This is easily googled up, as is anything these days. One of my avocations is genetics, I enjoy following the latest developments on google, and I know all about DNA from chemistry, all those amino acids. The oldest human skeleton in Europe is Paviland Man, found near Rhossilli in Gower in 1823. It is accurately known to be 33,000 years old, found in a cave that would have been seventy miles inland in those times, now on the coast. His diet was 15 – 20% fish, with some mammoth, whoolly rhinoceros and reindeer. A DNA study has probably been done, I will try to look it up and it may have the Rb1 gene, just a guess. The oldest known site in Ireland is 10,000 years ago at Mountsandel in Coleraine. The British and Irish are closely related genetically, and their nearest genetic relatives are the Basques, Y chromosome Atlantic Modal Haplogroup 1, Rb1 gene, direct descendants of stone age settlers. In this valley there are stone age monuments maybe six thousand plus years old. They can all be looked up on google. The Irish Leabhar Cabhla mentions the Milesians, sons of Mil, a soldier from Spain, that seems to be significant. Bryan Sykes claims to have traced the DNA of the British Isles to a small group in North East Spain. There is a strong predominance of the Haplogroup 1 gene throughout the British Isles. In Western Ireland it is over 99%. The gene responsible for red hair, fair skin and freckles is MC1R, originating 40,000 to 50,000 years ago. This is typically Irish and Scottish, and also occurs in Wales and other parts of Britain. It is thought that the Atlantic Modal gene originated in Lake Baikal in Siberia 50,000 years ago or so. If so, the Paviland Man could be one example of it, the oldest in Europe. I read these sites for pleasure, often they are very confused and confusing and contradictory, with much unadulterated bilge, but this kind of picture seems to be true. The Celtic languages could have originated in the Iberian Peninsula. Celtic was a predominant language group around 400 B. C. From tree dating of yew trees the Celtic language in Wales is 5,500 years old (yew tree at Defynnog which I have seen with my own eyes). My genealogy is now famous throughout the world because it is so accurate, that is a very valuable source of information. I am unusual in that I have considerable Norman blood, but the Norman DNA seems to have almost vanished. They were aristocrats who inter married a lot. It seems that my direct line Norman ancestor is Pierre de Gaunt d’ Or, Sir Peter Gunter, a knight of Bernard de Neufmarche. The Normans and Princes (my other ancestors) intermarried. My Y chromosme DNA will be Atlantic Modal, I don’t bother to take it because I know it already.
Archive for June, 2014
The next note will develop the metric from x theory as a Minkowski metric with the velocity defined as in Note 265(1). This metric gives the following phenomena self consistently and to experimental precision: orbital precession per radian, electromagnetic deflection by gravitation, gravitational red shift, gravitational time delay, photon velocity and photon mass at closest approach of a photon grazing the sun. The Einstein theory results in a disastrous singularity as shown in UFT264, and has been abandoned worldwide by Baconian scientists (the huge ECE / AIAS following). It should no longer be taught except as a matter of science history. It has been influential but for all the wrong reasons, notably cynically misleading propaganda for which Wikipedia takes most of the blame. The new metric is based correctly on plane polar coordinates whose Cartan spin connection is the angular velocity. It is an example of ECE theory. The new metric considers torsion and curvature correctly. Outside the solar system the new metric correctly gives the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy and its hyperbolic orbits, while the old and incorrect Einstein theory fails completely. The old Einstein theory is based on a geometry in which one basic property, torsion, is completely missing, and sooner or later was bound to fail catastrophically. Even worse, the Einstein theory of precessions has been known to be wildly wrong since Dec 1915, when it was heavily criticised by Schwarzschild. (Vankov, online translation with his own devastating criticisms). Dogma should not be allowed to corrupt Baconian science. One of the major aims of AIAS is to stop this happening.
I doubt if Stephen Hawking has ever studied cosmology, he leaves it to his secretary, who is always too busy to do anything at all. I figured out that it is an automated Dalek hidden in The Scott Polar Institute next to chem at Lensfield Road, covered in dust and freezing cold, swathed in background radiation. Whenever I try to speak to Stephen Hawking I get the Dalek. Roy Keys of “Apeiron” mentioned to me at Vigier One that cosmology invents a new parameter every Thursday afternoon at 3.30 p.m., just before coffee break. A model a day keeps the doctor away.
Sent: 30/06/2014 11:17:46 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Two Cosmological Anecdotes [small]
[cc:] Dear Prof. Dr. Myron Evans,
recently I found two anecdotes with connection to cosmology, the first in a surprising sense (because indirect) and the other with such a clear message that even S. Hawking may understand it (well, …)
1] in a blog where members dissect Climastrology, one of them challenged the blog owner with a proof that the Arctic was never ice free in the geological time-frame. Much to the surprise of the readers a geometric proof was offered which amounts to the division of a zero radius area by zero. But the real surprise was the successful rebuttal  by using L’Hopital’s rule (17th century). Needless to ask if mainstream cosmology or their highest priests have ever considered L’Hopital’s rule.
2] in another blog was a post which received the following comment  “They [cosmologists] are using a theory in which space and time are infinite. But they don’t know how to count observers in that infinite universe. So they draw a circle around a finite part of it, and say that nothing outside that part actually exists.”
Sorry for the longish links.
With kind regards,
Klaus D. Witzel
In the first part of this note the gravitational red shift is calculated from O level Newtonian dynamics, around Form Two or Three. It is a common misconception that it is due to Einstein. In fact it is due to the equivalence principle for any theory of dynamics. Wikipedia is particularly culpable for spreading misconceptions like this in its fanatical zeal for the standard model of physics. The gravitational red shift is then calculated with x theory to give Eq. (25) from the experimentally observed planetary precession defined by x. Eq. (25) can be tested experimentally by measuring the Lorentz factor gamma = dt / dtau for a precessing orbit. The Harvard tower experiment measured the inertial Newtonian result (15), and was and is a test of the Minkowski metric, nothing to do with the Einstein theory with its failed Schwarzschild metric. The precise result of the Havard tower experiment is due to the fact that it was an inertial experiment, it effectively dropped an object from the top of the tower to the bottom and measured the frequency difference, which translates into a time difference. As an Aberystwyth, Oxford and Cornell man I know that you cannot tell a Harvard man anything, even the time (in humour, a well known joke like the standard model).
This can be worked out with one of the equations I remember from school:
u squared – v squared = 2 g r
Now drop an object to earth from a distance r above the earth, with initial velocity u = 0, final velocity v. Thi is an inertial phenomenon with radial but no angular part to the velocity. The acceleration g due to gravity is conventionally
g = – MG / r squared
from the equivalence principle. So
v squared = 2 MG / r
In special relativity the Lorentz factor is
gamma = (1 – v squared / c squared) power minus half
= (1 – 2 MG / (r c squared)) power minus half
~ MG / (r c squared)
= dtau / dt
which is the gravitational time delay, QED. Nothing to do with the old and incorrect Schwarzschild metric or the old and incorrect Einstein theory. The starting equation comes from the work integral, and I will explain this in note 265(1). For an elliptical orbit:
v squared = MG ( 2 / r – 1 / a)
and this must be used in the expression for the gravitational time delay. The difference is that the orbit contains an angular as well as a radial contribution to v. Here a is the semi major axis of the ellipse. In a precessing ellipse v squared is modified as in UFT264 to contain x, and the gravitational time delay will also be a function of x.
The update is found as usual at the end of the attached Book of Scientometrics, which is now intensively studied in its own right as the early morning daily reports show in great detail. The update records the usual intense interest around the world from “Universities, Institutes and Similar”. This is carefully filtered, high quality feedback. The Book of Scientomerics is by now a well known feature of avant garde Baconian physics, (ECE Theory and AIAS) which has broken away from those parts of the the old physics system that are controlled by irrational dogmatists. The new avant garde physics has a huge following around the world, and the Book of Scientometrics has recorded this interest with great accuracy for over ten years.
There were 1796 hits from 379 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, yahoo and yandex. Essay 25 Fallacy of Indeterminacy 1053, Auto1 456, Auto2 82, F3(Sp) 312, UFT88 111, Llais 91, Book of Scientometrics 105, Crisis in Cosmology by Stephen Crothers 63, CEFE 49, Evans Equations by Laurence Felker 67 (numerous Spanish), Englynion (Book of Poetry in Welsh and English) 27, Principles of ECE 26, Autobiography Sonnets (Collected Sonnets) 25 to date in June 2014. Tianjing China extensive, Washington D. C. UFT14, Silesian Data Center general, Bacau Romania MWE page. Intense Interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for June 2014.
Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us
Summary Period: June 2014 – URL
Generated 29-Jun-2014 12:45 EDT
A literature search has shown that the gravitational red shift is not due to the Einsteinian general relativity at all. It is due to the equivalence principle, and appears in the Newtonian theory, which gives v squared = 2MG / r in the inertial frame (direct free fall towards the earth’s surface). The result v squared = MG ( 2 / r – 1 / a) for an elliptical orbit is derived in a non inertial frame. The extra 1 / a is due to the rotation of the plane polar coordinates. The gravitational red shift in an orbit will include this 1 / a, and there will be extra corrections for a precessing orbit, involving x as in UFT264. So in note 265(1) I will derive the gravitational red shift in a very simple way, and develop it for the precessing elliptical orbit of x theory. So there is nothing left of general relativity that can be attributed to Einstein. All the careful precision work on astronomy however remains valid, within the experimental assumptions and limitations, and can be attributed to x theory. Things that used to be attributed to Einstein can now be attributed to x theory. Things that do not exist in nature, such as big bang and black holes, should be eliminated completely from future natural philosophy. All this should be viewed in the light of improving Einstein’s pioneering work by constructive criticism and years of scholarly study, mainly by Horst Eckardt, Douglas Lindstrom and myself, but with contributions from the entire AIAS group. As usual these notes are directed at enlightened, open minded Baconian scientists, not at dogmatists.
Since March 2003 two hundred and sixty four papers have been written on unified field theory (UFT). The total life output of my Ph. D. supervisor, Prof. Mansel Davies of Aberda^r, was about seventy papers and books, and he was considered an eminent chemist. Someone should collect his papers in an Omnia Opera on a website. They are all in Google Scholar. I write about him accurately in Auto Two. He could be ballistic, but on the whole, heads and shoulders above some contemporary standard model dogmatists I have known, much against my will. It is lucky that these zealots do not have a box of matches, they would have set me on fire.
The force needed for any planar orbit to precess is:
F = x squared F0
x = 1 + 3MG / (c squared alpha)
Here alpha is the half right latitude, M the mass attracting a mass m in orbit, G the Newton constant and c the vacuum speed of light. The force F0 was first given by von Leibniz in 1689 in “Tantanem de Motuum Coelestium Causis”. It is defined by
F0 = m d2r / dt squared = – mMG / r squared + L squared / (m r cubed)
where L is the total angular momentum, a constant of motion. We have
alpha = L squared / (m squared M G)
F0 = – mMG / r squared + alpha mMG / r cubed
The force F0 produces the conical section
r = alpha / (1 + eps cos theta)
while F produces the precessing conical section
r = alpha / (1 + eps cos (x theta))
where eps is the eccentricity. It appears that x is the same in all observable precessions to high precision (telescope and satellite observations and so on). This is true inside and outside the solar system. The observed x cannot be obtained from the Einstein field equation, now widely known to be incorrect dogma, and not Baconian science. The x theory is based directly on the astronomical data and also produces light deflection due to gravitation, the gravitational time delay, the photon velocity at closest approach and the photon mass. The Einsteinian dogma incorrectly asserts that the photon mass is identically zero, and that light always travels at c. Photon mass was first suggested by Poincare in July 1905. The gross error found in the Einstein theory in UFT264 means that the entire edifice of standard physics collapses. The 264 UFT papers to date have rethought the subject completely.