Rebuttal of ‘t Hooft by Stephen Crothers

August 28, 2014

This is an important paper and will make Principles of ECE a valuable book. So even after torsion had been left out of consideration, the old relativity was still full of errors. Arrogance is usually a sign of lack of confidence. I don’t bother with ‘t Hooft, ECE is too interesting.

In a message dated 28/08/2014 13:00:44 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Scientists,

My long paper motivated as a response to ‘t Hooft is almost complete. ‘t Hooft is a rather ignorant fellow, and as arrogant as they can come. I will release my paper soon. ‘t Hooft shall receive a copy from me. It is this paper that I shall offer as my contribution to the latest AIAS book.

Last month I had long and acrimonious exchange with that old biggot ‘t Hooft on ResrearchGate. All he did was regurgitate the standard demonstrable codswallop on General Relativity and black holes etc. However, after 4 years, and continued stonewalling on this latest at ResearchGate, ‘t Hooft finally admitted before all and sundry that he does not even know what a first-order intrinsic differential invariant is, and so he doesn’t know either that they don’t exist. Yet ‘t Hooft, and Einstein and his followers, employ Einstein’s pseudotensor, which implies a first-order intrinsic differential invariant, and they do calculations with it! . Assume Einstein’s pseudotensor has mathematical validity. Contract it therefore. A first-order intrinsic differential invariant results. But the pure mathematicians proved in 1900 that first-order intrinsic differential invariants do not exist! Thus, the axiom is false, and so, by reductio ad absurdum, Einstein’s pseudotensor is a meaningless concoction of mathematical symbols. ‘t Hooft does calculations with it nonetheless. Marvellous!

One can construct first-order differential invariants, but to do so requires an additional extraneous quantity to augment the metric tensor. Consequently, they are not intrinsic.

Steve Crothers

On Thursday, 28 August 2014 5:15 PM, “EMyrone@aol.com” <EMyrone@aol.com> wrote:

Fully agreed, as a Civil List Pensioner I am gravely concerned about its overt dishonesty, the way in which it tries to ignore refutations. So if I were Permanent Under Secretary Sir Goronwy Daniel I would advise whether this is entirely wise, Minister.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2014 07:52:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Unites States Airforce Reads Gareth Evans

His work has become irrelevant and he has become insignificant as you and Horst have pressed on with the new physics. Says a lot about the Nobel Prize!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Note 269(9) Corrigendum

August 28, 2014

Combine Eqs. (9) and (17), not (9) and (16). this leads back to Eq. (10), which is a subsidiary constraint. However, Eq. (10) is overcomplicated and the simplest constraint should be used, Eq. (16). This all comes out of the lagrangian analysis with lagrangian variables in a basically straighforward way, giving though a very useful result (28).

Er Cof am Blant y Grithig

August 28, 2014

Thanks for your interest in the poetry. As you know Grithig is situated under a rocky mountain opposite Craig y Nos Castle and across the river. “Y Grithig” means “The Scarred Place” because of the rocks (“craethog” in modern Welsh). There is not much good land. So the Grithig Children were delicately carved from rock which remains eternal in memory. Similarly Bernini brought delicate carvings to life from marble, and Rodin brought Balzac to life. As in music the interpretation is endless and left to the reader’s imagination. The original englyn is designed to condense and be memorable.

In a message dated 28/08/2014 12:55:20 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

I can only read the English version. What does “cut of rock” mean in this context? That the scars of Grithig are hard like rock? Or does it relate to the hour, a “hard hour”?
I know, it is difficult to understand lyrics in a non-native language.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. August 2014 um 12:49 geschrieben:

Dyma farwnad i Blant y Grithig. Here is an elegy for the Grithig Children.

Er Cof am Blant y Grithig

Y graith hon o fron Grithig; – aethant y
Plant or byd; y Plant elwig,
Ymaeth rhed awr fel mwyth rhig,
Cred gwir y Plant caredig.

In Memory of the Grithig Children

Cut from scars of Grithig; – the Children
Have gone from the world; noble Children,
Away runs the hour, delicate cut of rock,
With the generous Children’s creed.

This is the englyn described in the online Oxford University course on cynghanedd, developed by my ancestral cousin Dafydd ap Gwilym in the fourteenth century. The transliteration is a poetic scan that retains only the meaning. In the first line for example there is a double cynghanedd, consonantal alliteration and internal rhyme. There is a crossed internal rhyme between the end of the first line after the hyphen, and the beginning of the second line, and the third and fourth lines contain consonantal alliteration. The four lines must rhyme, the last couplet must be a cywydd couplet. Above all there must be poetic art, not too much strain after cynghanedd. When narrated this poetry begins to sing and is often set to the harp. This is a traditional elegy in the form of an englyn. The last two Grithg children Raumond and Nan, died recently, but being formed form the scars of Grithig, they are there eternally in all weathers of memory.

Discussion of 269(9)

August 28, 2014

You are right, the phi I used should have been phi dot. We should just run it through the computer to make sure all is right and I will post a corrigendum shortly. The main result Eq. (28) is not affected, and that is the result of interest for astronomy. The subsidiary constraints will provide additional infomration that will also be useful for astronomers.

