The Spiral Arms

I think that the spiral arms are the result of an m(r) function. I will write up the note today, it is simply a matter of applying the expression for velocity in m(r) theory. The most general function for constant velocity seems to be a distribution of spirals or similar functions modulated by an m(r) function. As you know, both Newton and Einstein fail qualitatively in whirlpool galaxies and the empirical dark matter was introduced. The standard dogmatists have a severely split personality because they go around trying to say that Einstein is always precise, but they know very well that the Einstein theory fails totally in whirlpool galaxies. There are many shapes of galaxies as you know, each one would have its own m(r) function.
Velocity Curve of a Whirlpool Galaxy in m Theory
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

I talked with a standard physicist some time ago who told me that one of the main questions for spiral galaxies is how the angular modulation arises so that there are spiral arms instead of statistically distributed orbiting stars. I forgot the argument, but we should look up into this and have an answer for completeness.

Horst

Am 17.11.2018 um 13:10 schrieb Myron Evans:

Velocity Curve of a Whirlpool Galaxy in m Theory

In m theory, the question can be asked as to what is the most general orbit that is capable of giving a constant velocity as r goes to infinity. This question can be answered with precision using computer algebra, but I have completed a few hand calculations and in a given approximation the type of spiral galaxy is governed by m(r), so this explains the shapes of various galaxies for example. This is a particularly vivid illustration of m(r) because it can be observed with a large telescope by observing galaxies. I will finish my calculations in this subject and distribute the notes tomorrow. The shape of galaxies is determined by the type of spherical spacetime in which they have evolved. This is a vivid example of applying m(r) theory where both Einstein and Newton fail completely. As in PECE, volumes one and two they both give v dropping off to zero with r, whereas observations show that v reaches a plateau as r goes to infinity. The astronomer who first observed this was ostracized and ridiculed but is now famous. Same old story (SOS) about human nature. In New York they have a variation on SOS which cannot be mentioned here.


%d bloggers like this: