Thanks for checking this, the LHS’s come from rearranging the algebra to get Eq. (5). This plan looks very interesting.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 14/05/2017 14:38:49 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: 377(5): Relation between Forward and Retrograde Precessions

Where comes the LHS of eqs.(3) and (4)?

The calculations are ok. I will use eqs. 11 and 14 to compute kappa_X and kappa_Y from the orbit solutions X, Y, X dot, Ydot and graph them.

Horst

Am 11.05.2017 um 14:05 schrieb EMyrone:

This is given by Eqs. (1) and (2), which produce Eq. (10). Using the Coulomb law of ECE2 gravitation gives Eq. (18), assuming that the spin connection components are time independent. So X and Y can be found without ambiguity from a choice of spin connection components, regarded as input parameters. A retrograde precession is given by Eq. (19) from the relativistic Newton equation, which in component format becomes Eqs. (20) and (21). The forward precession is given by Eqs. (22) to (24). They can be interchanged by use of Eq. (10). This is a result that is entirely new to physics, and can be developed in many ways. By choosing spin connection components the experiemntally observable orbit can be described, forward or retrograde.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on May 15, 2017 at 6:56 am and is filed under asott2. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.