Counter Gravitational Experiment

Many thanks.

In a message dated 07/06/2017 21:48:27 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Hola!

I sent the correct link which is;

http://www.keelynet.com/inertia.html

and your email altered it to just;

http://www.keelynet.com/

Please review the inertia page.

NOT inertial thrust???

There was a guy years ago who got a patent on a device that extracted
power from a gyro interaction with the rotating earth.

02/25/17 – Earth’s Rotational Energy – Is it usable?;
http://www.keelynet.com/indexfeb17.html

“The flywheel plane is locked to the Universe, so, as the Earth turns
(and turns the bolted down gyroscope stand with it), the large gyroscope
base gear (attached to the flywheel which is in turn locked to the
Universe) makes the electrical generator gear spin (because the stator
of the generator is mounted on the stand and is thus locked to the
Earth). Add in a couple of wires and magnets and the rest of electrical
generator stuff and you got yourself some electricity coming directly
from the Earth’s rotational energy.”

02/25/17 – Obtaining Energy from the Earth’s Spin Force;
http://www.keelynet.com/indexfeb17.html

“Converting the Spin Force to Usable Electric Power – Since it moves
matter, it probably can be transformed into electricity. While
researching this spin force around the human body I realized that the
spin force of the Earth might be tapped as an industrial power source,
an alternative energy. The spin force is not necessarily the Earth’s
rotation, but is a name for that which drives the Earth’s rotation.
Bjoorn Vlistigk, an investigator in Denmark, built a giant apparatus,
like the kind I used and claimed to generate up to 5,000 watts from it.
He used this power generation to light a string of one hundred, 50-watt,
light bulbs. 6 Download The Spin Force pdf”

Jerry @ Keelynet y mas

On 6/7/2017 11:12 AM, Dr. Agatha Lorentz-Ferenstein, Ph.D. wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Jerry Decker wrote:
>
> Hola Dr. Lorentz-Ferenstein and *Sandy!*
>
> I thought you might be interested in this page:
>
> *http://www.keelynet.com/*
>
> Have been at it a long time so always hoping to see
>
> real testing and positive results of inertial drives.
>
>
> Good luck!
>
> Jerry @ Keelynet
>
> Hola *Jerry* and *Sandy, *
> Thank you very much for your friendly email,
> and for giving us much needed publicity
> at your *legendary* website.
> Much appreciated.
> As I already mentioned more than once,
> our Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis not only predicts
> the lift in upward direction, as*evident *in Sandy Kidd’s device,
> but also clearly understands its physical causes.
> Therefore, *Sandy’s experimental results constitute *
> *an empirical proof of the validity of our *
> *Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis : *
>
> * *https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/study-guide/*
>
> In our opinion, Sandy’s experimental results
> are *not* the case of *inertial propulsion,*
> neither do they *violate *any laws of physics.
>
> According to our Hypothesis, the *lift produced *
> by Sandy’s device is a genuine, natural *antigravity*effect,
> resulting from *: *
>
> hitherto unknown *physical interaction* between
> *angular momentum* of a spinning gyroscope
> and Earth’s *magnetic* and *electric* fields.
> Well, I only hope that both of you are not disappointed
> that we are not *violating* Newton here,
> and that this is *not* a case of inertial propulsion?
> *Yes, * THE G-ENGINES ARE COMING *:*
>
> * *https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/taming-gravity/*
>
> If you have not noticed, there is the *second, *
> much simpler experiment described
> at the bottom of this page:
>
> * *https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/*
>
>
> This second experiment is essentially a much simplified
> version of Sandy Kidd’s experiment.
> *Dear Jerry, I would greatly appreciate if you would like to think
> *
> *about some of your friends and associates, *
> *who might be interested in performing it. *
> **
> *Let’s keep in contact.*
>
> With respect and much gratitude,
> Agatha
>
>
> THE SECOND, simpler, Nobel Prize winning experiment :
>
> balance-scales
>
>
> TWO-GYROS
>
>
>
> TWO MOTIONLESS GYROS IN BALANCE :
>
> exp2
>
>
> TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS, BOTH GYROS
> MAY BE ENCLOSED IN NON-METALLIC CONTAINERS, WHICH SHOULD NOT
> DIMINISH THE ANTIGRAVITY EFFECT.
>
>
> THE SPINNING GYRO (WITH THE HORIZONTAL SPIN AXIS) WILL ANTIGRAVITATE :
>
>
> exp2
>
>
> TECHNICAL NOTES
>
>
> To be more realistic, and also more empirically precise, we need
> to perform the above experiment in slightly different way than it
> seems to be implied by the above illustrations.
>
> The two gyros hang in balance, motionless. By hand, let’s raise one
> motionless gyro, and let it come down freely. It will oscillate before
> it comes back to motionless balance again in due time.
>
> Now, let’s repeat it, this time raising a spinning gyro. It will freely
> come down, but slower. It will take more time due to a little bit of
> antigravity effect it will generate. This will decrease the frequency of
> its oscillations before it comes back to the motionless balance again.
> Perhaps the mean of the amplitude might be slightly shifted upward from
> the motionless balance level?
>
> It would be interesting to check if the direction of spin has influence
> on the results. It should not have any.
>
> The reason why the spinning gyro (with the horizontal spin axis) might
> not take off and antigravitate in a spectacular fashion, as it was
> suggested by the above illustrations, is that its angular velocity (and
> angular momentum) will start to instantly decelerate upon releasing it
> at the motionless balance level.
>
>
> Then again, it may as well raise, depending on how strong its
> angular momentum is when it is released at the level of the
> motionless balance.
>
> If instead of a gyro we would use a rotor with a constant angular
> velocity (and angular momentum), the spinning rotor would slowly raise
> (antigravitate) at a constant rate. For the rotor to accelerate its
> antigravitating movement, we would need to accelerate its angular
> velocity (and angular momentum).
>
> The spinning gyro (with the horizontal spin axis), should be suspended
> on the balance-scale in the way that will prevent it from precessing (or
> rotating), and the gyro should be allowed a degree of freedom to
> naturally hang horizontally at all times, even when it goes up, or down.
> The balance-scale should be allowed to move only up, or down. These
> conditions could be pretty much self-evident from looking at the very
> primitive graphics that were used above to illustrate the experiment.
>
> What if we repeat this experiment with both gyros having their axis of
> spin oriented vertically, instead of horizontally? What if one gyro is
> spinning horizontally, and the other one is spinning vertically? For the
> above two options we can try each direction of spin, too.
>
> *Experimenting with rotors is a bit more difficult, especially for the
> reason that should they happen to be electrically powered, this could
> potentially introduce electromagnetic field which in turn could
> interfere with Earth’s magnetic and electric fields in an unpredictable
> manner. *
>
> In this experiment, the natural antigravity effect is the result of a
> horizontally oriented angular momentum interacting with Earth’s
> perpendicular magnetic and electric fields, as per the Minkowski-Feigel
> effect <https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/abraham-minkowski/>.
>
>
> For the antigravity effect to be pronounced enough, we need a
> heavier gyro spinning at few thousand rpm. I would speculate that
> a 1400g (about 3 pounds) gyro spinning upwards of 6000rpm could
> produce quite impressive results. Because in this simple
> experiment we do not intend to alter the intensity of Earth’s
> magnetic and electric fields, therefore the only option we have
> for increasing the strength of the antigravity effect is to
> increase the value of the angular momentum by increasing the
> weight, the angular velocity, or the angular acceleration of the
> gyro.
>
> *https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/*
>
> Podkletnov <https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/taming-gravity/>
>


%d bloggers like this: