To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 28/07/2015 10:30:55 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Computer Check of Note 323(3) part 2I first checked that reversing the sign of beta in the Lorentz

transformation matrix gives the inverse transformation.

The results for the transformation of the field tensor F are o.k. withF’ = L * F * L_T

where L_T is the transposed matrix L. This is identical to L. Why is

this form applied here and not simplyF’ = L * F ?

Horst

]]>

Sent: 27/07/2015 18:20:55 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Typeset Version of Chapter Three of “Principles of ECE”If you have the typeset version of Chapter Two, with typewritten equations, in Word format, please send me a copy for translation.

Thanks.

Regards,

Monday, July 27, 2015 11:26 AMSent:

Typeset Version of Chapter Three of “Principles of ECE”Subject:I received this with great thanks form Horst and will proof it tomorrow morning. The book is progressing very well and many thanks to Horst and the typesetters.

]]>

J’ = gamma (J – rho v) + (gamma – 1) (J dot unit v)unit v

where unit v = v bold / v . This answers your question below. The end result is the usual one, readers should not ever believe wikipedia withut checking it by hand and computer, and when it comes to ECE, wikipedia is known to be a troll site. Marquis is the world’s leading reference vehicle, certainly not wikipedia. So having completed this check, the development of gravitomagnetism and a new kind of dynamics can continue with accuracy. There should be an investigation into the way wikipedia tried to destroy my career and ECE theory, and failed.

e

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 27/07/2015 15:42:40 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 323(3): Details of the Lorentz TransformI checked the not until eq.(54) so far. In (10) the second Lorentz transform must contain inverted beta’s in sign because it is the inverse transformation. Then the unit matrix comes out.

Eqs.(27-30) are correct, also (31-34).

The jeneral transformations (36-39) are somewhat problematic. I wonder why for J’ the orignal J appears, while for A’ the original A is multiplied by a factor gamma. Applying the general transformation (50) gives the same type of result for both: see output lines o7 and o10 of the attached. It seems that the factor gamma in front of A in eq.(39) is wrong.

I first struggled about the factor of 1/v^2 which does not appear in (36-39). However, as you wrote, one can prove that(gamma-1)/v^2 = gamma^2/((gamma+1)*c^2)

which I did at the end.

Concerning (64): I guess that the signs of beta have to be changed in the rhight-most matrix. Where did you get the matrix form

F’ = Lamba F Lambda^-1 ?

Is this the basis transform? Is this described in VAPP? Why isn’t it simply

F’ = Lambda F ?

Horst

Am 27.07.2015 um 13:16 schrieb EMyrone:

This note gives all details of the Lorentz transform, so that it can be applied to gravitomagnetism and to a new type of general dynamics being developed in teh notes for UFT323.

]]>

To: Emyrone@aol.com

CC: steve.bannister@econ.utah.edu, DWLindstrom@gmail.com

Sent: 27/07/2015 13:09:45 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Typesetting of Principles of ECE Theory, chapter 3Meanwhile I have typeset chapter 3. Steve is working on another paper.

Please check for typos.Did we have a bibliography for the whole book? I could not find that.

You are giving references [1-10] in the text. I added some other.

Perhaps it would be good to have a bibliography per chapter. This would

simplify the typesetting.Horst

]]>

Myron Wyn Evans, “O Hudd Ei Ddoe” (Autobiography Volume One, 1950 – 1968, published 2012 with Authors Online in hardback, softback and e formats, ISBN 978-0-7552-0700-8) at about £14).

I received my advance copy of “Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry” and it looks very well produced. Can you please give me an estimate of the cost of the book and when the other copies are expected to arrive here and one copy at The National Library of Wales? Many thanks, diolch yn fawr. As you can see from the daily reports on the www.ais.us blog, all the books are being read thousands of times a year open source. I can recommend your work to any prospective author and particular thanks for sending copies to the National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth. All my books are now in the NLW, and all my work is archived from there on www.webarchive.org.uk.

Myron Evans

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 27/07/2015 18:24:57 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Hello Dave: Broken Linkhttp://www.authorsonline.co.uk/ is now out of business. “All titles previously published by Authors OnLine are now published by New Generation Publishing Any author previously published by Authors OnLine who hasn’t already done so should contact New Generation Publishing who have taken on the support for all the services previously provided by Authors OnLine, without any additional expense to any of our authors. ”

They do have autobiography volume 2 and Collected Scientometrics

You need to get with them about autobiography volume 1 which I can’t find on their site.

http://www.newgeneration-publishing.com/I will update the links when you find out where it is.

Dave

]]>

]]>

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 27/07/2015 15:25:15 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Fwd:Below is the list of Editors of the Journal of Cosmology. So, two of these have accepted the scribbled comments made on the Hawkins/ Milner initiative. This seems to be an establishment acceptance of ECE theory? I suggested that they devote a complete future volume to ECE theory (not expecting any sort of response). Are you OK if I pursue this with them? They claim that the journal receives 500,000 hits per month. I would have done a better job on the response had I realised this!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Cc:

Subject:

The Journal of Cosmology

Rudolf Schild, Ph.D.

Editor-in-Chief,

Executive Editor

Astronomy, Astrophysics

Center for Astrophysics, Harvard-Smithsonian

Cambridge, MACarl H. Gibson, Ph.D.,

Executive Editor, Cosmology

Professor of Engineering Physics and Oceanography

University of California at San Diego

Depts. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

and Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Center for Astrophysics and Space SciencesN. Chandra Wickramasinghe, Ph.D.

Executive Editor, Astrobiology

Cometary Panspermia

Director, Buckingham Centre for Astrobiology, Buckingham University

Cardiff University, United KingdomMichael Russell, Ph.D.,

Executive “Guest” Editor

Abiogenesis, Life’s Origins

NASA, Planetary Science & Life Detection Section,

Jet Propulsion Laboratories,

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAJoel S. Levine, Ph.D.,

Executive “Guest” Editor

Human Mission to Mars

NASA, Senior Research Scientist in the Science Directorate,

NASA Langley Research Center, VASubhash Kak, Ph.D.,

Executive Editor

Computational Quantum Physics

Head, Department of Computer Science,

Oklahoma State University, OklahomaJohn McKim Malville, Ph.D.,

Executive Editor Astrophysical Sciences

Department of Astrophysical, Planetary, and Atmospheric Sciences,

University of Colorado at Boulder, USA,Joanne B. Gibson

Manager

Journal of Cosmology

Modern Cosmology Associates

ModernCosmologyAssociates@aol.comSir Roger Penrose, FRS.

Executive “Guest” Editor

General Relativity, String Theory

Consciousness

Mathematical Institute,

University of Oxford, Oxford, UKR. Norris Keeler, Ph.D.

Executive “Guest” Editor, Engr. Phys.

Former Director of Physics, LLNL, UC Berkeley

Consultant to the US Government

Rice University Engineer of the year 2011

Arlington, VA, USAVladimir Evgen’evich Fortov, Academician Russian Acad. of Sci.

Executive “Guest” Editor, Cosmology

Vice Prime Minister Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian FederationKamala Wickramasinghe

Media Manager

and Publications Editor

MA (Cambridge University), Cardiff, UKVladimir Evgen’evich Fortov, Academician Russian Acad. of Sci.

Executive “Guest” Editor, Cosmology

Vice Prime Minister Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

]]>

]]>

]]>

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 26/07/2015 22:24:45 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 323(2) : ECE2 DynamicsAll calculations are o.k. Meanwhile I my understanding of the current density problem has improved. In Maxwell theory it is thought of as an external source being given. This is one particular approach. Another way is to take the magnetic (or gravitomagnetic) field as given, then the current density can be computed in its rotational part. Linear parts could exist in addition but are not taken into account by the curl operator in

J ~ curl Omega.

The full equation (6) of the note has to be used.

HorstAm 25.07.2015 um 13:10 schrieb EMyrone:

In this note the generally covariant unified theory of dynamics in general is developed, giving a new type of dynamics in terms of field equations which reduce in the special case a = g to gravitomagnetic dynamics. The continuity equation, or equation of conservation of matter, is derived from the inhomogeneous field equation (2) of ECE2 dynamics. The latter therefore generalizes the continuity equation (matter cannot be created out of nothing or destroyed into nothing) and generalizes the equations of hydrodynamics and fluid dynamics based on the continuity equation. In the non relativistic limit the fundamental kinematic equation (39) of rotational dynamics is generalized to the Lorentz force equation (38). The rest frame is interpreted as the static or inertial Newtonian frame. The relativistic generalization of eq. (38) is given in eq. (42). This development generalizes Newtonian dynamics in the manner of other generalizations such as the Eulerian, Lagrangian, Coriolis and Hamiltonian generalizations of Newtonain dynamics. The ECE2 dynamics also correct the Einsteinian dynamics for torsion.

]]>