Archive for June, 2013

The Crisis for Standard Physics

June 30, 2013

While the CERN lads (and lasses) are crowing about opiate Higgsinos, back in the real world there is a deep crisis for standard physics as just discussed with Horst. This showed up about three years ago in UFT160. The CERN experiment bounces an electron off a positron of the same mass, and UFT160 shows that one of the masses becomes complex valued under certain conditions. The standard physics has no answer to that one, which is why they try to ignore AIAS and Steve Crothers and all sensible scientists. The R theory has an answer, as in UFT160 – UFT171. This flaw in standard physics occurs in its foundation stones: special relativity and quantum mechanics, which are put together in the de Broglie Einstein equations of the early twenties. Ultimately all masses must be interpreted as curvature, R, of the ECE wave equation. This is all described in great detail in UFT158 onwards to UFT171. If the politicians want to waste hundreds of billions on total fantasy that is not really their business, they are wasting our money and should be lobbied. We all know that twenty billion for the new linear accelerator will balloon out of control to a hundred billion by the time that all the little Higgses have popped up out of the opium den. After that there will be a hyper super duper collider stretching from here to the moon, but that time the human race will be extinct (only half un humour).

Calculations for note 244(4)

June 30, 2013

Many thanks again, there is a typo in the typed up version of UFT160. It should be

A = omega omega’ – x sub 2 (omega – omega’)

and I used this correct A in note 244(4). I think that your table looks fine and I assume that you used the above value of A. It would be a good idea to compute the velocities and I will work on this tomorrow. The photon masses are sometimes complex valued, agreed about that, and that is the problem that led to R theory in late 2010. One could take the real part of the mass as the physical part, or one could use the modulus of the complex mass, and tabulate results from both methods.

To: Emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 30/06/2013 17:37:18 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Calculations for note 244(4)

I used the formulas of paper 160, eqs. (39)-(43), to calculate the
photon mass from the table you gave in the note. The results (last block
in the protocol in units of electron mass) are partially complex. Your
result (28) for cos(theta)=0 is the fifth value in the table. It differs
from yours by a factor of ten, for which reasons ever. You used a
simplified calculation scheme.

It would be interesting to add the photon and electron velocities. In
principle we can use eqs. (13-14) of paper 160, but have to replace
omega double-prime. We could use eq.(20) of paper 160 with given fixed
mass m2. Does this make sense?

Horst

244(4).pdf

Photon Mass in UFT160

June 30, 2013

Many thanks, this confirms that the photon mass is near the electron mass under well defined conditions. In photon mass or Einstein / de Broglie physics the photon is a relativistic particle like any other, and does not travel at c in vacuo. The constant c is regarded as a universal constant, but not as the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in vacuo is v. The so called “tired light” theory is based on this type of physics, and refutes Big Bang immediately, for example UFT49. The idea of an ether current is fine in my opinion. Photon mass physics is entirely different from standard physics. I first came across it when Vigier started correspondence in 1993, and invited me to Princeton for a conference to which he had been invited, I think it was a celebration for Wheeler. ECE gives photon mass in many different ways, for example it gives the Proca equation, not the d’Alembert equation. Standard physicists know next to nothing about photon mass physics. Photon mass physics provides the missing mass (of photons) that is asserted to be dark matter in standard physics. Photon mass physics removes all the problems caused by the massless photon, indicates B(3) and refutes Higgs and little Higgsinos and all that.

In a message dated 30/06/2013 16:12:32 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

From the surface plots of paper 160 it can be seen that the photon mass is near to 1 in a wide range of parameters (blue colour in Figs. 1 and 2). Since atomic units have been used, m=1 is the electron mass. This finding could support a kind of ether model where space is filled with non-reactive particles. Photons would be such particles with high velocity, a type of ether current. In this picture it would be natural that photon velocities significantly deviate from the value of c, a point which probably is the most difficult one to understand from the view of standard physics. But it is too early to speculate on this.

Horst

But at the moment it is too early to

Am 30.06.2013 16:22, schrieb EMyrone

In this case the difficulties for the standard model discussed in UFT158 ff. become apparent in that the mass of the photon is complex valued for the given electron mass measured in standards laboratories. So mass means something more than thought of in standard physics. It is in fact a curvature R as described in UFT158 ff. However, if the real part of the mass is taken as physical, as is usual in physics calculations, it is

m = 9.75 ten power minus 31 kilograms

compared with an electron mass of

m = 9.10953 ten power minus 31 kilograms

On average in the Compton effect the mass of the photon calculated over all scattering angles is very similar to the mass of the electron. Recall that this is the result of the foundational Einstein / de Broglie equations themselves, (combination of special relativity and quantum necahnics), but without assuming a zero photon mass. The whole of standard particle physics depends on special relativity and quantum mechanics. Compton made the very special assumption of zero photon mass. This assumption is unphysical , because spacetime is reduced from four dimensions to two, and the little group of the Poincare group becomes E(2), an unphysical group. The CERN set up just brushes all these fundamental flaws aside and ignores the Einstein / de Broglie School of physics, or the photon mass physics.

Compton Scattering at 36.87 Degrees

June 30, 2013

In this case the difficulties for the standard model discussed in UFT158 ff. become apparent in that the mass of the photon is complex valued for the given electron mass measured in standards laboratories. So mass means something more than thought of in standard physics. It is in fact a curvature R as described in UFT158 ff. However, if the real part of the mass is taken as physical, as is usual in physics calculations, it is

m = 9.75 ten power minus 31 kilograms

compared with an electron mass of

m = 9.10953 ten power minus 31 kilograms

On average in the Compton effect the mass of the photon calculated over all scattering angles is very similar to the mass of the electron. Recall that this is the result of the foundational Einstein / de Broglie equations themselves, (combination of special relativity and quantum necahnics), but without assuming a zero photon mass. The whole of standard particle physics depends on special relativity and quantum mechanics. Compton made the very special assumption of zero photon mass. This assumption is unphysical , because spacetime is reduced from four dimensions to two, and the little group of the Poincare group becomes E(2), an unphysical group. The CERN set up just brushes all these fundamental flaws aside and ignores the Einstein / de Broglie School of physics, or the photon mass physics.

History of the Newlands Estate

June 30, 2013

This was bought from the Dyffryn Estate by my great grandfather William Newlands in 1926, freehold (in fee simple) – a total of 43.5 perches, 1,100.115 square metres – attached Deed of 1926. Large sections of the land were fenced off by neighbours circa late nineteen twenties, possibly under some kind of amicable agreement, but the section of Mountain Road adjacent to Rhyddwen Road was never fenced or conveyed, so it is owned by the five great grandchildren of William Newlands because three generations died without making a will. I have a double claim because the Road is directly adjacent to my freehold. There appears to be no conveyance record of any kind, the fenced in land was acquired by a legal kind of encroachment on the Newlands Estate of 1926. So this is a precise definition of what will go into the Newlands Family Trust for conservation and protection of the Welsh language. The construction of turbines on the beautiful and unique land of Betws was largely due to foreign ownership of farms sold to them by Welsh speakers. So laws need to be enacted by the Welsh Government to prevent sales of farms and houses in largely Welsh speaking areas, or a Trust Movement, in which families protect their heritage by Trust. Otherwise all the land will be bought up and the Welsh language severely damaged or destroyed entirely. This is wholly illegal under EEC laws protecting indigenous minority languages in Europe. So the appearance of turbines in Betws is entirely due to the greed of farmers seeking subsidies. All are newcomers hostile to the Welsh language. The Welsh Government must act against them in self defence. The appearance of turbines on the supremely beautiful Mynydd y Gwair is due to the wicked greed of the Somerset Trust. Laws must be enacted to nationalize land in Wales and to protect the Welsh language. Otherwise the soul of a nation will be sold to the devil himself.

adeedsofBrynAwelHouse.pdf

Dyffryn Estate

June 30, 2013

Many thanks, I will try to trace the Gwyn Family to Prince Brychan Brycheiniog, our mutual ancestral cousin. I like the Irish Land Acts a lot, introduced by Gladstone, Parnell and Balfour, and by the Irish Free State. The aim should be to reclaim all the land lost in Wales by encroachment, including turbine encroachment, and the demolition of all turbines. The evil of absentee landlordism led to the Great Famine in Ireland, insanely brutal evictions, and to the Highland Clearances and famine in the Highlands and Islands. In my opinion the sale of land and houses, and monoglot immigration, should be prohibited entirely in selected ares of Wales where language is still strong. The language is now fighting back strongly, especially among the under sixteen age group. All claims to mineral rights in freeholds such as mine should be abolished. Many sweeping reforms like this are long overdue.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/06/2013 19:28:46 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: History of this House

The Dyffryn Estate was owned by the Gwyn family of Neath and was centered around Cadoxton. The family also of course owned the Abercraf Estate which they largely retained until the 1920s when the freeholds were generally sold. They for instance owned the freehold of Tymawr in Caehopkin and adjacent land exploited for its coal reserves. They also owned the freeholds for practically all the pubs from the Gwyn Arms down to the top side of Ystradgynlais. They claimed descent from Brychan Brycheiniog.

Stuart Davies

Subject: History of this House

Thanks to Sia^n Ifan and Gethin ap Gruffudd for an offprint of “Land Ownership Change in a Glamorgan Parish, 1750 – 1850.” In this document the diary of Weston Dillwyn mentions on 14th October 1821 tenancies of Lord Jersey all bought by Mr Gwyn Attorney of the Dyffryn Estate. These include Pen y Fedwas; Pant Baban (the farm next door to or “Pant y Bedw”), Fagwr Wen, Cefn Parc, Blaen yr Olchfa, Melin Wen, Pant y Milwr Isaf, Tir Pen yr Heol, Pant y Coed Cae, Pen Twyn, Llwyn Ifan, Pant Lassau Uchaf, Mason’s Arms, Ffynon Fadog. A total of 540 acres all bought by some rich lawyer from Neath. The Dyffryn Estate sold a total of 43.5 perches to William Newlands in 1926. The new Land Act would prevent any one person owning so much land. Beaufort’s power relied on out dated privileges and prerogatives which led to many bitter and protracted disputes. So Beaufort was always a greed ridden absentee landowner. The Dyffryn Estate still tries to hang on to mineral rights even today. All land in Wales should be nationalized according to Socialist principles, and divided up among the local people. This makes the sale of 48 Rhyddwen Road even more deplorable, it ignores a long history.

FOR POSTING: Composite Transformations from HST Images.

June 30, 2013

I think that this is a brilliant piece of work by Robert Cheshire, resulting in many insights and images. I throw it open for discussion and hereby post it on the blog. I am sending it to Dave Burleigh for posting on the site.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/06/2013 17:14:20 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Composite Transformations from HST Images.

Dear Myron,
Please find attached a short video and a longer Word doc as parts 1 and 2 of “Observations and Transformations” and of photo data experiments.
I would appreciate a proof reading to ensure I’ve made no gaffs in my verbal interpretations! I will correct any of such upon your advices.
Part 1 is a “Method” video, basically showing how the transformations are made. It should preface the written work of Part 2.
The photos (in Pt 2)do not necessarily relate directly to the text in specific order but overall, and as a collection of studies of the constructs of “composite transformations”.

Best regards,

Robert

=

ObservationsinImagesofGalacticDynamics-Pt2.doc

Invitation to Stephen Crothers

June 30, 2013

You are very welcome to attend the Fourth AIAS Conference next year, probably again mainly at Aberystwyth, and no doubt the Third AIAS Conference will study your talk in detail. I think that the only thing that will stop the particle circus is the world running out of fuel and food. So much for natural philosophy that at one time promised to enlighten the masses. Roger Penrose has been running around the world half his life it seems to me. If he is peering through a big bang to another world he needs glasses made out of dark matter. I think he is in another world already. Congratulations once more and good journey home.

In a message dated 29/06/2013 17:57:04 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Professor Evans, Thank you most sincerely for the invitation to Aberystwyth. Unfortunately flight logistics and other commitments prevent me from being able to come on this occasion. If not for the conference in Russia I would have certainly attended the Conference in Wales. Perhaps I can attend the next AIAS Conference.

Roger Penrose will speak at a conference (Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory) at the Baumann State Technical University in Moscow this week. I was also invited to that conference, but I could not make it and that in Protvino. I would have relished the opportunity to tangle with Penrose in public. Penrose will speak on two topics (i) Twistors, (ii) Looking Through the Big Bang to Another World. I think the title of his talk speaks for itself!

Thank you for posting my Protvino presentation to the AIAS site, and for proposing to use it at the AIAS Conference.

Kind regards,

Steve Crothers

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:34 PM, <EMyrone> wrote:

This is one of many cover ups, they bought up all the quilts. There are many like minded people – this happened to be a conference where all the participants were standard physicists. MAyeb Steve can fly over to Aberystwyth if schedule permits.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 29/06/2013 11:56:36 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Talk by Stephen Crothers

Dear Stephen,

Well done!

You need a drink after that, but that will by yourself amidst icy looks.

It sounds as if things are getting worse after the cover up at the collider in CERN.

At least their neutrino revelations as faster than light fell apart.

Best Wishes

Kerr
Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013, 7:44
Subject: Talk by Stephen Crothers

Congratulations on giving this talk before the party faithful. Obviously they are not scientists. I think that the use of twenty billion dollars for this new accelerator is utterly disgraceful, and the money is much better spent on real science such as research into new energy, new forms of fuel, new forms of food production, and measures to combat the threat of methane being released from the Arctic (Michael Jackson). It is obvious that their kind of peudoscience is wildly out of control, Higgsinos will probably have five hundred adjustable variables, a new world record. I bet that none of these cats ever read the UFT papers, particularly UFT225, and they can be dismissed as propagandists of no interest to professional scientists. So stalinist propaganda has been replaced by one based on higgsinos, little Higgses. I advise Governments not to fund this new monster collider in view of the urgent problems now facing humankind. Congratulations to Stephen Crothers on having the courage to tell the truth. Safe journey home!

In a message dated 28/06/2013 19:25:02 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Professor Evans,

I spoke today at the conference in Protvino, Russia. I made it so simple that all understood, and they were very displeased. One arrogant fellow got up and left during my talk. Afterwards, during question time, they went on the attack but could offer no counter arguments and instead tried to evade the issues. Another bloke tried to accuse me of things I did not even say in my talk, so I stopped him and set him straight in front of everybody. Others told me that I should not criticise if I did not offer an alternative theory. One fellow particularly addressed me in this fashion, and so I told him that what he said was false because I am not obligated to invent another theory just because I proved their theory fallacious. That silenced him. Nobody would talk to me afterwards, not that many did beforehand, but they went out of their way to avoid me. It was madness. Here is what I opened with.

BLACK HOLE UNIVERSE
Is spatially infinite, is static, is not expanding, is asymptotically flat.

BIG BANG UNIVERSE
Is either spatially finite or infinite, is non-static, is expanding, is not asymptotically flat.

Thus the black hole and the big bang are contradictory, and so no black hole universe can be in a big bang universe, or even be in another black hole universe, and no big bang universe can be in a black hole universe or in another big bang universe.

So what did they collectively decide to do in the end? Pretend that nothing has changed and go on regardless.

Today’s programme (final day) was on black holes and cosmology. They invoked cold dark matter, warm dark matter, sterile neutrinos, primordial ‘non-relativistic’ black holes, evaporating black holes, primordial gravitational waves from the big bang, ‘normal’ black holes, temperatures of all these black holes and of the early universe, Higgs bosons with strings, and on and on.

The first two days was on particle physics. It is as bad as cosmology and black holes. They claim that their alleged Higgs boson is composite and made up of or involves Higgsinos (I kid you not). They have new particles all over the place, and Supersymmetry despite no experimental evidence for it and no actual theoretical model, and Quark Gluon Plasma, and other things. They are also already talking about a new collider to replace the Large Hadron Collider (it is called the International Linear Collider – ILC). It seems it is a done deal, and will be introduced to the public at a convenient time, at a cost of at least $20 billion. Don’t worry that people in this world don’t have money enough for food – give us a bigger collider!

Kind regards,
Steve Crothers

Feedback for www.aias.us, June 2013 To Date

June 30, 2013

As usual the feedback can be found at the end of the attached file. There was the usual intense worldwide interest in all material on the site, a total of 2,720 items. There were 75,731 hits from 15,653 distinct visits (about 150,000 readings), 11.60 Gbytes downloaded, 52, 646 page views from 95 countries, led by USA, Britain, Mexico, Germany, Canada, China, France, Spain, …..

overview1.docx

Daily Report Saturday 29/6/13

June 30, 2013

There were 2,188 hits from 530 distinct visits, 32.1% spiders mainly from Google and MSN. Auto1 303, Auto2 84, CEFE 98, Englynion 33. Mesh Corporation Japan extensive, United States National Archives general; Joint Institutes of Nuclear Research Dubna Russia UFT88. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for June 2013.