Archive for February, 2019

Final section 3 of UFT 331

February 22, 2019

Section 3.3 contains another major advance of m theory inferred by co author Horst Eckardt, the ability to produce the mass spectrum of all elementary particles, and their radii, in terms of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the wave equation of m theory. This can be called the m wave equation. So all the dippy, dubious, ugly, unobservable virtual particles of the standard model can be replaced by this wave equation (the words of Dirac and Feynman, not mine). The m wave equation is solved elegantly by Horst in the static limit using a transformation, and shown to be very similar to the Bessel equation. So the masses of the three pions for example can be inferred using this method. The Yukawa method asserts that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle allows transient violation of conservation of energy momentum as in the article sent over yesterday by Norman Page, and discussed this morning. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle was completely refuted in the very popular UFT175, and that also refutes the Yukawa method of calculating the pion masses. UFT175 also refutes quantum electrodynamics and quantum chromodynamcs, and refutes all theories that use virtual particles. It also refutes the Higgs boson. This new wave equation can give the masses of any observable particles. There are no “unobservables” in ECE and m theories, they are rigorously Baconian. Standard model electroweak theory was refuted completely in UFT225, sent to CERN. A lot of scientists at CERN follow www.aias.us. It gets very difficult to justify the huge expenditure on particle accelerators if the standard theory is in complete tatters, all sails blown to shreds in a hurricane of new twenty first century ideas from AIAS / UPITEC. However, if they switch to m theory their funding would still be justified at a very much reduced level. .

paper431-3.pdf

Fwd: Note 432(2)

February 22, 2019

Agreed, this is a good summary by Horst of the new and ubiquitous, or all pervading, m force of physics.

You are right, the m force is a geometrical force appearing additionally to conventional forces. For each particle the force is determined by the distance to its own origin, insofar it is a one-body force. Adding up two forces of two particles would mean using two distinct radial coordinates, but since these coordinates both describe the distance, their value is the same for both particles, therefore addition is justified.

Horst

Am 22.02.2019 um 07:50 schrieb Myron Evans:

Note 432(2)

These are interesting remarks. The m force was introduced in UFT417, as you know, in the context of gravitation from the Euler Lagrange system of dynamics. With respect to Eq. (11) of UFT417 the total force is expressed in the (r1, phi) frame on the right hand side of this equation as the sum of the two body force -mMG / r1 squared e sub r and the m force, which is a ONE body force because it contains only m. Therefore as discussed in immediately preceding papers any particle of mass m is accompanied by an ubiquitous attractive force F = – (1/2) m c squared gamma dm(r1) / dr1. This is the first term on the right hand side of Eq. (11) of UFT417. The m force as you know is the result of the geometry of space itself, and this is a radically new concept in physics that has already led to many new results in UFT415 to UFT431. A lot of these were your own inferences. There is already a lot of interest in these results as the feedback shows. In UFT427 the m force was rederived using the Hamilton system of dynamics, and the result is Eq. (1) of Note 432(2). It is seen that the m force is not due to the interaction between two masses, it is a new type of force that results from the geometry of space. Each particle m generates its own m force, which is a vector quantity. So the net force is the vector sum of the force generated by m1 and the force generated by m2. In general, the net force in physics is the vector SUM of force F1 and force F2. So in this note I consider the net m force of a proton and a Ni(64) nucleus and the net force inside the nucleus. The net m force inside the nucleus is in general the vector sum of all the m forces of the proton and neutrons inside the nucleus. This leads to a new nuclear physics developed in terms of m(r) and dm(r) / dr for each neutron and proton. Concerning the question about units, I agree that there should be 4 pi eps0 in the denominator. The repulsive force inside the nucleus was first used in Eq. (29) of UFT229. This was taken uncritically from a wikipedia article. The wikipedia article uses reduced units, a bad habit of the standard model, and the Wikipedia article omitted 4 p eps0. You are right to point out that S. I. units need 4 pi eps0 in the denominator. So one should google around to find the net repulsive force inside the nucleus in S. I. units. Great care is needed in using wikipedia. Every time I consult it there is an error. It is a propagandist outlet for standard physics and is completely intolerant of any really new ideas. It is riddled with errors.

Note 432(2)

A question: where did you find the formulla (17) for the potential energy of a sphere? I did not find it in Jackson. Is there a factor 1/4 pi eps0 missing?

Horst

Am 20.02.2019 um 14:30 schrieb Myron Evans:

432(3) : Equating the m force to the Born Lande Lattice Force

February 22, 2019

In this first approach to the m theory of lattices, the m force is equated to the Born Lande force, producing the differential equation (16). This is a modified resonance condition. This equation looks simple enough to be soluble on a computer. The problem being considered is a Born Lande lattice immersed in hydrogen gas (protons), and the condition is sought when p can enter the lattice and overcome the Coulomb barrier. A model is used with the sodium chloride lattice, but the nucleus can also be modeled by a lattice. The Nobel Laureate Ken Wilson used to do a lot of work like this at the Cornell Theory Center, which he founded. So this is another way of understanding low energy nuclear reactions.

a432ndpapernotes3.pdf

Lattice Forces and Pion Masses with m Theory

February 22, 2019

These are very useful articles from Alex Hill and Norman Page. The former articles show that strong lattice oscillations are needed in order to bring about a low energy nuclear reaction. These lattice oscillations can be modelled with the m force as it approaches resonance. Lattice oscillations are a kind of resonance. The article on the Yukawa potential sent by Norman Page shows that the interaction between the neutron and proton in quantum field theory is mediated by the class of particles called pions in the standard model. In quantum field theory, the interaction field between a neutron and proton is quantized into particles which were originally called mesons, now called pions, this is because the field is itself quantized. However these pions are virtual exchange particles that cannot be observed experimentally, violating Baconian principles. There has to be a better way of doing things, and particle physics runs into a lot of trouble when the entire zoo of particles has to be explained. So I suggest quantization of the total force between the proton and neutron, the m force plus repulsive force. This can proceed as in UFT428, on relativistic quantum m theory, which is already being heavily studied around the world. We know that the three pion masses must be proportional to m(r) power half. Each pion has its own m(r) function.The energy expectation values of this quantization must give the masses of what are currently known as exchange particles. For example, in classical physics an oscillating electron radiates an electromagnetic field which interacts with another electron. In quantum field theory the radiated electromagnetic field is quantized into photons. So the exchange particle between an electron and an electron is a photon. In massive photon theory the Yukawa potential is used, see “The Enigmatic Photon”. The exchange particle between a proton and a neutron is the class of pions. There are three of them. We can calculate the lattice forces associated with lattice energies, and equate the lattice force to the m force. This will probably be the subject of the next note, following that, a note can be written on the estimation of exchange particle masses with m theory.

Note 432(2)

February 22, 2019

These are interesting remarks. The m force was introduced in UFT417, as you know, in the context of gravitation from the Euler Lagrange system of dynamics. With respect to Eq. (11) of UFT417 the total force is expressed in the (r1, phi) frame on the right hand side of this equation as the sum of the two body force -mMG / r1 squared e sub r and the m force, which is a ONE body force because it contains only m. Therefore as discussed in immediately preceding papers any particle of mass m is accompanied by an ubiquitous attractive force F = – (1/2) m c squared gamma dm(r1) / dr1. This is the first term on the right hand side of Eq. (11) of UFT417. The m force as you know is the result of the geometry of space itself, and this is a radically new concept in physics that has already led to many new results in UFT415 to UFT431. A lot of these were your own inferences. There is already a lot of interest in these results as the feedback shows. In UFT427 the m force was rederived using the Hamilton system of dynamics, and the result is Eq. (1) of Note 432(2). It is seen that the m force is not due to the interaction between two masses, it is a new type of force that results from the geometry of space. Each particle m generates its own m force, which is a vector quantity. So the net force is the vector sum of the force generated by m1 and the force generated by m2. In general, the net force in physics is the vector SUM of force F1 and force F2. So in this note I consider the net m force of a proton and a Ni(64) nucleus and the net force inside the nucleus. The net m force inside the nucleus is in general the vector sum of all the m forces of the protons and neutrons inside the nucleus. This leads to a new nuclear physics developed in terms of m(r) and dm(r) / dr for each neutron and proton. Concerning the question about units, I agree that there should be 4 pi eps0 in the denominator. The repulsive force inside the nucleus was first used in Eq. (29) of UFT229. This was taken uncritically from a wikipedia article. The wikipedia article uses reduced units, a bad habit of the standard model, and the Wikipedia article omitted 4 p eps0. You are right to point out that S. I. units need 4 pi eps0 in the denominator. So one should google around to find the net repulsive force inside the nucleus in S. I. units. Great care is needed in using wikipedia. Every time I consult it there is an error. It is a propagandist outlet for standard physics and is completely intolerant of any really new ideas. It is riddled with errors.

Note 432(2)

A question: where did you find the formulla (17) for the potential energy of a sphere? I did not find it in Jackson. Is there a factor 1/4 pi eps0 missing?

Horst

Am 20.02.2019 um 14:30 schrieb Myron Evans:

Daily Webalizer Report 20/2/19

February 22, 2019

The equivalent of 267,640 printed pages was downloaded (975.817 megabytes) from 2,737 downloaded memory files (hits ) and 527 distinct visits each averaging 4.2 memory pages and 10 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 97.79, top referrals total 2,641,975, 52.2% spiders mainly from Amazon, Baidu, Google and MSN. Apple Inc. spidering; Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.

www.aias.us/new_stats/

UFT88 Read at the University of the Basque Country and CEA Institute of Theoretical Physics

February 21, 2019

The University of the Basque Country is ranked 601-800 by Times and QS, and 301 – 400 by Shanghai. It goes back to Universidad Sancti Spiritus de Christi in 1540, and is the heir to the University of Bilbao founded in 1938 by the Republican Basques in the Spanish Civil War. It was closed almost immediately by the dictator and usurper Franco but the specifically Basque University of Bilbao was opened in 1968, and the University of the Basque Country founded in 1980. There is an ECE School of Thought in the University, which has consulted www.aias.us many times in the past fifteen years. The French Atomic Energy Authority was founded on October 18th 1945, and the first Commissioner was Frederic Joliot Curie. My co author of “The Enigmatic Photon”, Prof. Jean-Pierre Vigier, worked with Joliot Curie but resigned in protest at the French atomic bomb. He went to work with Louis de Brogile. He was invited by Einstein to become his assistant at Princeton. In 2015, Reuters voted the CEA the most innovative organization in the world. UFT88 is a famous classic paper which refutes the Einsteinian general relativity using Cartan’s torsion, inferred in Paris in the early twenties. Google Bianchi differential to find UFT88 second out of 5,960,000 sites, so UFT88 is the most read paper on the second Bianchi identity on which the Einstein field equation is based directly. Cartan torsion changes the 1902 second Bianchi identity to the Jacobi Cartan Evans identity of UFT313. So the Einstein field equation is completely wrong because it is based on a geometry that is completely wrong, and the ECE School has accepted this in up to two hundred countries and territories.

Daily Weblogs Report 19/2/19

February 21, 2019

The equivalent of 822,545 printed pages was downloaded (2.999 gigabytes) from 3,612 downloaded memory files (hits) and 450 distinct visits, each averaging 6.3 memory pages and 9 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio 227.73 top referrals total 2,641,701, 61.8% spiders mainly from Amazon, Baidu, MSN and Yahoo. Princeton University UFT249; University of the Basque Country UFT88; Institute of Theoretical Physics of the French Commissariat for Atomic and Alternative Energies UFT88; Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Trieste UFT354; Intense interest all sectors, webalizer file attached.

www.aias.us/new-stats/

Explanation of LENR

February 20, 2019

Many thanks to Gareth. It certainly looks as if LENR is taking off via many patents, part of Steve Bannister’s second industrial revolution without any of the pollution and accidents.

Congratulations – fantastic! Now LENR can be developed with a rigorous understanding of how it occurs. This is the clean energy of the future.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Note 432(2)

February 20, 2019

This note gives the complete theory of Ni(64) p interaction inside and outside the Ni(64) nucleus, modelled as a charged sphere as is customary in nuclear physics. Without the m force there is no explanation for LENR in the old physics. However with the m force, the reaction can be explained straightforwardly. The m force also plays a key role in the nuclear strong force theory that binds neutrons and protons inside a nucleus. It is shown that only 3.13 ten power minus 6 % of the Ni(64) transmutes to Cu(63), with the loss of a proton. This explains why only traces of copper are found. This mass loss translates into the visible frequency as observed. If all the Ni(64) transmuted to Cu(63) the radiation emitted would be in the very harmful hard gamma ray region and no nickel would be left. It would all have changed to copper. This is not observed, no gamma rays are emitted in a low frequency nuclear reaction, otherwise LENR devices would not have been granted safety certificates and patents.in many countries on LENR taken out by governments and corporations. To get a LENR reaction going needs a lot of skill and experience, but by matching the net m force to forces in nuclear theory, such as Yukawa, Woods Saxon, Reid and more recent models, an idea can be obtained of which parameters to vary to optimize the reaction. The patents give a lot of detail of how the LENR devices work.

a432ndpapernotes2.pdf