Precession with 3D Orbits

October 28, 2014

Many thanks again to Dr. Gareth Evans. This is a very good summary, the three dimensions of an orbit manifest themselves in precession. Nature is again elegant. I am luckier than Dylan Thomas because of the development of the age of information. Forty million readings by the colleagues is the best thing that can happen, and this is heavy theoretical physics. Individuals such as trolls and those who cynically distort have no effect on me, I disregard them because the geometry is rigorous.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/10/2014 10:38:28 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 276(2): Simplest Explanation for Orbit Precession

That all orbits are three dimensional, and planar orbits in the solar system are an illusion, is a fantastic result. This is a great example in the development of science of attempts, over centuries, to explain something that is in effect only a snapshot of a much bigger picture. Now a coherent and clearer picture has evolved of how the universe, and it’s components, really behave. What is more, this is transferable to orbitals and the microscopic level and is only one aspect of the vast amount of general progress that has been made with ECE theory.

It took Dylan Thomas a long time to become fully recognised. I think it was his radio broadcasts during the war that elevated him from a gifted poet to a true genius. There is no doubt in my mind Myron that the same must happen with you. So, stay strong and focused and don’t let the system, and some of its individuals, grind you down. We want you to see this out fully for yourself – unlike Dylan Thomas.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Relativistic 3D Theory

October 28, 2014

Agreed on this. The 3D theory can be made relativistic by using the metric with spherical polar coordinates, then deriving the Thomas precession in 3D. I will have a look at this next. It should also be possible to derive light deflection by 3D theory, following the methods used earlier this year in x theory.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/10/2014 09:28:13 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 276(2): Simplest Explanation for Orbit Precession

We obtained the explicit form of x (dependent on parameters M, alpha, etc) from relativistic calculations earlier. Is there a way to bring both derivations together? For example that relativistic effects produce 3D orbits?

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. Oktober 2014 um 10:17 geschrieben:

This is Eq. (14), in which the experimentally observed orbit precession is explained by L / L sub Z in three dimensional orbit theory. Here L is the magnitude of the total angular momentum and L sub Z is its Z component. So all orbits are three dimensional QED. In the solar system and elsewhere they give the illusion of being two dimensional, but the precisely observed precession of the perihelion means that they cannot be explained by two dimensional theory. Equation (14) is derived in two ways, with a Maclaurin expansion method and with a Taylor expansion method due to Horst Eckardt. Both methods give the same result. This is another major breakthrough in orbit theory made by ECE theory and AIAS. It shows that the incorrect Einstein method is not needed at all. Precession can be described classically by use of the spherical polar coordinates in orbit theory instead of the four hundred year old method based on the plane polar coordinate s.

The Machine Stops

October 28, 2014

Agreed completely. Dylan Thomas was relatively lucky to be recognized in his “Eighteen Poems”, written before he was twenty years old. He was blazingly original and piled metaphor upon metaphor. The mature Thomas was clearer and steadier, resulting in this famous villanelle, used here by Gareth to describe the standard machine as it grinds to a halt: “Do not go gentle into that good night”. My book “Englynion” contains two villanelles dedicated to Dylan Thomas, one in Welsh, one in English. R. S. Thomas was profound and mercilessly honest. He was ordained priest in the Church in Wales and was Rector of Manafon, Vicar of Aberdaron. He taught himself Welsh and wrote his autobiography in Welsh. RST was nominated several times for the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Sent: 28/10/2014 08:23:55 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Standard Physics – The Dogmatic Machine

They “do not go gentle into that good night”. Standard Physics is in tatters and is in many ways inaccurate (as this, yet another example, shows) It will come to an end and disappear into that good night.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Precession and 3D Orbit Theory

October 28, 2014

Many thanks again to Gareth Evans, who is always appreciative of new and original results. His honours and awards have just been posted in a following message.

Sent: 28/10/2014 08:16:00 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Derivation by Horst of x ~ L / L sub Z

Fantastic result again. Well done to both of you!!

Watched a programme on TV last night about Dylan Thomas (100 years after his birth). His genius lives on and grows – just as yours will.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

276(2): Simplest Explanation for Orbit Precession

October 28, 2014

This is Eq. (14), in which the experimentally observed orbit precession is explained by L / L sub Z in three dimensional orbit theory. Here L is the magnitude of the total angular momentum and L sub Z is its Z component. So all orbits are three dimensional QED. In the solar system and elsewhere they give the illusion of being two dimensional, but the precisely observed precession of the perihelion means that they cannot be explained by two dimensional theory. Equation (14) is derived in two ways, with a Maclaurin expansion method and with a Taylor expansion method due to Horst Eckardt. Both methods give the same result. This is another major breakthrough in orbit theory made by ECE theory and AIAS. It shows that the incorrect Einstein method is not needed at all. Precession can be described classically by use of the spherical polar coordinates in orbit theory instead of the four hundred year old method based on the plane polar coordinates.

a276thpapernotes2.pdf

Standard Physics – The Dogmatic Machine

October 28, 2014

I would describe the obsolete standard physics as a dogmatic machine like E. M. Forster’s “The Machine Stops” or George Orwell’s “1984”, or R. S. Thomas’s “exigency of the machine”. Over and over again we have refuted its dogma, and have found simpler explanations for its claims. An example today is the simple explanation of orbit precession using the spherical polar coordinates by Horst Eckardt and myself. The dogmatism was so entrenched in the old machine that it took over four hundred years to find this explanation. Our very own modern era dogmatists will insist that their incorrect explanation will remain – in order to get more money from taxation. No taxation for the Baconian.

Nobel Peace Prize of 1977 to Amnesty International

October 28, 2014

This was awarded to Amnesty International in 1977. I am glad to have worked for Amnesty International from 1978 to 1983 during the dictatorships in Argentina and Chile. My duties were to write letters to try to get political prisoners freed. Thousands were murdered in Argentina and Chile as is well known. The worst offender by far at that time was Iran. Shortly after I founded the European Molecular Liquids Group (EMLG) in 1980 the Director of the Physics Institute in Katowice, Edward Kluk, was denounced by his own academic colleagues to the KGB for trying to join EMLG. The last time I saw him he was very tense and nervous, and knew what was coming. George Chantry and I protested strongly in “The Times” of London, and he was released. He emigrated to the United States. Mansel Davies and I worked for freedom in the dangerous era of the post Stalinist thaw with the great physicist Stanislaw Kielich. The latter accepted B(3) immediately, along with the great Jean-Pierre Vigier and many others. This is all described in Autobiography Volume Two above my coat of arms on www.aias.us and in the historical source documents section of the site. Amnesty International also investigated my severe mistreatment at the EDCL in Aberystwyth. This chronic abuse and violations of human rights probably resulted in physical damage which manifested itself in the form of uveitis, and later on catalysed serious illness, major severe depression, from which I almost died. The people responsible for that are identified in Autobiography Volume Two. So the abuses were investigated internationally at the time. Attached are descriptions of recognitions of my work during that era and later, and also of my EDCL group. Sweeping and urgent reform of the Welsh tertiary education system is needed so that all staff and students are fluent in Welsh, bringing it in to line with the secondary education system which has many excellent Welsh language schools. Emergency efforts are needed to prevent the Welsh language from becoming extinct as a spoken language. UNESCO has warned repeatedly of the need for these emergency efforts. I am a contemporary of Ffred Ffrancis at Aberystwyth. Ffred and his wife have been imprisoned often for protest work on behalf of the Welsh language. So dictatorship exists in our own back yard in Wales due to colonial rule. In 1776 they dealt with that by brewing tea in Boston. There are thugs and latent dictators in this small village. It only takes good men to remain silent for evil to prevail, in the words of James Burke and I have seen plenty of evil.

LIST OF ACHIEVEMENTS FOR NOMINATORS AND SUPPORTERS.docx

LIST OF AWARDS HALL OF FAME GROUP.docx

Derivation by Horst of x ~ L / L sub Z

October 28, 2014

This is an excellent result from Horst using computer algebra and the Taylor series approximation of Eq. (10). In this approximation the precession factor x is L / L sub Z. So precessions are due to a three dimensional orbit, a result of great importance. From experimental data:

x = L / L sub Z = 1 + 3MG / (alpha c squared)

To be rigorously self consistent a relativistic three dimensional orbit theory is needed, and after writing up this result by Horst in Note 276(2) I will proceed to a relativistic 3D orbit theory. The obsolete and geometrically incorrect Einstein theory is nowhere needed to produce orbit precession. It can be produced on the non relativistic level simply by using the spherical polar coordinates for the kinetic energy.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 27/10/2014 15:13:45 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 276(1): A Simple Explanation of Orbital Precession with 3D theory

I think the situation of precession has to be considered in somewhat more detail because x is a constant but in eq.(10) the variable phi appears. We can make a taylor expansion for a full orbit phi=2 pi:

Here we have in linear approximation for a small phi:

tan (phi + 2 pi) ~ phi.

Then we insert this into the Taylor expansion of the tan^-1 function:

Inserting this into (10), the factor phi cancels out and we obtain directly

x ~ L/Lz

for x~1. In this range the linear approximation is valid.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. Oktober 2014 um 15:32 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple explanation of orbital precession with 3D theory on the non relativistic level. The precession constant is given in Eq. (10). A more accurate relativistic theory is needed to explain why x is 3MG / (alpha c squared). That is adequately explained by the Thomas precession theory of previous papers. So orbital precession is due to a slight difference between L and L sub Z. This means that all orbits are three dimensional, because all orbits precess, QED.

Daily Report Sunday 26/10/14

October 28, 2014

There were 2,790 hits from 488 distinct visits, main spiders from google, MSN, baidu and yahoo. UFT145 645, F3(Sp) 493, Auto1 381, Auto2 106, Book of Scientometrics 287, UFT88 78, ECE Engineering Model 74, Englynion 79, Llais 55, CEFE 53, UFT273 46, Evans Equations 54 numerous Spanish, Auto Sonnets 12, Principles of ECE 12 to date in October 2014. Two complete site downloads from private sites in Germany; Denver University Colorado Essay 7, Autobiography Volume One; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign publications; Texas A and M University UFT166; Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for October 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: October 2014 – URL
Generated 27-Oct-2014 12:00 EDT

276(1): A Simple Explanation of Orbital Precession with 3D theory

October 27, 2014

This note gives a simple explanation of orbital precession with 3D theory on the non relativistic level. The precession constant is given in Eq. (10). A more accurate relativistic theory is needed to explain why x is 3MG / (alpha c squared). That is adequately explained by the Thomas precession theory of previous papers. So orbital precession is due to a slight difference between L and L sub Z. This means that all orbits are three dimensional, because all orbits precess, QED.

a276thpapernotes1.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers