To Local Authority Ombudsman

Thank you in turn. Under Section 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights I am allowed freedom of speech and opinion as human rights. In my opinion, MA008 is de facto conflict of interest under the Nolan rules because Councillor Ioan M. Richard has already been involved in drafting MA008 and posting it publicly on lamposts without first declaring conflict of pecuniary interest, a conflict which arises from the fact that he will put himself at an advantage in the planning process and will benefit thereby. His plans MA008 are opposed by essentially all his neighbours. For example he may be allowed planning permission to build houses which he can sell at a profit, thereby severely weakening the Welsh language and adding to the problem of gross overdevelopment. Even if he declares pecuniary interest at the planning stage and takes no part in any decision, he will still have suggested that his own property be developed under MA008 and this is an attempt to influence planning without declaring pecuniary interest. An opinion is not libel, a political campaign is not libel. His attempts to construe my opinion as libel breach the Nolan rules. The fact that MA008 exists is self evident, and my criticisms are thereby factual, based on truth. On the web there are many instances of criticisn for conflict of interest, it is a commonplace criticism. To attempt to pressurize the police to influence me to forego my human rights is a breach of the Nolan rules, and a serious one – latent totalitarianism.

In a message dated 25/01/2012 13:00:45 GMT Standard Time, Hayley.Morgan@ombudsman-wales.org.uk writes:

Dear Professor Evans

Thank you for your email, the contents of which have been forearded to the relevant officer.

Yours sincerely

Hayley Morgan

Casework Support Officer

Complaints Advice Team

Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

1 Ffordd yr Hen Gae

Pencoed

CF35 5LJ

Telephone/Ffôn: 01656 641179

Fax/Ffacs: 01656 641199

Email/Ebost: hayley.morgan

From: EMyrone@aol.com [mailto:EMyrone@aol.com]
Sent: 25 January 2012 12:25
To: Hayley Morgan; wsd@axenus.plus.com; nathan.smith@south-wales.pnn.police.uk; stephen.pritchard2@south-wales.pnn.police.uk; darren.george@south-wales.pnn.police.uk
Subject: To Local Authority Ombudsman

Local Authority Ombudsman for Wales

I acknowledge receipt of your letter in which I am advised that the Ombudsman will consider an investigation of Councillor Ioan M. Richards following a number of my complaints against him. I received the attached e mail message yesterday from the historian Mr Stuart Davies, a respected member of the community, advising me of defamation and cybestalking by a person unknown with pseudonym “coal miner”. I have been to Swansea Central Police Station today and have provided the police with this evidence. Attached is medical opinion that states that I suffer from no disorder. I have no criminal record at all. I have asked the stalker for his identity and occupation, but received no reply. I have asked the police adn others to help trace the stalker from his e mail address. This defamation is taken by the stalker directly from a letter from a person called Waldyr A. Rodrigues, a Brazilian national. I won compensation recently after a barrister found the letter by Rodrigues and associates to be wild and pejorative. It was found by the barrister that I was not ill and not dangerous. Accordingly there is precedent that the defamation by this stalker, pseudonym “coal miner” is wild and pejorative. In my opinion there is circumstantial evidence linking this pseudonym to Ioan M. Richard, who is associated with the former coal miners of Nixon Drift, and was at one time a manual worker. He has used other aliases such as “The Mole” and “Ioan ap Trefor”. If this e mail address is found to have originated from Ioan M. Richard then he must resign from office as Mayor of Swansea and County Councillor. It is an act of gross defamation and harassment by e mail.

Myron Evans

Prof. Myron Wyn Evans, Gentleman, of Glyn Eithrym

H. M. Civil List,

www.aias.us

In a message dated 24/01/2012 11:08:02 GMT Standard Time, wsd writes:

I have been advised verbally that coal.miner has been sending out an email marked STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL in which he describes you as very dangerous and advises people not to have anything to do with you.

He will not send me a copy because of the circulation named prior to him, so I suggest that you send an email to the above address and ask him whatever. You are mentally sick apparently.

It might well be your old friend.

Stuart Davies

=

Libel de Facto

To alias “coal.miner” ,

You are advised hereby that I have proven your statements to be, in law, vicious libel and libel de facto. Accordingly I am entitled to seek punitive damages. You are cautioned that anything you write may be used in evidence against you if you are charged with cyberstalking and that a warrant may be issed to order your vicious libel to third parties to be traced and to be used in evidence against you both in criminal and civil proceedings . The Chief Executive Officer of your internet carrier has agreed to cooperate with the police. What is your full name and address, age and occupation? I have asked you twice, and if you do not reply, your silence may be construed as obstruction of justice and contempt of Crown and Parliament, equivalent to contempt of court. You have lied maliciously to third parties about a Civil List Pensioner, who is employed directly by Queen Elizabeth II, and appointed by Act of Parliament

Prof. M. W. Evans
H. M. Civil List
www.aias.us

Objections to Cefn Gwrhyd Development

As a Candidate for County Councillor for Mawr I object strongly to the cynical manner in which this development is being pushed through for a third time, having been rejected twice. I support all the objections, and call for a moratorium on all development of all commonland throughout Wales. This development is wholly illegal under Section 38 of the Commonland Act of 2006 if it includes works on commonland. I urge native Welsh speakers and others never to put their property on the market, but to put it in trust for posterity within their own families. Judging by the tremendous damage caused to Mynydd Gelliwastad by criminal bikers and trespassing horse riders, access to the hauntingly beautiful and historical Mynydd Gwrhyd should be sealed off as much as possible. I also object very strongly to proposed wind turbine development on Gwrhyd, and urge that Capel Gwhyd be put in trust and heavily protected.

Myron Evans

Prof. Myron Wyn Evans, Armiger of Glyn Eithrym,
H. M. Civil List
www.aias.us

cc Welsh Government

In a message dated 27/01/2012 14:10:53 GMT Standard Time

FOR POSTING: OO701

This should be put at the end of the Omnia Opera list because it is one of the UFT papers published in M. W. Evans, Acta Physica Polonica, 38, 2211 – 2220 (2007). The standard model editors formed a club by internet to try to block UFT papers and van der Merwe’s journal “Foundations of Physics” was attacked in an underhand way. It editorship was given to a nonentity, ‘t Hooft, whose entire work in general relativity is easily shown to be incorrect. To Sir Edmund Halley, Sir Isaac Newton, Robert Hooke, John Aubrey and their colleagues, who founded the Royal Society, such conduct would have been dismissed out of hand as entirely unworthy of the principles of natural philosophy enunicated by Sir Francis Bacon, Marquis St. Albans, in his Invisible College, and entirely unworthy of honour. Bacon was also plotted against by a Buckingham, in his case the Duke of Buckingham.

OO701.pdf

FOR POSTING: OO432a

This is “Letter to Henrik Broberg” of about 1995 / 1996, sent to C. Roy Keys, the editor of “Apeiron”, discussing the plans for another Vigier Symposium. It describes the the fact that B(3) like entities had been considered by many fine scientists, including Biot and Savart, Dirac, Oppenheimer, Fock, Podolsky, Feynman, Dyson and Wheeler. I discussed B(3) with Wheeler in my last days at UNCC in late 1994, before flying back here. I remember that Wheeler sent a very long message by fax, about nine feet long, from Princeton. The B(3) concept was also accepted by Vigier, Costa de Beauregard, Kielich, Dvoeglazov, Lehnert, Horwitz et al, Barrett, and many others. This letter mentions a review by Dvoeglazov with reference to no less than a hundred and fifty papers accepting the longitudinal concept in electrodynamics. That completely refutes the U(1) sector symmetry still used at CERN, showing the meaninglessness of the theory used there. The CERN theory asserts, essentially, that space is two dimensional! This is the result of asserting zero photon mass that according to the standard model allows only transverse solutions and no longitudinal solutions. As discussed in my Omnia Opera this leads to all kinds of ludicrous results such as an unphysical little group of the Poincare group. The Higgs boson is based on these mad hatter concepts of the old physics and the Higgs boson is unphysical, i.e. does not exist. So billions are being spent on something that has been known not to exist for many years by all the best minds on physics, and the search involves so many adjustable parameters that anything can be claimed to be the god particle. That makes a laughing stock out of physics. I was singled out for “criticism” (personal attack in reality) and forced to resign, but many others using the same ideas were not forced to resign. This letter to Henrik Broberg mentions that “The weird happenings at UNCC are incomprehensible and very dangerous to intellectual freedom…” . I described Buckingham’s behaviour as “abominable”. Obviously his views were at odds with many great scientists but he still tried to force them on the world. So much for merit. Science in that era degenerated into a series of underhand attacks and reply blocking. That is the origin of all the cyberstalking. This era showed how all the carefully constructed ethics of science were undermined.

OO432a.pdf

FOR POSTING: OO443b

This is a paper which was not included in the list due to an oversight, it is by: A. E. Chubykalo, M. W. Evans and R. Smirnov-Rueda, Esc. Fiz Uaz., (1996) on theoretical support for the B(3) field from other groups.

OO443b.pdf

FOR POSTING: OO630 (Unpublished)

This is OO630 (unpublished, written about 2000 in Ithaca, New York). It is by the AIAS author group and is entitled “Derivation of the B(3) Field and Concomitant Vacuum Energy Density from the Sachs Theory of Electrodynamics”. As can be seen from the open letter to Buckingham my career was destroyed eleven times or so, necessitating many moves, some transatlantic, so belongings were lost and so on. Every time I won a Fellowship in open competition, I landed up having to move again. Even the most elementary support from the university system in Wales was lacking. The route cause was nepotism and the corrupt allocation of jobs in secret. I tried to preserve all manuscripts and will search for unpublished manuscripts here in my personal archives. The rebuilding of my Omnia Opera after such hostile, chaotic and self serving administration is a historic service to science. As one of the Queen’s Civil List scientists, I thank all concerned, especially the overseas colleagues.

OO630.pdf

Omnia Opera Essentially Complete

It is very pleasing to see the Omnia Opera essentially complete and being studied continuously all over the world. So many thanks again to all concerned, a great volunteer effort on behalf of truly new science. There are only a few items missing and only one erratum as follows.

1) OO51, G. J. Evans, M. W. Evans and C. J. Reid, Adv. Mol. Rel. Int. Proc., 12(4), 301 -312 (1978).
2) OO96, M. W. Evans, P. Grigolini and M. Ferrario, Physica A, 108, 136 (1981), which was a typographical error in an old list, so this is an erratum.
3) OO428, M. W. Evans, “Longitudinal Magnetic and Electric Fields in the Einstein / de Broglie Theory”, in “Waves and Particles in Light and Matter” ed. A. van der Merwe and A. Garuccio (Plenum, New York, 1994).
4) OO488, M. W. Evans, “B(3) Echoes”, ref. (472), page 285.
5) OO649, M. W. Evans, “Electrodynamics as a Non-Abelian Gauge Theory” in Frontier Perspectives”, 2, 7 – 12 (1998).
6) OO651, M. W. Evans, “The Equations of Grand Unified Field Theory in terms of the Maurer Cartan Structure Equations”, Found. Phys. Lett., 17, 25 (2004).
7) OO660, M. W. Evans, “The Electromagnetic Sector of the Evans Field Theory”, Found. Phys. Lett., 18, 259 (2005).

There are about eight hundred and fifty papers and books in all to date, and I will search around here for the unpublished manuscripts at the end of the list. The complete UFT series of 205 papers to date is in the course of publication in J. Foundations Phys. Chem., and we will be pleased to post the contents pdf’s when they arrive. There are about thirty reviews in the course of preparation for the journal. In comparison, the Omnia Opera of my Ph. D. supervisor, Mansel Davies, still a well known scientist, was about sixty papers and books. I published only one paper with him, (a paper which I wrote), because he recognized the quality of my work from the beginning and let me publish on my own. He was very capable, a Fellow of Peterhouse Cambridge, and had the very rare attribute of being a fair judge of young people. He wrote the biography of Peter Debye for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Faraday Division. On a personal level he was complicated, sometimes incomprehensible, but when it came to science he was objective, having been brought up as a Baptist, i.e. a Leveller who measured things only on merit and rejected false authority, intellectual or otherwise. A few people took offence at that and he was never elected F.R.S. or given any state honours. He was wholly unconcerned about that and was a Nobel Prize advisor for chemistry.

Historical Summary by GJE

This is a good summary. UNCC caused me to lose my first wife, furniture, possessions, pension and salary. I suppose they expected me to grow cabbages, which is what a plot should be for.

In a message dated 27/01/2012 10:15:54 GMT Standard Time

 What is remarkable is that out of this ECE theory and AIAS have grown. You lost a lot personally during this period but somehow, with the help of family and friends, you survived and have prospered. You were always a great scientist – now you are one of the greatest scientists. You have torn much of Einstein’s contributions to shreds – along with all of those who so blindly followed him. The system will catch up – it has got to!

Best, Gareth

Lost the Plot

Nice summary, “lost the plot”.

In a message dated 27/01/2012 10:10:42 GMT Standard Time:

Buckingham underestimated you and lost the plot – like so many other contemporaries.

Best, Gareth