This is Eq. (8) of note 414(1). It would be very interesting to graph it in various ways as a function of omega sub 1, d omega sub 1 / dt and t. Also it would be very interesting to plot the results of the ECE2 (r, phi’ ) theory against experimental data for the Hulse Taylor binary pulsar, notably the astronomically observed orbital shrinkage of the binary pulsar and its observed precession. There are probably many binary pulsars known by now. The precession in the classical limit of the (r, phi’) theory is simply delta phi = omega sub 1 T, where omega sub 1 is the angular velocity of the de Sitter type frame rotation induced by spacetime torsion, and T is the time taken to complete a revolution of 2 p radians of m about M. So it would also be very interesting to research and find some S star systems in which EGR fails completely, and use ECE2 (r , phi’) theory to explain all the S star precessions precisely. For any reasonable scientist or member of the general public, that deserves a Nobel Prize. The theoretical foundations of ECE2 are actually a hundred years old, Cartan geometry. These geometrical foundations have not changed in a century and are developed into physics in many simple and imaginative ways. This procedure has been described as brilliantly economical by a leading specialist in differential geometry, Diego Rapaport.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on September 5, 2018 at 6:20 am and is filed under asott2. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.