Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt

Subject: Fwd: AW: Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:44:41 EDT

Thank you in turn for all your hard work, done entirely voluntarily in your spare time. Your detailed checking of the notes for each paper is especially important, and there are so many cross checks, as you point out, that the probability of any error is vanishingly small. I think that your most important work has been to produce plausible engineering designs based on ECE theory, and one can now see networks of engineers working on the application of ECE theory. These multiple cross checks of ECE geometry are carried out by different colleagues, and using the computer. I hope that Stephen Hawking and Martin Rees will at least read some of these notes, otherwise there is going to be a complete collapse of professional confidence. One can actually see this happening, because the high quality readership of _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) is worldwide and sustained, every ECE source paper being read, and every educational article being read, every month. The highly visible fact that a sincere and able scholar like Crothers is treated in such an offhand manner will itself generate a loss of confidence in editors that just protect their own pet theory and funding interests at the expense of everyone else. Even worse is that there appears to be no coherent energy policy to meet the shortfall in oil and that these people waste so much public funding that should be used for new energy sources of all kinds. People actually stop me in the street to ask me to solve the energy crisis – they are not joking. However, I am not even allowed to advise the Welsh Assembly, except in a voluntary capacity, which I do almost every day. So there is a critical loss of confidence in government.

Civil List Scientist

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Assembly

Thank you very much for appreciating my work at AIAS. It is a pleasure to be a coauthor of so many papers with you. I personally think that work and actions speak for the people themselves. At least the experts can discern hollow phrases from sound scientific work. Our work at AIAS is VERY solid. Nearly every paper contains new physical insights. Where is this the case in the standard journals?


—–Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht—– Von: EMyrone] at [aol.com [mailto:EMyrone] at [aol.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Mai 2008 07:06 An: aje] at [warfplc.com; diego.rapoport] at [gmail.com; scullinan] at [uwic.ac.uk; gcnemeth] at [blueyonder.co.uk; f.fucilla] at [steriwave.com; J.Dunning-Davies] at [hull.ac.uk; garethjohnevans] at [hotmail.co.uk; fdamador] at [comcast.net; annwvyn76] at [hotmail.com; sean] at [somewhere.ws; dave] at [annexa.net; HorstEck] at [aol.com; rob] at [rfmicrosystems.co.uk; geesquared] at [gmail.com; kp] at [westmonmouth.torfaen.sch.uk; kp.phys] at [btinternet.com; karel.jelinek] at [gmail.com; rhodri.morgan] at [wales.gov.uk; BBCMidWales] at [bbc.co.uk; ioan.richards] at [swansea.gov.uk; ewehoe] at [yahoo.co.uk; john.hague] at [swansea.gov.uk; frank.lichtenberg] at [physik.uni-augsburg.de; twidlar] at [yahoo.com; ellisowilliams] at [hotmail.com; ted] at [annis.org; patternsof-thought] at [yahoo.com; spherical_symmetry] at [yahoo.com; thenarmis] at [yahoo.com; felker.larry] at [gmail.com Betreff: Fwd: Excellent Work by Dr. Horst Eckardt

Thanks very much to Prof. Diego Rapaport, a leading geomertist who has checked the correctness of ECE theory. The latter has alsi been checked extensively against experimental data. So if Tucker and Hehl use torsion, we should be “allowed” to use torsion, and allowed access to the same journals. Eckardt’s engineering plans are badly needed in the current energy crisis and are excellently thought out.

%d bloggers like this: