Archive for April, 2015

The Jacobi Identity in Special Relativity

April 30, 2015

It can also be applied to the group generators of the Lorentz group and Poincare group of special relativity, and also the standard electromagnetism. These methods have been made made entirely obsolete by ECE theory.

Discussion of UFT313

April 30, 2015

Good to hear from Dr. Douglas Lindstrom whose comments are inductive and interesting as ever. The second Bianchi identity with torsion (JCE and BCE identities) depend on the Cartan identity and not on the first Bianchi identity. I know that all chemists would throw up immediately at UFT313 unless they have put in ten thousand laps of training and many years of hard study as we have done at AIAS. So to put it in vector format is a good idea, and I can start on that straight away, building on papers such as UFT255. In fact UFT313 is not all that terrible, it is linear algebra with a few rules of tensor algebra. Finding the right way to the second Bianchi identity from the Jacobi identity took me twenty years, because no textbook ever gave the details needed. It is highly non trivial, and Ricci must have inferred his identity before the second Bianchi identity was inferred. Levi-Civita mentioned that it was Ricci who actually inferred the second Bianchi identity in 1880. The Ricci identity so called is not in fact an identity, it is simply the rule for covariant differentiation of a rank two tensor. This rule is needed to go from the first to the second Bianchi identities. So there are all kinds of misnaming and obscurantism that had to be cleared away before UFT313 took shape. It is useful when used with ECE theory based on the Cartan identity (UFT303). The Cartan identity as you know is the first Bianchi identity with torsion, which also works its way in to the Ricci identity. Torsion was of course unknown both to Ricci and Bianchi. So in summary the misnamed first and second Bianchi identities of the standard model are not identities at all. All mathematicians actually agree on this, but almost no physicists know it, and certainly no chemists or engineers, unless they are fans of ECE theory, then they all know it by now. The correct and exact identities are the Cartan identity and the JCE and BCE identities of UFT313. The First Evans identity is also an exact identity. It was discovered in UFT109 and a very remarkable result of UFT313 is that it comes out of the Jacobi identity. Another very remarkable result of UFT313 is that the Cartan identity also comes out of the Jacobi identity. The latter is the most fundamental identity of all group theory, obeyed by all group generators. It is also true in vector algebra.

Sent: 30/04/2015 14:43:01 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Engineering Model and Flow Charts

Myron, Horst I tend to agree with the comments made by Horst. I don’t know any engineers who think in 4d that alone non-Euclidean geometries. (Some would stop the sentence after think-I can say this because my ph.d is in engineering and I have taught quite a few …..). Enough tom foolery..
Perhaps two documents are required, one summarizing the current state of the ECE model, and the second being the engineering model.

I will go through paper 313 tomorrow and see if I can understand it. We badly need a nonlinear substitute for the second Bianchi equation that is not dependent on the first Bianchi equation. This paper may contain that. The standard second Bianchi basically reduces to d^R=0. This is a classical linear field supporting periodic waves, etc., and gauging for the spin connection. This doesn’t seem correct for a nonlinear theory.

By itself, the above state is the electromagnetic vacuum (zero torsion) but non-zero tetrads or spins. It would be good if this vacuum state supported the nonlinear traveling waves that Horst and I wrote about a couple of years ago.

Good work both of you.

Doug

On Thursday, April 30, 2015, <EMyrone> wrote:

I agree with these ideas, after prominently displaying The Engineering Model as UFT303 it became much more popular. This is also true of “The Principles of ECE” (UFT281 to UFT287), The Eckardt Lindstrom Papers (UFT292 to UFT299), CEFE (UFT301), “The Evans Equations” (UFT302) and “Collected Scientometrics Volume One” (UFT307). Updating the equation flow charts is a very good idea. The Evans / Morris papers are the most popular collection at present (UFT278 – 280, 289 – 291, 300, 304, 306 – 310, 312 in English and Spanish). The use of any relevant keywords on Google shows that all 311 items to date of the UFT Section will be in the Google front pages, often in number one position on the first page. UFT311 is impotrant and popular because it proves the existence of the spin connection experimentally, and of course UFT88 is a classic which has just been updated to UFT313.

Sent: 30/04/2015 07:48:56 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Vector Formulation of the New Identities

I would prefer considering only the “macroscopic” equations for the engineering model. In principle they are useable for engineering, but the document “engineering model” is of course much too high level to be directly applicable to engineering. In so for the name may be not the best.

What about letting the engineering model document as is (updating it with actual equations in vector form) and re-arranging the flow charts we had made years ago. This is the right place for all original ECE equations and identities.

Horst

Sean MacLachlan hat am 29. April 2015 um 19:53 geschrieben:

Also I think we should rename to simply ECE Model.
It’s best to capture all the main identities, field and wave equations etc.
This should be true whether it applies to devices we can engineer or cosmology or atoms.
It’s important that we have one reference document that we regularly update that summarizes the entire model we are building from galaxies to atomic processes and everything in between.

Sean

On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:24 AM, EMyrone@aol.com wrote:

This is a very good idea. I would say that the vector enters in to ECE theory through the definition of the tetrad, V sup a = q sup sub mu V sup mu. I think that UFT313 is a particularly important milestone so many thanks for the checking.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/04/2015 12:07:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: FOR POSTING: Four New Fundamental Identities For Engineering Model

It would be interesting to derive vector forms of these identities. I see a certain problem with the Ricci Evans identity because it requires the application to a vector V. What is V in the engineering model? e-m fields and potentials have at least two indices.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 29. April 2015 um 11:36 geschrieben:

These are:

1) The First Evans Identity.
2) The Jacobi Cartan Evans Identity.
3) The Bianchi Cartan Evans Identity.
4) The Ricci Evans Identity.

and can be applied to electromagnetism, gravitation or a combination.

Google Keywords, Exact Titles

April 30, 2015

Playing around with Google keywords for each of the 312 UFT items brings out a lot of information. Using UFT249 for example: Electron Spin Orbit Resonance without ” ” brings up the paper as number eight on the first page out of 1,190,000 results. For the classic UFT88 The Bianchi Identity of Differential Geometry without ” ” puts the paper in pole position as expected, number one on the first page of Google, and also number nine on the home page, out of 45,500 results. In order to get a meaningful indicator use less and less keywords to find how long it stays on the first few Google pages. This is a great deal of fun, and you can ask your grandchildren to do this. It would send them to sleep immediately and giving their parents some much needed rest. After their teeth grow they become super energetic. Google uses about two hundred indicators to determine the position of an item, notably quality and impact. It also uses a website filter and spiders www.aias.us very heavily.

Indicators from the Scientometrics

April 30, 2015

There is an unprecedented mass of scientometrical data available which can be used to build up many different indicators of the impact of ECE theory. This has been built up every day, almost without a break, for eleven years, 30th April 2004 to 30th April 2015, and is a unique data bank. One of the most important is the quality indicator, which measures the quality of sustained visits from the best universities in the world. This is given in Section Two of the attached volume two. The quality indicator is built up by taking all the different universities in the Webometrics top twenty in the world and the THES top twenty in the world. These are listed at the start of Section Two. There are twenty nine different universities in the two lists. The quality indicator shows that staff and students from these twenty nine universities have been studying the www.aias.us website for eleven years. The great majority of visits from universities, institutes, polytechnics and similar are from the top two hundred in the world measured by Webometrics, THES or other rankings. Webometrics ranks over twenty thousand universities. Webometrics and scientometrics are two new sciences of the last fifteen years or so, making citation completely obsolete. Another important indicator is long term impact, measured by a number of sub indicators including distinct visits (reading sessions), files downloaded (hits), page views, gigabytes downloaded, number of countries and number of items read. These are reported every end of the month. The long term impact is summarized in Section One of the attached, back to May 2002. The ECE theory made a meteoric impact in 2003, when it first appeared, immediately debated the standard model, and has been sustained at a very high plateau ever since. The data bank is of such high quality statistically that it can be used to extrapolate the impact of ECE well in to the future with essentially complete confidence. The theory will outlast all of us here. All of this is summarized in UFT307 which will be published shortly as a softback:

M. W. Evans, “Collected Scientometrics” (Joint Venture with New Generation Publishing of London at £8.99, copyright M. W. Evans, Volume One).

A third important indicator is the number of UFT papers read every month. Since the theory began, all the papers, essays, books and indeed all three thousand items on www.aias.us have been read each month. UFT307 contains a survey of Dec. 2014 proving this. A fourth important indicator is which items are read in which places, and this is given every early morning. A fifth important indicator is Google Scholar. All the UFT papers and books are in Google Scholar, both in English and Spanish. Finally a sixth important indicator is the use of Google keywords, initially selected to be as broad based as possible. As the keywords begin to match the title of a UFT paper more and more closely, the UFT paper will almost inevitably reach number one on the first page of google. This is true for all 312 UFT items in English and about 200 in Spanish, and also true for over a hundred essays in English and Spanish. The obsolete standard model does not have any of these indicators, and there is no university department in the world which has this kind of data bank available. The claims of the standard modellers are based on uncritical self citation. The only measure they have is citation of the standard model by standard modellers. So it is a club like any other. Jobs, promotions, prizes and so on are awarded to members of the club only. This is hardly new, just human nature, the very thing that my ancestral cousin Francis Bacon wanted to get rid of.

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.docx

Eleven Years of Daily Recording

April 30, 2015

Many thanks to my old friend and first post graduate student, Dr. Gareth John Evans of my Hall of Fame Room 262 Group. That was a famous group within chemical physics circles in its day, but the AIAS Group surpasses even that group, being known to the general public. This huge mass of accurate and detailed scientometrics gives many indicators all showing the complete acceptance of ECE theory and also the complete acceptance of the new methods of publishing pioneered by AIAS. Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe’s Post Einsteinian Paradigm Shift (ECE theory) has catalysed an unprecedented worldwide debate in physics in which entire professions reject the twentieth century dogma. So it is obvious that ECE theory should be taught at universities and schools using the essentially obsolete method of lectures and classes. It is already being taught everywhere using the enormously powerful new methods of the internet.

Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to 28/4/15 Amazing!! Sent from Samsung Mobile Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to 28/4/15 Up to 28/4/15 for www.aias.us there were 79,422 hits, 12,780 distinct visits, 57,238 page views, 15.22 gigabytes downloaded from 99 countries, led by USA, Germany, Luxembourg, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Mexico, Italy, Japan, Czechia, Australia, Netherlands, Indonesia, France, China, Argentina, Brazil, Switzerland, Colombia, Britain, …… There was the usual very high quality of university visits, using the Webometrics and THES lists of the top twenty universities in the world there were visits from: Columbia, MIT, Harvard, Princeton, Chicago, Texas A and M, Texas Austin, Wisconsin Madison, Cambridge*, Oxford, Imperial, ETH and Tokyo. Complete returns will be in shortly. These will be added to returns from www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com as usual. Another superb performance and congratulations to AIAS staff! This completes eleven years of daily recording (30th April 2004 to 30th April 2015). By now it is clear to all that ECE is the avant garde physics of the early twenty first century.

Engineering Model and Flow Charts

April 30, 2015

I agree with these ideas, after prominently displaying The Engineering Model as UFT303 it became much more popular. This is also true of “The Principles of ECE” (UFT281 to UFT287), The Eckardt Lindstrom Papers (UFT292 to UFT299), CEFE (UFT301), “The Evans Equations” (UFT302) and “Collected Scientometrics Volume One” (UFT307). Updating the equation flow charts is a very good idea. The Evans / Morris papers are the most popular collection at present (UFT278 – 280, 289 – 291, 300, 304, 306 – 310, 312 in English and Spanish). The use of any relevant keywords on Google shows that all 312 items to date of the UFT Section will be in the Google front pages, often in number one position on the first page. UFT311 is important and popular because it proves the existence of the spin connection experimentally, and of course UFT88 is a classic which has just been updated to UFT313.

Sent: 30/04/2015 07:48:56 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Vector Formulation of the New Identities

I would prefer considering only the “macroscopic” equations for the engineering model. In principle they are useable for engineering, but the document “engineering model” is of course much too high level to be directly applicable to engineering. In so for the name may be not the best.

What about letting the engineering model document as is (updating it with actual equations in vector form) and re-arranging the flow charts we had made years ago. This is the right place for all original ECE equations and identities.

Horst

Sean MacLachlan hat am 29. April 2015 um 19:53 geschrieben:

Also I think we should rename to simply ECE Model.
It’s best to capture all the main identities, field and wave equations etc.
This should be true whether it applies to devices we can engineer or cosmology or atoms.
It’s important that we have one reference document that we regularly update that summarizes the entire model we are building from galaxies to atomic processes and everything in between.

Sean

On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:24 AM, EMyrone wrote:

This is a very good idea. I would say that the vector enters in to ECE theory through the definition of the tetrad, V sup a = q sup sub mu V sup mu. I think that UFT313 is a particularly important milestone so many thanks for the checking.

To: emyrone
Sent: 29/04/2015 12:07:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: FOR POSTING: Four New Fundamental Identities For Engineering Model

It would be interesting to derive vector forms of these identities. I see a certain problem with the Ricci Evans identity because it requires the application to a vector V. What is V in the engineering model? e-m fields and potentials have at least two indices.

Horst

EMyrone hat am 29. April 2015 um 11:36 geschrieben:

These are:

1) The First Evans Identity.
2) The Jacobi Cartan Evans Identity.
3) The Bianchi Cartan Evans Identity.
4) The Ricci Evans Identity.

and can be applied to electromagnetism, gravitation or a combination.

Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to 28/4/15

April 30, 2015

Up to 28/4/15 for www.aias.us there were 79,422 hits, 12,780 distinct visits, 57,238 page views, 15.22 gigabytes downloaded from 99 countries, led by USA, Germany, Luxembourg, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Mexico, Italy, Japan, Czechia, Australia, Netherlands, Indonesia, France, China, Argentina, Brazil, Switzerland, Colombia, Britain, …… There was the usual very high quality of university visits, using the Webometrics and THES lists of the top twenty universities in the world there were visits from: Columbia, MIT, Harvard, Princeton, Chicago, Texas A and M, Texas Austin, Wisconsin Madison, Cambridge*, Oxford, Imperial, ETH and Tokyo. Complete returns will be in shortly. These will be added to returns from www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com as usual. Another superb performance and congratulations to AIAS staff! This completes eleven years of daily recording (30th April 2004 to 30th April 2015). By now it is clear to all that ECE is the avant garde physics of the early twenty first century.

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.docx

Daily Reports 27 and 28 /4 /15

April 30, 2015

On 27/4/15 there were 2,012 files downloaded from 488 reading sessions and on 28/4/15 there were 2,475 files downloaded from 702 reading sessions. Main spiders baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans / Morris papers 456, Scientometrics 248, F3(Sp) 240, Auto1 237, Auto2 83, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 207, Principles of ECE 182, UFT311 142, UFT88 133, Engineering Model 123, Evans Equations 84 (numerous Spanish), Llais 63, Englynion 61 (second book of poetry), Proof 1 60, Proof 1a (Sp) 22, Proof 2 (Sp), Proof 5 20, Proof 2 19, Proof 4 17, Proof 4 (Sp) 13, UFT99 56, CEFE 55, Autobiography Sonnets 22 (first book of poetry) to date in April 2015. Macquarie University Sydney Australia UFT175, University of Sydney relabelling of summation indices, University of Melbourne ECE Article, Bruker Company UFT258; Physics University of Mainz UFT110; Spanish Army Polytechnic Institute Ecuador UFT159(Sp); Iowa State University UFT197, UFT214; Reed College Portland Oregon UFT213, 228; University of Helsinki Essay 24 on the derivation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle from the Fermion equation; University of Poitiers My page, Omnia Opera, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Two Schools of Thought; Italian National Institute for Nuclear Research (INFN) Naples UFT57; University of Auckland New Zealand UFT175; U. S. Archives San Francisco general; Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk general. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2015

Vector Formulation of the New Identities

April 29, 2015

This is a very good idea. I would say that the vector enters in to ECE theory through the definition of the tetrad, V sup a = q sup sub mu V sup mu. I think that UFT313 is a particularly important milestone so many thanks for the checking.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/04/2015 12:07:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: FOR POSTING: Four New Fundamental Identities For Engineering Model

It would be interesting to derive vector forms of these identities. I see a certain problem with the Ricci Evans identity because it requires the application to a vector V. What is V in the engineering model? e-m fields and potentials have at least two indices.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 29. April 2015 um 11:36 geschrieben:

These are:

1) The First Evans Identity.
2) The Jacobi Cartan Evans Identity.
3) The Bianchi Cartan Evans Identity.
4) The Ricci Evans Identity.

and can be applied to electromagnetism, gravitation or a combination.

FOR POSTING: Four New Fundamental Identities For Engineering Model

April 29, 2015

These are:

1) The First Evans Identity.
2) The Jacobi Cartan Evans Identity.
3) The Bianchi Cartan Evans Identity.
4) The Ricci Evans Identity.

and can be applied to electromagnetism, gravitation or a combination.

aidentitiesforengineeringmodel.pdf