Many thanks for this typeset version. There are only three errors left in an excellently prepared paper.
1) There is a partial sub mu sign missing in eq. (2) in front of the column vector (my typo in writing up)
2) In Eq. (4) D sub mu in front of the first column vector should be partial derivative sign sub mu.
3) In Eq. (23), minus sign in numerator.
Eqs. (2) and (4) are the same, they are the standard covariant derivative equations of electroweak theory, so the first derivative of the column vector is the ordinary partial four derivative, partial sign sub mu. I took this equation of Ryder and checked it, finding numerous glaring algebraic errors which were cross checked by Horst Eckardt using computer algebra. I pointed this out to Ryder no less than three times, but he ignored my e mails, and abdicated duty. These errors mean that the whole of electroweak theory of the standard type collapses, as of course does Higgs boson theory. I first refuted Higgs boson theory with B(3) theory in about November 1991, as did four or five other groups. Vigier pointed out the link between B(3) and photon mass in early 1993. Although a most eminent physicist, he too was ignored by CERN. CERN has tried to ignore all the work on B(3), several hundred papers, thus abdicating duty. Some people at CERN look at www.aias.us quite regularly so CERN is fully aware that Higgs boson theory is complete nonsense. This is why large cuts in physics are beginning to be made in the States of Texas and Florida. Billions are being wasted on nonsensical algebra. The experimental data at CERN may or may not be reproducible, no one really knows, but this expense is wildly unsustainable. I pointed this out to senior CERN staff who again tried to ignore the refutation. So Governments are quite right to cut physics funding by 60% as in Texas.
Dr. Myron Evans 