many times for past UFT papers, and it is based on a treatment of the Lamb shift given by googling “Lamb shift”. Wikipedia is usually full of errors, which is why I checked the calculation. It was used for illustration only, in order to find the fluctuating m(r). The idea of using a charge density in multi electron states is a very good one, and leads into using computational quantum chemistry for the Lamb shift.

I have some difficulties in understanding this note. Assuming that eq.(11) is correct, The integral over (d kappa)/kappa should be

.

However there is only one log term in eq. (12), and this term contains constants that are not present in the limits of the integral. How can this be?

In eq. (13) the modulus of a single wave function psi(0) appears. This relates to a single state. In multi-electron systems we have for the charge density at r=0:

rho(0) = sum | psi_i (0) |^2

for all electrons i. Only s states contribute to psi_i(0). I guess that it would be allowed to use the total charge density rho(0) in eqs.(14/15). This would give an expression that is suited for quantumchemical calculations. The Lamb shift must be based on the total <Delta U>. It has to be added to the total electron potential. Thus it can be used in the self-consistency cycle.

Horst

## Escape Velocity from a Heavy Star

April 20, 2019Horst made the suggestion of investigating this problem with m theory, and this would be a good idea for UFT438. According to black hole dogma light cannot escape the black hole, which is defined by a particular m function m = 1 – r0 / r. In m theory different m functions can be chosen and a thorough investigation made of the escape velocity under all conditions. Such an investigation was initiated in UFT415 ff, it was found that superluminal velocities were possible (UFT417). The heavy star’s mass could be made to approach infinity. Quantum mechanics and general relativity are unified straightforwardly by m theory. In 2013 / 2014 Hawking abandoned black hole theory and also appeared to abandon event horizon theory. The attached survey of UFT88 shows this very clearly, Hawking’s theory has become untenable. It is widely accepted that Hawking’s work has been refuted in many different ways in the past fifteen years by ECE theory and m theory. These theories are real physics, they do not attempt to use the media to prepare for applications for more cash. Another problem with the media is that it manufactures idols of the cave, and proceeds to worship them. So whatever they say is recorded with great awe, and dumped on the public. Thousands of more worthy scientists are ignored. So establishment physics is in tatters, and closing half of the physics departments in existence today would make no difference to the general public. It is no longer possible to censor cover up and brush aside logical refutations.

## FOR POSTING: Statement Rejecting the Black Hole Photograph

April 19, 2019The AIAS / UPITEC group has rejected black holes for fifteen years, a rejection based on a mass of evidence, and Stephen Crothers immediately rejected the claim that a singularity had been photographed. Albert Einstein rejected black holes on the grounds that they were singularities, and in 2014 Stephen Hawking also rejected black holes. The famous UFT88 evidences complete rejection by leading universities of the torsionless Einstein field equation. Using the hamiltonian of m theory in the manner of our S2 star analysis, and using a very large central mass, but one which is not infinite, the true Baconian physics of the so called “Black hole” can be developed. The propagandists and the Big Frog (Wiki the Dinosaur) are desperate to convince the general public to unlock their wallets for another dose of pseudoscience. So I intend to show in the next paper (UFT438) that the dynamics of an orbit around a very heavy mass can be explained by m theory. In fact Horst and I have done just this already, in the S2 star system, which orbits a very heavy central mass in the Milky Way. Robitaille and many others have also made a Frog’s breakfast out of Black Holes, the cereal is shredded dogma and milk of toad. There is nothing that the Big Frog hates more than common sense, because it makes the Macbeth cauldron sound hollow and devoid of magic. The Big Frog swallows all mention of the rejection of Black Holes by the best scientists. Hawking became a victim of the Big Frog’s propaganda, so Hawking is covered up when funding is endangered. So just switch off the funding. In an atrocious condemnation of our times, it has emerged that Hawking was regularly beaten by his medical attendant, who has been struck off. This attendant should be in prison.

## Plans for UFT437

April 19, 2019In the four notes so far I have defined the m(r) needed to give the conventional theory of the Lamb shift and have proven the self consistency of vacuum force and Lamb shift theory. So Sections 1 and 2 can be written up along these lines, and in Section 3, it might be possible to apply computational quantum chemistry to the Lamb shift in helium and other elements, using the quantization rules t goes to m(r) power half t and r goes to r / root (m(r).

## Wikipedia The Big Frog (Beelzebufo)

April 19, 2019This big frog was discovered in Madagascar by staff of SUNY Stony Brook in 2008. It is called Beelzebufo from Beelzebub, a deity whose name can be translated as “Lord of the Flies”, and the Latin for frog, “bufo”. There is an illustration of this big frog eating a theropod at Prime Minister’s question time. So I propose to call the prehistoric wikipedia “the Big Frog”, because it is the only rag that still tries to abuse and distort ECE in public. “Lord of the Flies” is a famous novel by the Nobel Laureate Sir William Golding of Cornwall. We studied it at Pontardawe Grammar School. It is a vivid illustration of the struggle between civilization and barbarism. The MS was rejected many times before being accepted by Faber. The Lord of the Flies is a pig’s head on stick, attracting flies and public schoolboys who had reverted to savagery.

## UFT88 Consulted again at SUNY Stony Brook

April 19, 2019State University of New York Stony Brook is ranked 207 by webometrics, 251-300 by Times, 349 by QS and 301 – 400 by Shanghai. It has a 41% acceptance rate and astronomical student fees, with 26,236 students. It was founded in 1957, and notable discoveries include supergravity in 1976, and the largest frog ever discovered (2008 by Evans, Jones and Krause). This has a big mouth, like wikipedia, and consumed all new ideas and small innocent dinosaurs. The Nobel Laureate Yang is associated with Stony Brook. There is a well established ECE school of thought there and over the past fifteen years many consultations of www.aias.us. The huge impact of UFT88 is surveyed in the attached, using identifiable university URL’s. The total number of readings of UFT88 is about fifty thousand, and this is typical of the impact of essentially all seven hundred ECE papers and books. UFT88 corrects the 1902 second Bianchi identity for torsion, and this correction process gradually evolved into the Jacobi Cartan Evans identity of UFT313. The correct geometry of the Einstein field equation is completely different from the one used by Einstein, whose general relativity is therefore incorrect and obsolete. In its own time it was obviously a very influential theory. UFT88 also makes strange ideas like Big Bang and black holes obsolete, because these are torsionless theories. It is not possible to base physics on completely incorrect mathematics. Einstein’s idea was to base his 1915 field equation on the 1902 second Bianchi identity, which is incorrect because it omits torsion. The ECE, ECE2 and theories have overturned the standard model of physics, and have also made the physics establishment obsolete because it tried to censor ECE with a big frog (wikipedia), and failed spectacularly. The Einstein field equation has been refuted in almost a hundred ways in the UFT series, and it falls apart when attempting to explain such things as the S2 star and the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy.

## University defends giving money for students’ Las Vegas trips

April 19, 2019This is one reason why some government experts advocate the closure of up to half of pseudouniversities. There are many other reasons. Only the very wealthy can afford to enter university and they expect to be able to buy degrees. They do not even need A levels. In my h index analysis of performance at Aberystwyth, sent a couple of days ago, the mean h index of physics was a miserable 4, compared with my 50. An h index of 4 is not enough for a post doctoral. This analysis shows the method of appointment in smoke filled alleys of a thousand dustbins. With rare exceptions, none of the staff in physics Aberystwyth can speak Welsh. This is an insult to Welsh speaking Wales, and Aberystwyth is not a university, it is University College of Wales, Aberystwyth. No Vice Chancellor in Wales can speak or write or read Welsh, all have infinitesimal h indices and astronomical salaries. So these pseudouniversities should be shut down quickly before they do more damage to the Welsh language. They are gradually being forced into liquidation by economic forces. In terms of page views per author per month, the voluntary AIAS / UPITEC outproduces them by orders of magnitude, we really can them out of sight. So what is the point of having pseudouniversities which use public money for free holidays to Las Vegas, where the students can gamble away all their parents’ money. I read that the ex Vice Chancellor at Bangor, Hughes, took a champagne and caviar holiday to Hong Kong to meet alumni. He was forced to resign in complete disgrace. Cardiff has plans for thousands of redundancies. The lowest paid get hit first and hardest.

## Photograph of Einstein in 1950

April 18, 2019This can be found on the website of the Mallon relativity project, www.einsteinworld.com/home. He is in very shocking condition, frail and suffering from major depression. His wife Elsa died in 1936, and luckily he was looked after by Helen Dukas, his housekeeper. In 1954 he went into hospital at her request. In the final journey in the ambulance he talked about economics, merely saying that he knew nothing about the subject. Murray Gell-Mann speaks in a most unpleasant way on the net that Einstein declined after the death of his second wife, making fun of him, but Einstein was still able to write a letter to Roosevelt. In 1950 he was at home and was surrounded by dignitaries in the photograph. He was completely bored and uninterested and looks very ill. Similarly, Hawking was regularly beaten up by his medical attendant, who has been disbarred. The reality of being an icon is none too happy. The point is, if it were known that Einstein was ill, why wasn’t he properly cared for medically and by friends at Princeton? If it were known that Hawking was being regularly beaten up, why did not the police intervene? Sternglass met Einstein in 1947 and in 1995 told me of the meeting. Elsa Einstein and Albert Einstein were first cousin and there is a photograph of them arriving in the United States, presumably in about 1933. There cannot be a greater contrast between the 1933 and 1950 photographs of Einstein. I think that Einstein was also regularly beaten up metaphorically, by the Copenhagen establishment, but as Vigier mentioned to me, “Einstein had an answer to everything”.

## Fluctuating m Space Theory

April 18, 2019This derivation might be given in one of the background notes of the UFT papers, otherwise might be in a textbook or or on the net.

## 437(4): Self Consistency of the Vacuum Force and Lamb Shift

April 18, 2019This note demonstrates the self consistency of the vacuum force of UFT417 and the m theory of the Lamb shift given in Eq. (1).

## UFT88 Read at the Hebrew University Jerusalem

April 18, 2019The Hebrew University Jerusalem is ranked 175 in the world by Webometrics, 201-250 by Times, 154 by QS and 95 by Shanghai. It was founded in 1918 and has 23,000 students, affiliated with fifteen Nobel Laureates. There is an ECE school of thought there, the accurate scientometrics show that there have been many consultations of www.aias.us over the past fifteen years from its staff and students. The attached survey is a sample of the intense worldwide interest in UFT88, which incorporates torsion into the second Bianchi identity of 1902 and in a series of UFT papers, this was gradually transformed into the Jacobi Cartan Evans (JCE) identity of UFT313. The Einstein field equation was based on the incorrect 1902 identity, whereas it should have been based on the correct JCE identity. The latter is completely different from the 1902 identity, so the Einstein field equation is completely wrong. The results of the Einstein field equation have been refuted in almost a hundred different ways in the UFT series and it has been replaced by ECE, ECE2 and m theory in over seven hundred papers and books produced since 2003. Einstein was part of the foundation of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1918. The attached sample is only a small fraction of the total interest in UFT88. It can be estimated from the scientometrics that UFT88 has been consulted about fifty thousand times since it was first published, about ten years ago. That makes it a classic by any historical measure, and normally it would be recognized by a Nobel Prize or Fields Medal for Horst Eckardt and myself. Anti- intellectually, the establishment of physics is made up of standard modellers, these are dogmatists who do not allow free thought within their circles. However there is free thought everywhere else, including all the best universities in the world. This means you do not have to be a Nobel Laureate to be recognized worldwide. Very obvious in retrospect, and the international recognition extends to the entire AIAS / UPITEC group.

## Proceeding with UFT437

April 17, 2019I intend to go through UFT417 ff systematically using r1 = r + delta r. This will give the Lamb shift and also develop the m theory in new directions.

## Productivity at the EDCL

April 17, 2019By 1976, when I won the British Ramsay Memorial Fellowship in fierce international competition, I had already done enough for a tenured full professor at the EDCL (personal chair). The attached impact analysis shows that the productivity of those who corruptly denied me a chair was miniscule, indeed pathetic. From 1978 to 1983 my group outproduced all the EDCL staff combined. This was done under conditions of abuse and malfeasance. So the closure of the EDCL in 1988 was justified in the light of an objective historical analysis such as the one attached. The only contemporaries of comparable productivity were J. M. Thomas and Bill Jones. Both were given jobs at Cambridge without advertisement, and their productivity is due to large groups of co workers. My EDCL group won twenty Fellowships in international competition against the best in the world. So we were the best young researchers in the world. The Aberystwyth administration was so busy enriching itself that it did not notice. A system like that should be closed down, it cannot be supported by the tax payer. The corruption was horrendous, and this shows up on the historical level in the miniscule productivity of those appointed in smoke filled rooms because they happened to be someone’s crony. The People of Wales should not have this Anglo Norman system imposed on it. The People of Wales is made to pay for it.

## IBM

April 17, 2019This is primitive capitalism, which of course I reject as a bevanite socialist. I don’t like to think about IBM because when my first wife Laura and I returned from Zuerich to Cornell both our jobs had gone without any warning, and we were forced to go to the horrendously corrupt UNCC. We should not have gone to Zuerich, which had not made any preparation for my visit. The papers I produced at IBM are on the Omnia Opera. I wrote all the papers and reports but Clementi put his name on them. I outproduced all the rest of the Clementi environment. At the Theory Center I outproduced all of the paid staff. I was not paid by Cornell, but it used my work in an NSF Quarterly Report. The work that has been done over the past fifteen years at AIAS / UPITEC is greatly superior to the work done at IBM and the Cornell Theory Center. To any creative scientist, having someone else put their name on your work is grossly offensive, not to say unlawful.

IBM were under financial strain in the nineties as powerful desktop and personal computers took off. As the computing upower of these computers were doubling each year and their costs doubling, IBM was caught in a pincer movement as new competitors stole its customer base, with apple now holding its crown along with microso

On Tuesday, 16 April 2019, Myron Evans <myronevans123> wrote:

In 1986 to 1987 IBM Kingston’s Clementi environment were pioneering the LCAP array processor when I was a visiting professor there. The other visiting professor was Clement Roothaan of the Roothaan equations of computational quantum chemistry. At that time the first IBM company internet was being pioneered, and the first computer animations. At the end of my year at IBM I did not want to return to Wales, and was married to my first wife. We later moved to Cornell Theory Center, where IBM had set up a unit, and produced the prize winning animation on www.aias.us of my molecular dynamics code. I should have stayed at Cornell and not moved to Zuerich, and was forced to return here. Despite the fact that I was promoted direct from post doc to tenured full professor I should not have moved to UNCC. IBM Kingston was closed down with the loss of about ten thousand jobs and Cornell Theory Center also closed. The physics department at UNCC was also closed, together with chemistry at Aberystwyth, physics at Bangor, and chemistry at Swansea. I was not aware that IBM had been in trouble. In my opinion the unlawful universities in Wales are on the edge of being closed down. The AIAS / UPITEC institutes are free of corruption and greed.

IBM are on the mend. Their market value is $127 bn. Debts $33 bn.

It bought Red Hat cloud computing group for $34 bn in October.

In Jan 2019 it announced its quantum computing system for comercial use. It is aimed at tackling intractable complex and exponential problems to difficult to tackle by classical means.

## Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to 15/4/19

April 17, 2019There was the usual intense interest. The attached is estimated to be only about 5% of the total interest, because most staff and students use their own devices to access www.aias.us. I can identify only institutional URL’s. We are coming up to the fifteenth anniversary of daily scientometrics of this kind, showing overwhelming and permanent acceptance of ECE theory, and overwhelming rejection of all aspects of the physics system, notably its censorious intolerance of logical new ideas, and intolerance of Baconian science. There is also worldwide rejection of those parts of the university system which have been revealed to be greed ridden and corrupt.

## Fluctuating m Space Theory

April 16, 2019This is based on equation the potential of m theory with that of zitterbewegung theory in Eq.(1).The results are shown to be self consistent. The Lamb shifts for any atom or molecule can be explained with the universal fluctuating m(r) given in Eq. (29). This is a method based on Eq. (31): r1 = r / m(r) power half = r + delta r, i.e. r1 = r + delta r. This defines the (r1, phi) frame. The m(r) function is defined by m(r) power half = r / (r + delta r). If m(r) = 1, then delta r = 0. So vacuum fluctuations delta r are due to the departure of the metric from flat space. The quantization rules remain the same.

## IBM

April 16, 2019In 1986 to 1987 IBM Kingston’s Clementi environment were pioneering the LCAP array processor when I was a visiting professor there. The other visiting professor was Clement Roothaan of the Roothaan equations of computational quantum chemistry. At that time the first IBM company internet was being pioneered, and the first computer animations. At the end of my year at IBM I did not want to return to Wales, and was married to my first wife. We later moved to Cornell Theory Center, where IBM had set up a unit, and produced the prize winning animation on www.aias.us of my molecular dynamics code. I should have stayed at Cornell and not moved to Zuerich, and was forced to return here. Despite the fact that I was promoted direct from post doc to tenured full professor I should not have moved to UNCC. IBM Kingston was closed down with the loss of about ten thousand jobs and Cornell Theory Center also closed. The physics department at UNCC was also closed, together with chemistry at Aberystwyth, physics at Bangor, and chemistry at Swansea. I was not aware that IBM had been in trouble. In my opinion the unlawful universities in Wales are on the edge of being closed down. The AIAS / UPITEC institutes are free of corruption and greed.

IBM are on the mend. Their market value is $127 bn. Debts $33 bn.

It bought Red Hat cloud computing group for $34 bn in October.

In Jan 2019 it announced its quantum computing system for comercial use. It is aimed at tackling intractable complex and exponential problems to difficult to tackle by classical means.

## 437(2): Relativistic Developments

April 16, 2019These are important questions. The wavefunction in general is not known, but the potential can be modelled, so in the next note I will define m in terms of the electron shivering theory used in the description of the Lamb shift. That introduces the idea of a fluctuating m space. The potential energy between electron and proton is U(r) = – m(r) power half e squared / (4 pi eps0 r). This is made equal to U(r) = – e squared / (4 pi eps0 (r + delta r)). This explains the Lamb shift in terms of a fluctuating m(r). This method can be generalized throughout computational quantum chemistry.

437(2): Relativistic Developments

The question is where exactly the m function should be applied in quantumchemical calculations. It has to be included in the self-consistency cycle. Since the solutions of the SchrÃ¶dinger equation have to be transformed, it seems that the wave functions have to be transformed before the charge density is computed. Or do you see a chance that the effective potential can be altered by m(r) in any way?

Horst

Am 14.04.2019 um 13:36 schrieb Myron Evans:

437(2): Relativistic Developments

This note shows how the relativistic energy equation (1) reduces to the Schroedinger equation in the limit v << c. It does not use the SU(2) basis so all the well known information given in many previous UFT papers is missing: the g factor of the electron, the Lande factor, spin orbit fine structure, half integral spin of the electron and so on. The energy levels of the Dirac H atom are given in order to show that there is no Lamb shift in the Dirac theory. Many previous UFT papers have developed the Lamb shift. In the next note it will be shown that the Lamb shift is given precisely if m(r) power half = 1 – delta r / r. This introduces the new idea of a fluctuating m space. This form for m(r) power half comes out of first principles and shows that there is a shift in the 2S energy level of the H atom but not in the 2P. This idea merges m theory and zitterbewegung (electron shivering) theory introduced by Schroedinger.

## Some Leading Scientists who Accepted B(3) and ECE Theory

April 15, 2019These include Jean Pierre Vigier (co worker of the Nobel Laureate Louis de Broglie) and Lawrence Horwitz ( Ph. D. student of the Nobel Laureate Julian Schwinger). Special editions of “Foundations of Physics Letters” were devoted to both. Ernest Sternglass listened to a lecture of mine on B(3) at Vigier One in Toronto, and accepted the lecture without criticism. The entire conference accepted the B(3) theory. Einstein invited Sternglass for a private discussion about his work and advised him not to get trapped in the academic system, but to “take a cobbler’s job” in the daytime and work on his own ideas in the evenings. Einstein wanted Sternglass to talk in German, their native language. John Wheeler sent me a very long fax message about B(3) in which he discussed it in detail. Alwyn van der Merwe, the eminent and liberal editor, accepted B(3) and ECE theory and very generously supported it before he was purged by a group of long forgotten harassers. The mathematical physicist Diego Rapaport has given the best description of the ECE theory, describing it as economical and brilliant, or similar words. John Wheeler became Einstein’s assistant after Jean-Pierre Vigier was refused a visa. Vigier was Einstein’s first choice. By now millions have accepted ECE theory and there are seven hundred papers and books on it, roughly the same as Linus Pauling’s entire output. I found out about the academic system at UNCC, which fabricated childish lies to get rid of me because B(3) did not fit in to the academic thinking at the time. My actual research record there was outstanding, teaching was good to excellent, administration was average, and I was a tenured full professor. So they had to think of something, and came with “working too much from home” or using striped toothpaste. Einstein would obviously have condemned that outright. Mansel Davies also accepted B(3) and tipped it for a Nobel Prize. This was blocked by the machinations of the standard modellers. Now it is clear that the academic system has lost the moral and ethical high ground, after an endless series of scandals. The AIAS / UPITEC group consists of eminent people, notably Horst Eckardt, who have all greatly contributed to ECE. So they have taken the moral and ethical high ground, being untainted by greed and corruption. Einstein advised Sternglass that he would never make it to full professor if he were too radical or liberal in thought. Endless obstacles were put in my way by what is now known to be a very corrupt academic system. As a young man Einstein was himself a radical, one of his teachers at ETH, Weber, called him a lazy dog because he would study on his own. The small group of unethical harassers who had van der Merwe purged also attacked the Sci Topics Editor who had tipped my work for a Nobel Prize, and also used Wikipedia as a medium of gross defamation. Wikipedia comes out of this as a third rate propagandist rag. It even tried to suppress mention of my Civil List Pension. A Nobel Prize for B(3) or ECE would mean the end of standard physics, so they are obviously reluctant to judge fairly. I do not think that they have the technical ability to judge fairly. The standard model has become thoroughly obsolete with or without a Nobel Prize because of the educational power of the internet (for example the famous UFT88). The Nobel Prize has also become obsolete, it is no longer awarded for the best up to date work, but is often awarded for work carried out up to fifty years ago, and then only standard model work – “a club like any other” in the words of Mansel Davies, a chemistry Nobel Prize advisor. It seems that there are plans in the United States for the closure of two thousand colleges and universities. This may or may not be true, but the general public no longer has respect for a University system that loots the taxpayer, producing nothing in particular, and crudely suppressing scholarship and freedom of thought in violation of the First Amendment

## 437(2): Relativistic Developments

April 14, 2019This note shows how the relativistic energy equation (1) reduces to the Schroedinger equation in the limit v << c. It does not use the SU(2) basis so all the well known information given in many previous UFT papers is missing: the g factor of the electron, the Lande factor, spin orbit fine structure, half integral spin of the electron and so on. The energy levels of the Dirac H atom are given in order to show that there is no Lamb shift in the Dirac theory. Many previous UFT papers have developed the Lamb shift. In the next note it will be shown that the Lamb shift is given precisely if m(r) power half = 1 – delta r / r. This introduces the new idea of a fluctuating m space. This form for m(r) power half comes out of first principles and shows that there is a shift in the 2S energy level of the H atom but not in the 2P. This idea merges m theory and zitterbewegung (electron shivering) theory introduced by Schroedinger.

## Daily Weblogs Report 26/4/19

April 28, 2019The equivalent of 968,533 printed pages was downloaded (3.355 gigabytes) from 3,857 downloaded memory files (hits) and 384 distinct visits each averaging 8.4 memory pages and 10 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 251.11, top referrals total 2,699,498, 70.3% spiders mainly from Amazon, Baidu, Google and MSN. Apple Inc. spidering; German Aerospace Center general; University of Copenhagen UFT88; College of Information Sciences and Technology Pennsylvania State University UFT5; University of Nice UFT43; School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Citations from Google Scholar; British Library Complete Site Download. Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.