It looks as if there is a pi epsilon sub 0 missing in the denominator of the second term. This is again just a typo.

In a message dated 28/11/2017 14:16:02 GMT Standard Time, writes:

PS: the correct result for E (eq.27) with average values for delta r should be:

or

Am 28.11.2017 um 14:39 schrieb Horst Eckardt:

E_1 ~ 1/r^5 * (5/3 r (p*r) <delta r*delta r> + 1/9 p <(delta r*delta r)^2> + 1/3 <delta r*delta r> r.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on November 29, 2017 at 12:36 pm and is filed under asott2. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.