The condition for planar orbits is Eq. (17) or (27), the equation which results from the assumption that the constants of integration of Eq. (15) or (16) are zero. So this is the reason why planar orbits are planar. If one time dependent constant of integration is chosen as in Eq. (23), then the orbit is three dimensional and all previous work based on Eq. (24) remains valid. So Eq. (24) is the one to use in general. The three dimensional Binet equation is Eq. (26). The three dimensional orbit depends in general on the function (27) in which beta is a function of phi and theta. Computer algebra can be used to re express Eq. (27) in terms of phi and theta. I can also do this by hand using the chain rule of differential calculus. There are many interesting types of three dimensional orbits in galaxies, and they are all described by Eq. (27). All of this analysis is based on the spherical polar coordinates and lagrangian equations, so no one can object to the results, especially as they are checked many times by hand and computer algebra.

## 270(3) : The Condition for Planar Orbits

September 1, 2014## PS to Sean Mac Lachlan

September 1, 2014I have written a book on water with Wilse Robinson and others, it is in my “Contemporary Chemical Physics” series and makes extensive use of computer simulation. I produced many papers on water, e.g. Omnia Opera 255 with Lie and Clementi at IBM Kingston from 10 K to 1043 K, and used to do massive runs on the IBM 3084 and 3096 supercomputers on large water samples, one of these went on for over a week solid on the very fast IBM 3084. I was given use of the entire computer during a holiday. This was on code ported from Aberystwyth, Bangor and Swansea to IBM Kingston. Later the same basic code was used at Cornell Theory Center to produce the prize winning animation with Chris Pelkie on www.aias.us and also on the IBM 3096 at ETH Zurich. I helped pioneer computer animation at IBM Kingston and computer simulation itself at Oxford in the mid seventies. The code itself is all on www.aias.us right back to Algol in the early seventies. In 2010 Doug Lindstrom gave an invited lecture to the Serbian Academy on ECE applied to H bonding, with original contributions by Lindstrom and Eckardt. My Ph. D. supervisor Mansel Davies helped to pioneer the infra red and far infra red study of H bonding, and then its dielectric study. In the far infra red water absorbs very strongly so it has to be removed with zeolite. From the Physical Chemistry Laboratory in Oxford I produced a paper on the rotational motion of water free from H bonding (Omnia Opera 30, hyperlinked to the original paper in Faraday II). When freed from H bonding its dynamics are totally different. This paper received the massive number of one hundred reprint requests so the admin went crazy over postage. Compare that with up to fifty million readings of ECE theory. They would have had to have a special train hired from Shrewsbury on the mid Wales line and the entire College would have been bankrupted. All the envelopes in Wales would have had to be transported to Aberystwyth. That shows how things have changed from the seventies. The dogmatists on the other hand became stuck with a late fifties theory of the so called Higgs boson, and that dogma has just collapsed, wasting billions in taxation. We do nearly all our work at no cost to the taxpayer. So that says something about human society. It is something out of the alley of a thousand dustbins, full of old fish bones. If you wanted to drive Mansel Davies ballistic all you had to do was tell him that the dielectric permittivity of water was ten to the minus three and constant. Some undergraduates used to do this deliberately.

## Progress Made This Year

September 1, 2014Many thanks in turn, the entire AIAS and UPITEC should share in the credit for these major discoveries. This is a declaration of independence from dogma. In a variation on the words of Thomas Jefferson, all minds are created equal and there is an unalienable right to think, as there is to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Written as one citizen to another. Horst Eckardt takes particular credit for all his hard work and this animation, which instantly makes everything clear without the need for words or equations. However all of AIAS and UPITEC shares in the international kudos. Your summary is very similar to that of Albert Einstein, who said that he pitied the young academic under pressure for tenure in a politicized system, a false authority as we dissenters say. No one can argue, though, with spherical polar coordinates. If they do they will look silly. They were not known to Kepler, Hooke, Newton and their contemporaries, so all they could do was to construct planar orbits. That became universal gravitation and was cut into marble, always a boring thing to do. So now it is time to apply the new three dimensional Binet equation to galaxies. To get the true time dependence of the orbit needs a mathematical inversion, that is difficult but well worth trying by computer. The blog has also been a spectacular success, and thanks again to all who constructed it.

In a message dated 01/09/2014 00:32:13 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Myron,

We have made great strides this year. AIAS is racing ahead of the establishment in new discoveries and understanding unencumbered by the old way, jobs, or peer pressure. This is how real theoretical science happens. We now getting a clear picture into the inner workings of nature with a clarity of understanding like never before. It’s great to see the animation, I think it really helps bring clarity to scientists and lay people alike. Great progress! I’m excited to see quantum physics rewritten with clear geometry and none of that stringified uncertainty nonsense. I think it would be cool to work towards modeling a water molecule in the computer. That would really tie everything together.Sean

On Aug 31, 2014, at 9:08 AM, EMyrone wrote:

We have just made the major discovery that universal gravitation produces precessing orbits, the first time this has been realized in over four hundred years (1600 to present). Horst Eckardt’s first animation of this breakthrough is now visible on the blog of www.aias.us . This means that Einsteinian general relativity is not only totally wrong but not necessary. What is more every scientist must agree because all that has been used are the spherical polar coordinates. This will not mean much to the general reader but the orbital animation is very clear.

=

## Daily Report 30/8/14

September 1, 2014There were 1539 hits from 325 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN and yahoo. F3(Sp) 556, Auto1 464, Auto2 112, Essay 25 306, Book of Scientometrics 221, UFT88 87, Llais 67, ECE Engineering Model 54, Evans Equations 68 numerous Spanish, Englynion 52, UFT99 39, UFT227 38, CEFE 30, Auto Sonnets 7 for August 2014. University of Denver Colorado Autobiography Volume One; Extensive Download Bezeq International; The Indianapolis Public Library extensive study. AWStats started on new month. The stats are probably partial due to the end of month characteristics of the Weblog Program.

## Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

** Summary Period: August 2014 – URL
Generated 31-Aug-2014 12:00 EDT
**

## The Young Thomas

August 31, 2014When he was twenty years old Dylan Thomas spent two or three weeks in Donegal just after publishing “Eighteen Poems”. Among the poems he wrote in Donegal were “Altarwise by Owl Light”, a sonnet sequence the first six lines of which are as follows:

Altarwise by owl-light in the half-way house

The gentleman lay graveward with his furies;

Abaddon in a hangnail cracked from Adam,

And from his fork, a dog among the fairies,

The atlas eater with a jaw for news,

Bit out the mandrake with tomorrow’s scream.

There have been many Ph. D. Theses written about this sonnet sequence, often said to be surrealistic, or a dream sequence. To my mind it has meaning, although the young Thomas strives too hard for effect, making the poem needlessly dense and difficult. He himself insisted that his poetry was never surrealistic. The first two lines describe purgatory, the furies are Graeco Roman goddesses of vengeance, Abaddon is the Hebrew biblical word for place of destruction, and Adam has tasted the apple. A hangnail is a piece of loose skin from a fingernail, which might mean hanging on to life in purgatory, or might mean nothing at all, the poet carried away with words. The fairies are the magic people of European mythology and his fork might mean again purgatory, half in half out, downwards or upwards, you never know. The gentleman is a dog in the shady world and bites out the mandrake, the hallucinatory plant, to hear tomorrow’s scream, to know where he is going and what he is going to find. Around about this time Thomas was a reporter on the “Evening Post” in Swansea, so had a jaw for news. I think he got scared living in the Donegal wilderness and abruptly left without paying his bills on a bus to Belfast and no doubt by ferry home. This is not a very good piece of work compared with “Over Sir John’s Hill”, written in 1948, fourteen years later, and a work of maturity. Thomas was able to hypnotise audiences with his readings, and able to hypnotise them with words, even though they had no idea at all of his meaning. The vast majority of people in Wales have never read a world of Dylan Thomas, including Swansea Council. I am not sure that that is a good thing. Nonetheless the power and originality is obvious. There is nothing very profound in these six lines, they edge dangerously close to a child playing with words. The much simpler minimalist style of the granitic R. S. Thomas has more profundity. The best poetry by Dylan Thomas is that to which people can react, like “Ferndale”, or “Do not Go Gentle”, “In My Craft or Sullen Art”, or the great poem, “Over Sir John’s Hill”. I would certainly not analyse this sonnet sequence in a thesis. Dylan Thomas was very rude to the people of Donegal for some reason, I think that he was not cut out for solitude, and it got on his nerves.

## Animation of 3 – D Orbits

August 31, 2014We have just made the major discovery that universal gravitation produces precessing orbits, the first time this has been realized in over four hundred years (1600 to present). Horst Eckardt’s first animation of this breakthrough is now visible on the blog of www.aias.us . This means that Einsteinian general relativity is not only totally wrong but not necessary. What is more every scientist must agree because all that has been used are the spherical polar coordinates. This will not mean much to the general reader but the orbital animation is very clear.

## Animation of elliptic 3D orbit

August 31, 2014This is an excellent animation and shows immediately that the 3 -D orbit is a lot more intricate than the 2 – D orbit. The inversion problem is indeed a difficult one, and goes right back to Kepler himself. The computer might be able to find the answer straightforwardly. As Horst writes this should be regarded as a first attempt, but it is already full of originality. Obviously we have opened up a completely new subject area in cosmology upon which all can agree because it is based on the spherical polar coordinates.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 31/08/2014 14:44:45 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Animation of elliptic 3D orbitThis is an animation for the beta ellipse in 3D, parametrized by the theta angle. Since the theta grid has been chosen equidistant, the motion speed is not physical. I am not sure if the orbit is compatible with the first 3D surface r(theta,phi) shown in paper 269,3 (Figs. 3/4). Normally this should be a trace on the surface. This has further to be analysed. It would also not be straightforward to compute the right timing behaviour because the time function has to be inverted which has to be done numerically.

Horst

## FOR POSTING: sections 3 of papers 260 and 269

August 31, 2014These are both excellent Sections 3, and I am asking Dave to post them in the appropriate places in the UFT Sections. As usual the analysis by co author Horst Eckardt greatly adds to the original papers, and always produces incisive new results as well as checking the concepts and algebra. The graphics are rigorous science and also works of art.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 31/08/2014 14:31:40 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: sections 3 of papers 260 and 269I am sending this email from a friend.

I am sending over the numerical sections of papers 260 and 269, maybe there are still some typos in it.We have already discussed the results for the Beltrami calculation of elementary particles/partons. Perhaps this method has to be combined with a more sophisticated description in the outer particle region but the Beltrami field definitly works, showing that such vortex structures are present in the inner of particles.

For paper 269 I have compiled the 3D images for the LZ, Ltheta/Lphi and L^2-LZ^2 orbits, as well as some plots of angular restrictions following from epsilon>0 and <1. The results seem to be consistent.

Horst

## 270(2): Interpretation of the Dynamics for Constant Theta

August 31, 2014In this note the correct interpretation of the dynamics is given for constant theta. It is sufficient to understand the orbit in terms of Eq. (16) both for constant and non constant theta, (2-D and 3-D orbits respectively). There is no reason from the inverse sqaure law why a 3 – D orbit becomes a 2 – D orbit, but the geometry shows that all 2 – D orbits must precess. Some other mechanism must be at work to make the 3 – D orbit evolve to a 2 – D orbit. The inverse square law in 3 – D always transforms to a precessing ellipse in the 2 – D limit. For over four hundred years it has been thought that the inverse square law produces a non precessing ellipse. The error in the analysis was to restrict consideration to 2 – D from the outset. This error goes right back to Newton and Hooke, and was never corrected.

## The Obvious Problem with Contemporary Physics

August 31, 2014The obvious problem is that it does not work, and refuses to admit it. When a result such as that in Note 270(1) on the www.aias.us blog appears it is almost impossible for the standard physicists to accept its simplicity and power. They are ossified, turned to bone encasing an utterly obscure mindset. Despite the fact that anyone can see that note 270(1) is based on the spherical polar coordinates, the establishment of Einsteinian general relativity cannot bring themselves to admit that their entire approach is wrong, and indeed not needed. At the same time they cannot refute Cartan geometry, (no one can), and most certainly cannot refute spherical polar coordinates. So it is impossible to dialogue with them, which is why AIAS has evolved as it has. Note 270(1) shows that Newtonian gravitation can produce planetary precession. For over four hunded years this was thought to be impossible. Now it is known that it is perfectly possible, just use three dimensions. The entire basis of the Einsteinian general relativity evaporates. The ECE theory on the other hand goes from strength to strength. The graceful beauty of nature is wholly indifferent to human prejudice (pre judgment without fact). Einsteinian general relativity has become the ultimate in hearsay, the complete opposite of Baconian science. The next step is to apply these findings to galaxies where EGR collapses in a heap – and again they don’t admit it.