Archive for October, 2006

Physical optics, the Sagnac effect, and the Aharonov-Bohm effect in the …

October 31, 2006


Subject: Physical optics, the Sagnac effect, and the Aharonov-Bohm effect in the …
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:51:42 EST

Dear Ms Judit Szabo,

I am most grateful for your kind comments and I hereby forward this information on the “Hungarian Studies” journal of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences to my colleagues and friends here.

Cordially Yours,

Myron Evans

Ph. D. Thesis and D. Sc. Thesis

October 31, 2006


Subject: Ph. D. Thesis and D. Sc. Thesis
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:42:16 EST

Many thanks Roger, very nice to hear from you! This is a relief. I should explain to readers that Roger was a first year undergraduate student at the then UCW Aberystwyth when I was a second year undergraduate student. So we have known each other for about forty years. Our diet then consisted of a breakfast by our fag smoking landlady and a dubious variety of fish and chips in the afternoon from the Bridge End chipie. This drove many a poor student to drink. Having survived that I turned my attention to correlation functions.

Myron,

I saw your comments re. the possible destruction of your theses, and it reminded me of a UWA website I stumbled upon a while ago. If you click on this link and then do a search on Evans, M W, and follow through the process of clicking on your name, you will eventually arrive at a list of your publications held by the Hugh Owen Library. They include your PhD and DSc theses

http://voyager.aber.ac.uk/nonopac/

Whether this proves that they actually physically exist remains to be seen!!!

Best Wishes

Roger

Disclaimer: Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail and its attachments are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Nightfreight (GB) Limited.

Confidentiality: This email and its attachments are solely intended for the named recipient and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments and they have come to you in error, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show all or any of them to anyone. If you receive this e-mail in error, we should be obliged if you would e-mail our postmaster at postmaster] at [nightfreight.co.uk and highlight the error, and then remove the e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you.

Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us..

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we do not warrant that this email and its attachments are virus-free and do not accept liability for any damage resulting from any virus that does infect this email or any attachment. We advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure that any emails and attachments received are actually virus free.

Nightfreight (GB) Limited is a limited liability company, registered in England and Wales (registered number 02402927). Registered office at Crestwood House, Birches Rise, Willenhall, West Midlands WV13 2DB.

Reasons Why

October 31, 2006


Subject: Fwd: Top Ten Papers : Reasons Why
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:35:24 EST

Thanks! It takes time for basic work to develop sometimes, at other times there is a sudden transition, such as 1925 – 1927 in quantum mechanics. However basic work is always important.

Dear Myron,

Your reasons for your ten choices provide great insight into your work and show how your work has followed a unique path over 30 years of research. In particular, your choices give a flavour of how scientific progress develops over a prolonged period.

Best Wishes

Kerry.

—– Original Message —-

Sent: Tuesday, 31 October, 2006 12:00:52 PM
Subject: Top Ten Papers : Reasons Why

I note that Kerry Pendergast, the science master at West Monmouth School Pontypool, asked for the reasons for this choice, so I give them as follows.

1) This records the introduction at Aberystwyth of the rotational velocity correlation function for the analysis of far infra red data of all kinds, it enabled a triple comparsion between data, theory and simulation and is major theme of my work.

2) This records the introduction at Aberystwyth of the memory function method to the far infra red, a method in which the friction coefficient of the Langevin equation (Markovian process) is extended to a memory function hierarchy (non-Markovian process). The Langevin equation itself gives the Debye plateau in the far infra red, and is unphysical because the rotational velocity correlation function is undefined in the Debye relaxation process.

3) This is a paper written at Aberystwyth of forty four pages, invited by Mansel Davies, summarizing the work for which I was awarded the Harrison Memorial Prize and Meldola Medal of the Royal Society of Chemistry of London upon recommendation of the National Physical Laboratory of the British Government.

4) This paper from Aberystwyth introduced the gamma process of the far infra red, which I realized to be linked to the much lower frequenvy alpha and beta processes already known. So the complete spectrum stretches over an immense twelve decades of frequency, and its description is still a challenge to molecular dynamics computer simulation and theory.

5) These five parts, written at Aberystwyth, introduced the technique of field applied computer simulation, which I later developed extensively. The first external field to be applied was a static electric field, and it was found that the simulation produced the correct theoretical Langevin functions at all orders. The simulation could therefore be used to produce a variety of results which could not be produced by experiment or theory. Various other fields were used later, notably a circularly polarized electromagnetic field in the Evans / Pelkie animation from Cornell of the inverse Faraday effect. So the animation shows that the code works fine, and all the code is avaialble on http://www.aias.us.

