True Solutions Ltd.,

There has been great progress recently in designing circuits for new energy as can be seen in UFT311 and UFT321, and the report on www.aias.us on the Coeur d’Alene Conference by lead invited speaker, AIAS Director Douglas Lindstrom. For an account of commercially available spacetime energy devices see www.et3m, www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com. LENR is being developed extensively as can be seen from the internet. In UFT311 all of Tesla’s claims to have produced energy from spacetime are refuted by rigorous and meticulous experimental testing in the Munich group attended by UPITEC Director Horst Eckardt. UFT311 and UFT321 give details of circuits, and UFT311 verifies ECE theory precisely. I am a scientist, not an inventor and my primary interest is in freely available Baconian science. Baconian science means that the circuit used in UFT311 (the Osamu Ide circuit) must be built in another laboratory and his experimental results replicated. This may already have been done by the Munich group. In my opinion that replication would be the most significant advance in this area in over a century. All the false claims in this area have been cleared away by AIAS / UPITEC, there used to be a lot of crass nonsense masquerading as theory, and a lot of failed circuits made of horse hair. The Alex Hill company, however, (www.et3m) has been manufacturing and selling these devices for many years to large Fortune Fifty corporations. Their use in these corporations can be observed by appointment, if I understand things correctly. Alex Hill has also done a great amount of valuable translation work as you can see from www.aias.us. My own interest is in the general application of unified field theory as on www.aias.us , www.atomicprecision.com, and www.upitec.org, in cooperation with www.et3m.net. I am not a businessman in this area, but I suggest that you could manufacture the Alex Hill devices under licence in Europe, provided that a rigorous non disclosure agreement is signed as usual. This would be a matter for the businessmen. I am one of only fifty three Civil List Pensioners in Britain and as such I am very careful not to publish bad physics or bad engineering. The aim of producing energy from spacetime is very important. These devices could completely get rid of wind turbines and funding of CERN should be transferred to new energy funding, that would inject billions into very urgently needed new energy. Britain should pull out of CERN, which wastes billions. Wind turbines are a catastrophic failure, as is well known now all over the world, and should be demolished as quickly as possible. They have lost trillions of units of funding, a complete dead loss economically, and the present Chinese crisis is sign of their drag on the global economy. Subsidies are now being abandoned by all the major industrial nations. It is always a mistake to subsidise an industry, it results in a frenzy of greed and incompetence.

cc Prime Minister’s Office,

Main Gower politicians,

Osamu Ide

Myron Evans

cc Osamu Ide, inventor of the circuit in UFT311

]]>

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

www.webarchive.org.uk/ukwa/target/37617687/source/search

This is the modern way of depositing important collections at the National Library of Wales. So the collection will not be leaving Wales of course. It is probably one of the most important collections in avant garde science from the seventies to present, essentially all produced in Wales with invaluable international help. In fact a lot of it was produced in Aberystwyth. The MS collection of my Civil List predecessor Vernon Watkins is deposited at the National Library of Wales, and catalogued. It was put together by Gwen Watkins after being dispersed to many different localities. The papers of Richard Burton are in the library at University College of Wales Swansea, which also has the Dylan Thomas notebook of “Altarwise by Owl-Light” recently purchased for £104,000. The National Library of Wales is one of the leading libraries in the world, and has kindly taken all my books.

]]>

h bar kappa = mc

so the relativistic kappa is bounded above by mc / h bar. This gives a method of estimating the photon mass:

m = h bar kappa / c

and the new axiom also predicts that a wavevector magnitude kappa cannot become infinite. In the old interpretation p0 is allowed to become mc and kappa becomes infinite unless m is zero. Agreed that p0 cannot be measured in a relativistic context, but that p can be measured. The methods of ths note can now be extended to the H atom.

Sent: 01/09/2015 23:21:42 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 326(6): Relativistic Free Particle QuantizationIn eq.(33) is a small typo, should be c^4 at the RHS.

In (45,46) a factor c^2 shoud be added to kappa^2.

Eq. (54) can be simplified as given by the last formula of the protocol.

The function kappa(v/c) has been plotted including the non-relativistic/classical limit. Behaves as expected.

I personally would use the variable v instead of p0 since p0 cannot be measured in a relativistic environment, only the velocity v can be measured and the rest mass m. Then p0=mv has to be computed. Direct measurement of the momentum always gives the relativistic momentum p=gamma m v.Horst

Am 01.09.2015 um 12:07 schrieb EMyrone:

This note is a baseline calculation for the next note on the relativistic H atom, carried out for the free particle, and calculated without the crude approximations used by Dirac and contemporaries. Note carefully that this development is part of ECE2 generally covariant unified field theory, which is Lorentz covariant so all the equations of special relativity can be applied. The note gives detailed derivations of all aspects of special relativity and demonstrates complete and very well known self consistency in many ways. This is not surprising because these equations are those of special relativity. The notes show how the Lorentz gamma factor is derived and derives all the main equations of special relativity in detail. The velocity of the gamma factor is derived in complete detail. A relativistic velocity is nowhere used. The velocity of the Lorentz factor gamma is the non relativistic velocity of the observer frame, as is very well known. The main result is that the Compton wavelength is changed to Eq. (44) for a relativistic particle, and this equation can be graphed. The classical momentum / wave number relation of de Broglie for a relativistic particle is Eq. (54) and this can also be graphed. The calculations can be extended to the rotational relativistic particle on a ring straightforwardly. The next step in the next note is to extend them to the relativistic H atom but without using the rough approximations used by Dirac. The latter did very important work of course, but no one really knows why his rough approximations work. For example he approximated E = gamma m c squared by the rest energy m c squared. In the age of computers that need no be done any longer. This note removes that approximation for the free particle. I have been very careful to distinguish between the classical momentum p0 and the relativistic momentum p. Chemists and engineers should study this note carefully. In the main part, they will not be familiar with the concept of the relativistic momentum, nor of the Lorentz transform. My Ph. D. supervisor knew nothing about special relativity at all, so could teach to a certain point but no further. Nevertheless he was considered to be a distinguished chemist.

]]>

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 01/09/2015 15:04:48 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 326(7) : A New Interpretation and Axiom of Special Relativity and Photon MassThis looks very interesting since there is no relativistic mass enhancement but a velocity enhancement. Modern special relativity calls it momentum enhancement, not discerning between mass and velocity.

According to our previous discussion, there is only one physical velocity, the relative velocity between frames. So what is the physical velocity, v or v0?

The definition of the gamma factor (eq.5) uses v0 so the particle is not at rest in the moving frame but moves with v-v0 (or whatever) therein. This seems to be a modification of the conditions we had discussed before. My earlier argument was that the gamma factor contains v and v0 is a calculative quantity useful only to compare the results with the non-relativistic case.The last word must come from the experiment. I think that the velocity of elementary particles in an accelerator has never been measured directly because of experimental difficulty, it was always the momentum. The new method seems to imply that the limit v=c can be overcome, really a revolution.

Horst

Am 01.09.2015 um 15:25 schrieb EMyrone:

This new interpretation is that v sub 0 of the Lorentz factor gamma is bounded above by Eq. (12), i.e. v sub 0 of the Lorentz factor is bounded above by c / root2. This allows the Poincare / de Broglie / Vigier photon mass to be alwys non – zero, and immediately gives the correct light deflection due to gravitation, Eq. (13), without use of general relativity. These are major advantages over the usual interpretation, which allows v sub 0 of the Lorentz factor to go to c, so that gamma becomes infinite and unphysical and forces the mass of a particle movng at c to vanish, again an unphysical result. In the usual interpretation the relativistic momentum of the massless particle becomes indeterminate, the well known hyper-relativistic limit, generated by v sub 0 goes to c. So we arrive at a new fundametal axiom of special relativity:

The maximum velocity that can be attained by v0 squared of the Lorentz gamma factor is c squared / 2.

With this axiom a particle of finite mass can travel at c, and the photon may have mass as postulated by Henri Poincare in 1905, a hundred years ago. The axiom immediately gives the correct experimental light deflection by gravitation using special relativity, and allows the massive photon to travel at c for all practical purposes.

]]>

Monthly Feedback Statistics for AIAS.doc

Monthly Feedback Statistics for AIAS.docx

Monthly Feedback Statistics for AIAS.pdf

]]>

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.docx

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.pdf

]]>