FOR POSTING: UFT323 Sections 1 and 2 and Notes

August 2, 2015

In this paper the precession of the perihelion is described with the Lorentz force equation of ECE2 theory, and detailed notes given of other developments. As usual the paper is a synopsis of the notes. Section 3 is planned for graphics by Dr. Horst Eckardt.

a323rdpaper.pdf

a323rdpapernotes1.pdf

a323rdpapernotes2.pdf

a323rdpapernotes3.pdf

a323rdpapernotes4.pdf

a323rdpapernotes5.pdf

a323rdpapernotes6.pdf

Popularity of the Poetry

August 2, 2015

This is now the leading item on www.aias.us, being read or heard 4,380 times a year off www.aias.us alone, and regularly read off the blog in up to 182 countries. There is a book available in softback:

Myron Evans, “Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry” (with New Generation, London, 97 pp, ISBN 978-1-78507-416-5, at about £8.99 or less).

I have produced poetry at a much slower rate than science, but now I know that people of all nations and cultures seem to like it I should devote more time to it and to improving my knowledge of the Welsh language. Everyone should fight like hell for the language, otherwise in the words of Auden: “Intellectual disgrace / Stares from every human face.” A six thousand year old language and culture is about to be destroyed completely by the “exigency of the machine” as R. S. Thomas put it. He was also nominated a few times for a Nobel Prize, much against his will. The book will be available shortly at the British Library in London and The National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth, which has kindly taken all my books and archived all my output from 1973 to present.

The Incorrect Einsteinian Theory

August 2, 2015

Many thanks to AIAS Fellow and Professor Stephen Crothers. He is producing some very useful educational articles meant to stop the funding of nonsense physics. I no longer take any notice of Einsteinian general relativity. I continue to help Stephen Crothers in his struggle against the dogmatists and that is the only time I ever refer to Einsteinain general relativity. As Gareth Evans points out, children at school are forced to regurgitate this nonsense, thus heavily damaging science. This is because his children are at the age when they are taught this hogwash . I would advise taking up cynghanedd or farming.

Sent: 01/08/2015 16:42:18 GMT Daylight Time Subj: Mathematical Physicists Dear Scientists, A Few Things You Need to Know to Tell if a Mathematical Physicist is Talking Nonsense: the Black Hole – a Case Study, 29 July, 2015 http://vixra.org/pdf/1508.0007v1.pdf Yours faithfully, Stephen J. Crothers

Coulomb Law Spin Connection Resonance System

August 2, 2015

This is very important work in my opinion, the two circuit papers to date are UFT311 and UFT321. A clear and unequivocal experimental demonstration would be of key importance, attracting immediate international interest. The AIAS Co President Gareth Evans is keen to get a device developed and marketed. This could be done by the AIAS / UPITEC businessmen in a team effort. We have been attempting this for years but now we know how to design the circuit that takes energy from spacetime, and there are enough theoretical ideas to feed the five thousand.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 01/08/2015 18:20:40 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Updated Listing

Hi Prof. Evans,

Thanks very much for including me on the list of all your sources of email.

I’m currently working on an idea for an implementation of a Coulomb Law spin connection resonance system. I’m looking at two possible approaches, a parametric oscillator, and a non-parametric oscillator case. I usually correspond with Horst Eckardt on various ECE details, so once I’ve made more progress in developing this particular idea, I’ll confer with him.

Cheers,
Russ Davis
Miami, FL

Remarks on 323(5/6)

August 2, 2015

These are very interesting ideas by co author Horst Eckardt. I agree that numerical evaluation of Eq. (60) should produce Eq. (63). A more rigorous approach which I have in mind for UFT324 is to derive the generally relativistic Binet equation of orbits from lagrangian ECE2 theory. The non relativistic Binet equation gives the force (64) from the orbit (63) as in previous work. As we have shown, this force is qualitatively different from the Einstein force, so the latter cannot be correct at all. This was one of the many refutations of Einstein being accepted now by the international community. The most rigorous approach is the relativistic lagrangian approach, to derive the relativistic Binet equation which would give the relativistic force needed for a precessing planar orbit, or indeed any orbit. In the meantime it would be very interesting to try to solve equation (60), bearing in mind that gamma depends on v:

gamma = (1 – v squared / c squared) power minus half

where the circular part of v is omega r. It can be assumed that omega is a constant L / (m r squared), so

v squared = (L / (mr)) squared

so everything in eq. (60) is worked out in terms of r. You produced some very interesting graphical work on this problem a few years ago, graphics that gave wild and weird orbits if the Einstein claims are accepted. That made nice tasting mincemeat out of the Einstein theory. The profession worldwide now realizes that the establsihment in physics has been ignoring refutations while still demanding very large amounts of money from us, the taxpayers, and while still blasting out the meaningless propaganda. Nothing could be more remote form Baconian science.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 01/08/2015 13:07:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Remarks on 323(5/6)

Obviously Eq.(60) of note 5 is a kind of first principles approach for planetary precession. Comparison with x theory shows that x is not a constant. A natural way of proceeding would be to evaluate a numerical solution of (60) and compare it with the analytic solution (63). However this comparison will only be reliable if x is not too small. In this approach omega in the gamma factor is given by (62). In note 6 this is refined by v_Omega stemming from the gravitomagnetic field. Is eq.(62) sufficient for larger x values? If not, this prevents a true “first principles” approach in eq.(60).

Horst

Am 01.08.2015 um 10:19 schrieb EMyrone:

Wigner published this work in about 1939, so it has been known for seventy six years that the photon must have mass. The Higgs boson scene just ignores Wigner’s work and ignores UFT225. This was sent to CERN, who ignored this definitive refutation. Other parts of CERN routinely study ECE theory.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 01/08/2015 08:59:50 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Remarks on 323(6)

Interesting inference that the photon must have mass.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Cc:
Subject: Remarks on 323(6)

An important methodology has been developed in the past few years whereby Horst Eckardt and sometimes Doug Lindstrom check every note almost every day. This is very important because computer algebra can be used to check the algebra and concepts can be checked. We are currently developing an entirely new general relativity of planar orbits based on the general Lorentz transforms in ECE2, boost and rotation. The latter was checked meticulously by Horst and myself, again using computer algebra. In this case the notation will be clarified in the final paper. The most general group is the Poincare group, named by Wigner, who realized that there are three boost generators, three rotation generators and three spacetime translation generators (see a book such as Ryder, “Quantum Field Theory”, which has some wild howlers (UFT225) but in some parts it is free of errors). Wigner also discovered the concept of the little group, and showed that the little group of a massless particle is E(2), the planar Euclidean group. So for this reason alone the massless photon is unphysical, and there can be no Higgs boson for reasons given many times on this blog and numerous UFT papers. To all but ultra specialists quantum field theory is completely incomprehensible, and so is string theory. Some attempts at field unification of the now obsolete standard model contained over a hundred adjustables. With that you could fit a van Gogh. Several string theory metrics in general relativity of the obsolete type, due to Einstein, are refuted in CEFE “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 31/07/2015 20:50:35 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 323(6): Calculation of the Earth's Perihelion Precession

The calculation gives that the 4-vector Q’ (eq. 24) is

Q’ = [ c, 0,
0, 0]

i.e.

bold Q’ = 0.

This is plausible because in the rest frame there is no relative velocity. This should also hold in the relativistic case, not only in the non-relativistic limit, eqs. 31,32.
I will check the rest tomorrow. It seems that using the same symbol v for different kinds of velocities is a bit difficult to follow for the reader, I suggest using different symbols for the relativ velocity, angular part of verlocity etc.

Horst

Am 31.07.2015 um 15:36 schrieb EMyrone:

In this first, hybrid type, theory, the Earth’s perihelion precession is calculated from the general Lorentz transform by assuming that its velocity is cap omega x r where cap omega is the gravitomagnetic field. The method gives the observed precession of 11.45 arcseconds a year with a velocity for the Lorentz transform of 6.7685 ten power five metres per second. In the non relativistic theory where there is no precession, the orbital velocity of the earth about the sun is about 3 x 10 power four metres per second, or thirty kilometres per second. A more accurate method is to use a lagrangian analysis to derive the generally relativistic Binet equation. That will be the subject of the next note.

Computer Checks of notes 323(5+6)

August 2, 2015

Many thanks for this. It is particularly useful to calculate the dependence of x on gamma, which is the overall aim as you know, and to check that it reduces correctly to gamma = 1 for x = 1. Eq. (4) of Note 323(6) is precisely analogous to the Lorentz force equation in electrodynamics for a general boost for any v. The gravitomagnetic field cap omega plays the role of B as you know. The concepts are important to understand when dealing with the Lorentz transform. Eq. (4) can be thought of as the Newtonian force in a moving frame. In this work the frames are being transformed, not the particles. This is a key conceptual point. The cylindrical polars are produced by rotating the frame in a circle, Lorentz rotation. More generally one frame can move with respect to the other in any way in this new theory, so it is a theory of general relativity based both on torsion and curvature – ECE2 theory. The route taken in this first attempt, a hybrid theory, was to assume that the precession is given by cap omega, and to use the measured precession of the Earth, 11.45 arcseconds a year to calculate the gravitomagnetic field needed for the precession. It seems to be internationally accepted now that the Einsteinian claim to have predicted the precession cannot be right because he used an entirely incorrect geometry, one with torsion missing completely. The proofs are now being read thousands of timea a year. So now I will write up UFT323, based mainly on the later notes as usual. Usually the ideas take shape in the later notes.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 01/08/2015 11:37:25 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Checks of notes 323(5+6)

Eq.(66) of note 5 can be resolved for x, this gives the dependence of x on gamma, or v, respectively. See eq. o3 of the protocol. For gamma=1 follows x=1, QED.
Eq. (4) in note 6 is the force in the primed frame: Was this intended, although a precession is an effect in the observer’s frame?

The numerical value for v[Omega] is larger by a factor 10 in my calculation, increasing the difference to the experimental value (17). Perhaps an artifact of the chosen frame?

Horst

Am 01.08.2015 um 10:19 schrieb EMyrone:

Wigner published this work in about 1939, so it has been known for seventy six years that the photon must have mass. The Higgs boson scene just ignores Wigner’s work and ignores UFT225. This was sent to CERN, who ignored this definitive refutation. Other parts of CERN routinely study ECE theory.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 01/08/2015 08:59:50 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Remarks on 323(6)

Interesting inference that the photon must have mass.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Cc:
Subject: Remarks on 323(6)

An important methodology has been developed in the past few years whereby Horst Eckardt and sometimes Doug Lindstrom check every note almost every day. This is very important because computer algebra can be used to check the algebra and concepts can be checked. We are currently developing an entirely new general relativity of planar orbits based on the general Lorentz transforms in ECE2, boost and rotation. The latter was checked meticulously by Horst and myself, again using computer algebra. In this case the notation will be clarified in the final paper. The most general group is the Poincare group, named by Wigner, who realized that there are three boost generators, three rotation generators and three spacetime translation generators (see a book such as Ryder, “Quantum Field Theory”, which has some wild howlers (UFT225) but in some parts it is free of errors). Wigner also discovered the concept of the little group, and showed that the little group of a massless particle is E(2), the planar Euclidean group. So for this reason alone the massless photon is unphysical, and there can be no Higgs boson for reasons given many times on this blog and numerous UFT papers. To all but ultra specialists quantum field theory is completely incomprehensible, and so is string theory. Some attempts at field unification of the now obsolete standard model contained over a hundred adjustables. With that you could fit a van Gogh. Several string theory metrics in general relativity of the obsolete type, due to Einstein, are refuted in CEFE “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 31/07/2015 20:50:35 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 323(6): Calculation of the Earth's Perihelion Precession

The calculation gives that the 4-vector Q’ (eq. 24) is

Q’ = [ c, 0,
0, 0]

i.e.

bold Q’ = 0.

This is plausible because in the rest frame there is no relative velocity. This should also hold in the relativistic case, not only in the non-relativistic limit, eqs. 31,32.
I will check the rest tomorrow. It seems that using the same symbol v for different kinds of velocities is a bit difficult to follow for the reader, I suggest using different symbols for the relativ velocity, angular part of verlocity etc.

Horst

Am 31.07.2015 um 15:36 schrieb EMyrone:

In this first, hybrid type, theory, the Earth’s perihelion precession is calculated from the general Lorentz transform by assuming that its velocity is cap omega x r where cap omega is the gravitomagnetic field. The method gives the observed precession of 11.45 arcseconds a year with a velocity for the Lorentz transform of 6.7685 ten power five metres per second. In the non relativistic theory where there is no precession, the orbital velocity of the earth about the sun is about 3 x 10 power four metres per second, or thirty kilometres per second. A more accurate method is to use a lagrangian analysis to derive the generally relativistic Binet equation. That will be the subject of the next note.

323(6).pdf

List of Big Prize Nominations

August 2, 2015

These are beginning to be listed in “Marquis Who’s Who in the World” as the attached proof shows. I am honoured to have been nominated by the colleagues for the following major awards: The Nobel Prize (several times), The Wolf Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, the Milner Awards, The Royal Society Copley, Davy and Royal Medals, The American Chemical Society Priestley Medal, the ICTP Dirac Medal and others. I was appointed a Civil List Pensioner in 2005 and raised to the Gentry of Wales and Britain in 2008. I was included in “Burke’s Peerage and Gentry” in 2012 by the royal editor. Accurate recent genealogy shows that I am of royal descent, although a republican (U. S. citizen) and Bevanite socialist by persuasion and the son of a poor hill farmer and coal miner. We always spoke the ancient and now rare Silurian dialect of Welsh in the family. In direct line I am descended from the Tudor ancestor, Tewdwr Mawr ap Cadell, Prince of the southern regions of Wales (Deau Cymru). He was in turn descended from Hywel Dda and Rhodri Mawr, and before them the Kings of Rheged and Gododdin, whose capital is now Edinburgh. In one line I can trace my ancestry to hundreds of years B. C. using the ancient genealogies. The genealogy is also internationally well known and very popular in up to 182 countries. Tewdwr Mawr (Tudor the Great, from the Roman Emperor Theodoric, transliterated to “Tewdwr” or “Tudur” in British Celtic) was the ancestor of Wales’ greatest bard, Dafydd ap Gwilym, the ancestor of Henry VII Tudor, and of Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of the 1649 Republic to which I adhere by Leveller descent. The Levellers introduced The Agreement of the People at the 1647 Putney Debates of the New Model Army with Cromwell and Ireton, and this evolved into the U. S. Declaration of Independence of 1776, and the U. N. Delaration of Human Rights of 1948, followed by many human rights laws.

amarquiswhoswhointheworld2016.pdf

Update of the Thirteen Year Feedback Activity

August 2, 2015

This is an update of the scientometrics from May 2002 to July 2015, showing clearly that ECE and ECE2 are here to stay for the foreseeable future.

Monthly_Feedback_Statistics_for_AIAS.pdf

Book of Scientometrics Volume Two Updated to July 31st 2015

August 2, 2015

These are the final feedback activity data for the three sites for July 2015. The three sites are www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com and www.upitec.org. An estimated two days were lost due to timer problems, and this has been factored in to give 139,728 files downloaded, 18,667 distinct visits (reading sessions of up to half an hour each), 23.49 Gigabytes downloaded, 98,122 page views, 3,019 documents read or heard off www.aias.us alone from 100 countries, led by USA, Germany, Czech Republic, Russian Federation, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, Britain, Italy, ……. From the Webometrics and Times Higher Education lists of the of twenty universities in the world, there were visits from: Texas A and M, Chicago, University of California Los Angeles, University of California Berkeley, Office of the President of the University of California, Penn State, ETH and Tokyo. Nearly all the university and institute visits were from the top two hundred in the world. These scientometrics are internationally well known in their own right. Volume One is published open source as UFT307, and as a softback:

M. W. Evans, “Collected Scientometrics” (joint venture project with New Generation Publishing of London, 383 pages at £8.99, ISBN 978-1-78507-328-1).

This is available at the British Library in London and the National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth. The data have been steady at a very high plateau of intense interest (see attached graphics) for about eleven years, indicating a major and permanent paradigm shift in physics, the avant garde ECE theory taking over from the obsolete standard model. This has been described by Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe as the post Einsteinian paradigm shift. Alwyn van der Merwe is among the most eminent of physics editors of the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries. So many congratulations to all staff on yet another superb performance, the Fellows and Professors of AIAS and UPITEC, and the support staff. These all do work of objectively historic importance voluntarily

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.docx

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.pdf

smoothedaccumulateddategraph.zip

Daily Report 31/7/15

August 2, 2015

There were 2,293 files downloaded from 358 reading sessions during the day, main spiders baidu, google, MSN and yahoo. Collection of 26 papers on the Evans / Morris effects 630 (est); Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 372, Scientometrics 356, Autobiography Volumes One and Two 330, F3(Sp) 238, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers UFT292 – 299 232, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation and the refutation of Einsteinian general relativity 224, “The Principles of ECE Theory” (UFT281 – 288) 191, “The Evans Equations of Unified Field Theory” by Laurence Felker 161 (numerous Spanish, e.g. chapter translated by Alex Hill, F3(Sp)), Engineering Model 150, UFT88 137, UFT311 (first circuit paper) 123, UFT321 (second circuit paper) 85, UFT314 79, UFT318 77, UFT319 73, “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation” (CEFE) 67, UFT315 66, UFT317 66, UFT316 64, UFT313 52, translation of a Welsh language article in “Llais” by Dewi Lewis 47, UFT320 39, UFT322 31 for July 2015. Engineering Windsor University Canada UFT146, Xian Haotong University China UFT42; Chelsignal Company Ordzhonikidze Russian Federation Equations Flowcharts; Government United Arab Emirates home page; Reserva do Iguacu Parana Brazil UFT70; DNA Internet Finland Unified Field Theory Section; U. S. Archives San Francisco general; Gospel Ministry Alliance general; British Library general. Intense interest all sectors, completed usage file attached for July 2015.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers