Archive for January, 2009

Fwd: Very Intense Interest in ECE Theory

January 31, 2009

 



Subject: Very Intense Interest in ECE Theory
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:26:34 EST

There has been very intense interest in ECE theory this month, particularly in the last two weeks. There is therefore no doubt that it has superceded the standard model and that ECE leads to new and clean sources of energy in theory and practice. We should work flat out on such devices in my opinion. They have no carbon footprint, produce no emissions and are easy to use. Paper 94 on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) is always well read, and now we are rapidly developing code for networked CAD / CAM of devices based on ECE theory. There can be no further doubt that the Einsteinian era in gravitational physcs and cosmology has been superceded by the ECE era, based on spacetime torsion. The two ECE sites: _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and _www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com) , have recorded their average of about a quarter million hits again this month. I will give the final returns for January 2009 tomorrow. So we are off to an excellent start to the year.

Fwd: 15-30Jan09: Rest of World to www.aias.us

January 31, 2009

 



Subject: 15-30Jan09: Rest of World to http://www.aias.us
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:05:51 EST

There was very intense interest in the site in the last two weeks, particularly from Canada, Mexico, India and Japan as follows:

Sharjah Univ Arab Emirates, CNEA Argentina, Monash Univ Australia, Electrosul Gov. Brazil, UFF Brazil, UNB Brazil, UNICAMP Brazil, USP Brazil, Canadian ECE Network of Engineers, Gov. Quebec,McGill Univ*, McMaster Univ., NS Canada, Perimeter Institute, QC Canada, Univ British Columbia, Univ Toronto, Victoria Univ Canada, UV Chile, ITP China, City Univ Hong Kong, CU Hong Kong, DNS India, Amrita Univ India, BHU India, DU India, NIT RKL India, RCIL Gov. India, Osaka Univ Japan, Tokyo Univ Japan, Yatshutiro NCT Japan, Sony Corporation Japan, MIE-C Japan, AUB Lebanon, Itchihuahua Univ Mexico, IPN Mexico, UTHM Mexico, UASLP Mexico, UNAM Mexico, USON Mexico, UTHM Malaysia, ADDU Philipines, NUS Singapore, NCTU Taiwan, NCU Taiwan, Academica Sinica Taiwan.

Fwd: 15-30Jan09: USA to www.aias.us

January 31, 2009

 



Subject: 15-30Jan09: USA to http://www.aias.us
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:42:54 EST

This is the usual two weekly report on feedback US activity from a small selection of visitors from the higher education, government, military adn corporate sectors. The * denotes multiple visits form one institution. Each entry may denote multiple visits for an individual visitor. This two weekly report is divided into US, Europe, and the rest of the world.

SUNY Buffalo, Brigham Young, Catholic Healthcare West, Colorado State, Case Western Reserve*, Embry Riddle Aeronatical University, Evergreen, Georgia Tech, George Mason, Georgia Perimeter*, Harvard*, Indiana, Lousiana State*, Colorado School of Mines, Northern Arizona, New Mexico State, Old Dominion, Rowan, Sabanci, Stanford*, Toronto (on edu), Arkansas, Central Florida, Chicago, UC Irvine, UCLA, U Connecticut, UC Santa Barbara, U Mass Dartmouth, North Carolina Chapel Hill, New Hampshire, Yale; Argonne National Lab., Fermilab; Robins Airforce Base*, Army AMRDEC, Army ARO, Army CECER, Institute for Defense Analyses La Jolla, Centura Health Colorado, Catholic Relief Services, Dorchester County Public Schools, Seattle Public Library, Southwest Larroatories; Adobe Inc, Boeing*, Bose, Botevgrad*, Honeywell, Microsoft*, Mobile Gas, UPS.

Fwd: January 09: ECE Feedback Activity

January 31, 2009

 



Subject: January 09: ECE Feedback Activity
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:08:39 EST

Up to Jan 30th 2009, the feedback activity for the month is as follows. Final returns will be in tomorrow.

_www.atomicprecision.com_ (http://www.atomicprecision.com) : 178,550 hits

_www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) : 69,457 hits from 8,342 visitors, 6.195 gigabytes downloaded, 1,187 documents read from 80 countries, led by USA, Canada, Germany, France, Britain, Japan, Mexico, Australia, ….

The lead source papers off _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) were: 126, 125, 94, 110, 41, 43, 116, 99, 103, 76, 112, 115, 88, 123, 124, 108, 91, 47, 74, 122, 98, 1, 77, 111, 81, 100a, 104, 105, 109, 37, 82, 95, 102, 10, 114, 90, 71, 93, 113, 92, 18, 84, 117, 30, 56, 107, 34, 86, 106, 11, 12, 21, 2, 38, ……..

The lead articles off _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) were: “The Life of Myron Evans” by Kerry Pendergast, Douglas Lindstrom second numerical paper, “Space Energy” by Horst Eckardt (Spanish translation by Alex Hill), Johnson Magnets, ECE (Spanish), Munich Workshop history slides, “Crystal Spheres” by Kerry Pendergast, “Galaxies” by Horst Eckardt (Spanish translation by Alex Hill).

Well done to all staff!

Fwd: Heavy Snow Forecast

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: Heavy Snow Forecast
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:58:26 EST

There is heavy snow forecast – so I have prepared the house for this, and coaled up. However the ancient infra structure around here may be in trouble so if there is any outage this would be the cause. We are very heavily Council taxed by Swansea, but the actual services are among the poorest – we are not really part of Swansea. There is no road gritting and no snow ploughs (plows) as in Ithaca, New York for example.

Fwd: AW: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: Fwd: AW: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:45:23 EST

Very interesting discussion between Horst Eckardt and Barry Hunt.

The first reference is indeed interesting and goes in my direction since angular momentum, not linear momentum is the basic quantity of ECE dynamics. The second reference uses Euler’s equation which is “less” than ECE equations. Besides this, it is interesting to know where to find an online book on Navier-Stokes equations. Thanks for your contact offer to Peter Bradshaw but I do not intend to deal with this subject in depth in the next time. But it is good to know that you have such good contacts.

Horst

> —–Urspr?ngliche Nachricht—– > Von: Hunt, Barry (GE Infra, Aviation, US) [mailto:barry.hunt] at [ge.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2009 17:23 > An: Horst Eckardt > > Betreff: RE: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > In a simple boundary layer, each fluid element simultaneously SPINS and > translates. It is the effect of tangential frictional stresses on the > element boundary that causes and controls the spin. In an inviscid flow > (no friction) there is no such spin. However, in an inviscid transonic > flow (Crocco’s eqn.) a flow element passing through a shock discontinuity > will become rotational. > > Personally, I am NOT an expert on Navier-Stokes; my specialty is inviscid > flows. However, if you wish, I can immediately put you in touch with one > of the world’s top authorities on viscous flows — Peter Bradshaw of > Stanford U., who is a very good friend of mine, and a great philospher. > Let me know if you like to communicate with him. > > The following seems to be saying something similar to what you are saying: > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TJ2-46FYYD5- > 1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_v er > sion=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a1d2f3b9da35010550d7179c9e70073e > > … but also see the following (eq. 1.3.13 ff): > > http://books.google.com/books?id=Q6asDd- > b5LYC&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=navier+stokes+angular+momentum&source=bl&ots=k 91 > _iQIXuu&sig=ZkF5f275n7LUiaCD1mxYUNjpHD0&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum =5 > &ct=result#PPA9,M1 > > Barry > > —–Original Message—– > >
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:06 AM > > >
Subject: AW: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > PS: I am not absolutely sure if spin is contained in its most general form > in the Navier-Stokes equations. There are similar cases for example for > the Einstein equation, where you get spin effects, but spin is not > contained in the basic assumptions. Another example is that spin is > describable by Newtonian mechanics, but these are not the most general > equations for spin, as we know from ECE equations of dynamics. > > Horst > > > —–Urspr?ngliche Nachricht—– > > Von: Hunt, Barry (GE Infra, Aviation, US) [mailto:barry.hunt] at [ge.com] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2009 16:52 > > An: Horst Eckardt > > > > Betreff: RE: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > > > I agree. I am very sure that a whole new world of mathematical physics > is > > about to open up. I have thought for more than 40 years that this > would > > happen, but now it seems more true than ever. Laithwaite seemed to be > on > > the verge of something big many years ago, before he made a fool of > > himself with some elementary mistakes. Keep up the good work. > > > > Barry > > > > —–Original Message—– > > > >
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:49 AM > > > > > >
Subject: AW: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > > > Thanks fort he hints. Nevertheless it would be interesting to see if > > Navier-Stokes can be derived from ECE theory directly. > > > > Horst > > > > > —–Urspr?ngliche Nachricht—– > > > Von: barry_hunt] at [cinci.rr.com [mailto:barry_hunt] at [cinci.rr.com] > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2009 16:23 > > > An: EMyrone] at [aol.com > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > > > > > Myron & Horst, > > > > > > The expression for the mass m of a fluid element of volume V should > be > > > V*rho, not (1/V)*rho. > > > > > > The Navier-Stokes equations are “complete” and DO include all linear > > and > > > angular terms. The reason they do not match experiment in some cases > > is > > > that “turbulence” is “random” and has to be “modeled”; the same > > “model” > > > does not describe all possible situations. > > > > > > Also, The GENESIS Identity (that you have looked at), when applied > to > > > fluid dynamics, contains local or global “spin” in the curl term. > This > > is > > > usually called “vorticity”. The velocity induced by a vortex element > > > involves (in 3-D) an inverse square VECTOR product with the radius > > (unit) > > > vector. In contrast, the div term (compressibility) involves just > the > > > simple inverse square TIMES the radius (unit) vector. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Barry > > > > > > —- EMyrone] at [aol.com wrote: > > > >

Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:42:28 EST

Many thanks Barry, your own work is most interesting and we should think of deriving one from the other and vice versa.

I agree. I am very sure that a whole new world of mathematical physics is about to open up. I have thought for more than 40 years that this would happen, but now it seems more true than ever. Laithwaite seemed to be on the verge of something big many years ago, before he made a fool of himself with some elementary mistakes. Keep up the good work.

Barry

—–Original Message—–

Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:49 AM

Subject: AW: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory

Thanks fort he hints. Nevertheless it would be interesting to see if Navier-Stokes can be derived from ECE theory directly.

Horst

> —–Urspr?ngliche Nachricht—– > Von: barry_hunt] at [cinci.rr.com [mailto:barry_hunt] at [cinci.rr.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2009 16:23 > An: EMyrone] at [aol.com > > Betreff: Re: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory > > Myron & Horst, > > The expression for the mass m of a fluid element of volume V should be > V*rho, not (1/V)*rho. > > The Navier-Stokes equations are “complete” and DO include all linear and > angular terms. The reason they do not match experiment in some cases is > that “turbulence” is “random” and has to be “modeled”; the same “model” > does not describe all possible situations. > > Also, The GENESIS Identity (that you have looked at), when applied to > fluid dynamics, contains local or global “spin” in the curl term. This is > usually called “vorticity”. The velocity induced by a vortex element > involves (in 3-D) an inverse square VECTOR product with the radius (unit) > vector. In contrast, the div term (compressibility) involves just the > simple inverse square TIMES the radius (unit) vector. > > Regards, > > Barry > > —- EMyrone] at [aol.com wrote: > >

Fwd: Feedback for www.atomicprecision.com

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: Re: Feedback for http://www.atomicprecision.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:38:59 EST

This records a staggering 178,550 hits for _www.atomicpreision.com_ (http://www.atomicpreision.com) , and I will take the complete monthly returns for both sites tomorrow. Congratulations to all!

Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: Fwd: [AIAS] Fwd: Extension of ECE momentum theory
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:43:35 EST

Myron & Horst,

The expression for the mass m of a fluid element of volume V should be V*rho, not (1/V)*rho.

The Navier-Stokes equations are “complete” and DO include all linear and angular terms. The reason they do not match experiment in some cases is that “turbulence” is “random” and has to be “modeled”; the same “model” does not describe all possible situations.

Also, The GENESIS Identity (that you have looked at), when applied to fluid dynamics, contains local or global “spin” in the curl term. This is usually called “vorticity”. The velocity induced by a vortex element involves (in 3-D) an inverse square VECTOR product with the radius (unit) vector. In contrast, the div term (compressibility) involves just the simple inverse square TIMES the radius (unit) vector.

Regards,

Barry

—- EMyrone] at [aol.com wrote: >

OK thanks – it would be interesting to relate your theorem to ECE.

Fwd: 127(2): Relation between Spacetime Angular Momentum and Metric

January 30, 2009

 



Subject: 127(2): Relation between Spacetime Angular Momentum and Metric
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:43:10 EST

This relation is established through eq. (2), which defines the potential four vector in terms of the volume integrated tetrad of paper 124. In equation (13) the new concept of potential momentum pi bold of spacetime is introduced. This plays the role of vector potential in EEC electrodynamics. The spin angular momentum of spacetime is defined by pi bold. The orbital spacetime angular momentum L = r x p used as the starting point for paper 126 is defined as the limit (19) when pi bold and bold omega go to zero. It is shown that L = r x p is a property of spacetime. L defines all known planar orbits, including orbits of galaxies.


Attachment: a127thpapernotes2.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers