Archive for April, 2018

Spin Connection for Light Deflection due to Gravitation

April 30, 2018

This is intended as a preliminary calculation for this topic, and shows that for light deflection the vacuum fluctuation is at a maximum. Another approach would be to solve Eq. (6) numerically for the spin connection. I will now proceed to write up UFT406.

a406thpapernotes6.pdf

Book of Scientometrics Updated to 28/4/18

April 30, 2018

There was very intense international interest, with several new records being set. From the top twenty universities in the world there have been consultations in April 2018 to date from: Duke*, Illinois, Princeton, Michigan*, Berkeley, Cornell, UCLA, Texas Austin, Edinburgh*, Imperial and National University of Singapore.

BSlatestApril2.PDF

Daily Report Saturday 28/4/18

April 30, 2018

The equivalent of 271,960 printed pages was downloaded (991.566 megabytes) from 3,428 downloaded memory files (hits) and 654 distinct visits each averaging 4.7 memory pages and 9 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 79.33, top referrals total 2,430, 543, 47.2% spiders mainly from Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 4496, Top ten 1602, Collected Evans / Morris 924(est); Principles of ECE 590, Collected scientometrics 513, Barddoniaeth (Collected Poetry) 432, Autobiography volumes one and two 379, F3(Sp) 377, Collected Eckardt Lindstrom 294, UFT88 212, Collected Proofs 174, MJE 155, PECE 143, PECE1 141, Evans Equations 120(est), Engineering Model 85, Llais 81, CV 79, UFT321 64, UFT311 58, SCI 46, ADD 34, PLENR 34, UFT313 59, UFT314 38, UFT315 43, UFT316 46, UFT317 54, UFT318 54, UFT319 51, UFT320 48, UFT322 61, UFT323 55, UFT324 62, UFT325 57, UFT326 42, UFT327 49, UFT328 49, UFT329 55, UFT330 42, UFT331 51, UFT332 58, UFT333 36, UFT334 43, UFT335 61, UFT336 57, UFT337 44, UFT338 47, UFT339 36, UFT340 46, UFT341 41, UFT342 45, UFT343 45, UFT344 38, UFT345 63, UFT346 50, UFT347 47, UFT348 56, UFT349 36, UFT351 52, UFT352 50, UFT353 40 UFT354 58, UFT355 40, UFT356 44, UFT357 37, UFT358 42, UFT359 34, UFT360 37, UFT361 32, UFT362 54, UFT363 51, UFT364 56, UFT365 33, UFT366 141, UFT367 51, UFT368 47, UFT369 48, UFT370 48, UFT371 37, UFT372 46, UFT373 32, UFT374 42, UFT375 29, UFT376 39, UFT377 40, UFT378 37, UFT379 24, UFT380 26, UFT381 43, UFT382 61, UFT383 61, UFT384 21, UFT385 42, UFT386 34, UFT387 38, UFT388 44, UFT389 42, UFT390 44, UFT391 47, UFT392 5, UFT393 44, UFT394 52, UFT395 50, UFT396 103, UFT397 56, UFT398 52, UFT399 132, UFT400 83, UFT401 61, UFT402 60, UFT403 56, UFT404 66, UFT405 30 to date in April 2018. Duke University educational note one; Philippines National Electrification Administration general; University of Edinburgh spidering; U. S. Awake Direct general. Webalizer file attached.

www.aias.us/new_stats/

Table of precessions

April 29, 2018

Many thanks, these data look to be right, For the three inner planets the total precession is larger than the part attributed to Einstein by a factor of about ten or more. For the outer planets this factor becomes much larger, so the correction of the influence of other planets has to be accurate to one part in a million, so the entire experiment becomes meaningless.

Daily Report 27/4/18

April 29, 2018

The equivalent of 307,186 printed pages was downloaded (1.120 gigabytes) from 3,091 downloaded memory files (hits) and 3,091 distinct visits each averaging 3.7 memory pages and 9 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 99.38, top referrals total 2,430,307, 51.6% spiders from Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 4308, Top ten 1549, Collected Evans / Morris 891(est), Principles of ECE 572, Collected scientometrics 499, Barddoniaeth (Collected Poetry) 420, Autobiography volumes one and two 366, F3(Sp) 363, Collected Eckardt / Lindstrom 289, UFT88 208, MJE 148, Collected Proofs 145, PECE 140, PECE2 134, Evans Equations 112, Engineering Model 81, Llais 80, CV 77, UFT311 55, UFT321 50, SCI 44, CEFE 43, ADD 33, PLENR 29, 83Ref 27, UFT313 57, UFT314 37, UFT315 42, UFT316 44, UFT317 52, UFT318 52, UFT319 48, UFT320 45, UFT322 54, UFT323 52, UFT324 59, UFT325 51, UFT326 40, UFT327 47, UFT328 47, UFT329 50, UFT330 39, UFT331 48, UFT332 56, UFT333 34, UFT334 42, UFT335 58, UFT336 52, UFT337 42, UFT338 45, UFT339 31, UFT340 37, UFT341 39, UFT342 43, UFT343 33, UFT344 37, UFT345 60, UFT346 47, UFT347 44, UFT348 52, UFT349 36, UFT351 48, UFT352 39, UFT353 38, UFT354 58, UFT355 37, UFT356 39, UFT357 36, UFT358 40, UFT359 33, UFT360 37, UFT361 31, UFT362 53, UFT363 48, UFT364 49, UFT365 32, UFT366 134, UFT367 48, UFT368 46, UFT369 44, UFT370 44, UFT371 36, UFT372 45, UFT373 31, UFT374 41, UFT375 28, UFT376 37, UFT377 39, UFT378 36, UFT379 24, UFT380 25, UFT381 40, UFT382 57, UFT383 64, UFT384 22, UFT385 41, UFT386 32, UFT387 35, UFT388 44, UFT389 41, UFT390 44, UFT391 47, UFT392 64, UFT393 44, UFT394 52, UFT395 50, UFT396 101, UFT397 59, UFT398 52, UFT399 129, UFT400 72, UFT401 60, UFT402 60, UFT403 55, UFT404 55 to date in April 2018. Bolivian Pontifical University UFT170(Sp); Thyssen Group ECE Workshop; Bremen Institute for Production and Logistics general; Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy Government of Ecuador UFT177(Sp); Institute for Nuclear Physics Karlsruhe Institute of Technology UFT175; Wayback Machine spidering, UFT139(Sp), UFT150(Sp); University of Edinburgh spidering. Intense interest all sectors, updated webalizer file attached.

www.aias.us/new_stats/

Very Positive International Reception to ECE Theory

April 28, 2018

In view of the collapse of standard physics the colleagues are invited to continue to consult our sites www.aias.us, www.upitec.org and www.et3m.net as they do at present, and develop their study of the new physics into organized courses and seminars. I have checked that www.aias.us is archived on the Wayback Machine www.archive.org up to March 26th. In view of their central importance to science the three sites should be carefully archived in as many ways as possible. We have always maintained cordial relations with the enlightened colleagues of all schools of thought. The record high interest in ECE being recorded at present means that standard physics has become almost entirely obsolete. We are very careful to try to avoid any errors, however minor but if any error is detected by a reader we can attend to it.

Table of precessions

April 28, 2018

Many thanks, the first column is correct, the second column should be about half of the values in the first column (see Eq. (25) of Note 406(3)), i.e. the geodetic precession is 3 pi MG / (c squared a), so the second column is right also. I agree that there is a factor 1/2 missing in the Lense Thirring formula so the values in the third column should be halved. So the LT contribution is negligible and the standard model gives a theoretical result which is much larger than the claimed experimental result. In other words the standard model itself must always give the sum of an Einstein precession and a geodetic precession, and a small LT precession. In the literature of the last century the geodetic and Lense Thirring precessions of planets hav been ignored when testing the theory against the experimental data. Of courseĀ  I agree that the standard model has been completely refuted, it is used here to show that even within its own terms of reference it is completely wrong, because the standard model neglects the geodetic and LT precessions of planets and considers only the Einstein precession of planets when making a comparison with the experimental data. The experimental claim is also very dubious as you know because the effects of other planets are calculated with a Newtonian method. Strictly speaking the gravitomagnetic method was used to calculate LT, the standard method would give about the same, negligible, result for planets.

Table of precessions
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

I computed the three precessions according to note 404(4). I am not sure if the Lense-Thirring precession is correct. You used the factor 2/5. Is there contained the factor 1/2 from

Delts_phi_LT = 1/2 Omega * t ?

For t I used one earth year. Or must this be related to one planetary year first? In the formula the factor t seems to be missing. For omega and R I used rotational frequency and radius of the sun. r is the average distance of every planetary orbit.

All values of the table are in radians per earth year, please check the entries where we already had values available.
A question concerning interpretation: if the Einstein values are void, why adding all three values in the table? Shouldn’t only the geodetic and Lense-Thirring precession be relevant?

Horst

Daily Report 26/4/18 , New record high interest in ECE2 articles

April 28, 2018

The equivalent of 358,749 printed paged as downloaded (1.308 gigabytes) from 5,253 downloaded memory files (hits) and 801 distinct visits each averaging 5.9 memory pages and 8 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 68.29, top referrals total 2,430,078, 38.7% spiders mainly from Baidu, Google, MSN and Yahoo. Collected ECE2 4218 (new record high), Top ten 1479, Collected Evans / Morris 855(est); Principles of ECE 532, Collected scientometrics 470, Barddoniaeth (Collected Poetry) 415, Autobiography volumes one and two 354, F3(Sp) 316, Collected Eckardt / Lindstrom 281, UFT88 202, Collected Proofs 158, MJE 145, PECE 138, PECE2 133, Evans Equations 109, Llais 80, Engineering Model 79, CV 75, UFT321 58, UFT311 54, CEFE 43, PLENR 26, UFT313 54, UFT314 37, UFT315 41, UFT316 44, UFT317 51, UFT318 49, UFT319 47, UFT320 45, UFT322 54, UFT323 49, UFT324 57, UFT325 48, UFT326 39, UFT327 47, UFT328 45, UFT329 49, UFT330 37, UFT331 47, UFT332 56, UFT333 34, UFT334 41, UFT335 58, UFT336 53, UFT337 51, UFT338 41, UFT339 30, UFT340 36, UFT341 39, UFT342 42, UFT343 42, UFT344 37, UFT345 58, UFT346 46, UFT347 44, UFT348 50, UFT349 35, UFT351 47, UFT352 47, UFT353 36, UFT354 57, UFT355 36, UFT356 39, UFT357 36, UFT358 38, UFT359 33, UFT360 36, UFT361 30, UFT362 51, UFT363 47, UFT364 47, UFT365 31, UFT366 133, UFT367 47, UFT368 46, UFT369 44, UFT370 43, UFT371 36, UFT372 42, UFT373 31, UFT374 39, UFT375 28, UFT376 36, UFT377 39, UFT378 36, UFT379 23, UFT380 25, UFT381 40, UFT382 56, UFT383 63, UFT384 21, UFT385 40, UFT386 32, UFT387 35, UFT388 42, UFT389 40, UFT390 43, UFT391 47, UFT392 63, UFT393 43, UFT394 51, UFT395 50, UFT396 99, UFT397 59, UFT398 52, UFT399 129, UFT400 82, UFT401 60, UFT402 60, UFT403 65, UFT404 55, UFT405 29 to date in April 2018. UNiversity of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT390 – UFT405; Institute of Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics Cuba UT271, UFT232; Max Planck institute for Nuclear Physics Heidelberg UFT85; University of New Hampshire Essay 15; Centre for Media Research and Training Equation Flowcharts; Solomon Islands National University general; Institute of High Energy Physics Moscow title page; University of Edinburgh spidering; Neath Port Talbot Council Autobiography volume two extensive reading; Awake Direct Organization general; Henderson County Library North Carolina site download, etensive consultation. Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.

www.aias.us/new_stats/

Records Being Shattered

April 27, 2018

Many thanks to Gareth Evans! The Gareth Evans / Trevor Morris papers are also attracting great interest, which I currently estimate every day in the daily report at the rate of 33 readings a day. This may have increased a lot by now. This series also makes fundamental advances and refutations and they have become classic papers. GJE was a member what became described by the BBC as the Hall of Fame group. Strictly speaking I was inducted into the Hall of Fame as a famous graduate of UCW, but I always refer to this as the Hall of Fame group of the EDCL at UCW Aberystwyth. This group won a world record of twenty prestigious post doctoral fellowships, GJE winning three: an Advanced Fellowship (1982), a University of Wales Fellowship (1980) and a Sloan Foundation Fellowship (1980). He also won the Mathews Prize for his year (1972) for best freshman results. I won the Mathews Prize in 1969. Fifty years later the merit of that group has developed into AIAS, of which GJE is Co President, and UPITEC, based in Boise, Idaho, USA. The huge number of Fellowships shows that the entire world of chemical physics recognized our merit, but the ineffective and self seeking administration of the EDCL did not (Autobiography Volume Two). This is a gross violation of human rights and Amnesty International took interest in the case.

Records Being Shattered
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

Congratulations to you!! Amazing endorsement of your work and achievements.

406(5) Light Deflection due to Gravitation and Vacuum Fluctuations

April 27, 2018

Superluminal Travel Possible
These are very interesting graphs which can go into Section 3 of UFT406. They follow directly from the definition of the relativistic velocity using no other assumption. The observable velocity is v, and the Newtonian v sub N is the observable velocity in the case gamma goes to one. In other cases v sub N is formal as you infer. So the famous “twice Newton” result is a direct consequence of the definition of the relativistic momentum, p = gamma m v. Our work in UFT150 to UFT155 showed that the Einstein method is obscure, I think that he came dangerously close to fiddling, being fond of the violin.

Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: 406(5) Light Deflection due to Gravitation and Vacuum Fluctuations
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

I made some plots for the dependencies between gamma, v and vN. The graphics are quite small in the protocol due to certain driver problems. It can be seen that v>c would be possible, but always vN<c. The meaning of vN is not fully clear to me. Only v is observable. vN seems to be a formal quantity when v ~ c.

Horst

Am 26.04.2018 um 13:07 schrieb Myron Evans:

406(5) Light Deflection due to Gravitation and Vacuum Fluctuations

This note gives the ECE2 force equation (6) from which light deflection due to gravitation is calculated to be exactly twice the Newton value, which is exactly the experimental result (e.g. UFT324). This result is a simple and direct consequence of the definition of relativistic velocity in ECE2 covariant general relativity. Nothing could be simpler and nothing could be more powerful. The claims of the elaborate and incorrect Einstein theory, in the context of light deflection, are well known to have been refuted in several ways in UFT150 to UFT155 and similar papers, all of which have become famous classics. The next note will calculate the spin connection and vacuum fluctuation associated with light deflection due to gravitation. In previous notes for this paper, UFT406, the Einstein theory of precession has been refuted completely in very simple ways. So all the tests of the Einstein theory have failed: planetary precession, Lense Thirring and geodetic precessions and light deflection due to gravitation. This was bound to happen sooner or later because the geometry of the Einstein theory is totally wrong (e.g the famous UFT88). There is one more claim for the Einstein theory, gravitational radiation, but that has been refuted completely by Stephen Crothers and by Horst and myself. See “Principles of ECE Volumes One and Two” in the blue box above my coat of arms on www.aias.us. These volumes also show that the Einstein theory fails completely in a whirlpool galaxy, while ECE2 succeeds. The avant garde ECE2 theory is relatively simple, and so far has succeeded in describing all the data. By now this is very well known internationally.

406(5).pdf