This is an excellent paper and I am glad to accept it for the journal and www.aias.us website and blog.
Archive for March, 2012
These notes provide a straightforward refutation of Einsteinian General Relativity using Kepler’s second law of 1609 for a precessing elliptical orbit. It is shown that if the coordinate system is (r, beta), where beta is x multiplied by theta, then Einsteinian general relativity is not needed at all to describe a precessing ellipse. It is described by the inverse square law of Robert Hooke of Oxford. This was not discovered by Isaac Newton of Cambridge as in John Aubrey “Brief Lives” (online).
My intention in writing the UFT series of papers has been to cover as much ground as possible in the natural sciences and engineering. The refutation of Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) emerged as a surprising sideline, but an important one. In the rest of UFT214 I intend to look at aspects of planetary motion first analysed by Kepler. The EGR fails for the orbital equation, and so will also fail for Kepler’s second law and similar. No amount of verbiage, personal hostility, or media gloss will get around the basic problem just explained to Cantonian School in Cardiff in a file kindly prepared by Dr. Horst Eckardt. An entirely new approach is needed to relativity and the constrained Minkowski method has been initiated in recent UFT papers. I do not think that any pupil should go into EGR, that would be a complete waste of time. They should go into new energy physics and that would be a service to society. Many schools have studied www.aias.us as the attached overview file shows with complete objectivity. The attached represents only 2% of the total number of distinct visits. Tens of thousands of pupils and students have studied the site from their private computers. The attached records only what is in the public domain, and is restricted to universities, institutes, government departments, organizations, major corporations and military facilities. Each distinct visit may imply many real visits, approaching order of two million.
This is indeed full of interest, especially Patti singing at the National Eisteddfod. Bannister comes from the Norman French “banastre” or basket maker, and “Aubrey” from Alberic. “Burke’s Peerage and Gentry” included Lord Tudor Watkins in my genealogy as you know. This is the first photograph I have seen of him. Lord Tudor Watkins founded the Brecon Beacons National Park, and that is safe from the appalling damage of wind turbines. Even worse than the war casualties were the mining casualties as you know. There were many terrible accidents in this village. One of my sonnets refers to one such accident that happened to David Havard, the open wound was cleaned out with iodine. The worst accidents were falling stones in Nixon Drift, but of course fire damp was the most dangerous. If some of these biker criminals were put underground they would die of exhaustion within five minutes.
Dr Horst Eckardt, UPITEC Director and AIAS Fellow, has kindly prepared this file for you, and great thanks to him. It uses Maxima code to produce the precessing ellipse graphically, to differentiate the precessing ellipse, and to show that the Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) does not produce a precessing ellipse (the observed orbit of a planet). This is one of its most famous claims, and it is plainly wrong. I advise studying this code carefully, and feel free to forward it to schools all over the world by chain e mail, with the permission of your headmaster and teachers, in school time if they give permission, or from home. David Herbert, a sixth former at the school, wrote me a letter asking me to explain how to draw a precessing ellipse and differentiate it. This is my reply to him. Also please refer to 214(1), and 214(2) on this blog. EGR is an obsolete theory incorrect in many ways. It is very easy to show that it is wrong. We are writing a book on this to be published soon. Feel free to use this as a course book and to recommend it to other schools worldwide:
M. W. Evans, Ed., “Definitive Refutations of the Einsteinian General Relativity (Cambridge International Science Publishing, CISP, www.cisp-publishing.com)
See home page of www.aias.us for more information about how to buy the book. Also I recommend study of the UFT papers and other material on the www.aias.us website, archived at the NationaL Library of Wales and British Library on www.webarchive.org.uk. This is difficult, but you will find that the standard physics is full of flaws which are put right by ECE theory.
Prof. M. W. Evans,
H. M. Civil List
There were 3,179 hits from 537 distinct visits, 48.6% spiders. Federal University of Paraiba Brazil UFT8, UFT99; Technology Training Centre University of Alberta general; University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT213; Unitec University Cooperation Colombia UFT142(Spanish); Technical University Darmstadt general; Mathematics University of the Saarland Some Family History; Hampshire College Amherst GGLtr1; State University of New York Stonybrook UFT142; Engineering Universiy of Michigan UFT41; Library University of Michigan criticisms of G. ‘t Hooft by Gareth Evans; University of Washington general; University of Wisconsin Essay 42; Physics Complutensian University Madrid UFT33; University of Cordoba general; Science University of Valencia UFT166 (Spanish), Felker3 (Spsnish), UFT171(Spanish); University of Caen Normandy photon B3; University of Poitiers general, UFT212, UFT213; City University of Hong Kong autobiograhy; Indian Institute of Astrophysics UFT208; Physics University of Modena general; University of Siena Essay54 (Spanish); Sony Corporation LCR resonant; Polytechnic University Krakow Bruchholtz theory; University of Edinburgh UFT177; University of Nottingham UFT4; Kentucky Schools Space Energy, intense interest all sectors.
To David Herbert, teachers and pupils at Cantonian School in Cardiff. I will ask Dr Horst Eckardt if he will kindly prepare Maxima code for you of the precessing ellipse, with a graph, and Maxima code for the differentiation and comparison with the Einstein theory all in one file. I advise that you all use this file for your studies, with the permission of the headmaster and teachers. Then I advise making the news known by chain e mail with this file attached. Send e mails to schools over all Wales first asking the recipient to send the e mail to ten others and so on. You can so this in your own time from home. So every teacher and pupil will see very clearly that Einsteinian general relativity does not produce the orbit of a planet. The theory is very clearly meaningless The precession is caused by the x factor, this causes the ellipse to move. There are any number of animations of this on google.
Prof. M. W. Evans,
H. M. Civil List
To Dai Herbert: My advice is first draw the static ellipse, with x = 1, to see if the programme works. Then input small x, and redraw the ellipse. It will be rotated slightly. If there are any further questions please feel free to adress them to Horst Eckardt, Ray Delaforce and Robert Cheshire, who have all drawn the precessing ellipse, two of them from the equation using computer packages. Also look up google entries on the precessing ellipse. Try doing the differentiation by hand first, or if that is too difficult use Maxima, Mathematica, Maple etc. The Einstein theory is very easily shown to be wrong.
Many thanks for your letter of 26th March about the simple refutation of Einsteinian general relativity. Dr Horst Eckart (horsteck), Ray Delaforce (raydela) and Robert Cheshire (rpmc_6) here could help you graph a precessing ellipse from:
r = alpha / (1 + epsilon cos (x theta))
Notes 214(1) and 214(2) give all the details of how to differentiate it (see many textbooks and google items). Dr. Horst Echardt could help you with computer algebra. The whole Cantonian school should know that Einsteinian general relativity can be easily refuted. As a Herbert you are related to me. Please tell other schools in Wales and further afield in Britain and Europe about it by chain e mail. Thanks to your teacher for helping.