Archive for February, 2007

Applying as Individual

February 28, 2007

Subject: Applying as Individual
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:10:39 EST

Myron, if the opportunity arises that a grant from Europe may occur, please read the fine print about intellectual property. I read the European grant pdfs and could not find anything specifically.

Cheers john

PS: I agree about people who want to take over, I also find them overbearing.


Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 8:07 PM

annwvyn76] at [; gemma.smith] at [; simmonse] at [; ioan.richards] at [; phil.o’connor] at [; ewehoe] at [; john.hague] at [; fdamador] at [; sean] at [; dave] at [; HorstEck] at [; rob] at [; kp.phys] at [; thenarmis] at [
Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Registering AIAS

Exactly my thoughts, if Karel can demonstrate RFR, or show that he is making serious efforts to do so (as he certainly is), he and Charles University would be ideally placed for a big grant from Europe. It all depends on whether the standard referees can bring themsleves to be fair judges of an ECE proposal. In fact I am swinging my work away from space energy now into more interesting basic physics such as RFR because the irritating neuroticism of the inventors gives me the creeps. I have given space energy as much credibility as I can. RFR is actually my main interest – it has such obvious advanatges, and I am trained as a spectroscopist in the far infra red. RFR is also easily understood with the standard model, so it may be worth wording a grant application that way. This would be for post doctoral funds and equipment, overheads, consumables etc.

I think I can apply for one of these grants as an individual, as in the SERC Advanced Fellowship. I have a record number of Fellowships won in open competition so I am well used to the procedure. I have won the following post doctoral Fellowships in tough open competition: SRC, NRCC (Canada), ICI European, JRF Wolfson College Oxford; Ramsay Memorial, SERC Advanced Fellowship, two Univ of Wales Fellowships, Pilcher Senior, IBM UK Fellowship, two Leverhulme Trust Fellowships, von Humboldt Fellowship, plus seven honorary, making 19 in all. This was all for work less important than ECE. So logically there should be a good chance. I am quite used to making applications.

Several people have tried to take over AIAS in one way or another but since it is voluntary and very hard work they soon give up or I just end up blocking them electronically. Some are very overbearing with qualifications hard to find with a microscope, or very overbearing academics with no ideas.

15-27Feb07, Rest of World, Higher Ed. Sector.

February 28, 2007

Subject: 15-27Feb07, Rest of World, Higher Ed. Sector.
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:32:20 EST

New South Wales, INPI Gov. Brazil, UNICAMP, Gov. British Columbia Canada, McGill, Mc master, MUN Canada, Alberta, Toronto, IITM India, Nagoya Japan, Osaka, Ritsumei, YAmagata CIT, KAIST So Korea, Academica Sinica Taiwan.

15-27Feb07, Europe to, Higher Education Sector

February 28, 2007

Subject: 15-27Feb07, Europe to, Higher Education Sector
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:19:17 EST

JKU Austria, Free Univ Brussels, IMEC Belgium, Plovdiv Bulgaria, CERN, Irix Switzerland, LSNE Switzerland, UPC Czech Republic, German Synchroton Facility, KFA Juelich, Max Planck Informatics, Max Planck Quantum Optics, QSC, TU Berlin, TU Dresden, Hannover, Cologne, Leipzig, Munich, Paderborn, Rostock, Stuttgart, Barcelona, Valencia, Ensieta France, INSP France, NOOS France, SHOM France, F Comte, Marseilles, Poitiers, RITEH Hungary, YMFF Hungary, UCD Ireland, CSi Italy, Milan Polytechnic, Trieste, Milan, Padua, LUN LAtvia, EUR Netherlands, Twente, NTNU Norway, AMU Poland, IFJ POland, Krakow, UW Poland, Poznan, Wroclaw, UTL Portugal, RDSNET Romania, MTS-NN Russia, Omsk, PTN Russia, IRFU Sweden, UU Sweden, Agricultural UNiv. Slovakia, Bilkent Turkey, BOUN Turkey, Metu Turkey, Selcuk Turkey, Edinburgh, C251 EPSRC, Heriot Watt, Imperial, Loreto, New College Oxford, University Library Oxford, Southampton, Kent, Warwick, BBC, Assembly, Cerdigion, Cumbria.

USA to

February 28, 2007

Subject: 15-27Feb07, Higher Ed. Feedback : USA to
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:35:41 EST

A total of 87 US Universities visited _www.aias.us_ ( from 1-27 Feb., this is the list from 15 to 27 Feb., it includes the Headquarters of the US Airforce:

Arizona State Univ., Berkeley, Brown, Buffalo, Brigham Young, Caltech., Colorado, Univ Colorado Denver, Drake, Florida International, Central Pennsylvania, Harvard, Maine, Missouri, MIT, Michigan Tech., New Mexico State, Northwestern, Ohio State, OSU Okmulgee, Princeton, Penn State, Rice, Rooseveldt, San Jose State, Southern Methodist, Stanford, Swarthmore, Tarrant County, Temple, U Texas at Austin, Texas Medical Center, Tufts, U California System, UC Davis, Central Florida, UCLA, UC Santa Barbara, UC San Diego, Delaware, Iowa, U Illinois Urbana Champaign, U Mass., U Maryland, U Michigan, u Missouri St Louis, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Whitman, Wisconsin, Wright; Ames Lab., Argonne National Lab., BOP, Lawrence Berkeley, NIST, NOAA; US Airforce AFOSR, US Airforce Headquarters, US Navy NMCI, US NAvy NUWC.