In a message dated 28/08/2014 12:37:11 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

How exactly did you derive eq.(18)? When I combine eqs. (9) and (16) I obtain additional terms.
Will plot the surfaces r(theta,phi) with constraints and then try an animation of an orbit.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. August 2014 um 11:43 geschrieben:

The main result is the non planar orbit (28), which can be graphed in a 3-D spherical polar plot and animated. Under well defined conditions (25) and (26) it reduces to an Eckardt orbit. The usual theory of orbits is the Kepler Hooke Newton theory which gives the planar ellipse (27). In three dimensions it becomes the precessing ellipse (28).The new subsidiary equations of the lagrangian analysis are Eqs. (16) (17) and (18). So now I will proceed to writing up UFT269. Since this is a fundamental discovery in orbital theory there is a lot of mileage in it. No one can argue with spherical polar coordinates. This is a part of x theory, a subsidiary theory of ECE unified field theory. It is also applicable in all detail to the classical orbit of an electron around a proton. The usual hamiltonian is being used, expressed in spherical polar coordinates. This alone is sufficient to produce a vast amount of new information for astronomers to test out. An orbit need not be planar, and as GJE points out, the reason for planar orbits must be found. It must be due to a force additional to the inverse square. The planar constraint is theta = pi / 2, L sub theta = 0, L = L sub phi. This is highly artificial. So planar orbits are a small class of orbits which happen to occur in our solar system due to evolution.

Achievements Section of “Marquis Who’s Who”

August 28, 2014

This is a new section which records the main achievements of a biography. The following are what I consider in retrospect to be my main achievements. Top first class degree of my class of 1971, I was told that this was among the best undergraduate degrees of the University College of Wales Aberystwyth, the premier College. Among the best Ph. D. degrees of UW in 1974, I was told this by Mansel Davies and others. Youngest recipient under modern rules of the Scientiae Doctor (D. Sc. degree), submitted in 1977 when I was 26, awarded early in 1978 when I was 27, a degree founded by the University of London and intended by it to be a distinction higher than full professor. I have held this distinction for thirty six productive years. Holder of the largest number of internationally competitive Fellowships in the world for any subject area. Numerous early discoveries in the far infra red and molecular dynamics, notably the use of the memory function. Co pioneer of molecular dynamics computer simulation, now a vast subject area. The highly competitive Harrison Memorial Prize and Meldola Medal of the Royal Society of Chemistry of London. Founder of the European Molecular Liquids Group in 1980 at the National Physical Laboratory from Aberystwyth. Numerous discoveries with computer simulation and my own method of field applied computer simulation, University of Wales, University of London, IBM Kingston, Zurich and Cornell. Disovery of the B(3) field, published 1992. This led to several Nobel Prize, Wolf Prize and Milner Prize nominations. Inference of the ECE unified field theory from 2003 onwards. Pioneering of a new system of physics education, overturning the obsolete standard model. Civil List Pension 2005 at the personal discretion of the British Head of State, Queen Elizabeth, for distinguished service to science. Raised to the Gentry in 2008 and awarded a coat of arms. Included in “Burke’s Peerage and Gentry, Royal Section 2012″ because of achievement and descent from the Princes. Several original discoveries in genealogy, poetry in Welsh and English. Thirty editions of the world’s leading reference vehicle, “Marquis Who’s Who”, World, America, Science and Engineering. over a thousand scientific papers and books. Last but not least, establishment of the AIAS and its world famous group of pioneering scientists.

Er Cof am Blant y Grithig

August 28, 2014

Dyma farwnad i Blant y Grithig. Here is an elegy for the Grithig Children.

Er Cof am Blant y Grithig

Y graith hon o fron Grithig; – aethant y
Plant or byd; y Plant elwig,
Ymaeth rhed awr fel mwyth rhig,
Cred gwir y Plant caredig.

In Memory of the Grithig Children

Cut from scars of Grithig; – the Children
Have gone from the world; noble Children,
Away runs the hour, delicate cut of rock,
With the generous Children’s creed.

This is the englyn described in the online Oxford University course on cynghanedd, developed by my ancestral cousin Dafydd ap Gwilym in the fourteenth century. The transliteration is a poetic scan that retains only the meaning. In the first line for example there is a double cynghanedd, consonantal alliteration and internal rhyme. There is a crossed internal rhyme between the end of the first line after the hyphen, and the beginning of the second line, and the third and fourth lines contain consonantal alliteration. The four lines must rhyme, the last couplet must be a cywydd couplet. Above all there must be poetic art, not too much strain after cynghanedd. When narrated this poetry begins to sing and is often set to the harp. This is a traditional elegy in the form of an englyn. The last two Grithig children Raymond and Nan, died recently, but being formed from the scars of Grithig, they are there eternally in all weathers of memory.

