Salieri Syndrome

April 17, 2014

Many thanks to Doug Lindstrom! Salieri was in fact a first rate composer and Mozart died of natural causes, but we all know what the Salieri syndrome means. I began to recover as the ECE theory developed and as the AIAS group gathered pace. In a civilized society there is no stigma attached to an illness such as major severe depression. To discriminate against illness is of course unlawful. A single event MSD will eventually clear up because it is obviously caused by a profound shock, the bipolar type is more difficult to deal with, but the medical profession is improving its methods all the time. The feedback is a tremendous incentive. The problem is caused by the academic idea itself, it clashes diametrically with creativity and is a breeding ground of egotism and self serving as you say. of course there are some excllent academics and departments, I happened to run into an almost grotesque level of corruption that has almost destroyed all the ideals of the University of Wales and which has greatly harmed the Welsh language, almost to the point of extinction.

In a message dated 17/04/2014 20:16:59 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Some day, your life-story will be made into a movie. I read volume 2 of your autobiography over the past Christmas break. I couldn’t put it down once I started. We had situations in Canada with research supervisors (mine were terrific) but nothing like you experienced. It seems to me that for self interest purposes, some supervisors destroy the self-image of their graduate students; perhaps they are fearful of the competition. These same people seem to be continually throwing mud. I don’t know how they have so much time to worry about the work of others the way they do; maybe they have any work of their own anymore that amounts to anything.

A very wise man(or at least I thought so) once told me that to get tomatoes or mud thrown at you is a good thing. At least then you are getting noticed and obviously hitting a sore spot.

Doug

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

I remember almost th exact moment when I inferred B(3) in about November 1991. My first wife and I had just returned from Zurich and I was in peak athletic condition after training on a tartan track in Zurich and could cover 60 metres in 6.92 seconds. I was at my fastest over five thousand metres. Our small house in 77 Lois Lane was the first we ever had. It had a room looking out on Six Mile Canyon, and on the walls were many of my landscape photographs. When we arrived back in Ithaca, we were told that IBM had withdrawn support from Cornell Theory Center, so I desperately started to look for a job because Cornell would not pay me anything. It used my work to get funding, my wife accidentally discovered this in a quarterly report. After the sophistication of Cornell and the friendly lifestyle of Ithaca, reminiscent of the sixties, UNCC was not suitable. In this “den” of mine in Ithaca I inferred B(3) looking out on the snow and over Six Mile Canyon towards Ithaca College. It was just a matter of vector analysis and innocence of implication, the conjugate product has to give a vector along the (3) or Z axis. Neither of us wanted to leave Ithaca, Cornell has a magnificent library system and a fine campus. In retrospect we should just have stayed in Ithaca. UNCC time was of course horrendous. Coming back here was OK for me but some low form of life (a local developer) threatened my first wife, so we returned to Ithaca. The threat must have shocked her terribly, as usual around here the criminal was not punished. So this was enough to frighten her away. No one can be blamed for getting away from second hand threats, delivered by ugly people she did not know, and for ideas she could not understand. Geoffrey Hunter was another psycho who sent her hate mail. He was punished. That caused the depression, nothing else in particular. I couldn’t give a damn about UNCC. I think that this must be an all time low in physics, I do not know of any other scientist whose wife was attacked and who has been subjected to so much abuse just for thinking. As in the case of Rodin, the work must be good and original. My first wife was a Jewish girl from the Bronx, and very gifted, a fine pianist and multiple IBM award winner. So from 1998 to 2001 I was more or less trapped, waiting alone in Ithaca, by a single event major severe depression, without a car. In other words I could hardly move except to the desk to do some work. I survived two winters in a single heated room and only when absolutely forced to did I return here. That did not impair thought in any way, as the OO shows. As is well known, major severe depression has a paralyzing effect and is very dangerous. My parents died in 2000 and 2002, and three or four cousins at about the same time. So that would not make anyone happy. This became the source of the vilest gossip imaginable, spread by Rodrigues over the internet by mass mailing. It was taken up by a few other rats. The B(3) field continued to develop rapidly and in 2003 ECE theory was inferred back here. In 2004 I married my present kind and gracious wife and in 2005 received a Civil List Pension. In 2008 I was raised to the Gentry, or untitled nobility. However, nothing will ever undo the damage done to my fist wife by these thugs. So that is why I have campaigned against trolls for some years. The actual science shows no sign of this very dangerous illness, so the science is innate and deep in my mind. The events at Aberystwyth form 1977 to 1983 were depressing, because my award winning group was surrounded by organized animosity whose sole intent was to destroy my science. The head of department Jeremy Jones was such a damn fool that everyone became depressed. It was depressing because the people outside my group were so disappointing, but that did not cause anything near major severe depression. That means that my first wife was centrally important to me, quite naturally. My second wife is centrally important to me now. The difference is that we are well aware of trolls and I deal with their attacks routinely on my own. Methods have been developed to deal with them. They can cause terrible damage, but only if you read their ranting. All troll sites should be removed and all trolls imprisoned for up to life without remission.

Some Personal Reminsicences on the Discovery of B(3)

April 17, 2014

I remember almost the exact moment when I inferred B(3) in about November 1991. My first wife and I had just returned from Zurich and I was in peak athletic condition after training on a tartan track in Zurich and could cover 60 metres in 6.92 seconds. I was at my fastest over five thousand metres. Our small house in 77 Lois Lane was the first we ever had. It had a room looking out on Six Mile Canyon, and on the walls were many of my landscape photographs. When we arrived back in Ithaca, we were told that IBM had withdrawn support from Cornell Theory Center, so I desperately started to look for a job because Cornell would not pay me anything. It used my work to get funding, my wife accidentally discovered this in a quarterly report. After the sophistication of Cornell and the friendly lifestyle of Ithaca, reminiscent of the sixties, UNCC was not suitable. In this “den” of mine in Ithaca I inferred B(3) looking out on the snow and over Six Mile Canyon towards Ithaca College. It was just a matter of vector analysis and innocence of implication, the conjugate product has to give a vector along the (3) or Z axis. Neither of us wanted to leave Ithaca, Cornell has a magnificent library system and a fine campus. In retrospect we should just have stayed in Ithaca. UNCC time was of course horrendous. Coming back here was OK for me but some low form of life (a local developer) threatened my first wife, so we returned to Ithaca. The threat must have shocked her terribly, as usual around here the criminal was not punished. So this was enough to frighten her away. No one can be blamed for getting away from second hand threats, delivered by ugly people she did not know, and for ideas she could not understand. Geoffrey Hunter was another psycho who sent her hate mail. He was punished. That caused the depression, nothing else in particular. I couldn’t give a damn about UNCC. I think that this must be an all time low in physics, I do not know of any other scientist whose wife was attacked and who has been subjected to so much abuse just for thinking. As in the case of Rodin, the work must be good and original. My first wife was a Jewish girl from the Bronx, and very gifted, a fine pianist and multiple IBM award winner. So from 1998 to 2001 I was more or less trapped, waiting alone in Ithaca, by a single event major severe depression, without a car. In other words I could hardly move except to the desk to do some work. I survived two winters in a single heated room and only when absolutely forced to did I return here. That did not impair thought in any way, as the OO shows. As is well known, major severe depression has a paralyzing effect and is very dangerous. My parents died in 2000 and 2002, and three or four cousins at about the same time. So that would not make anyone happy. This became the source of the vilest gossip imaginable, spread by Rodrigues over the internet by mass mailing. It was taken up by a few other rats. The B(3) field continued to develop rapidly and in 2003 ECE theory was inferred back here. In 2004 I married my present kind and gracious wife and in 2005 received a Civil List Pension. In 2008 I was raised to the Gentry, or untitled nobility. However, nothing will ever undo the damage done to my fist wife by these thugs. So that is why I have campaigned against trolls for some years. The actual science shows no sign of this very dangerous illness, so the science is innate and deep in my mind. The events at Aberystwyth from 1977 to 1983 were depressing, because my award winning group was surrounded by organized animosity whose sole intent was to destroy my science. The head of department Jeremy Jones was such a damn fool that everyone became depressed. It was depressing because the people outside my group were so disappointing, but that did not cause anything near major severe depression. That means that my first wife was centrally important to me, quite naturally. My second wife is centrally important to me now. The difference is that we are well aware of trolls and I deal with their attacks routinely on my own. Methods have been developed to deal with them. They can cause terrible damage, but only if you read their ranting. All troll sites should be removed and all trolls imprisoned for up to life without remission.

Book of Scientometrics Updated to April 15th 2014

April 17, 2014

The Book of Scientometrics was started on April 30th 2004, and shows intense and sustained worldwide interest in ECE theory. It focuses on Universities, Institutes and Similar and shows that ECE has ben read in all the best places for a decade. This book records only a tiny 2% of the vast total impact of ECE theory, obviously the theory making most impact in contemporary physics, chemistry, mathematics and engineering. It is the first successful unified field theory,developed entirely from well known Cartan geometry in 260 UFT papers, several monographs, and articles and papers by the AIAS colleagues. There are also almost a hundred essays and essay broadcasts by Robert Cheshire, translated into Spanish and broadcast by Alex Hill. ECE has refuted the standard physics almost entirely and in a decade I have received nominations for a Nobel and Wolf Prize, a Civil List Pension and a Coat of Arms in recognition for this work. The AIAS colleagues fully deserve equal recognition. This book shows that the dogma of the old physics is still being pumped out incessantly but is being essentially ignored by avant garde intellectuals. During this decade energy from spacetime and low energy nuclear reactors have become routine in industry. The old physics asserts that they do not exist, but ECE has offered a plausible explanation.

overview1.docx

Daily Report 15/4/14

April 17, 2014

There were 1771 hits from 487 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN and seznam. UFT85 140, Auto1 99, Auto2 33, UFT88 55, CEFE 51, EEC Engineering Model 33, Book of Scientometrics 57, Animation 21, Englynion 19 to date in April 2014. University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT59, Arizona State University UFT214; Library Michigan State University UFT7; San Jose State University Essay 32; University of Limoges Open Letter to Prof. S. J. Hawking; University of Poitiers general; Silesian Data Center general; Joint Institutes of Nuclear Research Dubna Russia UFT33; University of Kent UFT99; Newcastle University AIAS Staff, Eduroam Oxford University UFT206. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2014.

Variations on a Cracked Record

April 16, 2014

Fully agreed, these fraudulent attacks were instigated by someone unknown to prevent me from being awarded a Nobel Prize. Now that the fraud is out in the open the Nobel Prize Committee is expected by the colleagues to judge fairly, bearing in mind that I have already been awarded two higher honours than a Nobel prize, in 2005 and 2008. A Nobel Prize for B(3) and ECE would mean the end of the standard model, and it would be a prize for all of AIAS, and not just yours truly. The standard modellers would be eating a lot of omelette and would have to admit that electric power can be obtained from spacetime. As Alex mentions, Fortune Fifty companies have already been using such power for years.

In a message dated 16/04/2014 18:49:32 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Perhaps it might be worth mentioning that rebuttals to ECE theory, claiming it contains fundamental mathematical mistakes, had sort of died away, especially from characters such as Bruhn, when AIAS mathematical developments started to be checked by computer by Horst using generally accepted mathematical software, such as Maxima and Mathematika, and operated by a scientist who has been doing this as his everyday job for several decardes at a Furtune 50 corporation.

This seems to be a renewed attack by means of a variation of the same old theme, as is called by musicians, forgetting the fact that if the basic equations which are behind ECE theory would be mathematically wrong as they claim then there would be red lights turning on all over the computer.

These basic attacks also claim that there is nothing mathematically wrong with all mathematical developments originating from EinsteinĀ“s field equation. If this would be so then I am sure they would not only be able to explain why the computer rejects such developments but also show wherein lie the mistakes in computer programming made unwittingly by Horst. If this could be accomplished by eliminating torsion from the equations fed to the computer then their mistake would become clearly obvious, since there is no doubt that torsion is part of Cartan geometry. Quite frankly, I doubt such changes could be done in practice.

So this simply seems to be a new attempt of rebuttal by means of old, deja-vu, worn out tools. If the claimed basic mistakes could be shown by computer analysis, as AIAS has done, and showing the details of the program used, then the discussion might attract some interest. But unfortunately this will never happen…

Regards,

Fraud in Physics and Mathematics

April 16, 2014

I don’t like saying this, but there is an awful lot of fraud in physics and mathematics. In some cases the fraud is easy to pick up. For example if violently abusive language is used by a person who attacks Cartan’s geometry by attacking me personally. So I advise that such e mails be forwarded to the police in your locality. I don’t think I wish to see such junk any longer. In about eleven years about 300 papers have been produced by AIAS giving many detailed proofs of Cartan geometry. Some proofs are self checking, for example the proofs of identities, one side is proven to be identically equal to the other. These are detailed expansions of proofs given by S. M. Carroll for example in graduate lectures at Harvard, UCSB, Chicago and Caltech. In a message to the late John B. Hart, Carroll accepted ECE theory. So it is quite clear that Waldyr Rodrigues, Gerhard Bruhn and Akhlesh Lakhtakia were and are frauds. Gerard ‘t Hooft’s editorship is unethical and very poor. Hehl just rolled out his own theory and deliberately tried to misrepresent. This is the verdict of the overwhelming majority. So if any more e mails arrive from these people I would just complain to the police in your locality. They go behind my back because I blocked them as much as eight years ago. I am proceeding now with a new book written with three co authors, and which is written with an overwhelming vote of confidence from genuine colleagues. If any genuine scientist wishes to ask a genuine question about Cartan’s geometry they are always welcome. There are other geometries of course, but I am not using other geometries, I am using Cartan’s geometry.

Formal Complaints against W. A. Rodrigues

April 16, 2014

There have been many of these down the years by many parties, for example on 4th Dec. 2011 I made a formal complaint to the President of UNICAMP and recorded it on this blog. The latter has been brought into severe disrepute by Rodrigues. Long ago this ceased to be a matter of natural philosophy and became a criminal matter. I do not correspond with or recognize criminals. In my opinion Rodrigues uses hyper abstract mathematics which have little or no meaning. He publishes this worthless material in his own journals, and for many years has used these journals in a defamatory manner. The journal publishers Springer are to be criticised internationally. I base my mathematics on entirely standard Cartan geometry, as is very well known throughout the world. A distinguished barrister employed by my insurance company Norwich Union / Aviva described the activities of Rodrigues and all his company associates as wildly pejorative in a case I brought against them to an Employment Tribunal. I was awarded compensation and having won my case did not go forward to the Tribunal. That was in 2010 and the case is closed. Since then Rodrigues has lied and harassed incessantly, disrupted conferences proposed in my honour, tried to adversely influence the Nobel Prize committee, Sci Topics, wikipedia and so on. This is known in the medical profession as pathological lying or pseudologia fantastica, a psychosis. In my opinion Rodrigues is disturbed, that is pretty clear to all. His activities should be stopped by UNICAMP or the Brazilian police. The antisymmetry of the connection is explained in Proofs One to Five, and in many UFT papers. These proofs and papers have been studied in all the best places for nearly a decade without a single objection from bona fide mathematicians. My mathematics are identical to those of S. M. Carroll. It is important to note that Rodrigues never attacks Carroll, and the latter if attacked would probably not respond. Senior academics do not respond to trolls. So I have no need to give further proof. The antisymmetry of the connection immediately refutes the Einsteinian general relativity as in UFT88, which has been studied for years. So all of this is going to be published in a new book, whose table of contents have been posted on this blog. Rodrigues should just be ignored completely. This is the obvious way to deal with internet trolls.If anything from Rodrigues arrives behind my back , feel free to sent it to me, and I will raise further objections until Rodrigues is finally dismissed or prosecuted. If an economics student like Steve Bannister can understand the proofs, so can all mathematicians, physicists, chemists and engineers of any ability. Rodrigues is a disgusting individual, in that he seized on a normal depression caused by the deaths of my family members to try to brand me as insane. He is the lowest form of life and a product of the gutter. If he came here I would tell him that to his face then phone the police.

Galaxy Rotation Curve

April 16, 2014

Many thanks, this is explained straightforwardly using cylindrical polar coordinates and relativistic synamics in several UFT papers, (for example UFT238 and 238b), without the use of dark matter. Recent experiments have refuted the theory of dark matter, so this is just another adjustable parameter that has failed, UFT238b was recently the subject of an internet conference involving several Austrian and other Universities and has been heavily studied without objection.

In a message dated 16/04/2014 03:12:18 GMT Daylight Time writes:

All stars in practically every galaxy have a constant orbital velocity around the superfluid center a.k.a. black hole of a galaxy, no matter their distances from the center. In other words, all stars orbit at the same unexplainable mysterious speed. This requires different amounts of dark matter for each galaxy, already in enormous amounts, to maintain it’s shape and structure by relativity or gravity theory. Quantized superfluid spin rates are at fixed increments, depending on the atom type and it’s energy level. Astronomers have identified galaxy types having distinctly faster or slower spin rates, which is evidence they are quantized. The faster spinning galaxies have faster star formation rates, with their center warming faster.

Daily Report 14/4/14

April 16, 2014

There were 1810 hits from 474 distinct visits. Spiders from baidu, google, MSN, Softlayer and yandex. Auto1 94, Auto2 31, UFT85 128, UFT88 55, CEFE 51, “Llais” 39, Engineering Model 32, Book of Scientometrics 53, Evans Equations 20, Englynion 19, Animations 21 to date in April 2014. University of Hamburg UFT239, University of Marburg UFT142, The Ohio State University Educational Note Two; University of Utah UFT88; University of Poitiers general; United States Oak Ridge National Laboratory Potential Waves; Mesh Company Japan; Autonomous National University of Mexico Center for Nanotechnology and Nanoscience F3(Sp); Silesian Data Center Poland general; Joint Institutes for Nuclear Research Dubna LCR Resonant; High Energy Physics University of Manchester UFT2. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for April 2014.

Paper Rebutted

April 15, 2014

This is a preprint dated 2011 and is again nonsense or false mathematics. Apparently this preprint has not been published or is just another item that Rodrigues published in his own journal. In this case the rebuttal is contained in proofs one to five and in S. M. Caroll. The commutator of covariant derivative acts on any tensor in any space of any dimension to produce the torsion and curvature simultaneously, as described by Carroll. The torsion is made up of the difference of two connections, the symmetry of the connection is the same as that of the commutator, antisymmetric, quod erat demonstrandum. Nothing can change this conclusion, least of all childish insults delivered behind my back at a safe distance. The pejorative comments all come from Rodrigues, I am exercising my right to self defence against deliberate disinformation. So as in my reply to the Brazilian Embassy he should not be recognized as a scientist. The kind of comments he delivers would have him expelled from any conference or scientific society. The fact that he repeatedly makes false and deeply insulting comments in the medical field means that he is a psychotic, a habitual liar is a kind of psychotic. So how can he be trusted as a scientist? He can fly here and make these comments to my face. I will apprehend him and take him to the nearest police station for an examination in the common law. In addition, Bruhn has been rebutted many times, and Hehl rebutted in UFT89. No one has ever objected to these rebuttals in almost a decade. I have asked several people if they can make sense of the pseudomathematics used by Rodrigues but they cannot. For example L. B. Crowell. S. M. Carroll never mentions Rodrigues, and I use the same mathematics as S. M. Carroll and everyone else. All this is very well known by now, and in the years 2011 to present the remarks by Rodrigues have been rejected by the international community.

Sent: 15/04/2014 20:44:26 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: The Wildly Pejorative Waldyr Rodrigues

Perhaps the blog readers might be more interested in a rebuttal to the attached paper than in the reading of the present exchange of pejorative comments, and it would look as a much more elegant way of silencing this vociferous individual, but of course this is completely up to you…

Regards,

1109.5403v1RebuttalofECEConnectionDecomposition.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers