Archive for July, 2007

Thomas Townsend Brown Scientific Notebooks, Vol. 1.htm

July 31, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Thomas Townsend Brown Scientific Notebooks, Vol. 1.htm
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:41:06 EDT

Many thanks to John Shelburne! These notebooks contain a large amount of interesting experimentation to which the ECE theory can be systematically applied over the next few years. I think that sceintists will be very interested in these data.

Attachment: Thomas Townsend Brown Scientific Notebooks, Vol. 1.htm

> Myron, As a putative set of examples of predictable natural phenomena in support for ECE theory, I am submitting this link to transcribed notes from T.T. Brown’s lab notebooks.

Perhaps in one or two of the described clear-cut cases in the notes, a casual observer may obtain and verify a ‘q.e.d.’ prediction of ECE theory.

John Shelburne

Refutations already available

July 31, 2007

Subject: Refutations already available
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:21:40 EDT

Jessica has asked if you have refuted this paper . At at [] at [.1de091d6/16 she has posted

1. Floris is still quite upset about all these things. He has found today this article by some physicists and mathematicians which seem to find the error in what Professeur Evans has been writing. It concerns itself with this Englishman Sir Hodge. I deeply do mistrust the english – l’Albion Perfide ! They are not so clever, for example never have they understood that the snail is to eat. Floris simply adores them with the butter and the garlic. Perhaps I can restore his spirit by offering him this – here the torsion makes the tension !!!

2. These men – Messieurs Jadczyk, Bruhn and Hehl – do talk with the aliens !! Floris has seen that Laura. the wife of Jadczyk, does communicate with the beings from an other galaxie. We are very excited by these news. Professeur Hawkings has said we should all to leave this planete – perhaps it is to this galaxie that we must go. With the free energy of the torsion of espace-temps, we may well have the good chances to make this voyage.

P.S. I do not think that these men have had the courtoisie to send the copie to Professeur Myron. That kind of bad manners is just what we have come to expect in Europe these days. And what for me is much worse, Monseiur Jadzyck. he is living here in France, not so far from me in a chateau with the lustres and the tapisseries !! These are our patrimoine – what was yesterday that of the comte, today it is for the parvenu polonais. Quelle honte !

The detailed refutations to this camapign of personal animosity by pseudo-scientists are already available on _www.aias.us_ ( , notably paper 89 and the Hehl refutation. This paper is nonsense because the resonances have already been demonstrated numerically in paper 63. The refutations on _www.aias.us_ ( have been unanimously accepted by the profession. We were not allowed to post them on arXiv. We found a sponsor but for an unknown reason the process was blocked. This indicates the existence of an author black list on arXiv. Jadczyk is involved with Lakhtakia, who is known to have disseminated gutter abuse, a common assault and a serious felony. Bruhn and ‘t Hooft are associates of Lakhtakia. They deliberately try to give the impression of errors where none exist, and are predictable in that they attack everything I publish. Several scholars have checked my work and use the exact same Cartan geometry. These scholars are not attacked, showing that this is personal animosity. Computer algebra has been used to check my work. I think that the police authorities should caution Bruhn for aggravated harassment. I do not regard these people as scientists: “Say a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”. We have heard that before somewhere. The general idea here is to block publication of ECE papers in journals. This has failed because of the huge and high quality interest in _www.aias.us_ ( . The mysterious “authority” that these people attempt to exude has been rejected by the entire profession, so the process has degenerated into a personal harassment which has been going on for years. For example my first wife was attacked by hate mail. She happened to be a Jewish girl from NYC. Is this entirely a coincidence I wonder? They use the journals of the profession to work off a bitter grudge. This simply brings the journals into disrepute, so the journals are also being ignored by the profession. When logically refuted they refuse to accept the refutation, or ignore its existence. Unfortunately for them, the rest of the profession does not. Until administrations and authorities control these people their personal bile will continue to saturate the internet. All that needs to be done is to refer to the refutations on _www.aias.us_ ( . These are very detailed and it is no problem for me to deal with these people intellectually.

British Civil List Scientist

Important New Paper by Crothers

July 31, 2007

Subject: for : Important New Paper by Crothers
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:26:11 EDT

Attachment: BlackHoleCatastrophePRS.pdf

This is an important new paper by the leading scholar Stephen Crothers which should without doubt be accepted by “Proceedings of the Royal Society” if it were a fair minded journal undominated by prevailing theology and basic incompetence. It should be posted with SC’s permission on _www.asis.us_ ( in preprint form. It shows that even in the very restricted torsionless case (paper 88) upon which general relativity is based, the prevailing solutions are incorrect. This special case is R ^ q = 0, D ^ (R ^ q) = 0, implying D ^ R = 0. I advise honest scientists to make the effort to study this paper carefully and thoroughly, and to discuss points that may arise with SC. Internal discussions within AIAS are going on all the time. This paper shows that Big Bang never happened, dark matter is a myth, black holes do not exist. The mathematics of interacting black holes are farcically incorrect. So public funding for fallacy and folly should be withdrawn, reorganized, and allocated to true scholarship.

Civil List Scientist

cc Welsh Assembly and IWA.

Dear Prof. Evans,

I have submitted the attached paper to the Proceedings of the Royal Society A. I do not at all expect it to be accepted by the Royal Society, but I thought I’d conduct experiment all the same. I will keep you informed of the course of all events.

Yours faithfully, Stephen J. Crothers.

your section of paper 87

July 31, 2007

Subject: Fwd: your section of paper 87
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:05:46 EDT


I now agree with all of your comments here Horst. The missing key seems to be in the amplification process and this is what we do not fully understand. The clues may be in Horta’s article(s) if the Foundry material he is using really is producing the resonances we are interested in. A low work function is then important for the release of electrons. I also agree that this, including the general details of Horta’s device now collected, are better left to the future (where the possible role of phonon modes can also be developed)..

If Myron agrees, therefore, Horst, I am happy for you to make the amendments to this last section, as per your message below. Perhaps you could overwrite as we did with the rebuttal ? I will then add any remaining omissions etc and Myron and yourself can have one final read before posting.

I think Myron and yourself have already taken us very close to the point where we can design devices from theoretical first principles Horst. If we continue to openly discuss developments on the website we may get important clues on the details still missing from outside.

Best, Gareth


your part gives a very clear overview on practical aspects of SRC, excellent! The first and the last paragraph relate to my part 4.4. We could make both paragraphs the first and last paragraph of 4.4. Then this part would get a greater weight. What do you think about this? The fifth paragraph (“In principle natural resonances…”) seems redundant to me. What do you mean by “natural resonances”? Concerning the Horta material we cannot say much more at the moment. You can give a further literature search a try, and we can decide then if we write some sentences about this material.

Best regards, Horst _________________________________________________________________ Celeb spotting – Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes

Summary of Interest in, 1 – 30 July 2007

July 31, 2007

Subject: Summary of Interest in, 1 – 30 July 2007
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:03:31 EDT

Articles of most interest were as follows, numbers denote ECE papers, OO denotes Omnia Opera, and HSD denotes historical source documents.

63, 89, Hehl Refutation, Workshop overview, 76, Eckardt Felker (Spanish), HSD6, 15, filtered feedback file, OO381, 2, 85, Galaxies article by Eckardt (Spanish), Space Energy article by Eckardt, Indranu Dan6a, Pendergast book, numerical solutions, UNCC source documents, 68, 83, IBM Code, 13, Workshop History, Timmons Thesis, Universe3, 61, OO108, Johnson Magnets, 77, Tornado in a Petrie Dish, Metric for Evans Vigier Field, 12, 54, 23, Etherington Report, Bruchholtz article, 9, 11, 21, 53, 86, 6, HSD27, 81, OO595, 16, 8, Indranu Dan4, 57, 5, Galaxies article, 70, HSD5, Royal Decree, 3, 52, Bruhn refutation, Workshop Intorduction, 4, 72, filtered feedback stats file, HSD2, 55, 7, OO401a, Heisenberg refutation, Hehl refutations, Phys Scripta refutations, 17, 58, 78, ……………………..

Visits from 72 countries, led by US, Canada, Australia, France, Britain, Germany, Belgium, ……

Total of 57,865 hits in the month, 7.948 gigabytes downloaded (second highest recorded), 7,938 visits in one month, dominated by the industrial and individual sectors in the higher educational summer vacation.

Civil List Scientist.

16-30July, Rest of World Higher Ed. to

July 31, 2007

Subject: 16-30July, Rest of World Higher Ed. to
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:36:37 EDT

MPF Govt. of Brazil, Govt. of Canada IC, Perimeter Institute, Alberta, TIE Chile, Kanazawa Japan, Kyoto Univ., PKNU S. Korea, NU Singapore.

16-30July07 European Higher Educational feedback to

July 31, 2007

Subject: 16-30July07 European Higher Educational feedback to
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:28:00 EDT

It is the middle of the summer vacation in Europe but the higher ed. and similar interest is intense in the past two weeks as usual.

ARCS Austria, Geolba Austria, U Vienna, TWIN Austria, Brutele Belgium, Nuytick Belgium, CVUT Czech rep., Max Planck Bonn, Darnstadt (Mechanical Engineering), Leipzig, CSIC Spain, JYU Finland, HOl Greece, ONDSL Greece, KFKI Hungary, Alcatel Lucent Italy (Research), Pavia, Gamta Lithuania, PT Luxembourg, Balticom Research Latvia, Decis Netherlands, Twente, ACN Warsaw Poland, Novis Portugal, PTSPB Russia, Agricultural Univ. Slovakia, Aberystwyth, Bristol. Oxford, Surey, Warwick, BBC, British Govt. Energis, National Library of Wales.

16-30Jul07, US Feedback

July 31, 2007

Subject: 16-30Jul07, US Feedback
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:06:58 EDT

As usual this give the filtered, high quality, feedback from US higher ed., government, and similar, * denotes multiple visits.

PAS Arizona, Brigham Young, Colorado, Cornell*, OPAC Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics, MIT, Naval Postgraduate School, Ohio State, Rice, Roseevelt, Texas A and M, Illinois Urbana Champaign, Utah, Washington, Argonne National, National Science Foundation (NSF), Santa Barbara, US Postal Service, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Bergen County Library, Jefferson National Laboratory.

Request for mathematical and analytical assistance

July 30, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Request for mathematical and analytical assistance
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:41:22 EDT

Myron, Horst,

The Request

Your assistance is requested to adapt the Maxwell/Heavyside equations to a magnetic material (Permalloy 80) to incorporate the nonlinear permeability condition that occurs in these materials.

Some Background

As you know, the Maxwell/Heavyside equations are given for air, which has a linear permeability. I am experimenting with magnetic materials and could greatly use corrected equations. Permeability in these materials is proportional to B at some proportionality relationship and abruptly reverts to that of air upon saturation by B.

I have the hysteresis curve for Permalloy 80.

If you and Horst agree to do this, then I will forward the hysteresis curve for Permalloy 80 and some pertinent discussion about hysteresis curves, which are not as straightforward as one might think.



I am prepared to help, but this is outside the work being done at present by AIAS and so is a consultancy. Reasonable rates of consultancy apply in my case. It must be rememberd that I work voluntarily without salary, and have done for over ten years, so a consultancy from time to time is entirely reasonable. My pesnion of 1,800 pounds a year ($3,600 a year) is an honorarium, not a salary. It is obviously not possible to live on $3,600 a year. This situation was brought about by events in 1994 at UNCC (see _www.aias.us_ ( ), events which have been repeatedly condemned by the profession. I was appointed by Parliament in 2005 for distinguished contributions to science. The internationally acclaimned ECE theory has been produced by a group of volunteers at AIAS, all working in their spare time.

Civil List Scientist

Paper 88 (re-posting)

July 30, 2007

Subject: Fwd: Paper 88 (re-posting)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:32:56 EDT

I have uploaded this new version.

On 7/30/07, EMyrone] at [ wrote: > > > I would be most grateful if this attachment could replace the current paper > 88. The only change is that eqs. (35) and (36) have been written out in > full, to make clear that they are twelve term expansions which are non-zero > in general. So it becomes obvious that the traditional “second Bianchi > identity”, with only three terms summing to zero, is a special case that is > true if and only if the torsion is neglected. The rest of the paper is the > same. The overall conclusion is that general relativity and cosmology need > a complete overhaul. >

Most grateful! The true Bianchi identity will be used from now on in ECE papers, in the form of the Cartan identity:

D ^ T := R ^ q

not equal to zero in general.

The traditional second Bianchi identity (D ^ R = 0) is a special case where there is no torsion, and the true second identity is

D ^ (D ^ T) := D ^ (R ^ q)

not equal to zero in general.

Tradional general relativity is based on the torsionless approximations:

R ^ q = 0 D ^ (R ^ q ) = D ^ R = 0


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers