Munich Discussions on the B(3) Field and RFR

Pleasure, if developed, RFR could lead to ESR, NMR and MRI without magnets, and a multi billion dollar industry. The resolution is much higher, the chemical shift pattern is unique, and there is no need for expensive cooled magnets. I discussed this with both Ernst and Anderson (joint Wolf Prize winners 1990). Ernst won the Nobel Prize in 1991 for FTNMR, just as I got back to Cornell Theory Center. I lectured to Ernst’s group at ETH and he was very encouraging. With the gear available today it should be straightforward and Simon Clifford has many good ideas as usual.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
CC: simon@mrclifford.org
Sent: 24/05/2013 08:40:35 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Typo in List of RFR items

Many thanks, we discussed RFR and other experiments basing on the B(3) field here in Munich last week. Simon Clifford visited a trade show in Munich last week and met with Bernhard and me. We will continue our discussions at the conference.
Horst

Verschickt: Fr, 24 Mai 2013 7:53 am
Betreff: Typo in List of RFR items

It should be: OO446, OO572, OO582, OO585, UFT80, UFT81, UFT83, and UFT84.

FOR POSTING: UFT242 and Background Notes

This is UFT242 which introduces a new wave equation of planar orbits and a new method of finding the planar orbit for any force law. Also reported are new animations by co author Bernhard Foltz.

a242ndpaper.pdf

a242ndpapernotes1.pdf

a242ndpapernotes10.pdf

a242ndpapernotes2.pdf

a242ndpapernotes3.pdf

a242ndpapernotes4.pdf

a242ndpapernotes5.pdf

a242ndpapernotes6.pdf

a242ndpapernotes7.pdf

a242ndpapernotes8.pdf

a242ndpapernotes9.pdf

Computation of General Expression for the Velocity of the Lorentz Factor

Agreed, simplification by intelligent approximation is necessary here, otherwise there is a full scale algebraic blizzard. This is probably why Minkowski himself did not address this problem. The appearance of the second time derivative of r is simply due to the relativistic equivalent of

F = m d2r/dt2

I will start to write up UFT242 today and then proceed in UFT243 to the Einstein Debye theory of specific heats, having squeezed a lot out of celestial mechanics in the last few papers. The computer input greatly strengthens these papers and many thanks to co authors Horst Eckardt and Bernhard Foltz.

EMyrone
Sent: 23/05/2013 21:10:10 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 242(10) : General Expression for the Velocity of the Lorentz Factor

The calculation gives an extremely complicated equation for Omega. As you can see, I inserted the Minkowski force (7) into teh definition of Omega (10). gamma can be expressed by Omega via v and dr/dt. The result is (15) or (17) resp., where f(r) has been resolved. This is an equation for Omega of order 6 but with integrals containing Omega.

It seems that the best way would be so solve the original eq. (1) of the note numerically with Omega from (4) put in. I do no more remember why the second time derivative appears in the Minkowski force. Normally we should have (at least non-relativistically)

mass * acceleration = F(r)

with forces at most of first time derivative.
The non-linear appearance of d^2r/dt^2 in the Minkowsky force produced all these complications.

Horst

Am 23.05.2013 18:30, schrieb EMyrone

This is given by eqs. (4) and (8). The resulting scheme is self consistent but complicated.

242(10).pdf

The Main RFR Reviews and Papers

These are OO446, OO582, OO572, OO585, UFT80, UFT81, UFT83 and UFT84. The first four are book sections and reviews, and the last four are papers. A form of RFR was first observed by induction by van der Ziel, Pershan and Malmstrom in the Bloembergen group at Harvard in 1964 in Phys. Rev. Lett. in doped paramagnetic glasses. It should be very easy to observe RFR with contemporary apparatus and electronics.

In a message dated 23/05/2013 20:13:13 GMT Daylight Time writes:

I remember that paper 84 is on RFR spectroscopy. Wasn’t there another,
simpler written paper? I cannot find it.

Horst

Visits from the London Ministry of Defence and Secret Intelligence Service (MI6)

They seem to be getting interested in the idea of resonant energy from spacetime. There have been many visits from their Washington counterparts. The daily feedback is dominated by the essay broadcasts as usual, and this kind of lecturing system has succeeded very well. Many thanks again to Robert Cheshire. I am monitoring how the Autobiography is being received at present, Volume One has been very popular for well over a year, and Volume Two is beginning to become popular. The book of poetry “Englynion” is also going well, and so is “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”. Maybe MI6 is after the EDCL administration.

Daily Report 23/5/13

There were 2,704 hits from 614 distinct visits, 42.2% spiders from google, MSN and sistrix. Auto1 88, Auto2 39, CEFE 24, Englynion 20. Johannes Kepler University Linz Austria Implications of Finite Photon Mass; Monash University Australia UFT104; University of Sydney UFT80; Physics Federal University of Pernambuco Brazil UFT57; University of Saskatchewan Canada Essay 44; Northrop Grumman Corporation UFT147; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems Dresden UFT177; Sherman Fairchild Center for Solid State Studies Lehigh University Pennsylvania general; University of Barcelona UFT152; Physics Complutense University Madrid UFT33; University of Poitiers general; British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) LCR Resonant; University of Pavia Italy UFT102; Seoul National University South Korea UFT2; Science Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation” ; Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Hacettepe University Turkey UFT177; Physics Middle East Technical University Turkey UFT33. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for May 2013.

Some Thoughts on Eq. (8) of Note 242(10)

This equation is a way of finding dr / dt for any force. The Minkowski force is much more complicated than the other forces but there is almost certainly a way of solving. Knowing dr /dt, the orbital dr / d theta can be found from

dr / d theta = (dr / dt)(dt / d theta) = (m r squared / L0) (dr / dt)

This can be done for any force simpler than the Minkowski force, for example the Einstein force. This would be a very simple way of checking EGR.

Computing Note 242(9)

Many thanks again! My note 242(10) crossed with this note from you. I think that the way to go is to find a simple solution or reasonable approximation to dr /dt of eq. (8) of note 242(10), otherwise the scheme is too complicated as you show here. It could be that the scheme in note 242(10) (the rigorously general one) is soluble in some way.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 23/05/2013 16:55:31 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 242(9) : True Anomaly from the Minkowski Equation with General Velocity

This note leads to some lengthy calculations. I tried out 2 versions of the first method and one of the second method you proposed.
In the first method we have the functional dependencies
v (Omega) eq.(9)
gamma (v) eq.(14)
F(gamma) eq.(13)
Omega (F) eq.(12)

This is a cyclic dependency. By inserting the definitions we obtain an equation for one variable remaining. I resolved

1. gamma = gamma (v(Omega(F(gamma))))

2. F = F(gamma(v(Omega(F))))

In both cases equations of third order come out (for gamma^2 or F). These solutions could be inserted into the Lagrange wave eqation to give an equation for r only from which the function theta(r) could be determined by numerical integration. However I stopped the calculation here because this would be extremely cumbersome even for computer algebra, probably I would end up in a stack overflow of Maxima.

The third method (your second proposition) gives an equation of 8. order in Omega, there is no solution found. This method seems to be even worse.

I look forward to see the general equations with relativistic and non-relativistic Lagrangian formalism. I guess that a formulation in cartesian coordinates will be the most simple one from a mathematical standpoint, which will probably be most feasable to numerical solutions. The spherical coordinates explain the physics quite well but sometimes are more difficult to use in general cases.

Horst

242(9).pdf

242(10) : General Expression for the Velocity of the Lorentz Factor

This is given by eqs. (4) and (8). The resulting scheme is self consistent but complicated.

a242ndpapernotes10.pdf

Computing 242(9)

This is the “slow motion” approximation to v – it is probably too simple. I will give the general calculation tomorrow, so it is best to postpone the computations until then. The general solution for v, eq. (4), is correct and also relativistic. So v can be expressed in general in terms of dr / dt and r. From eq. (1) of note 242(9):

dr / dt = – integral omega squared r dr + A

Then the set of equations (13) and (20) to (23) of note 242(9) give omega squared in terms r and the above integral. here A is a constant of integration.