This is an important paper and will make Principles of ECE a valuable book. So even after torsion had been left out of consideration, the old relativity was still full of errors. Arrogance is usually a sign of lack of confidence. I don’t bother with ‘t Hooft, ECE is too interesting.

In a message dated 28/08/2014 13:00:44 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Scientists,

My long paper motivated as a response to ‘t Hooft is almost complete. ‘t Hooft is a rather ignorant fellow, and as arrogant as they can come. I will release my paper soon. ‘t Hooft shall receive a copy from me. It is this paper that I shall offer as my contribution to the latest AIAS book.

Last month I had long and acrimonious exchange with that old biggot ‘t Hooft on ResrearchGate. All he did was regurgitate the standard demonstrable codswallop on General Relativity and black holes etc. However, after 4 years, and continued stonewalling on this latest at ResearchGate, ‘t Hooft finally admitted before all and sundry that he does not even know what a first-order intrinsic differential invariant is, and so he doesn’t know either that they don’t exist. Yet ‘t Hooft, and Einstein and his followers, employ Einstein’s pseudotensor, which implies a first-order intrinsic differential invariant, and they do calculations with it! . Assume Einstein’s pseudotensor has mathematical validity. Contract it therefore. A first-order intrinsic differential invariant results. But the pure mathematicians proved in 1900 that first-order intrinsic differential invariants do not exist! Thus, the axiom is false, and so, by reductio ad absurdum, Einstein’s pseudotensor is a meaningless concoction of mathematical symbols. ‘t Hooft does calculations with it nonetheless. Marvellous!

One can construct first-order differential invariants, but to do so requires an additional extraneous quantity to augment the metric tensor. Consequently, they are not intrinsic.

Steve Crothers

On Thursday, 28 August 2014 5:15 PM, “EMyrone@aol.com” <EMyrone@aol.com> wrote:

Fully agreed, as a Civil List Pensioner I am gravely concerned about its overt dishonesty, the way in which it tries to ignore refutations. So if I were Permanent Under Secretary Sir Goronwy Daniel I would advise whether this is entirely wise, Minister.

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 28/08/2014 07:52:33 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Unites States Airforce Reads Gareth EvansHis work has become irrelevant and he has become insignificant as you and Horst have pressed on with the new physics. Says a lot about the Nobel Prize!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile