Recognition and all that

Many thanks! I would say that the theory is already proven experimentally in many ways, for example B(3) was based from the outset on the inverse Faraday effect, which is why it has already been nominated for a Nobel Prize about half a dozen times. It was recognized by a Civil List Pension, much less well known than the Nobel Prize but a higher honour, being a State honour. Vigier was particularly pleased with the fact that B(3) was inferred from the inverse Faraday effect, which therefore proves photon mass, his life’s work. In the latest paper UFT434 the Lamb shifts are predicted from general relativity for the first time, and these Lamb shifts have already been observed of course. It is a matter of adjusting m(r). There are consultations from literally hundreds of universities, but none has been asked to cooperate as yet, and we have not applied for funding. So the spectroscopic measurements on the Lamb shift are very precise and have already been carried out of course. In my opinion, recognition does not depend on a Nobel Prize. I have shown that the h and g indices and output of Nobel Laureates are abysmally low compared with the group and myself. There is already a vast amount of recognition around the world. I would suggest a phone call to the University of Muenich for example. I would say that it is a good thing to predict a completely new phenomenon as you mention, but new explanations for well known phenomena also qualify for a Nobel Prize. For example the photoelectric effect. Your summary is the best one, the true understanding of the new theories must be soaked up like blotting paper.
The Time Dependent Schroedinger Equation in m Theory and General Relativity

The results of unification of quantum mechanics with general relativity in form of m theory are outstanding and – in particular – workable. However in my opinion this is not sufficient to be recognized by the complete scientific community. I was told that practical experiments have to show that the theory works. Best is to predict and then find experimentally any results not predicted by any theory hitherto known. So to earn Nobel prizes for AIAS, somebody has to execute e.g. spectroscopic measurements to find the predicted splittings. A combined theoretical/experimental effort would be needed. This is difficult to achieve because AIAS has no budget and universities are not willing to cooperate. This is a “hen egg problem”.
Concerning the planned meeting, when will Steve come over for a visit?


Am 22.03.2019 um 08:01 schrieb Myron Evans:

The Time Dependent Schroedinger Equation in m Theory and General Relativity

Many thanks to Kerry Pendergast. I am about to write up UFT434 and after that the systematic development of quantum mechanics in m theory, in other words generally covariant quantum mechanics. The m space causes more energy levels of the H atom to appear, and this is essentially the Lamb shift. Of course anyone is welcome in a planning conference, or at any time. The use of m theory automatically means general relativity. The Schroedinger H atom is a limit of the relativistic Dirac H atom, and m theory produces the generally covariant H atom. It is well known that the Dirac H atom cannot produce the Lamb shift, but the generally covariant H atom produces it. The m(r) functions are chosen to produce the experimentally observed Lamb shifts. So UFT434 will deal with generally covariant Schroedinger quantization illustrated with the H atom.

The Time Dependent Schroedinger Equation in m Theory and General Relativity

This is amazing!

Can we now concentrate on general relativity for the next few weeks?

It is time for a preconference in anticipation of Steve’s annual visit!

Perhaps Horst would like to join us this year!

Best wishes


Keep up this incredible work!

On Thursday, 21 March 2019, Myron Evans <myronevans123> wrote:

The Time Dependent Schroedinger Equation in m Theory and General Relativity

This is equation (3) and produces new energy levels, for example of the H atom. These can be observed as the Lamb shifts. As shown in previous UFT papers, the Lamb shift is due to the m function m(r), and can be interpreted as the interaction of the H atom with the vacuum in the language of the old physics, now thoroughly obsolete. The usual time dependent Schroedinger equation for the H atom produces the wave particle dualism of the atom, which is a particle and also a wave. So beams of H atoms produce interferograms, as is well known. The m theory can therefore transform classical physics into general relativity, and merge it with quantum mechanics in a simple way. This is far in advance of the old physics.

%d bloggers like this: