Archive for September, 2013

The “Black Hole” Concept is Completely Obsolete

September 30, 2013

I am glad that Stephen’s views are getting the support they deserve. Since torsion cannot be neglected (e..g UFT137) the black hole and big bang metrics are incorrect mathematically (e.g UFT88). A very heavy object is a different thing entirely. Both UFT88 and UFT137 have been thoroughly read worldwide for several years, ad also accepted.

Hello Stephen Crothers and all interested in the concept of the Black Hole:

As I indicated to Stephen and those who are interested as I and Stephen, the idea here is:

Black Holes

  • A Super Massive gravitational collapse of MATER (Nobody has ever seen one, much less, seen the EVENT take place)
  • I believe in all intuitive measure of COMMON SENSE, and we all have that, “there is nothing sporadic about a Black Hole; …. only that sporadically MATTER falls into it. A whole lot of matter; it’s now more the 4 million times the mass of our Solar System, the Sun and all the planets. (That is evident, lots of evidence Gentlemen!). The Astronomy is FULL of it. Take a good look at the stars orbiting about Sagittarius A*, believed to be a BLACK HOLE at our Galactic Center.
  • The BLACK HOLE does not come into being (exist) and then without explanation suddenly disappears, or simply vanishes (or not exist anymore.) Laws of conservation of energy and momentum is for real.
  • A Singularity in Matter is just a theoretical idea. An infinite density (or namely rho = infinity) is NOT a reality. a) A Black Hole in common sense science has to have the density of Neutrons, or is a Neutron Star. b) A Neutron Star has to have a “finite” density. There can’t be a mass point that has no size or vanishes as an infinite density mass.
  • Finally, the so-called “Big Bang” never happen and it never will. All such ideas that all the matter of the Universe was at the pin-head of a needle is really NOT science. It is a ridiculous idea. I believe we are all better than that Gentlemen. So, Let’s not go there. Let us do intuitive reasoning on this stuff.

I have done considerable research on the Super Massive Object located located at our galactic center known asSagittarius A*,


Take a look at my website: http://www.extinctionshift.com/SignificantFindings08.htm (Click here)


I will send you a Press Release on updates soon.


Regards.


EHDowdye


Edward H. Dowdye, Jr., Ph.D. Physics
Founder, Pure Classical Physics Research
Greenbelt, Maryland 20770
e-mail: gravityfindings
http://www.extinctionshift.com/SignificantFindings.htm
Details: http://www.extinctionshift.com

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Stephen Crothers <thenarmis> wrote:

Professor John Friedman,

Distinguished Professor Emeritus 
Department of Physics 

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Dear Sir,

Your short email does not actually possess any scientific content. You have in fact ignored all the salient issues I raised concerning the incongruent claims made by Bland-Hawthorn et al, and proponents of the black hole and big bang generally, instead limiting yourself to revealing that the alleged supermassive black hole Sgt A* is a rotating one, “with negligible charge” (issues that make no difference to my previous email to Bland-Hawthorn et al), some uninformative comments on the singularity of the alleged rotating black hole, and some damage control on the embarrassing nonsensical statement made by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, viz.

“One crucial assumption underlies the standard hot big-bang model: that the universe ‘began’ in a state of rapid expansion from a very nearly homogeneous, isotropic condition of infinite (or near infinite) density and pressure.”

[Misner C. W., Thorne K. S., Wheeler J. A.,
Gravitation, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York,
(1970)]

You mention only their “near infinite” density. What about their “near infinite” pressure? The assertion made by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler is patently absurd. To defend it is no less. Your attempt to twist their nonsense into “a rough way of saying the density at which classical gravity is not valid” is merely a common evasive technique; not science. Your 10^94 g/cm^2 alleged “Planck density” is no more “near infinite” or valid than 10^99999999 g/cm^3 phantasmagorical density. And while we’re at it, what about the infinite hotness of emptiness?

“At the big bang itself, the universe is thought to have had zero size, and to have been infinitely hot.”

[Hawking, S. W., A
Brief History of Time from the Big Bang to Black Holes, Transworld
Publishers Ltd.,
London,
(1988)]

Misner, Thorne and Wheeler are not the only to propose such “near infinite” nonsense. It is quite standard fare for the proponents of black holes and big bangs.

But is that, in fact, because of discovering that empty space has energy, it seems quite plausible that our universe may be just one universe in what could be almost an infinite number of universes and in every universe the laws of physics are different and they come into existence when the universe comes into existence.”

[Krauss,
L., Q&A, television station ABC1,
Australia,
(Monday, 18 February, 2013a) www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3687812.htm]

I ask, just how close to infinite must one get to attain “an almost infinite number”? This is little different to the “near infinite” density and pressure of Misner, Thorne and Wheeler.

Your remarks on the singularity of the alleged rotating black hole also make no difference to the fact that it is routinely stated by proponents of black holes that the singularity of the rotating black hole is an infinitely dense circumference of a circle. Resorting to ignorance is to no avail. Your “speck” is no different to the “speck” of Rees. Such ‘specks’ are in fact alleged to be points or circumferences of circles. All alleged black hole singularities have no volume, yet are alleged to be of infinite density.

The work that Roger Penrose and I did between 1965 and 1970 showed that, according to general relativity, there must be a singularity of infinite density, within the black hole.”

[Hawking, S. W., The Theory of Everything, The Origin
and Fate of the Universe, N
ew Millennium Press,
Beverly
Hills
, CA,
(2002)]

The matter that you say “one can observe is matter outside the event horizon” comes not from any alleged solution to Einstein’s field equations for a rotating black hole or from any other alleged black hole solution thereto. You have put it in by superposition, and you have added to your black hole, again by superposition, The Milky Way, and all the rest of the matter in the Universe, despite the fact that all alleged black hole universes contain only one mass and are not expanding by definition and cannot coexist with themselves or any big bang universe because their defining characteristics contradict one another, and the fact that the Principle of Superposition is invalid in General Relativity.

If you are truly willing to engage in a scientific discussion, then please address all the issues contained in my previous email to Bland-Hawthorn et al. They have been eerily silent.

Yours faithfully,

Stephen J. Crothers

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, John Friedman <friedman> wrote:

Dear Stephen Crothers,

Here’s a quick reply to a few of your questions.

> What type of black hole do you allege at Sgt A*? Is it rotating or not, is it charged or not?

Rotating and with negligible charge.

> Now I ask yougentlemen, how close to infinite must one get to be “near infinite”?

This is a rough way of saying the density at which classical gravity is not valid,
around Planck density, or over 10^94 g/cm^3. Within the classical theory, as you
note, the density becomes infinite, if a positive energy condition is satisfied.

> The singularity of the alleged rotating black hole is the circumference of a circle . . .

This singularity is present in an analytically extended solution and is not part of
the time-evolution of a collapsing star. What happens to the speck into which
the matter collapses is not known. What one can observe is matter outside
the event horizon, a surface with a circumference of several million km.

Regards,

John Friedman

 ************************************************************ John L. Friedman friedman Distinguished Professor Emeritus Phone 414 229 4476 Department of Physics FAX 414 229 5589 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Physics 422 PO Box 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201 ************************************************************ 

Worsening Situation at Fukushima

September 30, 2013

Can you provide me with scientific data on this situation? I have always been an opponent of nuclear power because it is too dangerous. Trawsfynydd and Wylfa also leaked radiation causing many deaths by cancer. The cover up has been busted now. Trawsfynydd has been shut down but I am not convinced that the radiation is not still leaking. Chernobyl was of course the worst incident, and Four Mile Island a near disaster. The authorities covered it up in the former USSR until the radiation was detected in Scandinavia. Thousands in the Ukraine, Belorussia and even the Baltic States are reported to have died or to have contracted radiation illness, but the authorities try to deny it. If the Japanese authorities are indulging in a cover up they should be censured immediately by the United Nations. There is clearly no global warming, and gas fired power stations should be built as a matter of emergency, otherwise Britain will become dependent on turbines that produce nothing, and on imported electricity, much of it from nuclear power stations on the continent. The USA and Germany have banned nuclear power stations.

In a message dated 30/09/2013 00:15:33 GMT Daylight Time writes:

Hello Myron. Ever since the Nuclear accident at Fukushima, as a result of the tsunami, I have regularly monitored the situation and its impact on the Pacific Ocean. Latest developments about leakages and the serious situation in the number 4 pool seem very disturbing indeed. It also is disappointing to find how little media coverage there is. I don’t know if you intend to make any comments on the issues but I hope that you will. Best wishes. Vivienne.

Feedback for Sept. 7th to Sept. 30th., www.aias.us

September 30, 2013

This is found at the end of the attached overview book as usual, and is restricted to the 2% sector comprised of universities, institutes and similar, showing very intense and increasing interest throughout September 2013. I do not record the other 98% percent because it is physically impossible. The total interest for a new and high brow theory is vast and unprecedented in the history of physics, and is to be found in all walks of life throughout the world, in as many as 163 countries. The attached overview book has been compiled daily since April 30th 2004 and shows the vast total interest in ECE theory, which has become something of a societal phenomenon throughout the world. The final returns for September will be in tomorrow as usual. These returns are given as usual on the last day of the month before the relevant file is overwritten. I will probably print off a few copies of the attached Book of Scientometrics and present it to various local libraries, including the National Library of Wales. It is the most comprehensive study ever made of a Kuhn type paradigm shift in science, and much more meaningful than citations because the attached proves that ECE theory is being studied intensely all the time in all the best universities and similar. Citations do not mean necessarily that the cited material has actually been read, and citations can be distorted in order to get promotions, prizes and so on. I am interested in pure scholarship and Baconian science. Every early morning on this blog I send out daily reports to show which item is being read at which institution. So congratulations to all staff!

overview1.docx

Daily Report Sunday 29/9/13

September 30, 2013

There were 2269 hits from 538 distinct visits, 21.1% spiders from baidu, google and MSN. Auto1 127, Auto2 29, CEFE 28, Englynion 13. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Vienna general; Simcoe County District School Board Ontario general; University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign general; Indian National Institute of Science Education and Research Essay 51. Intense interest all sectors, attached usage file updated for Sept. 2013.

Bacon and the Pig’s Breakfast

September 29, 2013

This message from GJE has the wit of a Dafydd ap Gwilym! They certainly made a pig’s breakfast out of Bacon. I remember back on the farm that the pigs would eat anything, month old school dinners, bits of wood, plastic, metal, tar, and the remnants of natural philosophy, and became the rulers of Animal Farm. To begin at the beginning is what we hope for now.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/09/2013 13:17:16 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: RE: Background to Pauli Matrices

Yes, we gave up “bacon” for muesli – a more modern, mixed up and advanced conglomerate. The next generation refinds “bacon” though and decide that something as long tested may be OK after all- and it smells and tastes good!!

— Original Message —
Subject: Background to Pauli Matrices

This is easily googled up. They were introduced by Pauli in 1927 and applied to the Schroedinger equation in 1927 to give the Pauli equation. They were used by Dirac in 1928 in his original version of the Dirac equation, which has recently been developed into the ECE fermion equation without negative energy. It was realized later that the Pauli matrices form the basis vectors of the SU(2) representation. In the sixties Gell-Mann introduced his matrices to form the basis of the SU(3) representation for nuclear strong field theory, which was deduced from ECE theory in some of the first ECE papers. In inferring electron spin orbit resonance (ESOR) I simply used the SU(2) representation of the Zeeman effect, and some simple operator algebra in quantum mechanics. This should be understandable to a good freshman student. ESOR can now be extended to NMR. In quantum mechanics the quantized spin is defined as the vector operator:

S psi = (1/2) h bar sigma psi

where sigma has become a vector operator, which may act on a wavefunction or a function such as a magnetic flux density B. Finding a new spectroscopy in 2013 opens up a myriad of opportunities for experiments and computation on supercomputers, and is much more useful than an infinite argumen tabout something that deos not exist, like a Higgs boson, black holes or big bang, an argument in which dogmatists refuse to let go of ideas until hell freezes over. They need global warming to unfreeze, another idea they refuse to let go of. That is pecisely why Bacon introduced science.

250(5): Proof of the ESOR Hamiltonian Direct from the Pauli Matrices

September 29, 2013

This is the proof direct from the Pauli matrices, and eq. (11) shows directly that the SU(2) basis introduces new quantum effects, in this case electron spin orbit resonance (ESOR). This technique can now be extended to all aspects of ESR and NMR theory systematically. The Pauli matrices give the SU(2) cyclically symmetric relations of spin angular momentum as in eqs. (1) to (3).

a250thpapernotes5.pdf

Opinion of Pauli on Unobservables

September 29, 2013

Pauli could get very angry at rubbish theories which contain so many unobservables that they cannot be tested, examples are big bang, black holes, Higgs boson, aspects of QED and QCD and myriads of other forgettable imposters in physics. He called them “not even wrong”. He was an Austrian prodigy who was educated at Ludwig Maximillian University in Munich. His Ph. D. supervisors were Sommerfeld and Born. He became a full professor at the age of 28 in ETH Zurich in 1928 and emigrated to the US in 1940 where he was a full professor at the Princeton Institute. He was nominated for a Nobel Prize for the exclusion principle by Einstein, and received it in 1945. He returned to Zurich and became a Swiss citizen in 1949. He fell out with Heisenberg who ignored his funeral. Pauli could be cuttingly critical of any theory that was lacking, which is exactly the line taken by AIAS scholars today. In UFT174 I derived the empirical Pauli exclusion principle from geometry. I met a descendant of Pauli who was a friend of my first wife on a visit to Minneapolis Minnesota. The Mississippi river crosses the campus of the University of Minneapolis Twin Cities and is just a small river in those latitudes. I refuted the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in UFT175 with Horst Eckardt making valuable computational contributions and checking the maths and concepts as usual. These papers have been read thousands of times without a single objection, and are mainstream physics by now. Jose Croca has refuted Heisenberg in many ways experimentally. Big Bang has been refuted by ECE in many ways, and has also been refuted experimentally. The dogmatists still cling to these outmoded ideas and are able to give each other huge prizes for rubbish, “not even wrong” but we will give you the prize anyway.

Background to Pauli Matrices

September 29, 2013

This is easily googled up. They were introduced by Pauli in 1927 and applied to the Schroedinger equation in 1927 to give the Pauli equation. They were used by Dirac in 1928 in his original version of the Dirac equation, which has recently been developed into the ECE fermion equation without negative energy. It was realized later that the Pauli matrices form the basis vectors of the SU(2) representation. In the sixties Gell-Mann introduced his matrices to form the basis of the SU(3) representation for nuclear strong field theory, which was deduced from ECE theory in some of the first ECE papers. In inferring electron spin orbit resonance (ESOR) I simply used the SU(2) representation of the Zeeman effect, and some simple operator algebra in quantum mechanics. This should be understandable to a good freshman student. ESOR can now be extended to NMR. In quantum mechanics the quantized spin is defined as the vector operator:

S psi = (1/2) h bar sigma psi

where sigma has become a vector operator, which may act on a wavefunction or a function such as a magnetic flux density B. Finding a new spectroscopy in 2013 opens up a myriad of opportunities for experiments and computation on supercomputers, and is much more useful than an infinite argumen tabout something that deos not exist, like a Higgs boson, black holes or big bang, an argument in which dogmatists refuse to let go of ideas until hell freezes over. They need global warming to unfreeze, another idea they refuse to let go of. That is pecisely why Bacon introduced science.

250(4): Comparison of Absorption Frequencies of ESOR and Zeeman Effects

September 29, 2013

This note shows that the electron spin orbit absorption frequencies for strong and weak magnetic fields, eqs. (14) and (16) respectively, are different in general from the anomalous Zeeman effect absorption frequencies (5) and the Zeeman effect absorption frequencies (8). The root cause of ESOR is the operator result (25), the use of the SU(2) basis in the Zeeman effect produces the electron spin orbit term through the Leibnitz Theorem. The ESOR term has no classical equivalent, and appears to be completely new to spectroscopy. This simple first theory can be greatly developed with contemporary computational quantum chemistry packages. As usual I sketch out the fundamentals of a new theory or new spectroscopy.

a250thpapernotes4.pdf

This Year’s Nominations for ACS Awards

September 29, 2013

American Chemical Society,
Awards Section,

Last year’s nominator, Professor Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe of the University of Denver, has kindly informed me that he is prepared to nominate again for the prestigious Priestley Medal, Debye and Hildebrand Awards of the American Chemical Society and has asked me to check with you whether any further material is needed for the Langmuir Award rollover for next year. I am honoured by these nominations and support letters, which at this level are as good as the award, like Oscar Nominations. I am a US dual citizen and was recently invited to join the American Chemical Society, which I intend to do. Many thanks for this invitation.

Cordially Yours,

Myron Evans

Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List Pensioner, D. Sc., Ph. D., B. Sc. (Wales)
AIAS President,
www.aias.us