asecondbookofpoetry.docx

The Post Einstein Paradigm Shift

August 28, 2014

I should think that the world of Baconian science agrees with GJE. UFT225 demolishes the old unified field theory and it was again covered up at CERN. This is why the gravy train must stop. After a Nobel Prize was carefully fixed up in smoke filled rooms for a “Higgs boson”, it has been admitted that none of its support particles exist! The B(3) field refuted the Higgs boson in 1992, so that is the reason for the campaign of animosity. It seems that Vigier and others nominated me for a Nobel Prize, so the other side put the boot in. With science like that who needs a street fight? UFT225 reduces electroweak theory to complete rubbish, this is well known internationally. The old publication system of physics also had to be outflanked to get new science out in to the open for honest colleagues to judge. The result is a Bob Dylan fan club.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2014 09:37:16 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: The Irrelevance of Standard Physics

They have spent their lives trying to fix the unfixable. You have developed a new physics that is correct from first principles. Their broken physics churns out nonsense. The new physics addresses long standing issues in a consistent way – like wave particle duality. It raises new questions (as any good theory should) taking us in directions that are sensible, real and useful.

Sent from Surface

 

Fully agreed, as a Civil List Pensioner I am gravely concerned about its overt dishonesty, the way in which it tries to ignore refutations. So if I were Permanent Under Secretary Sir Goronwy Daniel I would advise whether this is entirely wise, Minister.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2014 07:52:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Unites States Airforce Reads Gareth Evans

His work has become irrelevant and he has become insignificant as you and Horst have pressed on with the new physics. Says a lot about the Nobel Prize!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Section 3 of UFT260

August 28, 2014

This will be full of interest as usual. For a first theory impressive progress has been made and it is possible to experiment with more realistic potentials. That will almost certainly have to be numerical.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2014 08:25:46 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Proton to Electron Mass Ratio

The parton distribution function found from Beltrami theory looks similar (with exception of the limit behaviour which will be discussed in paper 260). Unfortunately the energy parameter cancels out so that there is no statement about mass energies possible and the parton structure comes out the same for all particles (with a variable radius scaling). The theory we used is probably too simple, we should resume the subject at any time.
The part of paper 260 is nearly finished, I need about half a workday to bring it into final form.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. August 2014 um 08:02 geschrieben:

Many thanks, I skimmed through this paper. It is speculative, but does contain a diagram with a torus structure. It all depends on whether the internal structure of a proton is governed by a Schroedinger equation with a particular potential. Horst is working on this now and this will be a much more rigorous theory than in this paper. There was an intense spike of interest yesterday on the blog because of the demonstration that the beta ellipse can be expressed as precisely equivalent precessing ellipses in theta and phi. Upon quantization this classical theory gives the orbitals of the H atom because we are working with the usual hamiltonian. This classical theory is completely original and opens up a lot of possibilities in orbital theory because it is fundamental to the inverse square law in spherical polar coordinates. For example it shows that general relativity is not needed for precession. The latter is not due to Einstein at all, it has been shown recently to be due to the ubiquitous Thomas precession, and fresh off the press, yesterday’s note which attracted immediate interest internationally. The Einstein theory is hopelessly wrong which is why friend ‘t Hooft gets up tight.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
CC: mail@horst-eckardt.de
Sent: 28/08/2014 01:45:21 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Proton structure

See Fig3 http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:120960/datastreams/file_b168733e-b69a-40bf-b0e9-48a68cc3ffbd/content
Can similar mass ratios be derived from your current work? Regards Norman Page

Sent from Windows Mail

269(9) : Summary of results for UFT269

August 28, 2014

The main result is the non planar orbit (28), which can be graphed in a 3-D spherical polar plot and animated. Under well defined conditions (25) and (26) it reduces to an Eckardt orbit. The usual theory of orbits is the Kepler Hooke Newton theory which gives the planar ellipse (27). In three dimensions it becomes the precessing ellipse (28).The new subsidiary equations of the lagrangian analysis are Eqs. (16) (17) and (18). So now I will proceed to writing up UFT269. Since this is a fundamental discovery in orbital theory there is a lot of mileage in it. No one can argue with spherical polar coordinates. This is a part of x theory, a subsidiary theory of ECE unified field theory. It is also applicable in all detail to the classical orbit of an electron around a proton. The usual hamiltonian is being used, expressed in spherical polar coordinates. This alone is sufficient to produce a vast amount of new information for astronomers to test out. An orbit need not be planar, and as GJE points out, the reason for planar orbits must be found. It must be due to a force additional to the inverse square. The planar constraint is theta = pi / 2, L sub theta = 0, L = L sub phi. This is highly artificial. So planar orbits are a small class of orbits which happen to occur in our solar system due to evolution.

a269thpapernotes9.pdf

The Irrelevance of Standard Physics

August 28, 2014

Fully agreed, as a Civil List Pensioner I am gravely concerned about its overt dishonesty, the way in which it tries to ignore refutations. So if I were Permanent Under Secretary Sir Goronwy Daniel I would advise whether this is entirely wise, Minister.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2014 07:52:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Unites States Airforce Reads Gareth Evans

His work has become irrelevant and he has become insignificant as you and Horst have pressed on with the new physics. Says a lot about the Nobel Prize!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers