I will start by making this comparison in order to find the analytical value of the spin connection. These are important results, so I will develop them by expressing the relevant lagrangian in curvilinear coordinates. They make Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) obsolete by producing the precession of the perihelion in two ways, both of which are simpler than EGR.. Congratulations to co author Horst Eckardt for finding the precessing orbit due to the spin connection, graphed in UFT363. I will attempt to express these results in terms of the observed precesion, 3MG / (alpha c squared). One spin connection is sufficient to produce precession. The lagrangian of ECE2 relativity is sufficient to produce precession, graphed in UFT372. This lagrangian has the same mathematical structure in special relativity.

To: EMyrone@aol.com, burleigh.personal@gmail.com

Sent: 14/03/2017 11:54:46 GMT Standard Time

Subj: Section 3 of papers 360, 363, 372

These are the numerical sections. Eq. (71) of UFT363 may be compared

with Eq. (58) of UFT372. There is a similarity, relating Omega with r0

and gamma, although not perfect, since the term r*phi dot ^2 is not

affected in UFT372.

It seems that the modification of the r equation is responsible for the

precession, not the modification of the phi equation. This may have to

do with the symmetry of modifying phi dot dot as I explained in UFT372.

Horst

paper372-3.pdf

paper360-3.pdf

paper363-3.pdf

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on March 15, 2017 at 8:24 am and is filed under asott2. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.