6) This records the disovery at Aberystwyth of the mechanism in the molecule fixed frame through which moelcular rotation and molecular translation influence each other. This had not been found using theory or experiment, only by computer simulation. This mechanism is important in general relativity (in a much broader context) because it governs the interaction of gravitation (translation) with any kind of spinning or rotating field (electromagnetic, weak, strong, fermionic etc.).

7) This records the first computer simulation at Zurich of the inverse Faraday effect, the magnetization of any type of matter by a circularly polarized electromagnetic field of any frequency.

8) This records the inference at Cornell of the fundamnetal spin field of electromagentic radiation of any frequency. It is obserevd in the inverse Farday effect and signals the fact that the electromagnetic field is the Cartan torsion of ECE field theory. Mansel Davies thought in 1992 that I shouls have been awarded a Nobel Prize in chemistry for this discovery – he was a Nobel Prize advisor in chemistry. The award of a Civil List Pension by Parliament is of much more historical significance than a Nobel Prize, because only one Civil List Pension has been awarded to a chemist since Michael Faraday. So this work has now been recognised democratically by Parliament in a much broader context than academic.

9) This paper from Craigcefnparc records the discovery of the wave equation that unifies wave (or quantum) mechanics and general relativity in an objective manner. This was a major aim of both Albert Einstein and Elie Cartan for many years.

10) This paper from Craigcefnparc records the development of the field equations of elcetrodynamics within ECE theory, a major advance from the standard model in which the electromagnetic field is still the nineteenth century entity of Maxwell, Heaviside, Lorentz and Poincare. In ECE theory the electromagnetci field is a field of general relativity, unified with all other fields geometrically.

British and Commonwealth Civil List Scientist, Chief Scientific Advisor to the National Assembly of Wales.

This choice is inevitably somewhat arbitrary and subjective, but if attention is being confined to papers or letters rather than reviews or books I would myself choose the following in chronological order.

1) Paper (5): M. W. Evans “Rotational Velocity Correlation Functions for Assessing Molecular Models for Gas and Liquid Phase Studies”, Faraday II, 70(9), 1620 (1974).

2) Paper (20): M. W. Evans and G. J. Evans, “Use of the Memory Function to Simulate the Debye and Poley Absorption in Liquids”, Faraday II, 72(7), 1169 (1976).

3) Paper (39): M. W. Evans, “Correlation and Memory Function Analyses of Molecular Motion in Fluids”, in Mansel Davies, (ed.), Dielectric and Related Molecular Processes, 3, 1-44 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1977).

4) Paper (67): C. J. Reid and M. W. Evans, “Zero – THz Absorption Profiles in Glassy Solutions, High Frequency Gamma Process and its Characterization”, Faraday II, 75(9), 1218 (1979).

5) Papers (115) etc.: M. W. Evans, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Induced Anisotropy, Parts 1 – 5″, J. Chem. Phys., 76, 5473, 5480 (1982); 77, 4632 (1982); 78, 925, 5403 (1983).

6) Paper (147): M. W. Evans, “New Phenonenon of the Molecular Liquid State: Interaction of Molecular Rotation and Tarnsaltion”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50(5), 371 (1983).

7) M. W. Evans, Paper (347): “Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation of Magnetization by an Elecrtomagnetic Field”, Phys. Lett. A, 157, 383 (1991).

8) M. W. Evans, Papers (372) and (373): “The Elementary Static Magnetic Field of the Photon”, Physica B, 182, 227, 237 (1992).

9) Paper (599): M. W. Evans, “A Generally Covariant Wave Equation for Grand Unified Field Theory, Found. Phys. Lett., 16, 513 (2003).

10) Paper (663), M. W. Evans, “The Spinning and Curving of Spacetime. the Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields in the Evans Unified Field Theory”, Found. Phys. Lett., 18, 431 (2005).

Reasons Why

October 31, 2006


Subject: Top Ten Papers : Reasons Why
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:00:52 EST

I note that Kerry Pendergast, the science master at West Monmouth School Pontypool, asked for the reasons for this choice, so I give them as follows.

1) This records the introduction at Aberystwyth of the rotational velocity correlation function for the analysis of far infra red data of all kinds, it enabled a triple comparsion between data, theory and simulation and is major theme of my work.

2) This records the introduction at Aberystwyth of the memory function method to the far infra red, a method in which the friction coefficient of the Langevin equation (Markovian process) is extended to a memory function hierarchy (non-Markovian process). The Langevin equation itself gives the Debye plateau in the far infra red, and is unphysical because the rotational velocity correlation function is undefined in the Debye relaxation process.

3) This is a paper written at Aberystwyth of forty four pages, invited by Mansel Davies, summarizing the work for which I was awarded the Harrison Memorial Prize and Meldola Medal of the Royal Society of Chemistry of London upon recommendation of the National Physical Laboratory of the British Government.

4) This paper from Aberystwyth introduced the gamma process of the far infra red, which I realized to be linked to the much lower frequenvy alpha and beta processes already known. So the complete spectrum stretches over an immense twelve decades of frequency, and its description is still a challenge to molecular dynamics computer simulation and theory.

5) These five parts, written at Aberystwyth, introduced the technique of field applied computer simulation, which I later developed extensively. The first external field to be applied was a static electric field, and it was found that the simulation produced the correct theoretical Langevin functions at all orders. The simulation could therefore be used to produce a variety of results which could not be produced by experiment or theory. Various other fields were used later, notably a circularly polarized electromagnetic field in the Evans / Pelkie animation from Cornell of the inverse Faraday effect. So the animation shows that the code works fine, and all the code is avaialble on http://www.aias.us.

6) This records the disovery at Aberystwyth of the mechanism in the molecule fixed frame through which moelcular rotation and molecular translation influence each other. This had not been found using theory or experiment, only by computer simulation. This mechanism is important in general relativity (in a much broader context) because it governs the interaction of gravitation (translation) with any kind of spinning or rotating field (electromagnetic, weak, strong, fermionic etc.).

7) This records the first computer simulation at Zurich of the inverse Faraday effect, the magnetization of any type of matter by a circularly polarized electromagnetic field of any frequency.

8) This records the inference at Cornell of the fundamnetal spin field of electromagentic radiation of any frequency. It is obserevd in the inverse Farday effect and signals the fact that the electromagnetic field is the Cartan torsion of ECE field theory. Mansel Davies thought in 1992 that I shouls have been awarded a Nobel Prize in chemistry for this discovery – he was a Nobel Prize advisor in chemistry. The award of a Civil List Pension by Parliament is of much more historical significance than a Nobel Prize, because only one Civil List Pension has been awarded to a chemist since Michael Faraday. So this work has now been recognised democratically by Parliament in a much broader context than academic.

9) This paper from Craigcefnparc records the discovery of the wave equation that unifies wave (or quantum) mechanics and general relativity in an objective manner. This was a major aim of both Albert Einstein and Elie Cartan for many years.

10) This paper from Craigcefnparc records the development of the field equations of elcetrodynamics within ECE theory, a major advance from the standard model in which the electromagnetic field is still the nineteenth century entity of Maxwell, Heaviside, Lorentz and Poincare. In ECE theory the electromagnetci field is a field of general relativity, unified with all other fields geometrically.

British and Commonwealth Civil List Scientist, Chief Scientific Advisor to the National Assembly of Wales.

This choice is inevitably somewhat arbitrary and subjective, but if attention is being confined to papers or letters rather than reviews or books I would myself choose the following in chronological order.

1) Paper (5): M. W. Evans “Rotational Velocity Correlation Functions for Assessing Molecular Models for Gas and Liquid Phase Studies”, Faraday II, 70(9), 1620 (1974).

2) Paper (20): M. W. Evans and G. J. Evans, “Use of the Memory Function to Simulate the Debye and Poley Absorption in Liquids”, Faraday II, 72(7), 1169 (1976).

3) Paper (39): M. W. Evans, “Correlation and Memory Function Analyses of Molecular Motion in Fluids”, in Mansel Davies, (ed.), Dielectric and Related Molecular Processes, 3, 1-44 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1977).

4) Paper (67): C. J. Reid and M. W. Evans, “Zero – THz Absorption Profiles in Glassy Solutions, High Frequency Gamma Process and its Characterization”, Faraday II, 75(9), 1218 (1979).

5) Papers (115) etc.: M. W. Evans, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Induced Anisotropy, Parts 1 – 5″, J. Chem. Phys., 76, 5473, 5480 (1982); 77, 4632 (1982); 78, 925, 5403 (1983).

6) Paper (147): M. W. Evans, “New Phenonenon of the Molecular Liquid State: Interaction of Molecular Rotation and Tarnsaltion”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50(5), 371 (1983).

7) M. W. Evans, Paper (347): “Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation of Magnetization by an Elecrtomagnetic Field”, Phys. Lett. A, 157, 383 (1991).

8) M. W. Evans, Papers (372) and (373): “The Elementary Static Magnetic Field of the Photon”, Physica B, 182, 227, 237 (1992).

9) Paper (599): M. W. Evans, “A Generally Covariant Wave Equation for Grand Unified Field Theory, Found. Phys. Lett., 16, 513 (2003).

10) Paper (663), M. W. Evans, “The Spinning and Curving of Spacetime. the Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields in the Evans Unified Field Theory”, Found. Phys. Lett., 18, 431 (2005).

PS To Karel , Paper 62

October 31, 2006


Subject: PS To Karel , Paper 62
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:55:19 EST

Paper 62 develops the Lemma and applies it to the electromagnetic and fermionic fields. In particular a cross check is given eq. (7) of paper 62, one of many cross checks given in volume two in particular. In that volume the tetrad postulate was derived or illustarted in a number of ways, and the Lemma derived in two ways. In chapter 17 of voluem one you can see teh taterad postulate at work in teh foru appendices. Without the tetrad postulate Cartan could not have developed Riemann geometry into Cartan Riemann geometry as he did in Comptes Rendues in 1922. This is all very well known. There may be other ways to derive the Lemma, it is a simple inference form the tetrad postulate, which is itself a simple statement – a complete vector field of any kind must be independent of the way it is expressed. For example, in 3-D Euclidean space a vector field in Cartesian coordinates is the same vector field as in spherical polar coordinates or any curvilinear coordinate system in Euclidean spacetime. In Cartan Riemann geometry, this basic fact is known as the tetrad postulate. You produced another cross check on the Lemma, so this is very good thinking! As you can see from section 3 of this paper the Lemma is a generally covariant wave equation, as you infer. It reduces to the Dirac equation in the limit when the fermion becomes a free fermion, (eq. (26) of paper 62. A free fermion is unifluenced by gravitation, so this is the Minkowski limit. This defines the finite volume of a particle in general relativity (volumes one – three and papers). There are no point particles or point charges or any singularities in general relativity, so the need for renormalization in q.e.d or q.c.d., or any quantum field theory, is removed by ECE theory. This is one of the major advances of the theory as you presented in your seminar. I think that this is a very good seminar, well presented and encourage the presentation worldwide of such seminars.

Summary of October to date

October 31, 2006


Subject: Summary of October to date
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:56:47 EST

Today is 31 Oct so the monthly stats page will change tomorrow when the final October 06 feedback will be in. For 1-30 Oct 06 there have been to date 284,897 hits, 6.817 gigabytes downloaded, 19,741 individual visitors and 150,358 previews from 104 countries, led by USA, Germany, Netherlands, Russia, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, Japan, Hungary, Sweden, Poland, Britain, France, Taiwan and others. The higher ed., corporate, govt. and organizational interest has been filtered out as usual. This is the peak of a very big mountain of interest as can be seen. Due to increased and largely irrelevant spider crawler activity we decided to prohibit automated spider crawler access to the feedback sites on the home page of http://www.aias.us. By any measure ECE theory is mainstream physics by now.

15-30Oct06, Some Major Corporations to www.aias.us

October 31, 2006


Subject: 15-30Oct06, Some Major Corporations to http://www.aias.us
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:45:31 EST

As usual I pick out a few major corporations from the huge corporate interest in ECE theory worldwide in the past two weeks: Amazon, Bank of America, Daimler Chrysler, Hoenywell, IBm ALmaden, IBM Australia, IBM UK, Jansen Research, Layered Technology, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Motorola, Philips, Simens (various countries), Raytheon.

15-30Oct06, Rest of World to www.aias.us

October 31, 2006


Subject: 15-30Oct06, Rest of World to http://www.aias.us
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:25:46 EST

As usual I filter out the higher ed and govt sectors from the rest of the world (excluding US and Europe), as follows. This is just the peak of a huge mountain of interest: Govt. of Argentina (Gabinete Social), Adelaide, Victoria, AEI Canada, CArleton, McGill, Alberta, Uniserve Canada, Toronto, Waterloo, York Univ Canada dept of physics, Pontifical University of Chile, Govt of Colombia (Risaralda), UO Cuba, INF Cuba, KGV Hong Kong, Univ of Indonesia, NITK India, IACS India, HUE Japan, Osaka, Saga, Tohwa, Univ Tokyo, KAIST South Korea, ENSMA Malaysia, Govt of Mexico, UNI Peru, National Univ of Singapore, CHU TAiwan, DWU Taiwan, KH Taiwan, NTNU Taiwan, TPC Taiwan, YLC taiwan, FHUCE (Yu), ULA Venezuela, UFAL Brazil, UFC Brazil, UFG Brazil, UGMG Brazil, UNICAMP Brazil.

15-3-Oct06, Europe to www.aias.us

October 31, 2006


Subject: 15-3-Oct06, Europe to http://www.aias.us
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:57:32 EST

As usual this records intense scholarly interest in ECE theory across the higher ed sector in Europe (* denotes multiple visits): Univ Vienna, Education Highway Austria, Kepler University Linz, KU Leuven, Royal Military Academy Belgium, SAS belgium, NVU Bulgaria, CERN, Basel, Freiburg, Geneva, Charles Univ Prague, Mazaryk Univ Brno, Palacky Univ Olomuk, FU Berlin, HU Berlin, The Albert Einstein Institute (Max Planck Institute for Garvitational Physics Ulm), Max Planck Institute for Informatics, RWTH Aachen, Tech Univ Braunschweig, Augsburg, Bielefeld, Bonn, Duisburg, Essen, Kaiserslautern, Leipzig, Marburg, Munich, Rostock, Saarland, Schwabia, Siegen, Wuerzburg, Aarhus Denmark, Technical Knowledge Centre of Denmark, Danish Technical University*, Student Dorm Network Odense Univ Denmark, Barcelona, Lleida, Granada, Polytech Univ Catalonia, Valencia, DNA Network Finland, Strasbourg, Poitiers, Univ of Macedonia, Patras, KFKI Campi of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest (five campi), Univ Szeged Hungary, Trinity College Dublin Ireland, Govt of Emilia Romagna Italy, MIlan Polytech, Pavia, Rome One, Turin, Restena Luxembourg, Netherlands National Institute for Nuclear and High Energy Physics Amsterdam, Radboud, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Haugesund Norway, Bergen,

Lublin Poland, ONi Portugal, Iasi Romania, TVS Romania, Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Chemical Physics (Dept of Extreme States), Aeroflot Russia, Joint Institutes of Nuclear Research Russia, Russian Telecom Kovrov, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences*, Govt of Tatarstan, Stockholm Sweden, Government of Turkey, VSTU Ukraine, Kharkov Ukraine, Bath, Cambridge, DL (UK), Durham, Edinburgh, Imperial, Lancaster, Hertford College Oxford, Queen’s Univ Belfast, Sussex*, Ceredigion County Council, Neath Port Talbot County Council, British Ministry of Defence, British National Health Service, Belgrade Univ.

15-30Oct06, USA to www.aias.us

October 31, 2006


Subject: 15-30Oct06, USA to http://www.aias.us
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:34:29 EST

The intense scholarly interest in ECE theory continued from State to State in the past two weeks. As usual this is selected feedback from Universities, Governmnent, Military and som Organizations, * denotes multiple visits: Arizona State, Boston, Brigham Young Hawaii, Caltech, Central Michigan, Carnegie Mellon*, Charleston, Columbia, City New York, Case Western Reserve, Duke*, Grand Canyon Univ., Georgetown, Hutchinson Community College, Kansas, Lehigh, Maine*, Michigan State, Northwestern*, Oregon State, Penn State *, Puerto Rico, Purdue*, Rowan, South Carolina, St Petersburg College, Southern Polytechnic State Univ., Stanford, Space Telescope Science Institute, SUNY Stonybrook, Texas Tech., Tufts, Alabama Huntsville, UC Davis, Chicago, UCLA*, UC San Diego, Illinois Urbana Champaign, U Mass Dartmouth, Michigan*, U Penn, Utah State, Texas, Virginia*, Washington*, Wisconsin*, Wright, Xavier, Yale*, Youngstown State; Govt of California, NASA Jet Propulsion Lab., NIH, US Airforce Academy, US Navy NCSC, UC Navy NUWC, US Navy SPAWAR, Assumption Organization, E2BN Organization, Fathom Organization, JJMorrison Organization, Florida Library, DHS State of Texas.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers