This would be a good candidate for application of UFT367 to UFT370, using a modification of the simultaneous differential equations given there. That would be a classical theory, and quantum classical equivalence means that there is a classical limit to any quantum hypothesis.

Gentlemen,In case you have

notnoticed by now,the SECOND, simpler,

Nobel Prizewinning

quantumgravityexperiment:is basically a much

simplerand technicallyeasierversionof the

Sandy Kidd’s deviceexperiment ( seebelow).Thank you for your attention,

Gentlemen.Dr. Bill Ferrier of Dundee University had this to say

aboutSandy Kidd’s device:

“ There is no doubt that thedevice does produce vertical lift.

Several modifications were then made at my suggestions

in order to disprove other possibilities of lift,

particularlyaerodynamiceffects.”

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Taj4VA1L_vw
v=MmtOAfrGnw0- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL_Gasok8xw
http://www.rexresearch.com/kidd/kidd.htm- https://beta.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/caostheory/conversations/messages/14532
I am interested in theoretical

opinions of all scientists in our groupin respect to the

purported lift effectproduced by the Sandy Kidd’s device.In your opinion, is this lift a

genuine anomaly?

If so, how exactly yourUFT(ECE2) could explain it?

And I am NOT asking for any mathematical equations, please!! :))

All I need from you is a short and clear explanation from the standpoint

of general principles of physical phenomena involved :

According to our Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis,

the lift produced by the Sandy Kidd’s device (powered rotors)is a

genuine antigravity effect,exactly as understood

and predicted by our Hypothesis.I would even dare to say that it does constitute

an empirical proof of the validity

of ourQuantum Antigravity Hypothesis.Looking forward to hear from all of you, Gentlemen.

Agatha