Archive for the ‘Daily Postings’ Category

Fwd: Youtube readings of Poetry

May 7, 2009

 



Subject: Youtube readings of Poetry
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:23:18 EDT

There are readings available on youtube by Gerallt Lloyd Owen and Dic Jones in Welsh and by Yeats, Joyce, Dylan Thomas and R. S. Thomas in English. Of these Dylan Thomas is by far the most powerful reader of his own poetry.

Fwd: BBC Radio Cymru Interview on 14th May

May 7, 2009

 



Subject: BBC Radio Cymru Interview on 14th May
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:15:14 EDT

I will be away on 14th May in a BBC Radio Cymru interview in Caerdydd (Cardiff). This will be a general interest interview in the Welsh language. Although I am mainly a scientist, I am also a poet in both my languages. Poetry is Wales’s main cultural strength as is well known, so I will see if the BBC is interested in a Dylan Thomas like programme of poetry reading. Franco might be interested in a film of poetry reading. I think that I have learned the intricate rules of cynghanedd well enough not to make a fool of myself in strict metre poetry in Welsh.

Fwd: Correct Physics

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Correct Physics
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:42:56 EDT

This is now seen to be a succinct and accurate assessment of the state of establishment physics that is unacceptable to those who understand the situation for what it has, to a large extent, become – myth and nonsense (pseudo-science). It allows “science” that is inaccurate to be taught in our schools and colleges and wastes vast amounts of talent, resources and effort. The worst thing of all is that it holds back progress at a time when the world desperately needs new inventions, technologies, and industries. We may not be able to provide sufficient supplies of water and food for a vast, and growing, population on earth in the not too distant future unless we quickly develop new technologies that conserve essential natural balances.

The establishment must wake up to the reality of the situation and focus on the possible solutions that emerge from a new and correct physics. Best, Gareth

Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:40:19 -0400
Subject: Personal Wiki-List: What is Science and what is Pseudo-Science

There are well known philosophical rules governing what is science and what is pseudo-science. Notably the mediaeval Ockham Razor, which states that a theory must be as simple as possible, the idols of the cave philosophy of Francis Bacon, which states that a theory must be tested against experimental data, and thirdly that a theory must be mathematically correct. I would add that a theory of natural philosophy must produce observables that may be directly tested against data. The ECE theory is therefore scientific on all these well known grounds. The standard physics on the other hand is obsolete and incorrect. The so called “establishment” has been replaced spontaneously. If one wishes to draw up a wiki-list of pseudo-science then I would include the following.

1) The Einstein field equation is easily shown to be wildly incorrect.

2) So there was no big bang, no black holes, no Schwarzschild metric.

3) All metrics of the Einstein field equation are incorrect, with computer algebra this is easily shown to be the case now, whatever computer language one cares to implement. 4) There is no dark matter, this is an ad hoc unobservable. 5) There is no dark flow, and no dark universe. 6) The U(1) sector symmetry of electromagnetism is incorrect, as shown for example in notes 131, and on numerous other occasions. 6) The unobservables of physics include: any dimension higher than four, i.e. all string theory; teh Copenhagen indeterminacy, the Dirac sea; virtual particles; the internal spaces of gauge theory, dimensional regularization, spontaneous symmetry braking, the non-simply connected vacuum, the Higgs mechanism; confined quarks; supersymmetries; approximate symmetries and many other unobservables of the mathematical idol of the cave.

In addition the conduct of the pseudoscientifc establishment is such that it tries to cover up basic errors, and tries repeatedly to assert errors in new science when none exist. This intellectual dishonesty is widespread throughout the physics system and journal system and there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for it on http://www.aias.us alone. This is pseudo-science and at its worst, criminal conduct. It has been rejected by entire professions, judging by the feedback to the ECE sites.

Civil List Scientist

_________________________________________________________________ Share your photos with Windows Live Photos ? Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/=

I agree with Gareth of course, he was also a victim of the EDCL purges of the eighties, that episode illustrates ultimate uselessness.

Fwd: Computation of Torsion from Curvature

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Fwd: Computation of Torsion from Curvature
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:35:51 EDT

Yes, this can be done from eq. (5) of note 131(11), and in fact this method has already been extensively developed in vector notation in the code by Doug Lindstrom and the ECE engineering model of Horst Eckardt. The torsion is now primary, the curvature is a type of torsion. The Einstein field equation will not do, because it leaves out torsion. I think we should cease referring to the backwoodsmen as the establishment, clearly they are no longer relevant to science. Similarly those who adhered to classical mechanics after teh mid twenties have been forgotten by history.

Myron,

Now that we have Maxima, Maple, and Mathematica to do the computation, has anyone tried to compute torsion directly as a function of curvature from the equation relating curvature and torsion? Is that in fact possible? I’ve got 2GB memory in my computer, so there should be plenty of memory available for the computation if it is possible :-).

Thanks, Dave Feustel

Fwd: Parallels in History to the Present Situation in Physics

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Parallels in History to the Present Situation in Physics
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:01:47 EDT

The population of physicists is now so large that it is a small country of its own. So I loo for parallels in events that include teh following.

1) The aftermath of the French Revolution, Spring 1794, in the power struggle between Danton and Robespierre (google youtube + Danton + French Revolution for the well known film on Georges-Jacques Danton). 2) The Reformation in Europe and the Thirty Years’ War of Kepler’s time. In fact it has been thirty three years since I was first attacked for “publishing too much”. That was shortly before I was awarded the Harrison and Meldola Medals, and told that my work was good enough for the Marlow Medal, and shortly before I was awarded a D. Sc. at the age of 27, still a record. There followed a purge at the EDCL, as is well known. This is not very different from Spring 1794, or the purge of heretics following the Lutheran Declaration. 3) Henry VIII Tudor’s Dissolution of the Monasteries for gross corruption. 4) The events which led to the establishment of the Commonwealth in Britain and to the Leveller Constitution of 1647, rejected by Cromwell, but the basis of the US Constitution of 1776.

Fwd: Personal Wiki-List: What is Science and what is Pseudo-Science

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Personal Wiki-List: What is Science and what is Pseudo-Science
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:40:19 EDT

There are well known philosophical rules governing what is science and what is pseudo-science. Notably the mediaeval Ockham Razor, which states that a theory must be as simple as possible, the idols of the cave philosophy of Francis Bacon, which states that a theory must be tested against experimental data, and thirdly that a theory must be mathematically correct. I would add that a theory of natural philosophy must produce observables that may be directly tested against data. The ECE theory is therefore scientific on all these well known grounds. The standard physics on the other hand is obsolete and incorrect. The so called “establishment” has been replaced spontaneously. If one wishes to draw up a wiki-list of pseudo-science then I would include the following.

1) The Einstein field equation is easily shown to be wildly incorrect. 2) So there was no big bang, no black holes, no Schwarzschild metric. 3) All metrics of the Einstein field equation are incorrect, with computer algebra this is easily shown to be the case now, whatever computer language one cares to implement. 4) There is no dark matter, this is an ad hoc unobservable. 5) There is no dark flow, and no dark universe. 6) The U(1) sector symmetry of electromagnetism is incorrect, as shown for example in notes 131, and on numerous other occasions. 6) The unobservables of physics include: any dimension higher than four, i.e. all string theory; teh Copenhagen indeterminacy, the Dirac sea; virtual particles; the internal spaces of gauge theory, dimensional regularization, spontaneous symmetry braking, the non-simply connected vacuum, the Higgs mechanism; confined quarks; supersymmetries; approximate symmetries and many other unobservables of the mathematical idol of the cave.

In addition the conduct of the pseudoscientifc establishment is such that it tries to cover up basic errors, and tries repeatedly to assert errors in new science when none exist. This intellectual dishonesty is widespread throughout the physics system and journal system and there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for it on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) alone. This is pseudo-science and at its worst, criminal conduct. It has been rejected by entire professions, judging by the feedback to the ECE sites.

Civil List Scientist

Fwd: Magazine DNA-12

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Magazine DNA-12
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:40:46 EDT

I can not find a Russian article on this site. Write, please, the exact address of the page where the article is located. —– Original Message —–

Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 4:44 PM
Subject: Fwd: Magazine DNA-12

Thanks for the invitation! I do not speak or write Russian myself, but it may be possible to find a translator for a key article. The ECE overview article has been translated into Russian and other languages and you are welcome to publish that one. It is found on the home page of http://www.aias.us. Do you have any length restriction or preferred format?

__________ NOD32 4055 (20090506) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com

Click “Publications” on the home page, then the top entry in the blue box, “ECE Theory, Start of a New Age in Physics”. I had this professionally translated into Russian. The authors are Lar Felker and Horst Eckardt. I Am keen to have the entire website translated into several languages, but of course this is a big task. It may be that the Siberian or Moscow Academies will take on this task.

Fwd: PS to Note 131(11)

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: PS to Note 131(11)
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:33:34 EDT

The equations tested by Maxima are (3) and (5). For the results see papers 93, 95, 100, 117, and 120 and so on. The Maxima code also produces several other checks, and was also checked by hand and against known results. The flaws in the Einstein field equation are very severe. In fact other scholars back to Schroedinger have repeatedly pointed out many flaws, but this work is by far the clearest.

Fwd: ECE-wiki

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Fwd: ECE-wiki
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:18:45 EDT

Myron,

I go to wikipedia to get definitions of terms like curvature, connection, torsion, etc. But the torsion entry discusses the Bianchi identities, the 2nd of which does not apply in ECE. Have you thought about creating a small ECE-wiki at aias.us where terms are correctly defined in terms of ECE theory?

Thanks, Dave Feustel

I think that this has been done in proofs one to five and so on, and also in Lar Felker’s book, where there is an extensive glossary as you know. Wikipedia is banned from use by most reputable universities because of its inaccuracy, and its grotesque attitudes. The definitions of torsion and curvature that are used in ECE are actually the ones used by Carroll in his book and downloadable notes. In my note to you today I tried to summarize the failures of the Einstein field equation in the simplest way possible, i.e. the strongest way possible.

Comparitive Impact Factors

May 6, 2009

 



Subject: Comparitive Imapct Factors
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:26:06 EDT

This Table was drawn up last September and shows AIAS way out in the lead. This first place has been sustained for the past twelve months, the running twelve month total approoaches three MILLION pseudo-hits – sorry, unobservable files downloaded. There are no impact data for physics departments inside the University of Wales, but they are vanishingly unlikely to be making this kind of intense mark on the world of physics. The time honoured method of comment / reply no longer exists in physics, but paper 89 is a long and detailed rebuttal of some remarks by a standard dogmatist who blocked one of my papers. Teh method now used is to ignore rebuttals, and to stridently blast out the propaganda on wikipedia. These are teh all too familiar methods of totalitarianism and the Ministry of Thought. The rebuttal has been intensely read for about two years, and I have received no support at my e mail address for the dogmatist. In the nineties, the erosion of the comment reply system began with unscholarly attacks on myself after I had proposed B(3) at Cornell. It turns out that at least four other groups inferred something like B(3) but none were attacked. These personal attacks led the UNCC administration to contrive false charges against me, for example working at home occasionally was construed to be neglect of duty. Committees were rigged and so on. The full details are on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) for historians. The British Government righted these false charges in 2005 and 2008, and the TGA in 2008. So physics has split into two communities because of the unethical, sometimes illegal, conduct of the standard dogmatists.

It is therefore a case of simple logic against strident wiki-dogma.


Attachment: acomparitiveimpacttable16thSept08.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers