Nobel Prize Nominators

October 25, 2014

It looks as if they can only be found by typing in a name, they are not actually listed, but I may be wrong. In my case my work covers both chemistry and physics, so if they can be found the work and its impact can be brought to the attention of chemistry and physics advisors by AIAS Fellows or any reader of ECE theory.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 25/10/2014 09:44:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Nominations for a Nobel Prize

Dear Myron,
Perhaps the prescribed nomination procedure might be of interest to your wider readership? See http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/prize_awarder/index.html and http://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/physics/.

Examining the list of Qualified Nominators, it is difficult to imagine much enthusiasm for nominating someone whose work might raze the edifice of the Standard Model and shame many of the members of the Club. You are not just rocking the boat, you are torpedoing the boat they are all sitting in! As we say here in Australia, Good on You!

Kind regards,
Axel

On 25 Oct 2014, at 6:01 pm, EMyrone wrote:

I have been informed that I have been nominated several times for a Nobel Prize and as mentioned many times on this blog, I regard the Civil List Pension as a higher and cleaner honour because it is a State Honour akin to Congressional Medal of Honor, and cleaner, in that the process needs an Act of Parliament and nomination by a Royal Society. In a Hansard written answer of 2013 it was revealed that there are only fifty three Pensioners, so it is a rarely awarded high honour. There are about sixty five Companions of Honour (C. H.) another high honour akin to Order of Merit (O. M.) of which there are twenty five recipients. The average honorarium is about £2,300 a year. The Nobel Prize is notorious for awards that have little or no meaning, so if they did award one to ECE it would do the Nobel Prize system a power of good. It would show that it is capable of elementary fair judgment, and capable of response to the vast worldwide interest in ECE. It is also clear that intense lobbying goes on for a Nobel Prize. There is no lobbying for a Civil List Pension. Only a few of those nominated by a Royal Society are awarded a Pension (a Norman French name meaning a gift from the Sovereign). I probably have more nominations than someone like Prof. Sir John Meurig Thomas, and the late Rrev. R. S. Thomas, the great poet. There is an intense lobbying campaign for example for Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, who is Order of Merit (O. M.). The Nobel Prize for an obviously non existent Higgs Boson more or less devalued it to nothing. In UFT225 AIAS demolished electroweak theory upon which the Higgs boson is based adn B(3) demolished the standard model in 1992. So for all those who wish me to get a Nobel prize (probably hundreds of thousands worldwide) I advise getting in touch with advisors consulted by the Royal Swedish Academy, if those advisors are known. It is all very secretive. The Civil List Pension on the other hand is in the public domain and in the archives of the House of Lords and House of Commons via the search engine “portcullis”. If Stephen Hawking (a Companion of Honour, C. H.) can be awarded a three million dollar Milner Prize for an obviously refuted theory, then ECE can be awarded a Milner Prize and a Nobel prize for a rigorously correct theory that makes a huge impact worldwide. However that is not the way the world works at present. So sweeping reform is necessary. I would be pleasantly surprised to get a Nobel Prize, (and don’t think about it), but people ought to realize that the nominations at that level are as good as the award, like Oscar Nominations. A great deal of fuss was made when RST was nominated for a Nobel Prize. It was on the TV and all that. I have also been nominated several times for a Wolf Prze, Milner Prize and Priestley Medal and I am very grateful to the nominators and supporters.

=

“A Club Like Any Other” (Mansel Davies)

October 25, 2014

Many thanks to Axel for this. This will be very useful. Hundreds of thousands of honest professionals wish me to get a Nobel Prize (computer feedback) because the Prize is so famous, while the Civil List Pension is almost unknown. Even O. M., C. H. and Congressional Medal of Honor are not all that well known compared with the Nobel Prize. The problem of smoke filled rooms is however very well known to the general public, but they cannot do anything about it, at least not yet. My Ph. D. supervisor Professor Mansel Davies was a chemistry Nobel Prize advisor and almost forty years ago he told me that the process is a “club like any other”. He immediately recognized B(3) as being worthy of a chemistry Nobel Prize back in 1992, so did Vigier, Kielich, Sternglass, van der Merwe, Lehnert, Hart and many others. In contemporary times we know impact exactly and in great detail by computer feedback activity. The only thing that the club can do is to ignore impact and claim that it does not exist. Neither did Bob Dylan. He has apparently been nominated for a Nobel Prize in Literature for his lyrics.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 25/10/2014 09:44:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Nominations for a Nobel Prize

Dear Myron,
Perhaps the prescribed nomination procedure might be of interest to your wider readership? See http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/prize_awarder/index.html and http://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/physics/.

Examining the list of Qualified Nominators, it is difficult to imagine much enthusiasm for nominating someone whose work might raze the edifice of the Standard Model and shame many of the members of the Club. You are not just rocking the boat, you are torpedoing the boat they are all sitting in! As we say here in Australia, Good on You!

Kind regards,
Axel

On 25 Oct 2014, at 6:01 pm, EMyrone wrote:

I have been informed that I have been nominated several times for a Nobel Prize and as mentioned many times on this blog, I regard the Civil List Pension as a higher and cleaner honour because it is a State Honour akin to Congressional Medal of Honor, and cleaner, in that the process needs an Act of Parliament and nomination by a Royal Society. In a Hansard written answer of 2013 it was revealed that there are only fifty three Pensioners, so it is a rarely awarded high honour. There are about sixty five Companions of Honour (C. H.) another high honour akin to Order of Merit (O. M.) of which there are twenty five recipients. The average honorarium is about £2,300 a year. The Nobel Prize is notorious for awards that have little or no meaning, so if they did award one to ECE it would do the Nobel Prize system a power of good. It would show that it is capable of elementary fair judgment, and capable of response to the vast worldwide interest in ECE. It is also clear that intense lobbying goes on for a Nobel Prize. There is no lobbying for a Civil List Pension. Only a few of those nominated by a Royal Society are awarded a Pension (a Norman French name meaning a gift from the Sovereign). I probably have more nominations than someone like Prof. Sir John Meurig Thomas, and the late Rrev. R. S. Thomas, the great poet. There is an intense lobbying campaign for example for Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, who is Order of Merit (O. M.). The Nobel Prize for an obviously non existent Higgs Boson more or less devalued it to nothing. In UFT225 AIAS demolished electroweak theory upon which the Higgs boson is based adn B(3) demolished the standard model in 1992. So for all those who wish me to get a Nobel prize (probably hundreds of thousands worldwide) I advise getting in touch with advisors consulted by the Royal Swedish Academy, if those advisors are known. It is all very secretive. The Civil List Pension on the other hand is in the public domain and in the archives of the House of Lords and House of Commons via the search engine “portcullis”. If Stephen Hawking (a Companion of Honour, C. H.) can be awarded a three million dollar Milner Prize for an obviously refuted theory, then ECE can be awarded a Milner Prize and a Nobel prize for a rigorously correct theory that makes a huge impact worldwide. However that is not the way the world works at present. So sweeping reform is necessary. I would be pleasantly surprised to get a Nobel Prize, (and don’t think about it), but people ought to realize that the nominations at that level are as good as the award, like Oscar Nominations. A great deal of fuss was made when RST was nominated for a Nobel Prize. It was on the TV and all that. I have also been nominated several times for a Wolf Prze, Milner Prize and Priestley Medal and I am very grateful to the nominators and supporters.

=

Discussion of 3D Orbital Graphic for a hyperbolic spiral

October 25, 2014

I would say that the essential difference between 2D and 3D orbits is that in 3D the total angular momentum L is conserved, while in 2D the angular momentum L sub Z is conserved. In 3D there are planar orbits r(beta), r(phi) and r(theta) as you infer, and also an orbit r(phi, theta) which is non planar. This is why three dimensional orbits are possible and physically present in the universe. Each of these four types of orbit are valid mathematically. In general galaxies are not planar, they can be ellipsoidal or nearly spherical, and all kinds of shapes. As you know, the only difference between the 2D and 3D theory is that in 2D the plane polar coordinates are used, but in 3D the spherical polar coordinates are used. Hwoever, this results in a vast amount of new information. In three dimensions of course there are L, L sub X, L sub Y and L sub Z. In two dimensions there is only L sub Z. The observable orbits are r(phi), r(theta) and r(phi, theta). The r(beta) orbit is not directly observable because of the way in which beta is defined.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 25/10/2014 09:42:15 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 3D Orbital Graphic for a hyperbolic spiral

To my understanding the plane rotates only if the components of the angular momentum are changed. Meanwhile I wonder why we got three-dimensional orbits before. The equations theta(beta) and phi(beta) do not depend on the force law so this transformation to a plane seems to be universal. Of course the intrinsic dynamics (time dependence) depends on the force law as well as the radial curve does. The 3D orbital surfaces describe a surface on which all orbits come to lie, it is correct that these are hypersurfaces. However the single orbits seem always to be plane cuts through these surfaces. This is what I initially suposed.

Horst

Am 25.10.2014 07:48, schrieb EMyrone

These graphics clarify the physics greatly, and thanks again to co author Horst Eckardt. So in three dimensions a whirlpool galaxy rotates its plane. It appears as a plane whirlpool to the astronomer or a space telescope such as Hubble, but the dynamics mean that its plane rotates over time. How quickly or how slowly such a process occurs appears to be a matter of evolution. These results show beyond doubt that three dimensional orbital theory is needed in general. Prior to this work, the rotation of the plane of the galaxy was unknown. This is the result of an inverse cubed law of attraction between a star of mass m and the central mass M of the galaxy, and the use of the spherical polar coordinates for the kinetic energy. The inverse square law of attraction in 3D gives the three dimensional conic section orbits, some of which were graphed by Horst in UFT272 to UFT274.

To: Emyrone
Sent: 24/10/2014 18:50:01 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: 3D Orbits for a hyperbolic spiral

I computed the orbits according to note 275(5). It comes out that the
spiral is always in a plane. Only the plane changes direction. For L=Lz
it is in the XY plane, for Lz=0 it is in the XZ plane, because the
angular momentum vector has no Z component. Time evolution does not
change because beta depends on L, not on Lz.
See near-side view and side view of the 3D spiral orbit.
The theta dependence oscillates strongly but is because of the rotation
of the orbital plane.

Horst

Investigation into UNCC

October 25, 2014

Michael Jackson might like to point out the UNCC Saga and the blog to the investigating body. The blog has many entries on UNCC. I also received hate mail post marked Charlotte recently and reported it to the police. The hate mail is on the blog, together with its envelope. This hate mail was associated with a troll site, suggesting coordinated harassment. I have also brought the UNCC Saga on www.aias.us to the attention of the North Carolina Legislature, both houses: Senate and House of North Carolina. One of the signatories of the troll petition came from North Carolina. The troll petition was removed from public view. Because of the acute anterior uveitis I limit my work at present on medical advice. Too much use of the eye would make it bleed again. So other Fellows can organize a complaint if they wish to. There should also be a rigorously impartial, formal, international investigation in to the verbal common assaults in the University of Wales. Informally those who carried out these common assaults have been condemned outright.

cc Mawr Community Council
Martin Caton, M. P. Gower

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 25/10/2014 08:27:42 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Corruption Scandal at University of North Carolina

Might be worth bringing your case to the attention of the investigating body.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Nominations for a Nobel Prize

October 25, 2014

I have been informed that I have been nominated several times for a Nobel Prize and as mentioned many times on this blog, I regard the Civil List Pension as a higher and cleaner honour because it is a State Honour akin to Congressional Medal of Honor, and cleaner, in that the process needs an Act of Parliament and nomination by a Royal Society. In a Hansard written answer of 2013 it was revealed that there are only fifty three Pensioners, so it is a rarely awarded high honour. There are about sixty five Companions of Honour (C. H.) another high honour akin to Order of Merit (O. M.) of which there are twenty five recipients. The average honorarium is about £2,300 a year. The Nobel Prize is notorious for awards that have little or no meaning, so if they did award one to ECE it would do the Nobel Prize system a power of good. It would show that it is capable of elementary fair judgment, and capable of response to the vast worldwide interest in ECE. It is also clear that intense lobbying goes on for a Nobel Prize. There is no lobbying for a Civil List Pension. Only a few of those nominated by a Royal Society are awarded a Pension (a Norman French name meaning a gift from the Sovereign). I probably have more nominations than someone like Prof. Sir John Meurig Thomas, and the late Rev. R. S. Thomas, the great poet. There is an intense lobbying campaign for example for Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, who is Order of Merit (O. M.). The Nobel Prize for an obviously non existent Higgs Boson more or less devalued it to nothing. In UFT225 AIAS demolished electroweak theory upon which the Higgs boson is based and B(3) demolished the standard model in 1992. So for all those who wish me to get a Nobel prize (probably hundreds of thousands worldwide) I advise getting in touch with advisors consulted by the Royal Swedish Academy, if those advisors are known. It is all very secretive. The Civil List Pension on the other hand is in the public domain and in the archives of the House of Lords and House of Commons via the search engine “portcullis”. If Stephen Hawking (a Companion of Honour, C. H.) can be awarded a three million dollar Milner Prize for an obviously refuted theory, then ECE can be awarded a Milner Prize and a Nobel prize for a rigorously correct theory that makes a huge impact worldwide. However that is not the way the world works at present. So sweeping reform is necessary. I would be pleasantly surprised to get a Nobel Prize, (and don’t think about it), but people ought to realize that the nominations at that level are as good as the award, like Oscar Nominations. A great deal of fuss was made when RST was nominated for a Nobel Prize. It was on the TV and all that. I have also been nominated several times for a Wolf Prze, Milner Prize and Priestley Medal and I am very grateful to the nominators and supporters.

Corruption Scandal at University of North Carolina

October 25, 2014

Many thanks for this information, I am not surprised at this. The UNCC Saga shows that the corruption was endemic and typical of some parts of academia and UNCC was condemned outright internationally as is very well known worldwide. It caused great hardship. The University of Wales was also caught in a corruption scandal, selling courses, and also caused great hardship. Contemporary medical research has shown that the treatment has resulted in uveitis in my left eye (see www.aias.us blog). The British Government recognized my work with the high honour of a Civil List Pension, an invitation to a Buckingham Palace Garden Party and Coat of Arms, being raised to the Gentry as Armiger of Mawr and surrounding areas. I have the uveitis under control at present but must be careful.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 24/10/2014 18:27:42 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Corruption Scandal at University of North Carolina

Dr Evans,

You are vindicated (again). This story about fraudulent grades handed out to University of North Carolina athletes is a verification of the climate of corruption, that you describe in your blog, and autobiography.

This has been national TV news, in the States, for days now. It’s a real humiliation for them, and another sign how college degrees have lost their value in the US.

I don’t doubt that an organization, like that, would treat you so badly.

http://www.popecenter.org/commentaries/article.html?id=3087#.VEqFR9deu8Y

M. Jackson

3D Orbital Graphic for a hyperbolic spiral

October 25, 2014

These graphics clarify the physics greatly, and thanks again to co author Horst Eckardt. So in three dimensions a whirlpool galaxy rotates its plane. It appears as a plane whirlpool to the astronomer or a space telescope such as Hubble, but the dynamics mean that its plane rotates over time. How quickly or how slowly such a process occurs appears to be a matter of evolution. These results show beyond doubt that three dimensional orbital theory is needed in general. Prior to this work, the rotation of the plane of the galaxy was unknown. This is the result of an inverse cubed law of attraction between a star of mass m and the central mass M of the galaxy, and the use of the spherical polar coordinates for the kinetic energy. The inverse square law of attraction in 3D gives the three dimensional conic section orbits, some of which were graphed by Horst in UFT272 to UFT274.

To: Emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 24/10/2014 18:50:01 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: 3D Orbits for a hyperbolic spiral

I computed the orbits according to note 275(5). It comes out that the
spiral is always in a plane. Only the plane changes direction. For L=Lz
it is in the XY plane, for Lz=0 it is in the XZ plane, because the
angular momentum vector has no Z component. Time evolution does not
change because beta depends on L, not on Lz.
See near-side view and side view of the 3D spiral orbit.
The theta dependence oscillates strongly but is because of the rotation
of the orbital plane.

Horst

Daily Report 23/10/14

October 25, 2014

There were 1,903 hits from 479 distinct visits, main spiders from google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. UFT145 597; F3(Sp) 393; Auto1 332, Auto2 89, Book of Scientometrics 269, UFT88 71, Engineering Model 65, Englynion 70, Llais 49, CEFE 41, UFT273 41, Evans Equations 47, numerous Spanish, Auto Sonnets 11, Principles of ECE 10 to date in October 2014. European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) general; MDA Corporation extensive; Columbia University New York City misconceptions in electromagnetism; Denver University Autobiography Volume One; Harvard University UFT137; University of North Florida Family History; University of Poitiers general; University of Technology of Troyes France UFT170(Sp); Campaign for Protection of Rural Wales Englynion and Second Book of Poetry; University of Edinburgh UFT175. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for October 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: October 2014 – URL
Generated 24-Oct-2014 12:00 EDT

Articles Studying Relation of Verbal Common Assault to Acute Uveitis

October 24, 2014

1) S. M. Maca et al., J. Ophthalmology, 97(3), 333 – 337 (2013) . Repeated verbal common assault leads to anxiety and a psychopathology that triggers acute anterior uveitis and recurrences.
2) Siamac et al., BINA, Spring 2006 vol 11(3), 313 – 317. Anxiety is effective in acute anterior uveitis and stress is a trigger factor for recurrence.

So it is highly probable that the acute anxiety caused by chronic verbal common assault from 1977 to 1986 caused acute anterior uveitis. The common assaults are described in all detail in Autobiography Volume Two above my coat of arms on the home page of http://www.aias.us, well known internationally. In 1978 I earned the youngest D. Sc. awarded in modern times, so had every right to expect a full professorship because the D. Sc. is a distinction higher than full professor by definition. Most of the British chemistry establishment expected me to be promoted full professor. Instead these series of assaults occurred because I refused to take up a corrupt offer of a junior post of lecturer at Swansea. That era was immensely productive, (Omnia Opera on www.aias.us), but the stress was acute for the obvious reason that I was told that I would be forced out of the university for exposing corruption and “never be given a job”. That devilish promise has been kept. Those injustices have never been put right by the university, but many high honours, honours and awards have put them right poetically. The abuse must have caused neurobiological insults beyond any doubt. That is little more than common sense. Everyone could see it going on, but no one would stop it with the exception of Gareth Evans. For doing that he was also subjected to the same treatment. So some recourse in law should be available. The same kind of abuse recurred at UNCC, resulting in a series of trauma. Trauma like these have had no effect on productivity, but they had a devasting effect when my first wife was attacked by hate mail. So trolls must be subjected to the full extent of the law. For example a death threat made by a troll means up to life in prison, not just two years. The trolls record their death threats so the evidence is there to have them arrested. Their identity can be found with a warrant.

Discussion of 275(6)

October 24, 2014

Many thanks, this will be most interesting.

In a message dated 24/10/2014 12:47:31 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

I will try to compute the time-dependence of the orbits for some examples today or tomorrow. Note 5 contains the full information.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 24. Oktober 2014 um 12:38 geschrieben:

This note is a summary of the general theory of three dimensional orbits for any potential of attraction U(r). For any potential the transition equations are (10) and (11). In general the orbit is given by Eq. (3) with beta given by Eqs. (12) to (14). Eq. (14) gives r (theta , phi) for any U(r). The theory is exemplified by the logarithmic spiral orbit (17), whose potential of attraction is Eq. (15) and whose inverse square force law is Eq. (16). So I will now proceed to write up UFT275, Sections 1 and 2 in co authorship with Dr. Horst Eckardt for checking the notes. He could also add an optional Section 3 if he feels it necessary. Otherwise UFT275 will be Sections 1 and 2 with authors M. W. Evans and H. Eckardt.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers