Counter Gravitational Results

If you can supply data for the change in the acceleration due to gravity in these experiments we can explain them straightforwardly with the Q vector or spin connection of ECE2 as attached. I assume that your data are reproducible and repeatable and that you observe a change in g, it becomes less negative. In other words there is an upward force.

Myron Eavns
(Dr. M. W. Evans, www.aias.us)

I

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Jerry Decker wrote:

Hola Dr. Lorentz-Ferenstein and Sandy!

I thought you might be interested in this page:

http://www.keelynet.com/

Have been at it a long time so always hoping to see

real testing and positive results of inertial drives.

Good luck!

Jerry @ Keelynet

Hola Jerry and Sandy,

Thank you very much for your friendly email,
and for giving us much needed publicity
at your legendary website.
Much appreciated.

As I already mentioned more than once,
our Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis not only predicts
the lift in upward direction, as evident in Sandy Kidd’s device,
but also clearly understands its physical causes.

Therefore, Sandy’s experimental results constitute
an empirical proof of the validity of our
Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis :

In our opinion, Sandy’s experimental results
are not the case of inertial propulsion,
neither do they violate any laws of physics.

According to our Hypothesis, the lift produced
by Sandy’s device is a genuine, natural antigravity effect,
resulting from :

hitherto unknown physical interaction between
angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope
and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

Well, I only hope that both of you are not disappointed
that we are not violating Newton here,
and that this is not a case of inertial propulsion?

Yes, THE G-ENGINES ARE COMING :

If you have not noticed, there is the second,
much simpler experiment described
at the bottom of this page:

This second experiment is essentially a much simplified
version of Sandy Kidd’s experiment.

Dear Jerry, I would greatly appreciate if you would like to think

about some of your friends and associates,
who might be interested in performing it.

Let’s keep in contact.

With respect and much gratitude,
Agatha

THE SECOND, simpler, Nobel Prize winning experiment :

balance-scales

TWO-GYROS

TWO MOTIONLESS GYROS IN BALANCE :

exp2

TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS, BOTH GYROS MAY BE ENCLOSED IN NON-METALLIC CONTAINERS, WHICH SHOULD NOT DIMINISH THE ANTIGRAVITY EFFECT.

THE SPINNING GYRO (WITH THE HORIZONTAL SPIN AXIS) WILL ANTIGRAVITATE :

exp2

TECHNICAL NOTES

To be more realistic, and also more empirically precise, we need to perform the above experiment in slightly different way than it seems to be implied by the above illustrations.

The two gyros hang in balance, motionless. By hand, let’s raise one motionless gyro, and let it come down freely. It will oscillate before it comes back to motionless balance again in due time.

Now, let’s repeat it, this time raising a spinning gyro. It will freely come down, but slower. It will take more time due to a little bit of antigravity effect it will generate. This will decrease the frequency of its oscillations before it comes back to the motionless balance again. Perhaps the mean of the amplitude might be slightly shifted upward from the motionless balance level?

It would be interesting to check if the direction of spin has influence on the results. It should not have any.

The reason why the spinning gyro (with the horizontal spin axis) might not take off and antigravitate in a spectacular fashion, as it was suggested by the above illustrations, is that its angular velocity (and angular momentum) will start to instantly decelerate upon releasing it at the motionless balance level.

Then again, it may as well raise, depending on how strong its angular momentum is when it is released at the level of the motionless balance.

If instead of a gyro we would use a rotor with a constant angular velocity (and angular momentum), the spinning rotor would slowly raise (antigravitate) at a constant rate. For the rotor to accelerate its antigravitating movement, we would need to accelerate its angular velocity (and angular momentum).

The spinning gyro (with the horizontal spin axis), should be suspended on the balance-scale in the way that will prevent it from precessing (or rotating), and the gyro should be allowed a degree of freedom to naturally hang horizontally at all times, even when it goes up, or down. The balance-scale should be allowed to move only up, or down. These conditions could be pretty much self-evident from looking at the very primitive graphics that were used above to illustrate the experiment.

What if we repeat this experiment with both gyros having their axis of spin oriented vertically, instead of horizontally? What if one gyro is spinning horizontally, and the other one is spinning vertically? For the above two options we can try each direction of spin, too.

Experimenting with rotors is a bit more difficult, especially for the reason that should they happen to be electrically powered, this could potentially introduce electromagnetic field which in turn could interfere with Earth’s magnetic and electric fields in an unpredictable manner.

In this experiment, the natural antigravity effect is the result of a horizontally oriented angular momentum interacting with Earth’s perpendicular magnetic and electric fields, as per the Minkowski-Feigel effect.

For the antigravity effect to be pronounced enough, we need a heavier gyro spinning at few thousand rpm. I would speculate that a 1400g (about 3 pounds) gyro spinning upwards of 6000rpm could produce quite impressive results. Because in this simple experiment we do not intend to alter the intensity of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, therefore the only option we have for increasing the strength of the antigravity effect is to increase the value of the angular momentum by increasing the weight, the angular velocity, or the angular acceleration of the gyro.

https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/

https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/taming-gravity/

a379thpapernotes5.pdf


%d bloggers like this: