My two international petitions for three Welsh medium schools in Mawr are gaining support. This is intended to counter the disaster left by Ioan Richard, during whose tenure Mawr has been almost completely anglicised, a wasteland in which the Welsh language has been murdered. Richard is well known for using abusive language, for example against myself, but against many others throughout Wales. On the one occasion that he stood for election to Parliament he came last, and faded into oblivion. His Mawr Community Council was severely reprimanded twice by the Audit Office of the Welsh Assembly. This is utterly disgraceful and at that point I decided to have no further contact with him. The Mawr Development Trust went bankrupt. Many people have complained bitterly about him to me as Armiger or Squire, including three councillors. Armiger is the Latin for Squire. The Council was first reprimanded in 2011 and again in 2015. As a result there has been a complete collapse in confidence among the silent majority. It is felt that the Mawr Community Council should be wound up. Several of the people I have spoken to expressed relief that Richard finally resigned, resigned or retired makes no difference, he is finally gone. I have known some of these people all my life, all put in a bad word for Richard. He has not commented on the fact that my car was subjected to severe criminal damage amounting to several hundred pounds, that I have been threatened with physical violence, and that the police made a house to house investigation. He has not commented on the fact that I was sent a hate mail letter investigated by the Neath Hate Crime Unit. Any real County Councillor would have been seriously concerned. I mentioned this in a Lands Tribunal to the Tribunal Judge, who asked when this incident occurred. The Judge was clearly angry. Richard turned up at the Tribunal for some reason and was asked by my barrister what he had against me. Under oath, he denied having anything against me, but his various postings reek with egregious malice and began well before the Tribunal. A high level police investigation has been ordered by the Commissioner for South Wales into a hate blog to which Richard contributes. This hate blog contains many instances of gross insults, defamation, ethnic hate crime against the People of Wales, cyberbullying, threats, documented death threats, multiple theft of postings, and so on. Is this the way for a former Mayor of Swansea to behave? For many years noone would have him as Mayor. Richard sometimes describes me childishly as “Moron”, as if we are still in the playground. Many of us find this this grossly offensive to Crown and Parliament, so does every decent person in Mawr. Richard is grossly distortionist, and forgets all my work against wind turbines. He was ineffective and completely failed to stop them. In one strange posting he ranted about the Mawr Community Council being bedevilled by hecklers, allowed by the then Chair who seems to have been a friend of Evans (that’s me apparently) and it had become a shouting shop doing nothing. This made me fall off my chair in laughter. The truth is that he resigned from the Community Council because there was such intense outrage at his plans for thirty houses which would have totally destroyed what is left of the Welsh language. In the Lands Tribunal he bowed his head before the Judge. My eight years of dangerous voluntary work in clearing bike vandals is not mentioned, and I never saw him in any position of danger out on Gelliwastad. In fact most of Mawr never saw him at all. My work in getting cars off pavements is not mentioned. So he had no credibility left as a Councillor and finally evaporated. At one point he started to communicate with us at AIAS / UPITEC via Stephen Crothers in Australia, with pseudonym “The Mole”. Another of his pseudonyms was “Y Dyn Gwyrdd”, “The Green Man”. That is a perfect rendering of envy and bile, van Gogh could not have done better. This is all rather odd, many people find him rather odd. The Ombudsman agreed with me that his language is more than regrettable, and after being criticised heavily, he finally retired. On another occasion he criticised a letter by Dr. Shah which stated that I am in perfect health, claiming that Shah’s accidental omission of a date indicated a conspiracy with the Devil. I needed this letter for an Employment Tribunal case in which I was awarded considerable compensation. Last yearÂ (2017) I was again found to be in perfect health by a PIP interviewer, and fortunately have always been in perfect health. Ioan Richard did nothing for Mawr in forty years. My family has been here since Tudor times and built up this village to a high level of culture: the Jones, Hopkin, Havard and Newlands families. I won my objection at the Land Tribunal by proving that Ellis Williams made a false statement of truth under oath. My case was an objection, not a land claim. The Tribunal found that the garage was built on an unadopted highway and was never gifted to my very good and life long friend Cen Williams. I found a 1917 map which showed that the land upon which it was built was part of the Newlands Estate, not any other Estate. This is just a short note to start to put the record straight. There are so many distortions that they would waste my time as the world’s most prolific scientist. In the immortal words of Oscar Wilde, Richard is summed up as follows: “There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about ” Long may the silence last.

## Archive for August, 2018

### Swansea County Council : Welsh Medium Schools in Mawr

August 31, 2018Hi,

I wanted to let you know about this petition I just started on Change.org, "Swansea County Council : Welsh Medium Schools in Mawr".

You can read more about it and sign the petition here:

https://www.change.org/p/swansea-county-council-welsh-medium-schools-in-mawr?utm_medium=email

### 413(8): Coordinate Transform Proof of Precession and Shrinking

August 31, 2018This is a simple proof that the coordinate (1) produces a precessing and shrinking orbit as t goes to infinity. The modifications in Kepler’s three laws are discussed. As the angular velocity of the orbit goes to infinity the distance between m and M decreases to zero. In fact this is very well known. It is also well known that the dependence of phi on t must increase monotonically as in Eq. (1) (Marion and Thornton, “Classical Dynamics”, third edition, chapter seven). The ECE theory explains the precession of the S2 star through equation (13). The Einstein theory fails by an order of magnitude to explain the precession of the S2 star. This drastic EXPERIMENTAL failure of the Einstein theory is again very well known to leading astronomers, and the Einstein theory has been abandoned by astronomers independent of AIAS / UPITEC. This means that black hole theory, Big Bang, gravitational radiation, claims to magical precision and so on have been abandoned, although the propaganda is still blasted out to a general public that does not have the technical ability to understand anything at all about EGR. The ECE theory is widely seen among the professional colleagues to be the successor to Einsteinian general relativity. This is shown objectively by fourteen years of very detailed scientometrics of high accuracy.

### 413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

August 31, 2018Many thanks! I think I will write one more note and then write up UFT413. So even in its classical limit the frame rotation theory is easily able to explain the main features of the Hulse Taylor binary pulsar, precession and orbital shrinking. This is done without the use of gravitational radiation. Stephen Crothers has heavily criticized the experimental claims of LIGOS, which has wasted hundreds of millions in funding.

413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

The graph of eq.(11) shows a decreae of r for an exponentially growing omega_1, in accordance with the findings for note 3, model 2. This is consisitent.

Horst

Am 30.08.2018 um 06:50 schrieb Myron Evans:

Fwd: 413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

Many thanks, the orbital shrinkage can be plotted from Eq. (11) and comes directly from L = m r squared d phi’ / dt. The coordinate system is changed from (r , phi ) to (r, phi’) where phi’ = phi + omega sub 1 t. In the hamiltonian, phi is changed to phi’. This results in Eq. (14), in which the alpha and epsilon are defined with phi replaced by phi’. A useful rule is that whenever phi occurs in any calculation or situation, it is replaced by phi’, but r remains unchanged. The Lagrangian calculation is also correct, it is equivalent to the hamiltonian calculation and leads again to Eq. (14). I agree that r(t) defined by phi and r(t) defined by phi’ are different. The orbit is also defined by phi replaced by phi’, leading to Eq. (14). So we simply plot alpha versus t from Eq. (14). The answer to the mystery is that alpha, the half right latitude or semi latus rectum of a shrinking ellipse, also shrinks with time according to Eq. (14). The cosine function in Eq. (14) is always greater than or equal to – 1 and less than or equal to 1 as time t goes to infinity. However, as time t goes to infinity, r shrinks to zero and so alpha / (1 + epsilon cos phi’) shrinks to zero. The quantity omega = d phi / dt is defined with phi (i.e. equivalent to omega sub 1 goes to zero, or no frame rotation) , giving the angular momentum L sub 0 when there is no rotation.

Re: 413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>PS: Isn’t omega be observed in the observer system? Then it could not be

identified with L_0 as in eq. (8), or am I wrong?Horst

Am 28.08.2018 um 12:13 schrieb Myron Evans:

> The shrinkage is expressed most clearly through equations (11) and

> (12), in which r can be plotted against t, resulting in Eq. (12). The

> shrinking orbit is then Eq. (14), from which the half right latitude

> can be plotted as a function of t. The orbit is given correctly by

> both the lagrangian and hamiltonian methods, so all is self

> consistent. The dependence of r on time of a binary pulsar can be

> measured in astronomy and the ECE theory compared with the data.

### Book of Scientometrics Updated to 29/8/18

August 31, 2018This is The Book of Scientometrics Volume Two updated to 29/8/18, showing the usual intense interest in universities, institutes and similar worldwide. The Book of Scientometrics Volumes One (UFT307) and Two has been available since April 30th 2004 and shows overwhelming and permanent acceptance of ECE theory worldwide, and by implication, almost complete rejection of the obsolete standard model of physics.

### Daily Webalizer Report 29/8/18

August 31, 2018The equivalent of 122,038 printed pages was downloaded (444.952 megabytes) from 3,452 downloaded memory files (hits) and 537 distinct visits each averaging 5.1 memory pages and 8 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 35.35, 53.9% spiders mainly from Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. University of New South Wales UFT177; York University Canada publications; Apple Inc. spidering; SWR4 Broadcasting Germany UFT311; Active Minds Medical Network extensive; Mathematics National Taiwan University UFT102. Intense interest all sectors, webalizer and weblogs file attached.

### Note Concerning Bruhn to Prof. Bo Lehnert

August 30, 2018I note that Bruhn sent you a letter in which he attempted to put forward the nonsensical notion that the ECE theory is not Lorentz covariant. He insultingly described my work as a “distortion”. On close scrutiny by able scholars, it was found that Bruhn deliberately misrepresented ECE theory with false mathematics. Bruhn’s output of work is miniscule and he suddenly disappeared in 2008 after a prolonged campaign of harassment, and abuse and insult of the British Head of State. The ECE theory is Cartan geometry itself, which is generally covariant and therefore Lorentz covariant. Bruhn also attempted to claim that the B Cyclic Theorem is not Lorentz covariant,whereas the B Cyclic Theorem is the frame of reference itself (see UFT89). The frame of reference is automatically covariant. For example the Cartesian frame i x j = k et cyclicum transforms invariantly under the rotational Lorentz transform. Bruhn was thoroughly answered in UFT89 for example, and in many other ways, and suddenly disappeared in 2008 after a campaign of harassment which destroyed van der Merwe’s journals in a completely unethical and some would say, illegal manner. Bruhn also harassed members of the Royal Swedish Academy such as yourself and also SciTopics of Elsevier, which tipped me for a Nobel Prize, thus strengthening your nominations. Your pioneering nominations are perfectly sound and ECE is now mainstream physics. Many of its papers and books are by now influential classics. I do not think that a small group of harassing , semi legal, dogmatists should be allowed to influence the Royal Swedish Academy in an attempt to distort nominations and prevent a candidate from being awarded a Nobel Prize. Harassment is illegal in almost all laws. Lakhtakia is suspected of ethnic hate crime, in that a series of abusive e mails mocking the People of Wales were received at my address. These were traced to within a few hundred metres of his workplace at Penn State. The Penn State administration opened an enquiry. I found that ‘t Hooft did not have the technical ability to understand Cartan geometry. The defence of ECE theory is wholly impregnable. It is Cartan geometry itself within a scalar that transforms the geometry into physics. Wikipedia was commandered by people like Lakhtakia, who is also suspected of having impersonated ArXiv staff. I have expereience of Lakhtakia slamming down a telephone receiver in uncontrollable rage on more than one occasion when I tried to explain B(3) to him. I had helped him from Cornell in his early career. As Oscar Wilde wrote, “No good deed goes unpunished.”

### 413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

August 30, 2018Many thanks, the orbital shrinkage can be plotted from Eq. (11) and comes directly from L = m r squared d phi’ / dt. The coordinate system is changed from (r , phi ) to (r, phi’) where phi’ = phi + omega sub 1 t. In the hamiltonian, phi is changed to phi’. This results in Eq. (14), in which the alpha and epsilon are defined with phi replaced by phi’. A useful rule is that whenever phi occurs in any calculation or situation, it is replaced by phi’, but r remains unchanged. The Lagrangian calculation is also correct, it is equivalent to the hamiltonian calculation and leads again to Eq. (14). I agree that r(t) defined by phi and r(t) defined by phi’ are different. The orbit is also defined by phi replaced by phi’, leading to Eq. (14). So we simply plot alpha versus t from Eq. (14). The answer to the mystery is that alpha, the half right latitude or semi latus rectum of a shrinking ellipse, also shrinks with time according to Eq. (14). The cosine function in Eq. (14) is always greater than or equal to – 1 and less than or equal to 1 as time t goes to infinity. However, as time t goes to infinity, r shrinks to zero and so alpha / (1 + epsilon cos phi’) shrinks to zero. The quantity omega = d phi / dt is defined with phi (i.e. equivalent to omega sub 1 goes to zero, or no frame rotation) , giving the angular momentum L sub 0 when there is no rotation.

Re: 413(6): Orbital Shrinkage Equation

To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

PS: Isn’t omega be observed in the observer system? Then it could not be

identified with L_0 as in eq. (8), or am I wrong?

Horst

Am 28.08.2018 um 12:13 schrieb Myron Evans:

> The shrinkage is expressed most clearly through equations (11) and

> (12), in which r can be plotted against t, resulting in Eq. (12). The

> shrinking orbit is then Eq. (14), from which the half right latitude

> can be plotted as a function of t. The orbit is given correctly by

> both the lagrangian and hamiltonian methods, so all is self

> consistent. The dependence of r on time of a binary pulsar can be

> measured in astronomy and the ECE theory compared with the data.

### Daily Weblogs Report 28/8/18

August 30, 2018The equivalent of 453,099 printed pages was downloaded (1.652 gigabytes) from 5,216 downloaded memory files (hits) and 633 distinct visits each averaging 7.1 memory pages and 10 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 86.87, top referrals total 2,497,144, 69.4% spiders mainly from Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT395 to UFT412; Apple Inc. spidering; University of Seville UFT406 and UFT408; Samsung Corporation South Korea CV, my page; Naval Marine Command Internet UFT177; Science Museum National Autonomous University of Mexico F3(Sp); University of Edinburgh spidering. Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.

### Note 413(7): Vacuum Force from Frame Rotation

August 29, 2018In this final note for UFT413 it is shown that the de Sitter type frame rotation (2) produces the vacuum force (5) as part of the underlying Cartan torsion, whose orbital part can be expressed as the total force (4). Using the same concepts as used in the well known Lamb shift theory, the modulus of the spin connection can be expressed as Eq. (12), in which the isotropically averaged vacuum fluctuation of position is developed in terms of the angular velocity of frame rotation. This spin connection produces the precessing ellipse (15) and the precession (16). The precession of the S2 star is explained by Eq. (16) by the product of the time T taken for one orbit and the angular velocity of frame rotation omega sub 1. The Einsteinian general relativity fails completely to describe the S2 star, by an entire order of magnitude, so the twentieth century dogma in general relativity has collapsed completely, to be replaced by plausible theories such as ECE and ECE2. In Alwyn van der Merwe’s memorable description, this is “the post Einsteinian paradigm shift”, the new twenty first century enlightenment. “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right, a single experiment can prove me wrong.” (Albert Einstein). There are now several experiments which prove him wrong, notably the S2 star system and the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy. He has been proven wrong in nearly a hundred different ways in the UFT series on www.aias.us. The dogmatists mindlessly block progress by ignoring it.