Archive for May, 2008

Oil Shortfall

May 31, 2008


Subject: Oil Shortfall
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 05:47:07 EDT

I am not sure whether this is a temporary shortfall, or a permanent sign of running out of oil reserves. I would have thought that Governments by now would have had plans to ration oil for the petrochemical industry, and to urgently introduce cars running on new fuels, hybrid cars, electric cars and so on. The British Government policy is to increase reliance on nuclear power stations, and this will need new ways of cleaning up nuclear waste. I am not sure whether the London Government wil respect the fact that Wales, like the USA, is nuclear free by unanimous vote of all Councils in Wales. It is clear that very strict safety precautions will be needed for nuclear power stations. The new energy methods advocated on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) would be a much safer solution, myriads of domestic and industrial devices can be produced on the now accepted ECE theory and engineering model paper by Dr Eckardt available on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) . Nets of engineers are working on this engineering model at present, and the patent offices are now issuing patents on these devices because post ECE it is known that they conserve energy / momentum. The key concept is spin connection resonance, derived directly from the structure of Cartan geometry itself. There is also heavy opposition in Wales to wind turbines, which are scientifically known to be essentially useless.

Civil List Scientist

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Welsh Assembly Government

Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt

May 31, 2008


Subject: Fwd: AW: Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:44:41 EDT

Thank you in turn for all your hard work, done entirely voluntarily in your spare time. Your detailed checking of the notes for each paper is especially important, and there are so many cross checks, as you point out, that the probability of any error is vanishingly small. I think that your most important work has been to produce plausible engineering designs based on ECE theory, and one can now see networks of engineers working on the application of ECE theory. These multiple cross checks of ECE geometry are carried out by different colleagues, and using the computer. I hope that Stephen Hawking and Martin Rees will at least read some of these notes, otherwise there is going to be a complete collapse of professional confidence. One can actually see this happening, because the high quality readership of _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) is worldwide and sustained, every ECE source paper being read, and every educational article being read, every month. The highly visible fact that a sincere and able scholar like Crothers is treated in such an offhand manner will itself generate a loss of confidence in editors that just protect their own pet theory and funding interests at the expense of everyone else. Even worse is that there appears to be no coherent energy policy to meet the shortfall in oil and that these people waste so much public funding that should be used for new energy sources of all kinds. People actually stop me in the street to ask me to solve the energy crisis – they are not joking. However, I am not even allowed to advise the Welsh Assembly, except in a voluntary capacity, which I do almost every day. So there is a critical loss of confidence in government.

Civil List Scientist

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Assembly

Thank you very much for appreciating my work at AIAS. It is a pleasure to be a coauthor of so many papers with you. I personally think that work and actions speak for the people themselves. At least the experts can discern hollow phrases from sound scientific work. Our work at AIAS is VERY solid. Nearly every paper contains new physical insights. Where is this the case in the standard journals?

Horst

—–Ursprüngliche Nachricht—– Von: EMyrone] at [aol.com [mailto:EMyrone] at [aol.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Mai 2008 07:06 An: aje] at [warfplc.com; diego.rapoport] at [gmail.com; scullinan] at [uwic.ac.uk; gcnemeth] at [blueyonder.co.uk; f.fucilla] at [steriwave.com; J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; garethjohnevans] at [hotmail.co.uk; fdamador] at [comcast.net; annwvyn76] at [hotmail.com; sean] at [somewhere.ws; dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; rob] at [rfmicrosystems.co.uk; geesquared] at [gmail.com; kp] at [westmonmouth.torfaen.sch.uk; kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; rhodri.morgan] at [wales.gov.uk; BBCMidWales] at [bbc.co.uk; ioan.richards] at [swansea.gov.uk; ewehoe] at [yahoo.co.uk; john.hague] at [swansea.gov.uk; frank.lichtenberg] at [physik.uni-augsburg.de; twidlar] at [yahoo.com; ellisowilliams] at [hotmail.com; ted] at [annis.org; patternsof-thought] at [yahoo.com; spherical_symmetry] at [yahoo.com; thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; felker.larry] at [gmail.com Betreff: Fwd: Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt

Thanks very much to Prof. Diego Rapaport, a leading geomertist who has checked the correctness of ECE theory. The latter has alsi been checked extensively against experimental data. So if Tucker and Hehl use torsion, we should be “allowed” to use torsion, and allowed access to the same journals. Eckardt’s engineering plans are badly needed in the current energy crisis and are excellently thought out.

15-30May08 Rest of World Feedback

May 31, 2008


Subject: 15-30May08 Rest of World Feedback
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:30:59 EDT

Extensive ECE engineering net established in Canada: Kitchener, Malton, Montreal, Ottawa, Quebec, Sherbrooke, St Hubert, Sudbury, Toronto, Hamilton, Windsor, London, and Unionville, DND Canada, UCDSB Ontario, Univ Calgary, UCF Cuba, UO Cuba, PUCE Ecuador, Univ Goa India, Technogroup India, Shiraz Univ Iran, UNAM Mexico, UITM Malaysia, UCT South Africa, Univ Witwatersrand South Africa.

15-30May08, European feedback

May 31, 2008


Subject: 15-30May08, European feedback
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:13:38 EDT

Medical Univ. of Vienna, Wienkav Vienna, Univ Ghent, CAS Czechia, Charles Univ Prague, QSC Germany, Siemens*, Mainz, Mannheim, UGR Spain, Parliament of Spain, Finntech Finland, Ellecelmetalin France, Bordeaux, Poitiers, OTE Net Greece, Zuriel Hungary, Trinity College Dublin*, ENEA Italy, IOL Italy, AO CAreggi Tuscany, CWI Netherlands, NTNU Norway*, Poznan Poland, Porto Portugal, FDS Net Russia, ISSR Russia*, Chalmers University Sweden, LUTH Sweden, Umea Sweden, UNiv Uppsala Seden, SZU SLovakia, Aberystwyth, Cardiff, Univ Wales Registry Cardiff, Exeter, Kent, Liverpool, Liverpool Derby-Rath, Nottingham.

BCC List

May 31, 2008


Subject: Fwd: AW: BCC List
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:07:08 EDT

I hope that Rees and Hawking read the emails themselves and your messages are not thrown into the electronic bin by „secretaries“. Maybe they are even not aware of your sent emails.

Horst

—–Ursprüngliche Nachricht—– Von: EMyrone] at [aol.com [mailto:EMyrone] at [aol.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Mai 2008 07:14 An: aje] at [warfplc.com; diego.rapoport] at [gmail.com; scullinan] at [uwic.ac.uk; gcnemeth] at [blueyonder.co.uk; f.fucilla] at [steriwave.com; J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; garethjohnevans] at [hotmail.co.uk; fdamador] at [comcast.net; annwvyn76] at [hotmail.com; sean] at [somewhere.ws; dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; rob] at [rfmicrosystems.co.uk; geesquared] at [gmail.com; kp] at [westmonmouth.torfaen.sch.uk; kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; frank.lichtenberg] at [physik.uni-augsburg.de; twidlar] at [yahoo.com; ellisowilliams] at [hotmail.com; ted] at [annis.org; patternsof-thought] at [yahoo.com; spherical_symmetry] at [yahoo.com; thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; felker.larry] at [gmail.com Betreff: BCC List

I have started to include Martin Rees and Stephen Hawking on the BCC listings so I will be giving some bakground that will be familiar to others here. if I get told to get lost it will be another boring episode of intoleration, buit they might learn something. This would be like sticking two fingers at Parliament.

I hope that they will read them because they are sent from the Civil List Scientist appointed by Parliament. I have found that it is very difficult to discuss anything with former energy advisor David King for example. As the price of petrol goes through the roof, they ought to be listening to all kinds of advice on new energy. If they do not it give a very poor impression to the public.

15-30May08, USA Feedback to www.aias.us

May 31, 2008


Subject: 15-30May08, USA Feedback to http://www.aias.us
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 03:45:45 EDT

This is my two weekly selection of major universities, corporations, military facilities, and so forth who regularly study ECE theory and are using it for engineering (* denotes multiple visits). I divide this feedback into USA, Europe and Rest of World. This high quality of interest has been monitored daily for more than four years. So ECE is a new school of thought, being used in engineering.

Brigham Young, Caltech, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Colorado, Columbia, Iowa State, MIT, Michigan Tech., MU Ohio, North Dakota system, SUNY Oneonta, Portland State, RPI New York State, UC Irvine, U Texas Arlington, U Texas, Washington*, Los Alamos, Robins Airforce Base, USAR Army, NMCI Navy, Austin Waldorf, South West Labs., Boeing Company, Botevgrad, C.A.P. group, Energetiq Group, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Mobile Gas, Motorola, Northrop Grumman, engineer networks working on ECE theory.

May 08 Feedback for www.aias.us

May 31, 2008


Subject: May 08 Feedback for http://www.aias.us
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 03:18:38 EDT

Thsi is my monthly summary of feedback activity to _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) , which I have been following daily and analysing for over foru years. There is intense and sustained interest in the theory all over th eworld, all its papers are read every month.

Up to 30th May 942 documents were read off the site by visitors from 76 countries, led by US, France, South Africa, Germany, Italy, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, Britain, ….. .There were 58,812 files downlaoded (hits) from 10,999 individual visitors, downlaoding 4.27 gigabytes of material. All posted source papers on ECE theory were read. The most read papers were:

15, 53, 49, 68, 94, 65, 64, 45, 43, 103, 110, 111, 93, 109, 105, 63, 21, 20, 106, 37, 67, 104, 1001, 9, 102, 76, 56, 50, 54, 6, 12, 47, 90, 40, 7, 99, 61, 55, 30, 2, 16, 3, 4, 66, 42, 60, 92, ……….

My professional colleagues produce excellent educational articles and papers to do with ECE theory and for May 08 the most read papers were:

Space Energy (Spanish translation), ECE Engineering Model, ECE Introduction (English), ECE (spanish), ECE (French), Workshop history, Crystal Spheres, Galaxies (Spanish), Space Energy, Johnson Magnets, Galaxies, Numerical Solutions, GGLTR1, Crothers 1, Crothers 2, A Fundamental Flaw in the Einstein Equation, Bruhn refutation, Spacetime Development, ECE (Italian), Armorial Bearings and Badge, New stats, Royal Decree, Tornado in a Petrie Dish, Cosmo7, ECE (Dutch), Paper 93 extra plots, Riemannian torsions, PS refutation, Ulrich Thesis, ECE (German), Effects of the homogeneous current of ECE theory, Ricci flat criticisms by Crothers, Hehl refutations, filtered feedback from June 06 to Nov 06, Indranu 6a, ECE Overview slides, Indranu 8, A year’s feedback stats part two, Black Hole catastrophe, PS refutation part two, …………………

British Civil List Scientist

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Welsh Assembly

Introduction

May 30, 2008


Subject: Introduction
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 02:39:23 EDT

Welcome to distingushed colleagues who have joined us recently. I am the British Civil List Scientist appointed by Parliament on the recommendation of the Royal Society and Prime Minister in 2005 for pre-eminent contributions to Britain in science (_www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) ). My predecessors on the Civil List or similar include Isaac Newton (Master of the Mint, 1699), two Astronomers Royal, William Herschel and George Airy, the chemical physicists John Dalton and Michael Faraday, the thermodynamicist James Joule, the mathematian and engineer Oliver Heaviside, and the botanist Robert Brown. I send out daily postings and use BCC to eliminate the contemporary plague of cyberstalking as much as possible. If anyone does not wish to receive these messages please inform me and they will not be sent. My work is described on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) , which I own, and which is run by a voluntary international web-team. This site has generated about five million hits, over a million visitors, including all leading institutions to do with physics. It is mainly concernend with a variation on the theme of relativity known as Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) field theory. There are 112 papers available on the theory. In 2007 we demonstrated the incorrectness of the geometry used by Einstein in paper 93, a recognised major advance, and replaced it with field equations based on the correct Bianchi identity and dual identity. I have produced nearly eight hundred papers and books in my career, and was a student of Mansel Davies, Fellow of Peterhouse Cambridge. I am sometime Junior Research Fellow of Wolfson College, Oxford, educated at Aberystwyth. I wish to forge a collegial discussion on ECE theory and produce new cosmologies based on ECE theory. I am currently the only scientist on the British Civil List, and the only one from Wales. My predecesor was the great metaphysical poet Vernon Watkins, friend and mentor of Dylan Thomas.

Myron Evans

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Welsh Assembly

Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt

May 30, 2008


Subject: Fwd: Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 02:05:33 EDT

Very nice plan, congratulations!!

2008/5/30 :

> Of course I agree : his work with Maxima is historical, as was the > contribution by Tom Widlar to the code. AIAS Director Horst Eckardt’s > various educational articles and slides on http://www.aias.us are the most > popular every month, and he also goes through every note in detail. His > engineering article is of key importance to the design of new energy > devices. > > cc Prime Minister’s Office and Welsh Assembly > > > > > ———- Mensaje reenviado ———- > > >
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:23:27 +0000 >
Subject: RE: The planned book in response of the CUP book > Horst’s contributions are sometimes underestimated in my view. The > development and use of computer algebra alone has been so important. > > Best, Gareth > > —————————— > >
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 01:46:37 -0400 >
Subject: Fwd: The planned book in response of the CUP book > > gcnemeth] at [blueyonder.co.uk; f.fucilla] at [steriwave.com; > J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; garethjohnevans] at [hotmail.co.uk; > fdamador] at [comcast.net; annwvyn76] at [hotmail.com; sean] at [somewhere.ws; > dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; rob] at [rfmicrosystems.co.uk; > geesquared] at [gmail.com; kp] at [westmonmouth.torfaen.sch.uk; > kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; > rhodri.morgan] at [wales.gov.uk; BBCMidWales] at [bbc.co.uk; > ioan.richards] at [swansea.gov.uk; ewehoe] at [yahoo.co.uk; > john.hague] at [swansea.gov.uk; frank.lichtenberg] at [physik.uni-augsburg.de; > twidlar] at [yahoo.com; ellisowilliams] at [hotmail.com; ted] at [annis.org; > patternsof-thought] at [yahoo.com; spherical_symmetry] at [yahoo.com; > thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; felker.larry] at [gmail.com; dfeustel] at [mindspring.com > > This is an excellent summary of the book by Horst Eckardt. I will send out > some of the metrics I abstracted from the book. > > –Forwarded Message Attachment– > > > CC: twidlar] at [yahoo.com; EMyrone] at [aol.com >
Subject: The planned book in response of the CUP book >
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 23:29:07 +0100 > > Dave, > > the book is planned to investigate a greater number of metrics of > general relativity. These are taken from a book that represents the > state of the art in Einsteinian general relativity, Myron refers to it > as the CUP book. It is a very mathematical book. Currently Myron has my > exemplar. Perhaps Tom Widlar can give you further details. The metrics > used in paper 93 are only a very small selection of what is in the CUP > book. > > The aim of our own book is to analyse these metrics concerning > fulfilment of the Ricci cyclic equation, metric compatibility, dual > Bianchi identity and what else is analysed in the code of paper 93. > Concerning the dual Bianchi identity, originally Myron aimed at > investigating a possible cosmological charge density which is described > by the dual of the Riemann tensor. Therefore we made the plots. At the > same time he realized that the occurrence of the charge density means > that the metrics do not fulfil the dual of the Bianchi identity because > torsion is always assumed zero in Einstein’s theory. So our planned book > has a threefold purpose: > > 1. provide an encyclopedia of current metrics of Einstein theory with > all Christoffel symbols, Riemann tensors, etc. > > 2. Show the possibility for a cosmological charge and current density > effect > > 3. Prove that nearly all of these metrics reveal that Einstein theory is > at variance with Cartan geometry because the occurrence of a > charge/current density means that the dual Bianchi identity is not > fulfilled. > > So this book could be the culmination and closure of Einstein’s general > relativity based on Riemann geometry. > > I suggest that you first try to understand the code of paper 93, after > that you could look into the code I sent over and see if you can > understand it and eventually help develop it. This should be coordinated > with Tom Widlar who could do work of this kind as well. > > Perhaps you and Tom could discuss details of the text (table of contents > in a first stage). I would be glad if I need not write much of the texts > since I am doing a lot of things in parallel as you know. > > Best regards, > Horst > > > > —–Ursprüngliche Nachricht—– > Von: dfeustel] at [mindspring.com [mailto:dfeustel] at [mindspring.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008 21:19 > An: Horst Eckardt > Betreff: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Maxima] Please disregard] > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Horst Eckardt wrote: > > PS: you are welcome to contribute to the planned book. I designed the > > new code in such a way that it can be produced nearly automatically. > > therefore I switched to LaTex output. Mainly the diagrams are still > > missing. They need some individual input which has to be added into > the > > input.txt files. Each directory M01, M02 etc. contains one metric to > be > > studied. > > > > Horst > > Horst, > > Thanks for the info re the Maxima code. I am getting into Maxima slowly, > partly due to eye problems that make reading the computer screen hard at > times. That makes trying to read the 870 page Maxima 5-14 manual hard. > Reading printed books is much easier, but I am having no success getting > anyone to print the Maxima manual in book format. I think I will have to > just work my way through the pdf file containing the manual. > > Typesetting the Maxima code makes it much easier to read. I now have > both Maxima and wxMaxima running on my computer and I have a lot of > documentation on LaTeX to help me with graphics and fonts. > > Thanks for the offer to contribute to the planned book. I don’t know > much about the book. Can you provide an overview of what the book > will cover? definitely have resources to apply to the task now. > > Thanks, > Dave > > > —————————— > Get Started! > > = >

Thanks very much to Prof. Diego Rapaport, a leading geomertist who has checked the correctness of ECE theory. The latter has alsi been checked extensively against experimental data. So if Tucker and Hehl use torsion, we should be “allowed” to use torsion, and allowed access to the same journals. Eckardt’s engineering plans are badly needed in the current energy crisis and are excellently thought out.

EPL G20767

May 30, 2008


Subject: Fwd: EPL G20767
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 02:00:46 EDT

If Tucker has anything to do with Hehl this explains the conspiracy. They will not give Crothers a fair hearing. Hehl is completely biased against ECE theory and unable even to understand the Bianchi identity. So this is beyond doubt a small faction which refuses to accept Bacon’s principle that a theory must be tested against data, not against another theory. There is simply an anthropomorphic bias against Crothers. If Rees and Hawking have no objections I will put them on my BCC list along with a few other FRS’s.

It should. You may be surprised to learn that the editor Prof. Tucker has published many articles on torsion but obviously in the standard model approach.

2008/5/30 :

> Again this is malfeasance, and again this paper can be posted on > http://www.aias.us. > > > ———- Mensaje reenviado ———- > > > david.bensimon] at [lps.ens.fr, erminald.bertel] at [uibk.ac.at, canadell] at [icmab.es, > leticia] at [lpt.ens.fr, fauve] at [lps.ens.fr, fazio] at [sns.it, fortov] at [ras.ru, > fortov] at [ficp.ac.ru, g.gehring] at [shef.ac.uk, havlin] at [ophir.ph.biu.ac.il, > fhimpsel] at [wisc.edu, plamen] at [buphy.bu.edu, pmjacobs] at [lbl.gov, > anders.kastberg] at [physics.umu.se, kotliar] at [physics.rutgers.edu, > lambrecht] at [spectro.jussieu.fr, lazaro] at [vdg.fis.puc-rio.br, > leger] at [lps.u-psud.fr, levi] at [roma3.infn.it, maciej.lewenstein] at [icfo.es, > hrma] at [sjtu.edu.cn, atmol1] at [tifr.res.in, frederic.mila] at [epfl.ch, > mcp1] at [cam.ac.uk, pegoraro] at [df.unipi.it, racz] at [general.elte.hu, > reimann] at [physik.uni-bielefeld.de, sawatzky] at [physics.ubc.ca, > c.m.schneider] at [fz-juelich.de, useifert] at [theo2.physik.uni-stuttgart.de, > sauro.succi] at [gmail.com, htakagi] at [k.u-tokyo.ac.jp, treumann] at [issibern.ch, > treumannr] at [gmail.com, robin.tucker] at [lancaster.ac.uk, d.vanmaekelbergh] at [uu.nl, > luis.vina] at [uam.es, rudiger.voss] at [cern.ch, patrick.warren] at [unilever.com, > zelevinsky] at [nscl.msu.edu, zelevins] at [nscl.msu.edu, fuchun] at [hkucc.hku.hk, > markus.schwoerer] at [uni-bayreuth.de, mceh] at [bluewin.ch, oleandri] at [sif.it, > quilbe] at [edpsciences.org, andrew.wray] at [iop.org, graeme.watt] at [iop.org >
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:34:27 +1000 >
Subject: Re: EPL G20767 > > The Editorial Board and Directors, > EuroPhysics Letters, > > Please explain what you mean by this vague statement. Please specify what > it is in my paper that makes it “*not fit the scope*” of your journal. In > particular, specify and prove any technical errors in my paper. The > statements on the mission of your Journal, on your website, make it pretty > clear that my paper *does* fall within the scope of your Journal, so I do > not believe that Caroline Orbann and Professor Robin W. Tucker have been > honest. The relevant paper is attached. > > *”Our vision is for EPL to become a leading home for global physics > letters, to offer rapid publication of ground-breaking physics results from > the international community, and to provide the broadest coverage of physics > research.”* > > * > https://www.epletters.net/4DCGI/_general&presentation/-1/0/0/0/0/0/083493622 > * > > > Yours faithfully, > Stephen J. Crothers. > > > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:42 PM, wrote: > >> >> Title: Point-Mass singularities, energy and the two-body problem in >> general relativity >> Author(s): S.J. Crothers >> >> >> Dear Dr. Crothers, >> >> >> Thank you for submitting your paper to EPL (Europhysics Letters). >> >> The Co-Editor, Professor Robin W. Tucker, has read carefully your paper >> and came to the conclusion that >> it does not fit the scope of our jounal, and therefore cannot be >> considered for publication, >> but you might wish to seek publication in a more specialized journal. >> >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> >> on behalf of Professor Robin W. Tucker >> >> Caroline Orbann >> Editorial Assistant >> >> > >