Archive for October, 2012

Diary Statistics End of October 2012

October 31, 2012

From 1st January 2010, when stats of this type became available, to Oct 31st 2012 there have been 126,260 readings of my diary on www.aias.us (the “blog”) from one hundred and forty three countries, led by Britain, U. S. and Canada. There are nearly fifteen thousand postings and archives go back to 2006. The entire diary is kindly interwoven with feedback and transferred to pdf by AIAS Fellow Michael Jackson and archived quarterly at the British Library in London from the National Library of Wales. In the last thirty days the interest has been dominated by low energy nuclear reactors (LENR), the most read postings are: Brillouin energy theory; interest in LENR, proposed LENR conference at Aberystwyth, UFT229(3), LENR accepted, wave driven LENR. UFT226 – UFT230 on LENR are now available on www.aias.us.

Internal Cross Checks by Horst Eckardt, Douglas Lindstrom and myself.

October 31, 2012

Pleasure! The on-going internal cross checks by Horst, Doug and myself mean that the finished product is to all intents and purposes error free. As usual in physics the concepts must be tested against experimental data.

In a message dated 30/10/2012 17:59:20 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Many thanks for working this out in detail. I will study this tomorrow.

Horst

Am 30.10.2012 18:30, schrieb EMyrone

This note demonstrates in full detail my reply to Horst’s comment this morning and develops a new tetrad definition that can be used throughout ECE theory. The conceptual advances over the theory by Elie Cartan are summarized.

List of Papers Published in Journal and Future Plans

October 31, 2012

To Victor:

This is a list of papers published in the first six issues, and plans for the first 24 issues drafted up some time ago. We can post each finally published paper on www.aias.us . As mentioned, I think that Issues 7 and 8 should be UFT203 to 230, then the following issues can be based on these plans. There are about one hundred and eighty papers available for publication in the journal over the next few years, and a large number of invited reviews in preparation.

ajournalfirst24issues.pdf

LIST OF PAPERS IN JOURNAL OF FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS AND.pdf

Overview File in Word 2007

October 31, 2012

This is the overview file in improved Word 2007 format.

overview.docx

Feedback for October 2012

October 31, 2012

This is found as usual at the end of the attached file, to date in October there have been 78,525 hits from 19,737 distinct visits, 49,708 previews from 99 countries, led by US, Mexico, Germany, Ukraine, Canada, Britain, Argentina, …. The overview file filters out the 2% sector known as universities, institutes and similar.

overview.doc

Daily Report 30/10/12

October 31, 2012

There were 2480 hits from 651 distinct visits, each of n real visits, 32.7% spiders from baidu, yandex, google and MSN. CEFE65, CEFEL40, FPL28, LMEP15. General Sarmiento National University Argentina index; Concordia University Canada UFT4; National Technological University of Chile UFT222(Sp); University of Miami UFT4; University of California Los Angeles UFT175; Deaprtment of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Texas at Austin IJTP Crothers; Complutensian University Madrid Esay25(Sp); Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology Hyderabad India Space Energy; Italian National Computational Laboratory Univeristy of Salerno Italy LCR resonant; University of Salento Italy UFT103, 104; National Medical Holding Kazakhstan general; Mexican National Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (Potosino, coordinating several institutes) UFT177(Sp); National University of Mexico UFT174(Sp); Students University of Luton UFT205; Virtual Private Network of the Department of Statistics Oxford University UFT170; University College London UFT118. Intense interest all sectors, attached updated usage file for October, showing intense interest in all material on www.aias.us.

Commutativity of Matrix Triple Products and Tetrad as Metric

October 30, 2012

This note demonstrates in full detail my reply to Horst’s comment this morning and develops a new tetrad definition that can be used throughout ECE theory. The conceptual advances over the theory by Elie Cartan are summarized.

a231stpapernotes2.pdf

FOR POSTING : “Against Global Warming”, a new essay by Robert Cheshire.

October 30, 2012

This is a brilliant new essay by Robert Cheshire and I am forwarding it to Dave Burleigh for posting in the essay section of www.aias.us and simultaneously posting it on the blog. It inverts “Dogma” to give “Amgod”, a suitable summary of some of those among us who walk on immense pylons and flail their arms like the demented. Also forwarding to the entire Principia group.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 18:06:44 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Professor Evans,
Many thanks for your draft. I have given it careful review.

I note that you have not included in your legal argument any reference to the astonishing new ruling by the Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Perhaps you’ve not been advised of it yet. I strongly urge that you amend your proposed statement of claim to include reference to this potential game changing decision made last Summer. In it UNECE decided it was incumbent on all member EU states to enforce the Aarhus Convention. This gives additional weight to your human rights arguments and need for governments to apply due process (which they patently haven’t!).
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
As such, it is a requirement under the Convention that the EU must apply those principles as adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. In a nutshell all EU States must properly reassess their National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAP).
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
Pat Swords, author of the successful complaint to the UN that the EU now agrees it must apply, advises: “the Compliance Committee has shown that the EU’s renewable energy programme is proceeding without ‘proper authority’.” Currently, the EU has about 60,000 wind turbines and related infrastructure, which have cost some €180 billion.
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
I concur with Pat Swords that the EU and its 27 Member States must be suspend all further wind farm development until the conclusion of consultation as stipulated in the ruling. I have advised the Devon community I’m assisting in this matter and they are instructing their legal counsel accordingly. Among PSI there are only two of us qualified in law, myself and Alberto Miatello in Italy. I’m adding Alberto’s email for convenience so he may make use of all such evidence as he sees fit in his home country.

I hope that helps.
Best,
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com

AgainstGlobalWarming.doc

Compliance Committee of the United Nations: Betws and Mynydd y Gwair are Illegal

October 30, 2012

Many thanks indeed, this is indeed useful information. It is clear that the Swansea County Councils must consult legal advice on this point and throw out Mynydd y Gwair immediately. If the Welsh Ministers attempt to catalyse a crisis of democracy, become loathsome tyrants, and ignore a 95% opposition, they are acting illegally in my opinion on the grounds of UNECE. Betws was driven through against very weak opposition. Monstrous turbines are being built on some of the most beautiful and precious landscape in the whole of Europe. Betws violated many human rights, conservation laws, environmental laws, and ignored an 85% written objection majority. The opposition to Mynydd y Gwair consists of twenty groups, and is polled at 95%. It includes Swansea City and County Councils, and Neath Port Talbot Borough Council, town councils, community councils, CADW of the Welsh Government, environmental groups, conservationists and many others. What is needed now is the organization of a fund to cover legal costs of filing an injunction against Betws and a national fund to fight wind turbines through the courts. Perhaps a steering committee can be organized and a treasurer elected.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 18:06:44 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Professor Evans,
Many thanks for your draft. I have given it careful review.

I note that you have not included in your legal argument any reference to the astonishing new ruling by the Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Perhaps you’ve not been advised of it yet. I strongly urge that you amend your proposed statement of claim to include reference to this potential game changing decision made last Summer. In it UNECE decided it was incumbent on all member EU states to enforce the Aarhus Convention. This gives additional weight to your human rights arguments and need for governments to apply due process (which they patently haven’t!).
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
As such, it is a requirement under the Convention that the EU must apply those principles as adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. In a nutshell all EU States must properly reassess their National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAP).
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
Pat Swords, author of the successful complaint to the UN that the EU now agrees it must apply, advises: “the Compliance Committee has shown that the EU’s renewable energy programme is proceeding without ‘proper authority’.” Currently, the EU has about 60,000 wind turbines and related infrastructure, which have cost some €180 billion.
<!–[if
!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>
I concur with Pat Swords that the EU and its 27 Member States must be suspend all further wind farm development until the conclusion of consultation as stipulated in the ruling. I have advised the Devon community I’m assisting in this matter and they are instructing their legal counsel accordingly. Among PSI there are only two of us qualified in law, myself and Alberto Miatello in Italy. I’m adding Alberto’s email for convenience so he may make use of all such evidence as he sees fit in his home country.

I hope that helps.
Best,
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com

Checking Note 231(1).

October 30, 2012

Many thanks for going through this note. The first point is answered by the associative law of matrix multiplication:

(AB)C = A(BC)

(G. Stephenson, “Mathematical Methods of Science Students”, (Longmans 1968), p. 287, eq. (18)). Will think about the second point and report back.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 19:05:05 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Eq.(16) seems to be problematic because mu in eq.(15) is a dummy index, q sup a sub mu can not be isolated by multiplying with another g sub mu,nu.
In eq.(43) R can only be defined in this way because the tensors Omega and q are linearly dependent. This works in the example of the circular complex basis, I am not sure if this works in cases where the vector spaces or bases significantly differ. Perhaps one has to start with the wave equation ( 46) directly in that case.

Horst

Am 29.10.2012 11:37, schrieb EMyrone

This note gives the foundations of a new type of differential geometry in which the tetrad is defined as a mixed index metric. The whole of Cartan’s differential geometry can be developed in terms of mixed index metric, and classical and quantum equations of ECE unified physics derived. These contain more information because they are equations of a higher topology. This is the first note in this series.