Remarks by Gareth Evans on 260(5)

This is because the electron is essentially a perfect sphere, too small to be measured by the Imperial College experiment. It does not decay into other particles. The golden age physicists such as Compton and his student Bostick would have rejected supersymmetry out of hand, Bostick was scathingly critical of the standard model in 1986. It is also very clear that our refutations of Einsteinian general relativity have been accepted, for example UFT88 has been read over a hundred and thirty times this month (March 2014). It has been doing the rounds of all the best places for six or seven years. This means total rejection of harassers like Laktakhia, Rodrigues, Bruhn and ‘t Hooft (one of the most dubious Nobel Prizes in history, shared prize on renormalization in QCD). The Nobel prize for the Higgs boson is just being rejected out of hand, it is almost a joke. You only need to glance at google to see that. It also means total rejection of wikipedia’s silly little distortion of ECE, now out dated by years. I am in wikipedia in several other ways: The British Civil List, Marquis, Burke’s Peerage and Gentry and so on, not that being in wiki means anything at all.

In a message dated 31/03/2014 11:50:40 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Very interesting that there is no dipole moment Myron – the way charge is more conventionally perceived. Perhaps not such a surprise that there are no quarks etc. As you say, using so many adjustable parameters almost anything can be conceived (and fitted – but this is no proof). Another hammer blow for the classic model!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile

260(5): ECE Theory of the Structures of the Electron, Proton and Neutron

This note develops a new theory of the internal structures of the electron, proton and neutron on the basis of a Beltrami equation for the tetrad. Each property is the expectation value using wavefunctions that are solutions of the Helmholtz wave equation, products of Bessel functions and spherical harmonics. For example the recent ten year experiment at Imperial College London has shown that the electron has no electric dipole moment, and is a sphere of unmeasurably small radius. In the ECE theory this result is described by Eq. (32), by choice of the wavefunction. The magnetic dipole moment of the electron is described by Eq. (35), and is well known to be proportional to the intrinsic spin angular momentum of quantum mechanics. The homogeneous internal structure of the electron is again described by a choice of wavefunction, analogous to the S orbitals in hydrogenic wavefunctions but using Helmholtz / Beltrami wavefunctions. The wavefunctions being used here are not hydrogenic, atomic or molecular they come from a Beltrami structure. The results of the Imperial College experiment have refuted all supersymmetry theories of the standard model, and there is no actual experimental evidence for quarks inside the electron. The particles predicted by supersymmetry have not been detected at CERN in electron positron collisions, and UFT225 shows that the GWS theory is wildly incorrect. No one has challenged UFT225 in almost three years and it has been sent to CERN. All that is observed experimentally for the electron is a perfect sphere without an electric dipole moment but with a magnetic dipole moment coming from intrinsic spin angular momentum. The next note with deal with the internal structures of the proton and neutron using the same Beltrami sub geometry of Cartan geometry in the context of ECE theory. The experimental data here come from deep inelastic electron proton and electron neutron scattering, and again give no evidence at all for quarks. The latter are just figments of imagination produced by a curve fitting exercise with over a hundred adjustables in supersymmetry theories that have just collapsed entirely, along with superstring theories and so on. The ECE / Beltrami theory has no adjustables except for kappa of the Beltrami tetrad equation.

%d bloggers like this: