This quirky judgment has one immediate consequence, the occupier of a garage built on a highway (adopted or unadopted) could be prosecuted by the local authority for obstruction. The precedent is clear: R(on the application of Smith) versus the Land Registry Peterborough Office (2009). In this case the claimant was a squatter who claimed title to part of a highway by parking his caravan on it for more than twelve years. The Land Registry rejected the claim for first registration of title over the land of the highway. The Registry noted that it is impossible to acquire title over a highway (adopted or unadopted) and given that the highway by definition is a public right of way, it is impossible to occupy it to the exclusion of all others. On judicial review the High Court rejected the application (Pelling Q. C. could see no way in which the possession needed to acquire adverse possession could be acquired other than by obstruction, a breach of what is now Section 137 of the Highway Act 1980 – a criminal offence). The Judge (Pelling) advised the local authority to prosecute for obstruction. The Judge in the Waters Evans cse therefore went against a High Court ruling, a mistake in law and grounds for an appeal. I will bring this matter to the attention of Swansea County Council and the local community council. According to the judgment Cen and Ellis were squatters on a public highway and could have been prosecuted. They never were prosecuted but neither was ever granted title.

## Archive for November, 2016

### Consequences of the Judgment

November 30, 2016### Discussion of Note 363(1)

November 30, 2016Thanks again! I will go through the protocol and make it into Note 363(2). It looks like a better approximation. The fundamental idea is that in the vacuum or aether:

r(t, r, theta) = r(t, r(t), theta(t))

In the classical dynamics of orbits (e.g. Marion and Thornton), r is a function only of time, r = r(t).

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 30/11/2016 11:24:00 GMT Standard Time

Subj: Re: 363(1): Orbital Precession due to a Fluid Vacuum or AetherI checked the note and tried a different way of approximations for Omega. The eqs. (16,17) can be considered as two equations with two unknowns v[r,N], v[theta,N]. Then these Newtonian velocity components can be re-expressed by the fluid velocities v[r,P] and v[theta,P]. This is eq. o4 in the protocol.

Then several approximations can be made. Assuming Omega_101 = Omega _202 = 0 gives eqs. o6. These can be resolved for the spin connections: o7. Obviously the spin connections depend on the ratio of velocity components. Inserting the definitions shows that these depend on the radial components and their derivatives: o12. Inserting precessing orbits then gives the results o15. With the approximaitoncos(x*theta)=cos(theta),

sin(x*theta)=sin(theta)your result (34) follows with Omega_202=0.

Modifying this tocos(x*theta)=cos(theta),

sin(x*theta)=x*theta

sin(theta)=thetagives an x^2 in the approximation o17, perhaps a better approximation

Horst

Am 29.11.2016 um 14:42 schrieb EMyrone:

This note shows that orbital precession is due to the spin connections (34), which come from the assumption of a fluid vacuum or aether. So orbital precession in this theory is an effect of the aether, vacuum or spacetime within the framework of ECE2 unified field theory.

### Final Version of Note 363(1)

November 30, 2016### Judgment in the case Waters versus Evans

November 30, 2016This judgment (or adjudication) was that the garage was built on an unadopted highway.and ignored the definitive evidence in 1863-507b in the attached map of 1917, evidence which shows that the 30 perches leased to William Newlands in 1898 were of a large enough area for two houses. The map shows that number 48 had been built about 1897 – 1898, and number 50 was built in 1926. The additional 13.5 perches conveyed to William Newlands in 1926 were obviously additional land, exactly as pointed out in my response. The garage was built on this additional land Therefore the judge or adjudicator ignored key evidence (this map), which was made available to him. The judge agreed that this land was not owned by the Philips Estate, exactly as in my response. The Appeals Court has ruled that an adopted highway cannot be subject to adverse possession. So why should an unadopted highway (Mountain Road) be subject to adverse possession? Indeed, all the sites I have read indicate that no highway of any kind can be subject to adverse possession. Adverse possession was not granted to Ellis Williams (despite all his paper witnesses) but was granted to the Waters, contrary to the Appeals Court ruling that no highway can be taken by adverse possession, and according to the judge himself, the garage was built on a highway. This makes no sense. There were many other problems with this case, and grounds for appeal. For example I was just told that I did not remember what I clearly remember – that Cen Williams was given permission to build the garage by the Newlands Estate. That is not a judgment, it is assertion without proof, and would never be accepted in Baconian science. Another problem is that I was not allowed to use the Welsh language in the hearing. That contravenes human rights legislation, which is now law. Another problem is that my witnesses were all ignored, and I had to prepare the case file for the applicants. They failed to prepare it. In my opinion, adverse possession is legalized theft of land, in this case theft of a highway, and this is the opinion of many lawyers. So I will draft many objections and ask for an appeal or judicial review. In my opinion cases such as this should be dealt with a local, Welsh speaking judge familiar with the laws and customs of Wales. This judgment means that anyone can build a garage in the road, and can take the road by simply locking up the garage. This is not natural justice and not even common sense

cc Trustees Newlands Family Trust.

### UFT362 OK

November 30, 2016I checked that UFT362 is written in such a way that the erratum does not appear in it. So it does not need to be reposted. However, I agree that there should be two different spin connections, and will develop this further in notes for UFT363. One spin connection is made up of r(t, r(t), theta(t)) and the other from v(t, r(t), theta(t)) in fluid dynamics.

### Discussion of 362(5), Erratum in Eq. (26)

November 30, 2016OK thanks again. Agreed, In Eq. (26) substitute r for v. This is the spin connection for Eq. (26). The spin connection for Eq. (27) contains v. I will correct this in UFT362 and repost, and correct the error in Note 363(1) and repost.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 30/11/2016 10:01:39 GMT Standard Time

Subj: Re: 363(1): Orbital Precession due to a Fluid Vacuum or AetherComing back to note 362(5), in eqs. (22) and (23) the same term with Omega appears at the rhs, but (22) is for the position vector and (23) for the velocity. There must be a difference, the spin connections cannot be the same because both are multiplied with the same vector

[r dot, r theta

dot].Horst

Am 29.11.2016 um 14:42 schrieb EMyrone:

This note shows that orbital precession is due to the spin connections (34), which come from the assumption of a fluid vacuum or aether. So orbital precession in this theory is an effect of the aether, vacuum or spacetime within the framework of ECE2 unified field theory.

### Discussion of UFT362

November 30, 2016Pleasure.

Discussion of UFT362

Ok, thanks, I overlooked the re-formulation in eq.(7) of note 362(5).

Horst

Am 27.11.2016 um 12:55 schrieb EMyrone:

I think that all is OK. It comes from Eq. (3) of Note 362(5), which I cross checked as in Notes for UFT361 and UFT362. It is precisely this term that is responsible for the transition from particle or classical dynamics to fluid dynamics. You could check it through using Eq. (3) of Note 362(5), which leads to Eq. (5) of that note. Eq. (7) is Eq. (5) in matrix format. The basic idea of UFT362 as you know is to assume that spacetime or the vacuum or the aether is a fluid governed by the ECE2 / Kambe equations of fluid dynamics. The basic idea of fluid dynamics is that the general vector field V is:

V = V(t, r(t), theta(t))

needing the chain rule of differentiation (e.g. “Vector Analysis Problem Solver”). The chain rule leads to the convective, material or Lagrange derivative, a special case of the Cartan derivative as we have just shown. In classical dynamics, V of a particle is V(t).

EMyrone

Sent: 25/11/2016 19:58:32 GMT Standard Time

Subj: Re: FOR POSTING: UFT362 Sections 1 and 2, Orbital Theory in a Fluid AetherShouldn’t in eq. (8) in the middle term, rhs, capital and lowercase v be interchanged? To my understanding the operator is

(v*del) V.

In (22) the Cartan derivative is applied to [r 0]. Shouldn’t this vector also appear in the last term of the rhs?

Horst

Am 25.11.2016 um 14:28 schrieb EMyrone:

This paper begins the consideration of orbital theory in a fluid spacetime, aether or vacuum, and shows that the aether or vacuum changes the orbit through the Cartan spin connection. For example an elliptical orbit may be changed into a precessing elliptical orbit by choice of spin connection. This can be considered in future work.

### Book of Scientometrics Second Volume Updated to 27/11/16

November 30, 2016November 2016 has been an outstanding month with study visits to date (27/11/16) from eighteen of the top twenty universities in the world by Webometrics, Times, QS and Shanghai rankings (* denotes repeat or multiple visits): Caltech*, Columbia*, MIT, Princeton*, Penn State*, Chicago, UCLA, UC San Diego, Texas Austin, Cambridge*, Oxford*, UCL*, Stanford, Texas A and M, Michigan, EPF Lausanne, ETH Zuerich. Final returns will be available in two days’ time as usual.

### Wind 7.14%, 1 – 25 mph, Wales 3 – 5 mph, 0815 local time

November 30, 2016The wind speed over Wales today is again only 3 – 5 mph, not enough to start any of the big turbines which have caused so much damage to the environment. The strong wind is again over the Shetlands, closer to Norway than to mainland Britain. Plaid Cymru and Labour need to switch policy so that a political consensus is built up quickly in order to have these useless scams demolished. If an effort is not put in to hydro soon, Britain will be at the mercy of foreign providers such as France, which charge a huge amount for exported electricity. Hydro will produce so much that it can be exported. This is common sense.

### Daily Report 28/11/16

November 30, 2016The equivalent of 90,362 printed pages was downloaded during the day (329.460 megabytes) from 1,829 downloaded memory files (hits) and 444 distinct visits each averaging 3.4 memory pages and 7 minutes, main spiders google, MSN and yahoo, printed pages to hits ratio of 49.41. Top ten 1439, Collected ECE2 1435, Evans / Morris 924(est), Collected scientometrics 501(est), F3(SP) 299, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 286, Principles of ECE 253, Eckardt / Lindstrom 253, Autobiography volumes one and two 250, Evans Equations 196, Collected proofs 174, UFT88 156, CEFE 113, Engineering Model 92, PECE 52, Llais 39, Self charging inverter 36, UFT321 36, UFT311 36, PLENR 35, ECE2 22, List of prolific authors 18, Lindstrom Idaho lecture 17, Three world records by MWE 16, UFT313 32, UFT314 34, UFT315 34, UFT316 24, UFT317 32, UFT318 25, UFT319 35, UFT320 38, UFT322 37, UFT323 32, UFT324 40, UFT325 37, UFT326 37, UFT327 38, UFT328 33, UFT329 27, UFT330 33, UFT331 26, UFT332 22, UFT333 26, UFT334 26, UFT335 21, UFT336 24, UFT337 30, UFT338 21, UFT339 23, UFT340 28, UFT341 26, UFT342 28, UFT343 22, UFT344 22, UFT345 30, UFT346 34, UFT347 27, UFT348 24, UFT349 26, UFT351 23, UFT352 30, UFT353 19, UFT354 42, UFT355 36, UFT356 38, UFT357 26, UFT358 27, UFT359 45, UFT360 43, UFT361 40, UFT362 12 to date in November 2016. City of Winnipeg UFT362, ECE Devices; University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT360 – UFT362; Swiss Federal Institute Lausanne UFT102; Swiss Federal Institute Zurich genera; Deusu search engine Taughannock Sequence of Photographs; Rhine Westphalia Technical University Aachen UFT175; Polytechnic University of Ejercito Ecuador Essay 19 Spanish; Stanford University ECE article; University of Salamanca UFT137(Sp); Brief Creatif Web film and motion design France general; Pohang University of Science and Technology South Korea UFT42; National University of Sciences and Technology Pakistan UFT88, UFT104; Students Technical University of Warsaw My page, PLENR. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2016.