Agreed with the sign changes, which I have incorporated in the note. In Eqns. (2) and (3), the integration method in immediately preceding UFT papers is used, with omega sub X and omega sub Y as variables or input parameters. The idea is to produce a precessing ellipse from Eqs. (2) and (3). Using a two variable least means squares method, (NAG routine for example), the orbit obtained from Eqs. (1) and (2) is fitted to the orbit obtained in UFT378. For an elliptical orbit, omega sub X and omega sub Y are zero. In general omega sub X and omega sub Y are functions of t, X, and Y. Having found omega sub X and omega sub Y, and X and Y for the precessing orbit, Eqs. (5), (6) and (18) are used to find omega sub 0, Q sub X and Q sub Y for the precessing orbit. These are three simultaneous equations in three unknowns. That is one typical method of solution.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 25/06/2017 13:56:10 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 380(1): Evaluation of the Q three vector and Spin connection four vector

There seem to be further sign changes required in the note, but without changing the principle results, in eqs. (26,27,31,32,34,37).

Eqs. (2,3,5,6,18) depend on Q, omega and additionally on X, Y so that these are 5 equations with 7 unknowns. X and Y are orbits X(t), Y(t) while omega, Q are fields in dependence of (X,Y) because spatial derivatives appear for these fields. It is not so clear for me if such a kind of equations is meaningful.

Horst

Am 19.06.2017 um 13:44 schrieb EMyrone:

This analysis introduces consideration of the gravitomagnetic field and considers the Newtonian and zero and counter gravitational limits. Any experimental claims of counter gravitation can be analyzed straightforwardly with ECE2 theory.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on June 26, 2017 at 7:21 am and is filed under asott2. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.