Bedini Cole Device

February 27, 2007

Subject: Bedini Cole Device
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:29:35 EST

I think that this is the device that should be concentrated on to develop paper 63 and I thank John Shelburne for agreeing to forward all the information he can direct to the Prime Minister’s Office. This should if at all possible include information on the 100,000 amplifier as well as any other device deemed appropriate, such as the Bedini Cole device. It is to be noted that the Mexican Group approached me initially several years ago but now we need as much information from them as possible. If this is still not forthcoming, on some trivial pretext or other, attention should be switched to the Bedini Cole device. None of their proprietary rights is being affected, the information requested by Gari Owen is the test information. From what Franklin Amador has been able to gather the Mexican Group device works on IBM foundry technology of about 2004 with a particular type of dopant. They have accepted my explanation based on ECE, their own theory is not credible in any way, having been inspected by Franklin Amador and Charles Hubbard. So I have sought to give them credibility, in exchange for which I expect cooperation. As a US / British dual citizen my primary loyalty is to the US in military matters. This is by Oath at the citizenship ceremony. However, under the special relationship information is freely exchanged among the two Governments. As an appointee of the British Prime Minister’s Office I clearly have the responsiblity to advise that Office to the best of my ability, in a voluntary (unpaid) capacity, and cannot be swayed by commercial considerations or by personal gain. The advice must be of the highest quality possible. This is obviously what Gari Owen and I have been trying to do.

Civil List Scientist

Device in Paper 63

February 27, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Device in Paper 63
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:26:30 EST

I think that Sean makes sure that responses are posted, good comment by GJE!

It is great to see a working device (;topic=1988.0;attach=5732 ). I noticed the comment from a visitor to the site, “I am not sure what’s giving the motor its excess energy”. As Myron has shown, it works by spin connection resonance. Is anyone going to post this response on the website ? Best, Gareth

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:59:57 +0000> _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger

Details for Prime Minister

February 27, 2007

Subject: Details for Prime Minister
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:22:23 EST

Is there anything legal stopping the vitally needed transfer of details of the 100,000 amplifier to the PM’s Office? I see nothing wrong with this. There is no breach of proprietary details and scientific advances must be made open to all. One company or one individual should not be allowed to delay this process indefinitely when so much effort has been made in good faith to understand that company’s claims scientifically. Transfer of the Bedini device details will be most helpful, and I am most grateful for this.

Device in Paper 63

February 27, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Device in Paper 63
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:12:19 EST

One must click “Register” on the toolbar at the top of the web page to gain acccess to data and a video of the device in operation:,1988.0.html

————- Original message follows ————-

Hello John,

the forum pages you mention require a login to the forum. Could you gather the Web references of the Bedini Cole machine and post it to the AIAS environment directly?

Regards, Horst

—–Original Message—–

annwvyn76] at [; gemma.smith] at [; simmonse] at [; ioan.richards] at [; phil.o’connor] at [; ewehoe] at [; john.hague] at [; fdamador] at [; sean] at [; dave] at [; HorstEck] at [; rob] at [; kp.phys] at [; thenarmis] at [; john.shelburne] at [; jshelbu] at [
Sent: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 9:42 AM
Subject: Device in Paper 63

These were worked out with a Fourier analysis by AIAS Fellow Horst Eckardt who works for the Siemens Company in Munich, and as far as I can see you are correct, you have much mroe experience than I in electrical engineering. So this is further very good news for ECE theory because the Bedini Cole device is now known to work by spin connection resonance. This 63rd paper of and was inspired by your comments and the work of the Mexican Group. Hopefully we will be able to get all the 77 papers on to arXiv soon. Attached Message john.shelburne] at [

Subject: RE: Update on Mexican Group Device
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 9:31 PM Myron, I have a couple of questions on paper 63. As I see the device embodiment pictured in the paper, it is:

A pulsed solenoid with a bifilar winding sourced in increments of a wavenumber k, which results in excess power being derived from electrons made available from the atoms of the solenoid core. Excess power is derived from a conventional solenoid winding.

Is this correct?

If so, which specific multiples of the excitation frequency are necessary? I see equation #111 in the paper where specific multiples of the driving frequency are given. So, am I correct in assuming that a device should be constructed that incorporates these multiples?

If all this is true, then I believe I have found this embodiment which is an pulsed inductive device called the “Bedini-Cole motor.”

A mechanical rotor is constructed with equally spaced permanent magnets with north poles facing outwards. The pole faces are rotated past one end of a solenoid coil, inducing forward and backward EMF’s. The back EMF’s are collected SEPARATELY, and stored in batteries or capacitors. Transistors are used to switch solenoid windings, both inductive and noninductive. The rotor seeks it’s own period of rotation, and the battery permanent power storage is switched out leaving the capacitor to supply and store excess power. The energy accumulation increases indefinitely so the capacitor must bleed power off power continuously, or else explode due to excess charge accumulation. See long paragraph in the paper on page 32 and 33. I have attached an email to my colleague Frank Downs which has an attached link to an internet site detailing the motor.


________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.

Many thanks!

Philosophy and Applications

February 27, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Philosophy and Applications
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:10:59 EST

Excellent, we need the power of both US and British Governments to find out all details of how these devices work.

Attachment: smime.p7s

The space energy devices extract and convert energy at any location. Once finally prototyped, these are build-able by any competent lower level technician, much like lawnmower maintenance. It is therefore an “every-man” device, which will drastically change the large scale energy utility system.

—–Original Message—–

Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:23

annwvyn76] at [; gemma.smith] at [; simmonse] at [; ioan.richards] at [; phil.o’connor] at [; ewehoe] at [; john.hague] at [; fdamador] at [; sean] at [; dave] at [; HorstEck] at [; rob] at [; kp.phys] at [; thenarmis] at [; ngutierr] at [; aktas] at [; ffarahi] at [; raja] at [; mcorwin] at [; bfmelton] at [
Subject: Philosophy and Applications

I am basically a philosopher of course, holding the degrees of Philosophiae Doctor (Ph. D.) and Doctor in Scientia (D. Sc.), so my basic role is one of advancing natural philosophy. So to me the most important advance in ECE is the advance in natural philosophy per se. The applications of ECE happen to be very important at present, because humanity has got itself into a fuel crisis because of profligate greed. The logistics of device deployment can be left to experts in logistics of device deployment, similarly for global warming. I am not a meteorologist but trust that ECE will be of use to all kinds of people. I am not an electrical engineer but can suggest a few simple circuits as in paper 63 from the equations of resonance, in this case spin connection resonance. In my case, and that of others, the role of “university” has collapsed – the university has consistently failed to support philosophy. This leaves me no choice but to continue my philosophical work upon my own initiative. I am most grateful to the British Government for its generous appointment to the Civil List and concomitant high honour. It seems to me that it it of the utmost urgency and importance to deploy Space Energy devices, and no selfish individual motives should be allowed to stop this. We should not be distracted from this task by arguments about global warming, which no one fully understands. Our task at AIAS is first of all philosophical, then to scientifically understand, build, manufacture, and deploy devices to meet the much more urgent fuel crisis.

Civil List Scientist

Questions about torsion

February 27, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Questions about torsion
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:52:47 EST

The governing relation between geometry and energy momentum density in ECE theory is always:

R = -kT ————————— (1)

where R is the scalar curvature and is defined from the tetrad postulate in terms of the spin connection and general gamma connection. Here k is the Einsetin consatnt and T is the index reduced canonical energy momentum density. The general gamma connection is the Christoffel connection if and only if it is symmetric in its lower two indices. So Eq. (1) describes T due to torsion as well as T due to curvature. There may be gravitational torsion and electromagnetic torsion. The latter gives rise to the electromagnetic field:

F = A(0) T ————————— (2)

where in Eq. (2) T is shorthand for the Cartan torsion. The electromagnetic field equation is derived from the first Bianchi identity:

d ^ T + omega ^ T = R ^ q

re-expressed as

d ^ F = mu0 j —————————- (3)

and Hodge dual:

d ^ F tilde = mu0 J —————————– (3a)

.. The current j is

j = (A(0) / mu0) (R ^ q – omega ^ T) ———- (4)

The T in eqs. (2) and (4) is a shorthand for Cartan torsion (a vector valued two-form). In Eq. (1) T is the index reduced canonical energy momentum density. When there is interaction between gravitation and electromagnetism, j in Eq. (4) is not zero. This fact gives rise to optical effects such as polarization changes in light deflected by gravitation. These are observed and provide one of the numerous successful experimental tests of ECE theory (see News Section, thirty advantages)

Dear Dr. Evans, my name is Nicol√≤ and I already e-mailed you about the wedge product present in the antisymmetric metric. There’s a thing that I still don’t understand about the sources of the torsion field, since to me they are still energetic and then I suppose they should be source of a gravitational field. I don’t understand what are the electromagnetic sources you refer to in the antisymmetric equation. Can you please explain it to me clearly because I’m very interested in this part of the theory. Furthermore, I would like to know how do you explain electrostatics in terms of geometry or within your field equations, since this is another thing I wasn’t able to understand. Thank you for your patience.