Moebius strip in cosmology

This is an excellent development, and can be included in Section 3 of UFT362, whose main themes are relativistic orbits and lagrangian quantum mechanics. It is significant that three dimensional orbits produce tilted planar orbits, so the observed Moebius strips in cosmology may be due to three dimensional orbits (UFT371, which is already very popular).

Sent: 12/03/2017 18:44:41 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Moebius strip in cosmology

I produced the structure of a Moebius strip by two masses orbiting a common centre in tilted orbits. The two masses are independent, i.e. there is the assumption that the interaction between orbiting masses is small compared to the gravity of the centre. This seems reasonable. The initial condition for phi of the second mass has been shifted slightly so that both orbits have no common points. Fig. 7 shows the orbits, in Fig. 8 the difference vector between both masses has been plotted. This shows the structure of a Moebius strip, if I am right. One can imagine that the there are much more than two masses moving in the 2D space between the two plotted orbits. This is a quite simple and classical explanation of the observed Moubius structure.


Am 06.03.2017 um 01:10 schrieb Norman Page:

Horst/M Normanyron Somewhat fanciful speculation – maybe the number of masses (electrons ) in each shell equals the number of twists in each Mobius strip?
On 3/4/2017 9:06 AM, Horst Eckardt wrote:

This is interesting. The ring structure with modulated height Z while the ring is originally in the XY plane can be modeled by a angular-dependent potential. I will give such an example in section 3 of paper 371. The special curving as a Moebius strip requires modeling motion of more than one mass around the centre which is possible. In the article it is spoken of special light polarization where E and B fields are not perpendicular to each other or direction of propagation. This is possible for longitudinal wave expansion as we have shown in great detail on basis of ECE2 theory. This is obviously ignored by standard physics.


Am 03.03.2017 um 22:11 schrieb Norman Page:

On 3/3/2017 3:05 PM, Norman Page wrote:This site has an enormous amount of empirical data relative to your recent orbital calculations. Regards Norman Page

On 3/3/2017 6:33 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Many thanks to the Co President on behalf of�Horst and myself. �

To: EMyrone
Sent: 03/03/2017 10:37:01 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Graphics and Computation of Note 371(4)

Fantastic developments again.

Sent from my Samsung device

%d bloggers like this: